MARTIAL LAW: Citizen's arrest on on treasonous Australians

Martial law. Treason. When citizens arrest is blocked it exposes more than the fear. The determination for Australian's to take back the lucky country.  

A conversation with Mike Holt.

Transcript

SPEAKER_00 0:00

Military officers can order troops to open fire on civilians on Australian soil with or without agreement of a state government. But what about Australian civilians? Do they have the authority to act on treasonous individuals via martial law? I'll be talking with Mike Holt on this matter, but in the meantime, be courageous with your comments and make sure you subscribe. Mike, you as a military person back in the 60s, uh both here in Australia and then fighting in Vietnam, there was an oath that you had to uh make for Australia. What is that oath?

SPEAKER_01 1:02

This is the uh schedule to the end of the Constitution, and the oath should be I, Michael Holt, do swear that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Victoria, her heirs and successors according to law. So help me God. Well what this does is it binds the oath taker to protect the nation. Right? That's what it's all about. It's not so much to uh bearing allegiance to her majesty Queen Victoria, although that's what it says. The fact is we're bearing allegiance to Her Majesty because, or his majesty now, uh, because we're there to protect her and the nation.

SPEAKER_00 1:43

So from this context, we're saying that we are you have made an oath to protect Australia, and that's extern it doesn't say where, so we're talking about enemies externally but also within.

SPEAKER_01 1:57

Exactly. And the military needs to understand this. I don't know what oath they take today, but that was the oath I took back in the day, and I took it twice, once when I joined the the RAAF, and the next time before they sent me over to the Vietnam War. I guess they wanted to be sure I would support the war. And and when I went over there, I did. But then I saw what was really going on, and when I came back, I didn't.

SPEAKER_00 2:20

Indeed. So we've got these two cases at the moment, we've got Ben Roberts Smith and we have Jesse Freeman, and what's unfolding with each of those is the corruption, and in fact, the word treason has been used many times as well, which means that we could have martial law in this country step up. Does that mean?

SPEAKER_01 2:41

That's right. Martial law, if we if if the military declares mar martial law, the whole nation comes under that. That's the the supreme law then, and then they can go around and start arresting the traitors. And it it's the traitors we need to go after, the politicians, the banksters, and the judges, the judiciary. They are all traitors to this country. And uh it's uh you know, there is a saying, when a c when a government no longer serves the will of the people, the will of the people have the right to lawfully rebel. Well, military law is one way to go, but if that won't work, then we the people have a duty. No right, just a duty to step up and form groups and go and arrest the traitors. Now this happened in the uh American Revolution. Remember, they got groups of men to march into the courthouses, into the government offices, and they dragged these traitors out and they tarred and feathered them. And that's a horrific torture. And then they threw them onto ships and sent them back to England. And maybe we don't have to go quite that far, but the gallows would do equally well. I think the minor traitors should be sent to islands, but the major traitors, those who have perpetrated this deliberately, I don't think they deserve life. I think they deserve to go to the gallows, and the law is very specific. It's the criminal um well the crimes act 1914 specifically states that the penalty for treason is death. Now they the government has tried to change that law, but the original law is still there.

SPEAKER_00 4:20

So we've got now a position where we're not just talking about media that is not being honest. We we don't have the right uh investigative journalism to uncover the truth as sufficiently as they should, so that we the people are aware of what's going on. And now we've gone to greater depths here where we're saying our law enforcement and our judiciary and our politicians are not doing what they should be doing in terms of representing we the people. So, martial law for our listeners, have a look at Mike's website that's available to you now, and also start these conversations. You need to be curious enough to be courageous enough to talk to your peers about martial law, what it means, and where you can step in.