Mr Monopoly Part 2: The One Sided Arbiter

A continuation of the Perversions of the State series focussing on the one sided arbitration of the state and the establishment against the people of this country, touching on several different economic and societal factors.  

Thank you all so much for listening, feel free to contact me at flatcapnationalist@gmail.com. 

Also keep your eyes peeled as I will be uploading these audio episodes to YouTube in the near future. 

Transcript

SPEAKER_01 0:17

Hello, good afternoon, welcome back to the Flat Cap Nationalist Podcast. It's a pleasure to be back with you as it always is, speaking to you on a Sunday afternoon. Today's the 31st of May 2026, last day of May before the madness of June kicks off. Hope you're all well, hope you've all enjoyed the last episode or two. Let's get into this one. This is Mr. Monopoly Part 2, the One Side of the Orbiter. So with this one, I wanted to have a bit of a look at how legislation, particularly the Equality Act, is used as a bit of a cudgel against Western normality. Of how the state, the establishment, and all its minions like to play both sides of an issue off against each other and then come down in a one-sided manner to establish the direction of travel for the country. Now, as noted a moment ago, today it's the last day of May. June starts tomorrow, people, which means everybody's favourite month is back on the table. Yes, Pride Month, where homosexuals and transvestites, men that think they're women or want to be, or just get a kick out of seeing themselves as a woman, are free to display all their perversions publicly for all the world to see, all while bashing us over the head and telling us they just want to be accepted to live their life the way they are. They just want to be left alone, you see. And of course that is why every business has to be festooned with rainbows and pride acceptance mottos. Yeah, this is why you will be shamed for not participating, not playing along with the perversion. I mean let's let's think about it. On the face of it, what is a pride march? It's just a bunch of people that have a shared characteristic, i.e. they are sexually non-normative. You know, they are not heterosexuals, they are confused about their gender, they wish they were something other than what they are, and they want us all to participate in their delusions of transgenderism. That seems to be the biggest one, doesn't it? You know, Pride Month is not so much about the gays and lesbians anymore, and even then, I don't see why why should you have a Pride Month? Yeah, now not only is Pride one of the seven deadly sins, yeah, but the way they go about it, the way they rope kids into it. Now, let's just say a couple of doggers are getting up to whatever they do in a car park of an evening. Yeah, would you take your kids along and wave flags and and take pictures and and participate? No you wouldn't. You'd say, you people are filthy wrongs, why are you doing this? No, I'm not laying this at the feet of every gay couple or every gay person in the country, they're not all like this. You go to a pride march and you will see absolute degenerate filth. You will see men in leather dog costumes being walked on leashes with their arsees hanging out. Yeah, and they oh this is just normal, you know, and you don't have to look too far to find gays performing sexual acts on each other publicly. And you're not allowed to have an opinion against that. You're not allowed to say, actually, this is kind of wrong. Yeah, but it is, it's sickening. And the fact they try to get kids along and they they try to advertise them as family-friendly events. Yeah, take your kids along to pride, not on your Nelly sunshine. I don't have kids, but when I do, you can bet your butt on dollar they will not be going to a pride march. Not a chance. But no, we we're supposed to celebrate this particular part of their personal identity. Right, in a way that we we don't do for straight people. Now I know a lot of gays that will say, you know, well, well, straight people can walk around the streets whenever they want, holding hands and kissing in doorways. So, yeah, yeah. I mean I'm not a big fan of that either, don't get me wrong, makes me feel sick. Usually it's teenagers, isn't it? At a bus stop just eating each other's faces. But it's even worse when they're both like fat, bolding men in their forties with beards. It's yeah. There's no particular discrimination at play here. I don't like seeing it from anybody, but particularly from the gays. You know, in front of kids, they they want to expose kids to all this stuff at the youngest possible age, which is why they're taught about it in school. Now a lot of schools are actually teaching about gay stuff long before traditional sex education. Now I'm of the opinion schools shouldn't be teaching sex education. Well, there shouldn't be. I think it's it's good to have some kind of understanding of how it functions, but is that not the parents' role and responsibility? Yeah, not not filtered through the lens of leftist academia that glorifies gay them. Yeah, glorifies transgenderism, treats them like a privileged class of people, even while they cry that they are being