What is the real root of chronic stress — and can it be removed?

In this episode, Epictetus, Carl Jung, and Laozi examine why chronic stress persists even when we know intellectually that worrying doesn't change outcomes—and they disagree sharply on how to remove it. You'll hear why stress is self-generated (whether through misplaced control, disowned parts of yourself, or constant resistance to what is), and you'll learn a single, concrete practice to identify what you're actually responsible for carrying and what you need to put down.

📖 Pay Attention by C. Trebue — available on Amazon: 

eBook: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0GR8WLMPC 

Paperback: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0GVV46SWF 

📬 Subscribe to The Daily Practice newsletter: https://thedailypractice33.substack.com

Transcript

SPEAKER_00 0:09

You're exhausted. Not from what happened today, from the same thing that happened yesterday and the day before and the day before that. You have been managing it, not solving it. Welcome to the Stoic Compass. I am Epictetus, and today I am joined by Carl Jung and Lao Tzu. Today we are examining what is the real root of chronic stress and can it be removed. Let us begin with the obvious thing nobody wants to say. Chronic stress is not something that happens to you, it is something you are doing. Every single day you are making a choice, usually an unconscious one, to treat things outside your control as though they are your responsibility to fix. That is the engine. That is what keeps the machine running. You cannot remove the stress without first removing the illusion that feeds it. The illusion is this: that if you worry hard enough, long enough, the outcome will change. It will not, and until you see that, you will keep paying for something you are not buying.

SPEAKER_01 1:05

I would not be so quick to call it an illusion. What Epictetus is describing is real, but it is only the surface layer. The deeper question is why the person keeps choosing the worry even when they know, intellectually, that it changes nothing. That is not ignorance, that is compulsion, and compulsion has a source. I have sat with patients who could recite Stoic philosophy from memory and were still paralyzed by anxiety. The knowledge was not the problem. Something beneath the knowledge was driving the behavior. Until you go looking for that something, you are treating the symptom while the wound stays open.

SPEAKER_02 1:38

You are both starting from the same assumption that the person is doing something wrong and needs to be corrected. But what if the stress is simply telling the truth? What if it is the most honest signal in the person's life, pointing at a mismatch between how they are living and what they actually are? You can call it an illusion epictetus. You can call it a wound, Jung. But before either of those framings becomes useful, the person has to be willing to hear what the stress is actually saying. Most people are not. They are too busy trying to make it stop.

SPEAKER_00 2:08

I'm not saying ignore it, I'm saying locate it precisely. What is the stress about? Trace it. Nearly every case of chronic stress I have encountered in myself, in students, comes back to one thing. A person has handed authority over their inner life to something external, a reputation, an outcome, another person's judgment, and they are spending every waking hour trying to manage that external thing instead of recovering authority over themselves. That is not a wound, that is a posture. And postures can be changed the moment you decide to change them.

SPEAKER_01 2:41

Postures do not change by decision alone. That is the part you consistently underestimate. If it were that simple, the decision would have been made already. Why hasn't it? That is the real question. What I see again and again is that chronic stress is often an identity. The person is not just worried, they have become the worrier. The anxiety is doing something for them, it keeps them vigilant, which feels like control. It keeps them suffering, which sometimes feels like penance. It keeps them busy, which means they never have to sit still long enough to face what is actually underneath. The stress is not the problem. It is the solution the psyche has constructed for a problem it cannot bring itself to name.

SPEAKER_02 3:18

And yet people have lived without this kind of chronic exhaustion. Not because they solved the problem or excavated the wound, but because they were not at war with the nature of things. The stress does not come only from handing authority to the wrong thing, Epictetus, or from burying what cannot be faced, Jung. It also comes from insisting that things should be different from what they are. That is a very specific kind of effort. Constant, invisible, and completely unproductive. You cannot press against the current forever and call it a strategy.

SPEAKER_00 3:49

I agree that insisting things should be different is wasteful. But your prescription sounds like acceptance, and acceptance without discernment is just resignation. There are things worth changing, there are injustices worth fighting. The question is not whether to act, it is whether the action comes from clarity or from panic. Most people who are chronically stressed are not calm warriors choosing their battles. They are people who cannot distinguish between what they can actually affect and what they are merely reacting to. That distinction is not passive. Making it requires more discipline than most people want to apply.

SPEAKER_01 4:22

I agree with you on the distinction, Epictetus. I disagree that discipline is the primary tool for arriving there. You cannot think your way to clarity about something your mind is actively protecting you from seeing. The psyche conceals for a reason. The reason is usually that the truth about what you actually want, what you actually fear, what you are actually doing to yourself is too threatening to face directly. Stress is often the ego's way of keeping that door shut. The person stays in motion, stays anxious, stays busy, and the thing they cannot look at remains safely in the dark. Discipline applied to the surface changes nothing below it.

SPEAKER_02 4:57

You are both describing real things. But I notice you are both still treating the stress as a problem to be solved, one by discipline, one by excavation. What neither of you is sitting with is the possibility that the stress dissolves on its own when the person stops forcing. Not forcing a solution, not forcing understanding, just stopping the effort to make the situation into something it is not. I'm not saying do nothing. I am saying the doing that most people engage in around their stress is itself the mechanism that keeps it alive. The more they manage it, analyze it, push against it, the more firmly it roots.

SPEAKER_00 5:33

That is dangerously close to telling someone to float. The person who is chronically stressed does not need permission to float. They need a lever, give them something to grab, a distinction, a practice, a line they can draw between what is theirs and what is not. Without that, what you are offering is mood, not method.

