Patrick's Podcast
Content will include video production tips and services.
Patrick's Podcast
Donor Hero Is Dead! Ethical Storytelling Is Key!
Welcome to the deep dive. So we've got this interesting stack of sources today, all circling around a panel discussion on, well, a really critical topic. Nonprofit storytelling, its power, and how the best practices are uh really evolving.
SPEAKER_01:That's right. And our mission here really is to dig in and pull out those practical strategic nuggets for you. We want to get past those, you know, 20-year-old fundraising cliches.
SPEAKER_00:Tropes.
SPEAKER_01:Exactly. And figure out how modern nonprofits can actually shift from just asking for money to building real connections with their community, with their donors and doing it ethically. That's key.
SPEAKER_00:Aaron Powell Okay. So let's jump straight into maybe the biggest headline, the thing that really stood out from the sources. It's the shift away from the donor as hero story. I mean, it worked, right? It raised a lot of money for years.
SPEAKER_01:Oh, absolutely. It was incredibly successful financially. But ethically.
SPEAKER_00:Yeah.
SPEAKER_01:Well, it's really being challenged now.
SPEAKER_00:Why though? What's the core issue?
SPEAKER_01:Aaron Powell The problem is what it implies, you know, this idea that the donor, usually someone from outside the community, is the only one who can bring the solution. Some of the sources were pretty blunt, saying it can uh smack a white saviorism.
SPEAKER_00:Right. And it sort of reinforces existing power structures, keeps people needing help just to tell a good story.
SPEAKER_01:Aaron Powell Precisely. It can unintentionally keep recipients in that disadvantaged position because that's what makes the hero narrative work.
SPEAKER_00:Okay, but here's the tension, the real dilemma for listeners, I think. The sources admit that when orgs stopped using that narrative, sometimes donations dipped because it was effective. So how do you square that circle? Good ethics versus, well, potentially less money.
SPEAKER_01:Yeah, that's the million-dollar question, isn't it? The pivot seems to be about changing where the power in the story comes from. It's moving away from the donor as this external rescuer.
SPEAKER_00:And towards what?
SPEAKER_01:Towards the donor as like an active participant, someone acting based on shared values. It's about building up the donor's moral identity.
SPEAKER_00:Ah, okay. So less you are the savior and more.
SPEAKER_01:More like people like you, kind, compassionate, caring people. You make this possible. You're reinforcing who they want to be.
SPEAKER_00:That makes sense. So you change the actual appeal language instead of say your gift will save a life.
SPEAKER_01:Right. Which is very much that rescue narrative.
SPEAKER_00:You shift it to something like your compassion helps her fight. It's connecting on like common humanity, not a power imbalance.
SPEAKER_01:Exactly. And that ethical piece, it forces a strategic change in comms, too. Storytelling can't be a monologue anymore, just the nonprofit talking at donors.
SPEAKER_00:It needs to be a dialogue.
SPEAKER_01:A dialogue, yeah. One that actually includes the community's voice. The big principle now is centering the storyteller who's getting the services, the recipients, their families, the communities around them.
SPEAKER_00:So ethical storytelling isn't just, you know, changing a few words. It's about real collaboration.
SPEAKER_01:Absolutely. He's got the sources to find it with like three key checks. First, does the storyteller actually benefit? Is there empowerment, agency over their own story?
SPEAKER_00:Okay, empowerment and agency. What else?
SPEAKER_01:Second, they need to be treated like a collaborator, maybe even a co-author, not just a subject. Got it. And third, consent. But not just a quick signature, real, ongoing consent. They need to be asked how their story gets used, especially across different platforms, print, video, social media, you name it.
SPEAKER_00:Wow. Okay. So they need to approve the different versions.
SPEAKER_01:Yeah. They need to be okay with how it's framed everywhere. It's way more work, definitely.
SPEAKER_00:Aaron Powell, but it builds trust, which seems essential. Okay, let's shift gears a bit. From the ethics to the practical strategy. One expert on the panel mentioned that modern storytelling isn't linear anymore. What does that actually mean for, say, a nonprofit's content team?
SPEAKER_01:Aaron Powell It means basically we're in the age of the strategic mashup. Remember when you'd spend months making one beautiful five-minute video.
SPEAKER_00:Yeah, and that was the campaign.
SPEAKER_01:Right. Those days are kind of over.
SPEAKER_00:Yeah.
SPEAKER_01:That one long story, now it's just the starting point. It's the raw material.
SPEAKER_00:Raw material you have to slice and dice immediately.
SPEAKER_01:Precisely. That one film has to spin off like a dozen other things. A 30-second clip for Instagram. Maybe three key quotes for a direct mailpiece, a little audio snippet for an email, a photo for the annual report. It's not one story anymore. It's a whole system of assets, all coming from that one authentic core story.