oppressed, laughable. And it's just I don't want to see it. Don't want to say I'm I'm sick to death of having this stuff rammed our throats at every possible opportunity. And they'll all say, Well, we don't ram it down your throat. Yeah, yeah, okay, okay. How many straight marches are there? How much how much straight pride is there? None. Because it's normal. Okay, so the admission there is that the LGBT community, it's not normal. And we all know it's not normal, right? That's not how we are designed to function. Now I'm not saying gay people are bad people. But I think if you're willing to put your perversions on display in front of children at so-called family events, right, and if anybody tries to stop you, you kick off, you get the police involved, you cry discrimination. Yeah, that's kind of wrong. That is wrong. And it's not the only lunacy in store for us this summer, is it? Because it's the return of the World Cup, ladies and gentlemen. Return of the most prestigious football tournament in the world. Now, you remember the last one, yours? Ah well, it's another opportunity to celebrate the wonder that is diversity, is it not? Yeah. You remember the last one? When we win, we have to celebrate diversity and we have to give all the thanks and praise to the players of colour, yeah, the black players. When we lose, even if it's their fault, we're not allowed to point that out, otherwise we're a racist. Yeah, you remember last time around, and I I kept seeing this graphic, kept seeing it posted everywhere, and it was saying this is what the England squad would look like without immigration. And what they did was basically they crossed off every black player. I think that's very telling in and of itself, because it means they know who's English. They know what English really means. Right now they try and say, oh if you're born here, you're English. Well, I would say ask Bakayu Saka about that. He'll tell you he's born here, but he's not English. And I respect the honesty. I do. Yeah. He identifies fully with his African roots. More power to him. I wish more people would have this level of honesty. And notice my response to this. Yeah? Because when I've expressed about English identity before, maybe I didn't explain it quite so well. There's nothing wrong with not being English. Yeah, I want to make that loud and clear. There's nothing wrong with not being English. But don't try and delude yourself that you're something that you're not. Yeah, if you're claiming to be as British as me, right? And and not laying it to Saka's feet because as I say, I respect his honesty. But if Saka turned around and said, Well I'm just as British as you, are you? Are you really? Well tell that to the crowd that are holding up these graphics, saying this is what the England squad would look like without immigration. Yeah, so they they know. They know who's English and who isn't English. Now, when it comes to a losing performance, now you might remember a certain penalty shootout in which three black players missed crucial penalties. Well then suddenly it's a collective thing, and you're not allowed to lay the blame at the feet of those same diverse players we are forced to celebrate every time we win. Now, last time around, the vast majority of the racist comments aimed at the players, I call them monkeys and this, that and the other, all kinds of horrible names. Vast majority of them came from bots or came from people well outside of the UK. I think there was a lot of Moroccans involved, a lot of Chinese. That's where the the comments were coming from. But that was used as a cudule to be smashed over our head and tell us, you know, what worthless, racist, right-wing people we are, that we, you know, we can't even watch a football match without bringing racing to me. Now I'm sorry, people, but was it not the establishment that did this by forcing us every time, every time we won a game, we had to celebrate how diverse our squad was, how many players of African descent were in our squad, and and we had to celebrate that and praise it and thank them for coming over here and enriching our football team. But when we lose, no no no no, cannot possibly go the other way. It's a little bit of a tangent, but it's certainly an example of this one-sided arbitration we see from the establishment. Yeah, so when we do well, we have to thank diversity. When that very same diversity costs us a win, we're not allowed to blame diversity. We're not allowed to say, well, if only they'd had this player, this you know, native-born player, take the penalty instead, we might have won. No no no. We can't do that. So it's all one-sided. And this is done entirely in the self-interest of the establishment. Right? Big up the outsiders when we win. Lay all the thanks at their feet. But don't you dare, don't you dare question the diversity when we lose. Either way, whichever way the game goes, it's kind of used as a cudgel against the native white population of the British Isles, is it not? And okay, it's a little bit tangential. But it put me in mind of an economics book I read a long time ago. Now, I've read many economics books, I'm no economist, but I've got a a keen interest in economics. I find