Charlie Kirk verses Islam
Charlie Kirk in 2025 said about Islam that it is a threat to America. He said, “America has freedom of religion, of course, but we should be frank: large dedicated Islamic areas are a threat to America.”
He also said, Islam is not compatible with western civilization.
But a much earlier warning about Islam came from William Shakespeare. He said Islam is a threat to England. He too said it is not compatible with western civilisation. The warning came in the form of a play. It is one of the plays we find in First Portfolio which was published in 1623. The West was warned about Muslims 400 years ago.
I am talking about the hate play which has the famous line "I hate the Moor." You can read all about Iago's hate for Othello the Muslim in this fabulous book...
Charlie Kirk verses Islam
Lost Society
Charlie Kirk tried to save society. He thought it was worth saving.
Charlie described England a "totalitarian third world hellhole." There was a turning point UK. Margaret Thatcher famously declared "there is no such thing as society" in 1987. It marked the policies that systematically dismantled social cohesion and collective welfare.
The consequences are evident today. Society is a prize for imperialists. "Islamification of the UK" goes unchecked. Freedom of speech has been sacrificed to "the Muslim faith family." Their vote is so crucial the government is forced to prioritise problems of the Middle East.
This podcast makes a crucial distinction between religion and ethnicity, arguing that Islam is being miscategorized as an ethnicity to claim human rights protections when convenient. When faith becomes ethnicity, democracy becomes theocracy.
The transformation threatens democratic principles by pushing societies toward theocratic structures where religious identity supersedes civic identity.
If you're concerned about the future of Western democracy and the complex interplay between religion, identity, and governance, this episode offers uncomfortable but essential insights that challenge conventional wisdom from both left and right.
You'll find the answers here... https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0FDLSJFG9
Charlie Kirk, like many a disappointed visitor to England, described the old country a totalitarian third world hellhole. I am afraid this is true. This is what England has become since Margaret Thatcher in 1987 said there is no such thing as society. Her political family succeeded because today there is no such thing as society. They wrecked society, knowing any problem was going to be a future one for someone else to deal with.
Speaker 1:Subsequent governments continue the policy of making future problems out of present ones. More recently, government is the problem. The present government has normalised Islam and ushered in two-tier policing. If a white non-Muslim criticises Islam on social media, it draws the attention of the security services. If a white non-Muslim tries to do something about the Islamification of the UK, they are sent to prison. Freedom of speech is already lost so that we can maintain the Muslim faith family, also known as the Muslim Brotherhood.
Speaker 1:The future problem is called ethnic hatred.
Speaker 1:Charlie Kirk called it totalitarianism, but I call it greed and corruption. We found out recently that our elected representatives do not work for wages. They work for freebies. Our Prime Minister was receiving freebies from a Muslim. American presidents have courted Saudi kings and princes. We have a king who is all things to all men. They are all overseeing the decline of Western civilization.
Speaker 1:Elizabeth, the Virgin Queen, made a statement with her life choices, and that was to end monarchy. Society reminds me of her mother, Anne Boleyn, because we cannot rely on politicians and the establishment for anything except for our demise. Charlie Kirk had a sense of society. He thought Christian America, with all its flaws, was worth fighting for. He did his best to stop America losing all sense of identity and becoming like England. America and the world need to know that the hate of Islam is not a racial thing. Islam is a religion and the faith family pretends spirituality is ethnicity, but there is nothing biological about Islam. Ethnicity allows for the deluded to claim human rights when it suits them. They are spirit beings and they belong in a theocracy, not a democracy.
Speaker 1:Charlie Kirk tried his best to start a conversation about toxicity of imperial cultures like Islam, but Charlie Kirk was no William Shakespeare. Shakespeare was a Catholic and a humanist. Shakespeare managed to lock out Islam. But England of today is more Muslim than even Russia, and Russia is a country full of ethnic hatred. Ethnic hatred, when subdued for the sake of peaceful coexistence, eventually results in self-loathing. Russians are full of self-loathing. Putin loathes and wants to kill Ukrainians because he thinks they and all Slavs are Russian. Alexander Litvinenko said he was poisoned for pointing out the self-loathing Russia thrives on. As far as humanists are concerned, Russia is a lost cause.
Speaker 1:The problem for Charlie Kirk was that Islam is a far superior religion to Christianity. Muslims have one great virtue. T hey do not believe Jesus of Nazareth is bigger than the solar system. They believe Jesus is still the same size he was 2,000 years ago. Christianity is a ridiculous belief system because Christians cannot believe Jesus is a man. T hey believe Jesus is bigger than the Milky Way galaxy. I have written a book which turns Jesus of Nazareth into a man on a permanent basis. It is called Anne Boleyn, the Mother of the Nation, and it is available to buy on Amazon.