The Land Deal: Prime Land Buyers Podcast | Sell Land for Cash

Michigan Land Values Explained: From $9,333 to $247,000 Per Acre

• Rone

Share episode

Discover why Michigan land prices vary so dramatically across the state. This episode breaks down the 26-to-1 price difference between Michigan's most expensive and cheapest land, exploring the three key factors that determine value: location premiums, proximity to major cities, and parcel size.

Learn why Leelanau Peninsula commands nearly $247,000 per acre while Upper Peninsula counties offer land for under $10,000. We cover the hidden challenges of buying cheap UP land, how remote work is reshaping rural property demand, and why future climate trends could dramatically shift regional values.

Whether you're a land investor, prospective buyer, or simply curious about Michigan real estate, this episode provides data-driven insights into what drives land values across the Great Lakes State.

Read the full data analysis: cost of land by acre and county in Michigan

Looking to sell land in Michigan for cash? Get a fair offer today.

Emma:

Welcome to the Land Deal, the podcast where we explore land opportunities and investment strategies and market insights across America. I'm your host, Emma Dezima, and this is episode two. Today we're diving deep into the Michigan land market, where price disparities are absolutely wild. Did you know you could buy 26 acres in the Upper Peninsula for the cost of just one acre in Michigan's most expensive region? We're breaking down exactly what drives these extreme differences, from waterfront premiums to the hidden challenges of buying cheap rural land. Whether you're a seasoned investor or just curious about Michigan real estate, you'll walk away understanding the three key factors that determine land values across the Great Lakes State. Let's get started. The price gap between Michigan's most expensive and cheapest land is so extreme. You could buy 26 acres in the Upper Peninsula for the cost of just one acre in the state's priciest region. Let's explore what's driving these wild differences.

Jake:

Those numbers are mind-boggling. What exactly creates such a massive disparity in land values?

Emma:

Well, it really comes down to three main factors. First, you've got the up north premium. Places like Lillanao Peninsula commanding nearly $247,000 per acre because of their Lake Michigan frontage and vacation appeal.

Jake:

That's an incredible premium for waterfront property. What about the other factors?

Emma:

The second big driver is proximity to major cities. Take Washtenau County around Ann Arbor. Land there goes for over $152,000 per acre for small parcels. And Oakland County near Detroit shows similar premium pricing.

Jake:

Hmm, and I'm guessing the third factor has to do with parcel size?

Emma:

Exactly. The price per acre drops dramatically as parcels get bigger. In Lilanao County, it falls from $246,733 for small lots to just $92,610 for two to five acre parcels. By the time you're looking at 20 to 100 acres, even the most expensive counties are under $10,000 per acre.

Jake:

That's fascinating how the economics of scale works in land prices, though I imagine managing larger properties comes with its own challenges.

Emma:

You know, that's a great point. When you're dealing with bigger parcels, you've got to think about maintenance equipment, property taxes, and whether you actually need all that space. Plus, the features of the land itself become much more important.

Jake:

Like how agricultural potential affects prices for larger parcels in places like Huron County.

Emma:

Exactly right. And speaking of land features, let's talk about the Upper Peninsula. It consistently offers the lowest prices across all parcel sizes. Gaugabic, Iron, and Antonagon counties are always at the bottom of the range. But there's definitely a buyer-beware aspect to those low prices.

Jake:

I've heard some horror stories about people buying cheap UP land without doing their homework first.

Emma:

Oh man, you wouldn't believe some of the situations. People buy these parcels sight-unseen, only to discover they've purchased an inaccessible swamp or a heavily wooded lot with no legal road access. And don't even get me started on the seasonal challenges.

Jake:

Like how a property that looks perfectly accessible in July might be completely different under five feet of snow.

Emma:

Right. And here's something interesting. These regional price differences might shift dramatically in the coming decades. Climate change could actually make those UP properties more attractive, while coastal areas might face new challenges.

Jake:

That's an intriguing point about future value. The current price disparities might look very different in 20 or 30 years.

Emma:

You know what else fascinates me? How these price patterns reflect historical development. The old logging and mining regions in the UP still show the effects of those industries in today's land values.

Jake:

So if we're looking at current trends, what's driving the newest changes in land values?

Emma:

Well, remote work is really reshaping these price distributions. We're seeing increased demand for rural properties with good internet access, something that wasn't even a consideration just a few years ago.

Jake:

That makes sense. The pandemic really changed how people think about where they can live and work.

Emma:

And here's something surprising. The price differentials between counties tend to narrow as parcel size increases. That 26 times difference we see in small lots becomes much smaller when you're looking at larger acreage.

Jake:

Well, that certainly changes the equation for investors looking at different sized parcels.

Emma:

Speaking of investors, we're seeing different types of buyers dominating different segments of the market. The small lot market is all about primary residences, while larger parcels attract everyone from farmers to hunting clubs to land speculators.

Jake:

The recreational aspect is particularly interesting in Michigan, given the strong hunting and outdoor culture.

Emma:

And let's not forget about water rights and mineral rights. Those can create some surprising value variations, even within the same county. Michigan's water-rich environment makes those considerations particularly important.

Jake:

It really shows how complex land valuation can be in this market.

Emma:

You know what it all comes down to? While these price differences are dramatic, they're not arbitrary. Each region's values reflect a complex interplay of factors that smart buyers need to understand. From soil quality to road access, from future development potential to current use restrictions.

Jake:

That's why local knowledge is so crucial in this market. The raw numbers only tell part of the story.

Emma:

Looking ahead, I think we'll see these regional differences continue to evolve, but probably not disappear entirely. The key is understanding what drives value in each specific area and market segment.