it kind of fascinating. So I figure that makes me at least as qualified as our current Chancellor, Rachel Reeves, the tea lady, right? And certainly more qualified than the person that has been floated as a potential replacement for her in Angela Reina. You know her, the ginger wench that left school with more babies than GCSEs. Uh, yeah. So I'll have to uh I'll have to go and find out this particular economics book. Because I didn't intend to bring this one in on the podcast actually, but it just sprang to mind, so I thought, ah, go on, we'll we'll we'll discuss it, why not? So this was from back in the day, back in America, around about the time where the 40-hour working week was standardised. Alright, so there was a production company for uh motor vehicles, maybe it was Chevrolet, let's say it was Chevrolet, why not? And at the time, they were let's keep the figures normal, right? They were paying the workers £10 an hour, and they were doing 12 hours a day, two 12-hour shifts, you know, to keep keep the place in operation all around the clock. Because at shift change, that's when productivity dropped the most, right? So the fewer shift changes they could have in a day, the better. So they only had the two shifts, 12-hour days. And let's say, for the sake of simplicity, they're being £10 an hour is what they're getting paid, right? So each worker in that factory is being paid £120 a day. And there's two shifts. Right? So for every machine in that factory per day, it was costing £240. The workers were getting £120 for that. Then the unions got involved, right, because the the 40-hour work week has been standardised, so the unions got involved, and they basically wanted to make each factory comply with that. So that would mean you get three shifts instead of two, and there's a resultant drop in productivity. So instead of that, what this company did was they said, okay, what we'll do, we'll pay you your £10 for the eight hours, five days a week, that makes up your 40-hour work week. Then for the remainder, the remaining four hours per day, we'll pay you time and off, we'll give you £15 an hour, and that that way there are still two shifts. This meant that instead of £240 a day, each machine with the two shifts running it was costing 280 quid, each worker getting 140 quid. Okay, though now the workers with this were pretty happy, they're getting paid more, which is very, very nice. But then the union also thought, nah nah, nah, these hours are too long, you can't be working 12 hours a day. What we're gonna do is we're gonna pressure the company to put you on the 40-hour work week. So instead of eight hours a day at £10 and £4 hours a day at £15, they were getting paid £10 an hour for £2, and that was it. Right, and there were three shifts. So the overall running cost per machine in the factory was the same, £240 a day, but the workers were only getting paid £80, because there's there's three shifts now instead of just the two. So they're actually down, you know, a third of their wages. Right, and this is very difficult to live on. So what happened then was the union, the ones responsible for that pay drop, yeah, they then pressured the company into paying £12.50 an hour instead. So for eight hours, £12.50, the workers would be getting paid £100. And there'd be three shifts, meaning each machine costs £300 a day instead of the original £240. So the company's worse off because they're having to pay more out in wages, and there's two shift changes per day instead of one, meaning they are less productive overall. The workers are worse off because they're only getting £100 a day instead of the £120 they're originally on, or the £140 that the union managed to secure for them. But you know who did win? Yeah, the union. Because now there's three shifts full of people. So if the factory can hold 100 people at a time, instead of 200 employees, there are now 300 who can pay a union membership. And do you not think that's pretty perverse? Everybody in this situation is worse off. The workers are earning less, the company is paying more, and the union is the only winner earning more money because of the membership fees they can charge because there are more workers to pay it. And this in practice still goes on because the union, like any parasite, has to ensure its own survival. Yeah, and if you look at who some of the biggest backers of Labour are, oh yeah, it's the unions. Unions are overwhelmingly leftist. They always, always fund leftist campaigns. Why would they do such a thing? Well, because it keeps them in a job. Because they will back and vote for governments that will keep the borders wide open, which suppresses wages. So the unions have always got a cause to fight. Yeah? You you're not giving your workers a pay rise, how dare you? And at the same time, those same leftist governments are hiking taxes. So the company is always worse off because they end up paying more and more and more in tax. And this is a this is a practice that is mirrored by the government themselves. You know, they uh they flood the country with low-skilled workers, they open up odd job markets to the entirety of the world, knowing full well it's going to stifle wages. At the same