Charlie Kirk verses Islam
Charlie Kirk in 2025 said about Islam that it is a threat to America. He said, “America has freedom of religion, of course, but we should be frank: large dedicated Islamic areas are a threat to America.”
He also said, Islam is not compatible with western civilization.
But a much earlier warning about Islam came from William Shakespeare. He said Islam is a threat to England. He too said it is not compatible with western civilisation. The warning came in the form of a play. It is one of the plays we find in First Portfolio which was published in 1623. The West was warned about Muslims 400 years ago.
I am talking about the hate play which has the famous line "I hate the Moor." You can read all about Iago's hate for Othello the Muslim in this fabulous book...
Charlie Kirk verses Islam
Death of Islam - Part 1
Muslims reserve the right to kill non-Muslims. They think they are superior. But they are not. They are animals just like the rest of us. This was proven by Aristotle.
This episode is about Aristotle the world's first biologist.
The time is come for Muslims to know that non-Muslims will do the same. Non-Muslims reserve the right to kill Muslim’s.
It is a betrayal of our humanity to concede Muslims have the right to kill us at will. It is to embrace our survival instinct to deal with the threat. (I cannot believe they tell Muslim children they are spirit and martyrs.)
Islam is not the religion of peace. Islamophobia is the religion of peace.
For a detailed explanation of the rights of a human go to...
Charlie Kirk started a conversation in 2012. He was eighteen years old. Anne Boleyn was a fourteen year old when she started her conversation. Anne was a Christian, but more than that, she was the world's first existentialist. Existentialism was the only way for her to justify her love for Henry VIII. Otherwise Anne was guilty of adultery. Anne's conversation with Henry VIII and England lasted fourteen years. Charlie Kirk used universities to develop his thoughts. Charlie had the honour of following Anne Boleyn into the debating chambers of Oxford and Cambridge universities. On september tenth, Charlie Kirk was taken out of the conversation, and on september eleventh Charlie Kirk became the conversation. America saw his assassination as an attack on freedom of speech. More important than anything Charlie Kirk said was the fact that he started a conversation. His conversation will crush Islam. Charlie was looking for truth. Anne Berlin was the first person in history to work out the truth. So we know Charlie was not being unreasonable. When Anne was taken out in fifteen thirty six it was an attack on truth and not freedom of speech. Anne Boleyn had the protection of Henry VIII. She enjoyed freedom of speech like no other person during the Renaissance and Reformation period. The Queen of England gave up the Catholic faith and found herself left with absolute truth. Charlie Kirk was not about absolute truth. He could not see past his Christian prejudices, and that annoyed people. But not all Christian prejudice is bad. Islamophobia is a good thing because it is a humanist thing. What we learn from Charlie Kirk's pitiless stand against Islam is that anyone capitulating to moral pressure from Hamas and flying the flag for Islam despises humanity. Muslim sympathizers across America and Europe despise their own humanity. If you have marched for Palestine, then in terms of humanism you are a hypocrite. Here's something for you to chew over. Every single Muslim reserves the right to kill all non Muslims. They are given that right by Allah, the angel Gabriel, Muhammad the Prophet, the Quran, and the local mosque. A Muslim can refuse to exercise his right to kill non Muslims, but he won't condemn Muslims who do exercise their God given right. Let me explain their inadequacy. The story begins with the world's first humanist and the world's first scientist. Aristotle was the world's first biologist, but he is downgraded to philosopher, which he was. Professor Aristotle opened a school, and he could expect to attract the best students. Aristotle put higher education on the map when he became tutor to Alexander the Great. Aristotle was not a Muslim retrospectively. In fact, the biologist was the first enemy of Muslims, because Aristotle is the man who tried to stop Islam from happening. But one thousand years after Aristotle it happened. One thousand years before Islam, Aristotle's school was flourishing. But one year there was not a single person enrolling. Aristotle discovered there was a school of divine philosophy opened just two blocks away. It was run by Gnostics. What we today might call pre Muslims. Pre Muslims said it was possible to have daily interaction with God through prayer and worship. It was possible because God is spirit, and man is spirit, and spirit could be finely tuned to make two way conversation possible. Gnostics said spirit is eternal, and therefore a spiritual lifestyle is eternal lifestyle. As for science, pre Muslims said all science alluded to intelligent design, and that meant a designer. Therefore science proved the existence of God. Aristotle, the biology professor, could not offer his students eternal life. Biology taught him that man was not made of spirit. The popular expression for biology was earth to earth and dust to dust. It all happens without spiritual intervention at any point. It would not be wrong to pause here and try to understand Aristotle in terms of evolution. Two thousand years before the theory of evolution, Aristotle believed that man and all living creatures came out of the ground. If after two thousand four hundred years of knowing better you go on a march for carrying on the good delusion, then don't bother coming back. That human known as Jesus of Nazareth made clear his opinion on the matter. He said hypocrites, for ye shut up the kingdom of heaven against men. The God delusion in terms of humanism equates to hypocrisy. Aristotle and Jesus of Nazareth and Boleyn were humans who gave the world a specific choice. You need to choose between existential truth and spirituality. The New Testament was written by people who made the wrong choice. It is thanks to Charlie Kirk that we can discuss the spiritual distortion of man, God and universe by creationists, such as Christians and Muslims. The last big name biologist to say spirituality is a pack of lies was Richard Dawkins. I am skipping Francis Crick. Dawkins resurrected Yahweh, the god of war, and described him a bloodthirsty ethnic cleanser. This is so unfair because Yahweh was a blood thirsty geographic cleanser. Yahweh was not a racist because he hated all humans. He killed Israelites too. Dawkins gave the God of the Bible human attributes. But what he failed to realize was that he was restoring the original narrative. Anyway, Dawkins tried to explain why Muslims believe in spirit. It is to do with a dualism, the dualism of flesh and spirit, and the dualism of the material universe and the spiritual universe. Muslims believe in supernatural dualism. Dawkins said the dualist believes the mind is some kind of disembodied spirit that inhabits the body and therefore conceivably could leave the body and exist somewhere else. Dawkins called it innate dualism, and Aristotle called it the biological soul. Dualism manifests itself in the form of conscience and self correction. Dawkins made the same mistake as Aristotle. He claimed dualism is something to do with the mind. He declared it the result of psychological byproducts from mental modules misfiring. Dualism and the perception of spirit is to do with our genetic makeup. Aristotle, Jesus of Nazareth, and Anne Boleyn kept it real. Charlie Kirk put himself in the opposite corner when he said the most important thing is my faith.