Charlie Kirk verses Islam

Shakespeare verses Islam

Navalny Jones Season 1 Episode 2

Send us a text

Shakespeare's brilliant mind did more than craft timeless plays—it built cultural fortifications. Through his 1604 masterpiece "Othello, the Moor of Venice," Shakespeare introduced Western audiences to Islam while simultaneously establishing boundaries against its influence. The play's memorable line "I hate the Moor" quickly became London's viral sensation, a cultural shorthand for resistance against what Shakespeare perceived as fundamentally anti-human religious principles.

The podcast examines the theological appropriation that occurred when Islam incorporated Jesus of Nazareth and Abraham as Muslim figures. Appropriation and revision extended beyond personages to sacred spaces, most notably the Temple Mount in Jerusalem. The building of a mosque on the Temple Mount represented an erasure of previous religious history.

The Holy Trinity is appropriation and revision of Jesus of Nazareth by Christians. It would be hypocritical of a Christian to lambast Muslims. Shakespeare was a humanist. 

If you don't believe me, read the book.

 https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0FDLSJFG9 

Support the show

Speaker 1:

William Shakespeare was a Catholic and humanist and he exposed Islam to the West in 1604. He wrote a play about a Muslim to show just how anti-human is the religion we call Islam. The message from Othello the Moor of Venice is captured in one glorious line. The line was given to Iago who said "I hate the Moor, and within a few days, all London was repeating the latest Shakespearean soundbite. Shakespeare managed to lock down and lock out Islam from 17th century England.

Speaker 1:

Shakespeare lived and died long before the events of October 7th 2023. Today we have BBC propaganda, but back then they had Shakespeare. The murder of Desdemona exposed a new phenomenon unique to Muslims, that being honour killing. Shakespeare did not excuse Muslims. The greatest evil to come out of Islam was the threat to kill God. There was a short time when Muslims wanted to kill Jesus of Nazareth. Muslims reserve the right to kill anyone and everyone who is not a Muslim. Thankfully, not all Muslims are anti-human in practice, but they are all anti-human in principle. A significant amount of murderers in waiting . M uslims stopped threatening God by turning Jesus of Nazareth into a Muslim. Jesus of Nazareth was a close buddy of Abraham the patriarch, and so they took him too.

Speaker 1:

In the 7th century, Yahweh-Christ and Abraham were appropriated by Muslims.

Speaker 1:

If the death of Anne Boleyn was judicial murder, then the revision of Jesus of Nazareth by Muslims was literary murder. With Yahweh and Abraham listed as Muslims the Moor was free to grab the Temple Mount and Jerusalem for himself. He made a show of his military might by building a mosque on the highest point of the mount. B ut Jews and Christians swore to take back what was theirs. Their day would come in 2023. The Temple Mount was where God declared he was Jesus of Nazareth. It is a good thing God is an existentialist and therefore cannot punish anyone. Muslims built a new layer to the Temple Mount and erased God's history from history, in the same complete way Catholics erased Anne Boleyn from history. There is now a Muslim Jesus, and that leads to the greatest lie to come out of the mouths of Muslims.

Speaker 1:

Nothing irritated William Shakespeare more than the blatant lie that Muslims are Christian. It was a lie they could get away with in their own empire, but not in London, not in Shakespeare's London. There was only one way for Shakespeare to expose the lie and express his hate and contempt for the fiends, and that was to write a hateful play. In 1604, there was no one in any doubt that Muslims ought to be locked out of England, and they were. Charlie Kirk expressed hate for Islam, but he was not a humanist and therefore could not emulate Shakespeare.

Speaker 1:

Having said that, he did reach the same conclusion and there must be a lockdown and lockout of Islam for the sake of truth, never mind freedom of speech. They need to reconstitute their religion to remove the right to kill people for not believing their lies about Jesus and history. Abraham was not a Muslim and that is truth and that is freedom of speech. It is the correct and proper response for humanists "to do unto others what others have done unto you, meaning, if you are a humanist, then you are obliged to reserve the right to kill all Muslims. Humanism does not offer you an option. If you refuse to reserve the right to kill all Muslims, then you are a hypocrite. Those Muslims who do not want to kill everyone must stop calling themselves Muslim and must start opposing this great evil tenet of Islam. They certainly must not be allowed in countries with a non-Muslim population without taking an oath of sanity.