time, they consistently hike taxes on businesses, meaning that the company doesn't have as much money as it would like to give pay rises, meaning they can always demonise businesses. You aren't paying your workers enough. Yeah, they can always keep the workers angry, they can always claim to be for the workers, when actually it's their policies that are suppressing the wages. Now I'm not going to say that there aren't a lot of right-wingers and you know, so-called capitalists, free marketers, that also have a vested interest in mass immigration because it keeps wages down for themselves. But this is perverse, and this is a system that has been going on for a long, long time now. And what we want, well me personally, I can't claim to speak for you guys, but what I would like to see is a party, a government, come in, say what we're gonna do, we're gonna cut taxes on our end so that the company can pay higher wages. We're also gonna put a stop to endless immigration, meaning that the workers' time has a greater value. Everybody wins in this scenario. Why are we not doing this? Ah, okay, okay. Well I say everybody wins. Maybe the government takes less, but on paper, maybe so. Well, I I'm sure many of you will be familiar with the principle of the laffer curve, which states that effectively beyond a certain point, raising taxes means you will get less in return. Yeah, because you get less productivity, you get millionaires and business owners leaving and taking all that capital with them and all the jobs gone. I mean, look, just since Labor took power, hundreds of thousands of jobs have disappeared. That's why their tax take is so low. That's why they're constantly hiking taxes to try and replace you. And they don't seem to realise, or maybe they do, and maybe it's all part of a vicious plot to collapse our economy, who knows. But on the face of it, they don't seem to realise that the more you taxes, the less you're gonna get. Now, I don't want to fall into the socialist trap of only speaking about the material, okay, because there is, believe it or not, ladies and gentlemen, more to life than just the economy and money. So let's have a look at a couple of societal things, shall we? Let's take the 2010 Equality Act. Now, what this did essentially was it identified certain characteristics, certain traits or of a person's being that cannot be discriminated against. Protected characteristics, they call them, and there are nine of them. These nine characteristics are age, disability, gender reassignment, marriage and civil partnership, pregnancy and maternity, race, religion, sex, and sexual orientation. Now these are characteristics, you can't discriminate against them. So let's just say you are an employer, right, and a gay man applies for the job. You can't deny him the job on the basis of him being gay, which is fair enough, right? I think we'd all agree with that, because it has no impact on the job role. But let's have a look at something like gender identity, yeah, gender reassignment. Now, it's not a popular thing to say, but I'm sure most of the people listening to me will agree with this, that undergoing gender reassignment surgery, or believing that you are the opposite of what you actually are, and taking steps to make yourself, quote unquote, a woman when you were born a man. That's indicative of mental illness. And you should absolutely be able to say, no, no way. Particularly because the transgender community are complete snowflakes, right? They're they're so sensitive around any issue. They are some of the most likely people to cr to claim discrimination. Right? Because they think everything is discrimination. If you say, actually, you know, my my five-year-old daughter is in that changing room, I don't want a fully grown man in there with her, that's discrimination, apparently. Right? So yeah, I think you should be well within your eyes to say, no, I'm seeing red flags with you. Right? Red flags, like the blue hair, the nose ring, yeah, the beard and the dress, a bit of a red flag to me. Nah, you're not right for this position. Or let's say you're a scaffolding company and you're wanting to expand, you're looking for new people, and a 78-year-old man comes in for a job, and you say, mate, you're too old for this job. Apparently you're not allowed to say that. You're not allowed to discriminate against him on the basis of his age. Okay, now fair enough. I understand it can be very, very difficult for older people that just want to supplement the retirement income because the state pension ain't what it used to be. Right, despite the fact that it goes up every year, it's it's not enough to live on. The cost of living has gone through the roof. And many, many people that have retired are unfortunately being dragged back into the workforce. And I I think this is kind of perverse. You work your whole life with the promise that you're gonna have a pension to take care of you when you're too old to work. Oh, oh, there goes me discriminator again. Sorry, when you are no, there's no better way to say that. When you're too old to work. I only to be, you know, to find that I can't live on this. I can't afford to heat my home and have meals every day. So