SPEAKER_00:Aaron Powell, I can almost hear our listeners groaning. Are we saying every nonprofit, big or small, suddenly needs to be a mini media company? That sounds like a lot of resources.
SPEAKER_01:It is intensive, yeah. But it's actually efficient if you plan for it up front. That's the key.
SPEAKER_00:Planning makes it work.
SPEAKER_01:Think about it. If you interview one person, ask five really strategic questions, you should aim to walk away with like 15 pieces of content right there. And this idea extends to donors too. Get them sharing their stories maybe after they donate. It builds that community feel.
SPEAKER_00:Right, like user-generated content almost. It mirrors how marketing works now with creators and influencers. People relate to other people.
SPEAKER_01:Exactly. Which brings us nicely to persuasion psychology. The sources kept coming back to Simon Sinek's golden circle. That idea of starting with why. How does that apply here?
SPEAKER_00:Can you break that golden circle down for us quickly?
SPEAKER_01:Sure. So you've got three circles. The outside is the what what you do, like serve meals. The middle is the how how you do it, your unique process. But the center, the most important part, is the why, your core belief, your purpose.
SPEAKER_00:Okay.
SPEAKER_01:Cynic's point is when you lead with that why, the emotional core, you tap into the limbic system in the brain. That's the part that makes decisions.
SPEAKER_00:And that part doesn't really use language or logic, right? It's more feeling.
SPEAKER_01:Exactly. That's why people say they donated because it just felt right or it felt good. The decision was emotional, almost instant. If you start with a what and how, you hit the rational brain, the neocortex.
SPEAKER_00:Which just wants to analyze everything.
SPEAKER_01:Right. Starts calculating. So the practical takeaway is lead with the mission, the crisis. The ocean is sick, not we're a maritime museum.
SPEAKER_00:Lead with the heart, not the head.
SPEAKER_01:You got it. Yeah. And this works for major gifts too. It can totally reframe how board members approach fundraising. Don't just ask them to solicit checks.
SPEAKER_00:What should they do instead?
SPEAKER_01:Train them to tell their own story. Why are they involved? Pair them up, have them practice that authenticity, that personal conviction, that's way more powerful with a potential major donor in any slick brochure.
SPEAKER_00:That's a fantastic internal tactic. Okay, shifting again. Defining successful storytelling, we heard. Emotional, experiential, ethical. And this idea about focusing on the person the donor wants to become.
SPEAKER_01:Yes, it's aspirational. And when you're actually making the story, executing it, there are a few key things. First, the story arc. It needs to focus on the now and the future.
SPEAKER_00:Not just the past trauma.
SPEAKER_01:Right. Donors want to see progress, sustainability. What's a plan for five, ten, fifty years? Focusing only on past trauma can, again, reinforce that dependency narrative we want to avoid.
SPEAKER_00:Okay, focus on now and future. What else?
SPEAKER_01:Respect during the capture. Meet the person beforehand. Maybe a quick zoom or call. Don't just show up with a camera. Never make them memorize lines you want real conversation.
SPEAKER_00:And respecting their perspective.
SPEAKER_01:Crucially. Like if they ask you not to show their neighborhood in a negative light just for dramatic effect, you honor that. It's their story.
SPEAKER_00:Makes sense.
SPEAKER_01:And the third point treat them as real collaborators. Get their feedback. Some sources even mention paying them for their time and story. Ensure the final product is true to their experience. It moves from extraction to partnership.
SPEAKER_00:Okay, partnership. Now let's talk about the big mistake. The one that seemed universally flagged, and honestly, it feels counterintuitive. Data dumping.
SPEAKER_01:Ah, yes. Okay, pause here because this is so important and so often misunderstood.
SPEAKER_00:Yeah.
SPEAKER_01:The huge mistake isn't just using data. It's mixing the single emotional story with big statistical data.
SPEAKER_00:Right. Why is that combo so bad? Don't organizations need data to prove the need?
SPEAKER_01:You'd think so. But the research is clear. It's called the identifiable victim effect. Studies, like a famous one with Save the Children, showed people give way less money when faced with stats about many victims, say 20,000 kids in need.
SPEAKER_00:Compared to the story of just one.
SPEAKER_01:Compared to the story of just one child, let's call her Rokia, whose face and story they can connect with emotionally. Okay, that part makes some sense, but the really wild finding was The wild part is when they combined Rokia's story with the statistic about the other 20,000 kids, people gave less than they did for Rokia alone. The data actually hurt the donation.
SPEAKER_00:Wow. Why? What happens in the brain?
SPEAKER_01:MRI studies give us a clue. Rokia's story hits the emotional limbic system. You get that warm glow, that dopamine hit, you want to help. But the second you throw in the big numbers, the stats.
SPEAKER_00:The brain switches gears.