SPEAKER_02 5:50

I am not offering mood, I am pointing at a mechanism. The mechanism is this: forcing produces resistance, and the resistance is what the person is calling stress. It is not just a metaphor. Watch anyone who is chronically stressed, and you will see someone who is constantly in opposition to their circumstances, to other people, to themselves. The opposition is the exertion. Remove the opposition, and you have not removed the difficulty. You have removed the friction that turns difficulty into suffering.

SPEAKER_01 6:20

There is something in what Lao Tzu is saying that I want to bring forward because I think it connects to the unconscious dimension. When a person is in that constant state of opposition, fighting their circumstances, fighting themselves, what they are very often fighting is the part of themselves they have disowned. The shadow does not disappear when you refuse to acknowledge it. It generates pressure. That pressure looks like anxiety, chronic stress, irritability, the sense that something is always about to go wrong. What the person is defending against is not the external situation. It is an internal truth they have decided is unacceptable.

SPEAKER_00 6:53

So what you are both saying in different languages is that the stress is self-generated. Jung says it is generated by what you will not face. Lao Tzu says it is generated by what you will not stop pushing against. I say it is generated by misidentifying what belongs to you. All three of these may be true simultaneously, but they point to the same thing. The person is in a relationship with something that is not theirs to carry, and they have forgotten that they chose to pick it up.

SPEAKER_02 7:20

Forgotten or never knew, some people were handed the weight very early. They did not choose it consciously. They simply grew up carrying it and assumed that was what living felt like.

SPEAKER_01 7:30

Yes, and that is where the excavation becomes necessary. Not as an intellectual exercise, but as a genuine confrontation with the origin. Where did this pattern begin? What was the original situation that trained the nervous system to stay on alert? The person who has been anxious since childhood is not making a philosophical error. They are living inside a template that was built before they had any language for it. You cannot correct a template you cannot see.

SPEAKER_00 7:54

Agreed, and I will grant that the origin matters for understanding. But at some point, at some specific moment, the question shifts. It stops being where did this come from and becomes what am I going to do today? The origin does not have to be resolved for the behavior to change. People change behavior before they understand it all the time. What they need is not the whole archaeology. What they need is one clear place to put their foot.

SPEAKER_02 8:19

One clear place, yes. But the foot has to be put down in the right direction. Not toward more control, not toward more analysis, toward less insistence. That is the direction most people cannot find because every instinct they have tells them the answer is more, more effort, more vigilance, more management. The exhaustion is the evidence that more is not working. But the evidence keeps getting ignored. Because the exhaustion is familiar.

SPEAKER_01 8:44

And the familiar, even when it is painful, feels safer than the unknown. The person who has been chronically stressed for 10 years has built an entire identity around that stress. Their relationships are calibrated to it, their schedule is organized around managing it, their sense of self depends on it in ways they cannot fully see. Removing the stress is not just a behavioral change, it is a threat to the architecture of who they think they are. That is why the knowledge that the stress is self-generated rarely helps on its own. The person hears it and agrees and then goes home and does the same thing they did yesterday. The architecture is sturdier than the insight.

SPEAKER_00 9:18

Then the insight has to be followed by an action, immediately, before the architecture reasserts itself. One action, small, concrete, that demonstrates, not to the mind but to the body, that something different is possible. That is how templates change. Not by understanding them, but by doing something that is outside them repeatedly until the new path becomes the path of least resistance.

SPEAKER_02 9:41

That action you are describing, Epictetus, it only works if it comes from stillness, not from strategy. If the person takes the action because they have decided to fix themselves, it is just another form of forcing. If they take it because they have genuinely, even briefly, stopped fighting, then the action has a different quality. It does not add to the load, it releases something.

SPEAKER_00 10:03

You have heard the argument from three directions. Now set the argument down. There is something simpler than all of it, and it is the only part you can actually use. Chronic stress has one root, not ten. One. You have decided, somewhere below the level of words, that your peace depends on something you cannot control. Maybe it is how a project turns out. Maybe it is what someone thinks of you. Maybe it is whether everything holds together the way you need it to. Whatever it is, you have made it the condition for your own stability. And so every day you go to work managing that thing, protecting it, worrying about it, because somewhere inside you believe that if you stop, something terrible will happen. Here is what is actually true. The terrible thing is already happening. It is the stress itself, it is the exhaustion of that endless management. You are paying the price every single day for a form of control that does not work and has never worked. The removal is not passive, it is not surrender, it is a precise act of seeing. You look at the thing you are gripping, the outcome, the opinion, the result, and you ask one question. Is this actually mine to determine? Not mine to influence, not mine to work toward, mine to determine? If the honest answer is no, you have a choice, you can keep gripping. Or you can redirect that same energy toward the one thing that is genuinely yours, your next decision. Today, try this. Pick one thing that has been stressing you, one specific thing. Write down exactly what you are afraid will happen. Then write down what part of that outcome you can actually control and what part you cannot. Be ruthless about the line, the part you cannot control. Write three words next to it, not my load. Then let it sit there on the page. You do not have to believe it yet, you just have to see it clearly. The stress does not live in your circumstances. It lives in the gap between what is and what you are insisting should be. Close that gap, not by changing the world, but by getting honest about what is yours to carry. You have been managing the wrong thing for a long time. That ends when you decide it ends, not when conditions improve. The conditions may never improve. You do not need them to. If today's conversation has served you, take it further. Pay attention by C Tribut, 12 Lessons in the Practice of Seeing Clearly. Available now on Amazon.