I'm gonna have to work. I I understand it's very, very difficult for elderly people to find work, and a lot of places will say, sorry, you just tell we're looking for somebody younger. Yeah, but conversely, you'll also have some jobs. Well, let's just say you're a real estate agent. I don't know about you, I wouldn't want to buy a house from a 19 year old. Yeah, I I just wouldn't. There's there's a certain level of professionalism that I don't think. Young people have achieved by that point, and that's no knock on them. You know, this is just purely down to experience in the workplace. Now, I used to be a car salesman. When I was 19 years old, I was a car salesman selling high-hond ice. Yeah, yeah. And not very prestigious, right? But there were a lot of people. You know, if I went out to go and speak to them, you could just tell, they're thinking to themselves, yeah, you're trying to pull the wall over my eyes, kid, or come on, mate, you know, you you still got your mother's milk around your lips. You know, pull the other one. And I at the time, yeah, it was kind of frustrating. But I get it. Well, I totally understand it. There's a certain wisdom that comes with experience, right? And there's a sweet spot. In whatever walk of life you're in, there is a sweet spot where you're young enough to be, you know, to have the vitality and the stamina to work hard, long hours. Yeah. Uh but you you've also got the age and the experience to do your job well. So a little bit of a questionable one, that. With pregnancy. Now, I don't think pregnant women should be discriminated against whatsoever. But from an employer's point of view, somebody comes in through job interview, they're quite heavily pregnant already. You know, if you're going to hire this person, it's not long before they're going to be off work, and you're going to have to pay them to do nothing, and in the meantime, you're going to have to pay somebody else to fulfil the role. So, in that sense, yeah, you you you should be able to discriminate. Right now, what I don't agree with, and what the Equality Act rightly put a stop to, was people firing employees that get pregnant. Okay, because at the end of the day, we should be encouraging families, we should be encouraging the next generation. Now, regardless of how you might feel about women in the workplace, you know, when they could be mothers, yeah, which is the traditional way of doing things, and I think people were raised better when they spent more time with their mother in there. There are studies to back this up. Rather than being put into a state-funded daycare, children thrive when they're with their mother. Yeah, we all know this to be true. Might upset people, but we know it's true. So we should be encouraging an environment where people have children, right? Where mothers, yeah, they can have paid time off work. Now, you're going to come into a job and before you've put in the hard yards, before you've earned your stripes there, immediately going off, having babies and demanding to be paid for it, I can see why that's an issue for some employers. But firing people because they fall pregnant, nah nah nah nah. So the Equality Act, in and of itself, is not entirely without merit. It's not entirely unwarranted, but the way that it's utilised absolutely is. You might remember a news story from a few years back now, to be honest, probably longer ago than I'd I'd imagine, probably 10, 15 years ago. But a gay couple, they went out of their way to find a Christian baker and told him to make him a gay wedding cake. And he said no, because that's against my religion. And they went to the papers crying discrimination, all my days, I can't believe that this bigoted baker won't make us a wedding cake just because we're gay. Well hold on there, because you've gone out of your way to find a Christian just so that you could make an issue out of this using the Equality Act as your shield. Well, because yes, under that Equality Act, your sexual orientation, your affinity for phalating other men, yeah, it titles you to protection and protects you from discrimination. But also, his religious beliefs are a protected characteristic. So in this scenario, you've got two characteristics that have been designated protected by the state. Right, you've got the gays on the one hand, you've got the religion on the other hand. Now which side did the establishment come down on? Which side had all the support of the newspapers, the media, the politicians, which side did they come down on? Oh yeah, that's right, the gay side. Because the Equality Act, as I say, is a cudgel used against Western normality. Okay, now they might believe that the Christian baker has been bigoted by not baking them a cake. Right, but are they not also showing their bigotry by not respecting his religious beliefs? But the Equality Act is only used one way. Another one, let's have a look at butches, slaughterhouses. Now we have laws in this country because I don't know if you're aware of this people, but British people, we have quite an affinity for animals. Yeah, we like to be good to our four-legged, two-legged, no-legged friends. Yeah? Which is why non-stun slaughter is illegal. So you, as a