SPEAKER_01:Totally switches. It activates the calculating analytical neocortex.
SPEAKER_00:So instead of feeling and acting, you start thinking, analyzing the problem.
SPEAKER_01:Exactly. You go from, I need to help this person to wait, 20,000 kids. How big is this problem really? Can my$50 even make a dent? What is the definition of famine anyway?
SPEAKER_00:You shift from wanting to solve the problem to trying to define it. And that kills the impulse to give.
SPEAKER_01:Precisely. It creates friction, hesitation. So the huge takeaway, keep them separate, the emotional story and the ask. Keep data out of that moment. Use data elsewhere, maybe in reports or detailed website sections, but not right next to the martstring pole.
SPEAKER_00:That is incredibly practical advice. Okay, final section. Let's talk tools and tactics. How do nonprofits actually gather and use these ethical, powerful stories? Where's the starting point?
SPEAKER_01:You know, the most overlooked resource is often internal. You have to build a storytelling culture inside the organization.
SPEAKER_00:How do you do that?
SPEAKER_01:Well, first, stop letting stories get lost in emails or forgotten reports. Create a central story bank, a simple database, whatever works, and maybe start staff meetings, board meetings with a different question. What inspired you about our mission this week?
SPEAKER_00:Oh, I like that. It forces everyone to look for those moments.
SPEAKER_01:It turns everyone into a potential story gatherer. And it brings those real visceral impact stories to the surface, like that example in the sources about sending development staff out just to observe.
SPEAKER_00:Yeah, the food pantry story, where they saw kids kept asking for water because the fountains were broken.
SPEAKER_01:Exactly. That detail, kids being thirsty, wasn't in any report, but that observed moment, infinitely more powerful and actionable than a chart about facilities needing repair.
SPEAKER_00:So get out there, observe, listen, and when interviewing someone for their story, any key tactics.
SPEAKER_01:Be ready to dig a little deeper. The first story someone tells, whether it's the nonprofit staff or the recipient, might be kind of vanilla. Protective. Uh-huh. You need to gently peel back the layers to find that authentic turning point, the real struggle, the small victory that makes it resonate.
SPEAKER_00:Makes sense. And we mentioned persuasion earlier. Cialdini's principles, reciprocity, commitment, social proof, etc. How does good storytelling tap into those?
SPEAKER_01:Well, ethical storytelling activates them naturally. Think about social proof. When you share a success story from someone who receives services, that's social proof that your program works. It's not just the org saying it, it's the community showing it.
SPEAKER_00:Okay, so the story itself is the proof. What about, say, commitment?
SPEAKER_01:Commitment gets built when someone donates based on those shared values we talked about. They're acting in line with an identity. I'm a compassionate person.
SPEAKER_00:Once they've done that, they're more likely to do it again to stay committed to that identity.
SPEAKER_01:Exactly. Reinforces their self-image. The donation becomes less of a transaction and more of an affirmation to who they are.
SPEAKER_00:Turning a donation into part of their lifestyle almost. Okay, one last strategic tip for organizations maybe just starting to think this way.
SPEAKER_01:Yeah, a practical one. Look at your competitors. Or even organizations you admire in other sectors. Find content pieces you think are really effective, videos, reports, campaigns.
SPEAKER_00:And just copy them.
SPEAKER_01:Well, learn from them. Send them to your team and say this hits the mark emotionally. How can we achieve something with this level of depth and clarity for our mission? Imitation in this case is smart strategy.
SPEAKER_00:Great advice. Okay, this deep dive has really shifted my perspective on nonprofit comms. Let's try to wrap up the core lesson here for everyone listening. What's the future look like?
SPEAKER_01:Aaron Powell I think the absolute non-negotiable is authenticity and transparency. The next generation of donors, maybe all donors now, they're just bombarded with information. They have finely tuned uh BS detectors.
SPEAKER_00:They can sniff out manipulation.
SPEAKER_01:Instantly. They're a harder sell in that sense. Your stories feel fake or extractive, or if you're not clear about where the money goes, you lose them fast.
SPEAKER_00:Which loops us back perfectly to that identity pitch. It's like you said, think about big brands. Nike isn't just selling shoes.
SPEAKER_01:They're selling aspiration. Just do it. Air Jordan gives you wings. It's identity. It taps into emotion.
SPEAKER_00:Yeah.
SPEAKER_01:Who you want to be. So here's the final thought I want to leave you with. If giant corporations use identity and emotion so effectively to sell sneakers or phones, imagine how much more power your mission has. Your work is already about purpose, about change. So the question is The question is what identity are you actually offering your donors beyond just the service you provide? Are you offering them the chance to be a distant hero or the chance to truly live out their values as a compassionate, engaged human being? Getting that right. That's the future of powerful ethical fundraising.