British slaughterhouse, catering for British people, you must stun your animals before killing them. You have to do that, right? So the animal doesn't suffer. However, if you're Jewish or you're Muslim, you don't have to do that. You can make that animal suffer. And this somehow is protected under the Purview of the Equality Act of 2010. Well, how is that? How is that? How is it that because of your religion you get preferential treatment? Now what they'll do is mental gymnastics and they'll say that, well, you know, a British Christian he can eat whatever meat he wants. Yeah, because there are no religious requirements for it to be slaughtered in a certain way. Now in all in the interest of respecting the Jewish and Muslim faiths, we have to allow them to break our own laws. So you are held to a standard that Muslims and Jews are not. And this is where I want to really repeal the Equality Act. I think it's a disgusting piece of legislation. No more religious exemptions. Because once you start giving religious exemptions, they expect preferential treatment. Right? And preferential treatment leads to pandering, and pandering leads to the mess that we're in at the moment, pandering to every special interest group. Right. Now let's take a look at the Sikhs. Now, by and large, I don't mind Sikhs. Out of all the Indians, the Sikhs tend to integrate the best. Right, because their their faith is more peaceful, and it places value on community. And and they are willing to share community with each. So by and large, I have no problem with the Sikhs. But we need to stop pandering to them. Okay, now I'm sure you know where this is going, ladies and gentlemen. Henry Novak. Henry Novak was a teenager, Polish descent, got into what's being called an altercation with a Sikh lad. Or Vikram Digwar. And during the course of this altercation, Digwar pulled out his kerpan, an eight inch knife. Ceremonial, presumably, supposedly. Pulled it out and stabbed Henry Novak to death. Okay? Called the police. Didn't call an ambulance, by the way. Called the police. And on that police call, he said, I've been racially abused. So the police come screaming around because of course racial abuse is the worst thing that you can possibly do. Never mind the fact that most police constabularies didn't solve a single burglary last year. I guarantee you almost all of them are arrested people for speech offences. Yeah, one kind of person in particular, namely us. Alright, they don't respond to burglaries, but you say I've been racially abused, and they'll be round there like a shot. So they turn up on the scene. Henry Novak is still alive. Alright. And you're a seat lad there saying this man racially abused me. Meanwhile, you've got a man who's been stabbed multiple times and he's bleeding to death. And he's saying, No, I didn't. No, I didn't. Well what happens? Well, the copper's put him in handcuffs. And the whole time he's telling them, I've been stabbed, please help me. I've been stabbed, please help me. Right? And Digwar's family, who, for part of my French people, his entire family's a piece of shit. Digward's family, his dad's there saying, no, no, no, the lad's just drunk. Nothing's happened to him. He's fine, he's pretending, he's just drunk. Yeah, and his brother's telling him the same thing. And his mum's already been to the scene and taken the knife, the curpan that she's allowed to carry. She's taken that away to hide it. Right? Henry Novak is handcuffed. And he's saying, Please, brother, help me. I can't breathe. I can't breathe. Right now, if this was a black lad, we know damn well how this would go down. If it was a brown lad, we know damn well how this would go down. But because it's a white lad, the establishment, the coppers, seen white lad, brown lad who says he's been racially abused. Right, we've got to handcuff that guy. Never mind the fact he's been stabbed multiple times. And these coppers, by the way, have all got degrees. Well, I'm sorry, mate, but you don't need a degree to see that somebody is bleeding out, do you? One of the knife wounds allegedly to the face. How do you not see that? How do you not see that there's a stab wound in somebody's face? Right? And the whole time, Digwar is saying, Look, look at my eye, look at my eye, I've got a swollen knife. No evidence of this, by the way. And the coppers won't release the video footage of this. And Henry Novak bled out. And the entire time Digwar's family is saying he's pretending, he's faking, and they're trying to cover for him. Right. Now the very fact that they phoned the police after stabbing Henry Novak. They phoned the police and not an ambulance. So that's in and of itself barbaric. How can you even do that? Right, you didn't even try to get the bloke help. But the thing that they reported was he's racially abused me. Now this is a product of not only the Equality Act, but legislation going back to the Stephen Lawrence case. Any accusation of racism is immediately treated with the utmost seriousness. Right, never mind, you might have been stabbed, but hey, if you've been racist, well maybe you deserve to die, is the way that it comes across. Right. Now I I've read mixed reports about the Stephen Lawrence case, by the way, but I believe that it's the result of Keir Starmer's work on that case that he got his knighthood. Yeah, by basically bringing about an environment where race can be used as a weapon against the native people of this country. Right, and by extension, other white people. Because the coppers that turned up, like I say, they sent a white lad and a brown lad, and they immediately chose their side. Right, this is the produce of the Equality Act. Yeah, it's only ever used one way. Never mind the fact that Emory Novak was descended from immigrants. I'm not sure if he was born in the country or if he was born out of the country and came here to study, I'm not sure. But they just see white lad, aka enemy. Yeah, that's who we're against. We're gonna immediately take the side of the other bloke. And Digwar's mum, I mean my mum, I love her to pieces. And one of the things that I love about her is her sense of right and wrong. That she's drummed into me from when I was a kid. Right. So if my family turned up on the scene and they know I've stabbed this lad, they're not gonna try and cover for me. Right, they're not gonna take the murder weapon away and try and hide it. Yeah? But Digwall's mum, yeah, yeah, that's what they do. Because they cover for each other. All these different special interest groups, all these people of protected characteristics, this is what they do. They look out for their own. Right? And this is why, when it comes to the case of the Manchester Airport thoughts, yeah, beat up a couple of coppers. Jury was unable to reach a verdict on whether or not they assaulted the copper. Yeah. Never mind the fact it's all on video. It's all on video. Now, when they initially released that video, you might remember they only showed the croppers battering the Muslims. Yeah. When the full video came out, it told a completely different story. But surprise, surprise, a jury, yeah, unable to reach a verdict. Clear as day, it's all recording, it's all on footage. Yeah. These two Muslim lads there smirking because there's a few of theirs on the jury. Enough to make sure that no verdict can be reached. So they walk away, scot-free. Right now, I believe one of them's been convicted for an assault on a female officer. But they've been cleared on the others. Well, I think one of the brothers completely got away with it, and the smirk on his face when he left the court, that just shows you justice is done in this country, which is why repeal the Equality Act and make sure that only British natives can serve on juries. Well, because studies will show you that the native people of these British Isles, with the fair-mindedness that's been drummed into us from when we were kids. Yeah, the natives of this country are the fairest when it comes to trials, whereas people from other groups will vote in favour of their own. Yeah, they have more of a bias towards their own in-group. They're allowed to do that, and we are not. Where's the Equality Act then? But it's a crime to carry a knife. You or I, as British citizens, yeah, I'm Catholic, you might be Christian, atheist, Jewish, whatever it might be. You're not allowed to carry a knife. But it's a requirement of the Sikh religion. Now most of them get around this by wearing just a short, you know, a very small one on a necklace. It's symbolic. Yeah, but they are fully permitted. They are well within their rights, according to the law, to carry an eight inch knife around with them. Something that you or I would face prison time for doing. This is why I say no more religious exemptions. Now in the case of halal and kosher slaughter, we outlaw that, and if it means Jews and Muslims don't come here, then Jews and Muslims don't come here. We ban the Kerpan. If it means Sikhs don't come here, Sikhs don't come here. Yeah. Might sound awesome, but we need to get used to hearing these kind of things because fair is fair. If you you can carry a knife around and nobody else can, it doesn't sound very equal to me. Yeah, how about you? What do you think on that one? And of course, the response from the establishment. Now we all know when Saint George Floyd overdosed and died there i in the ambulance after being detained by the police six years ago. The entire world had to burn. Yeah. Black people all the world over. All over the world. Went out rioting and looting. Where are the Henry Novak riots? Where are they? Are we gonna have a summer of love? Yeah, are we gonna are we gonna get kissed armor taken a knee for how despicable this crime was? No, no no. Wrong shade, mate, wrong shade. Now, I I don't want to kneel for Henry Novak. Not only is it a meaningless gesture, but I'm I'll kneel for nobody but Jesus Christ. But the point remains that the establishment bent over backwards the virtue signal to the world. We're not racist, we're not racist, C C we care when a when a black fencing ladict overdoses, yeah, a criminal, lifelong criminal, with many convictions, many disgusting crimes under his belt, we care about that man. We want to lionise that man. But Henry Novak, 18-year-old student, knifed to death in the street by a Sikh man who used the Equality Act and used accusations of racism to cover up his own mis misdeeds. Not a peek. You won't hear him talking about Henry Novak. Same as you won't hear him talking about Wayne Broadhurst. Yeah, uh the man that was set upon by Afghan migrants while he was walking his dog, went to walk his dog and died. Say his name Wayne Broadhurst. The establishment doesn't care about that. Rihanna White. She got a little bit more airtime. Yeah, but not a lot. She was stabbed to death by a so-called asylum seeker that then went laughing and dancing after murdering her with a screwdriver. She was one of the workers at the hotel that he was staying at, murdered her. Say their names. Henry Novak, Wayne Broadhurst, Ryan White. These are all people that should be treated with the same level of introspection and sadness as criminals like George Floyd. Yeah. The treatment that George Floyd got, everybody knows his name. There were murals painted on walls, lionizing him. Yeah, the world had to burn in his memory. Yeah, Henry, Wayne, Rihanna, what did these people do? Henry was on a night out. Wayne was walking his dog. Rihanna was heading home. They died. And the establishment does not care. Why don't they care? Because they're not brown. Because they're not black. Yeah. So this kind of one-sided arbitration. The establishment always comes down on one particular side. And you're not supposed to notice that pattern. In fact, you are a terrible person if you do notice it. But I've noticed, you've noticed, we've all noticed, we all know it's going on, and we all know that it's wrong. Yeah, this is disgusting from the state, disgusting from the establishment, and we deserve better than this. This is why. Whether we end up with reform or hopefully restore. I want the Equality Act repealed, right, and forgotten about, crushed into dust. This should never have been put upon us. This legislation should never have been brought about because, as I say, it is a cudgel against Western normality. If you're straight, if you're Christian, if you're white, the Equality Act doesn't apply to you. You have no protection. As a Christian, you don't enjoy the benefits of having your religion protected. And I'm not necessarily advocating for that. I'm not going to say that anybody that offends my religion should be thrown in prison because huge swathes of the country would be in prison right now. Because we live in such a secular society that it seemingly cannot wait to rid itself of Christian influence, despite the fact that that is what made us great in the first place. Now I also want to bring your attention to this kind of establishment enforced double standard in advertising. Now we on the right never particularly cared about representation. That was an issue that was brought to the people and forced upon the people and propagandized across to the people about how it's really, really important that you see people that look like you. Yeah, providing you're from a minority background, really important that you see yourself reflected in media, in movies, in advertisements. Yeah, it's really important that your stories get told. Okay, you know what? I I can accept that. I can accept people living here from different backgrounds might want something that's just for them. Now we're not allowed to have that, but I can understand the desire for them to have something that represents them. But has it not gone too far? Now consider Reform Sarah Poaching when she made comments about being sick of the amount of black people and minority people in adverts and the fact that seemingly every couple is mixed race. Now this is a projection of the kind of society the establishment would like to see. That's what this whole multicultural project has been about. It's never been about integration. Because integration, one, it's largely a myth, rarely happens. But two, you can't have integration and multiculturalism. Okay, now when people come over here, it's seen by the establishment as a great thing that they can just slip into a community of people that look exactly like them. Yeah, and it's supposed to be good, it means it's easier for them to fit in. You or I, we're not allowed to advocate for that. If I if I want to live with my own people, I want to live among white Christian British people. If I say that, I'm the worst person on the world. Am I not? Yeah. I I just want to live around people with shared values. Yeah, I want to live in a society that doesn't enforce Christianity upon people, but that fosters Christian values. Yeah? Because they are good values to hold. I say that, I'm a terrible person. Pakistani man that turned up five minutes ago says, I want to live around more people that look like me, that have my religion. Or we'll bend over backwards, we'll make sure you get your social house as close to the mosque as possible. But the response to Sarah Poach's comments from the establishment were predictable, you know, calling her a Nazi, calling her a fascist and a racist and an extreme right winger, blah blah blah. Right? Simply for stating that representation has gone too far because I don't know if you know these people, but in the UK, black people at the last last census made up around 4 or 5% of the total population. You watch advertising, you would think it's somewhere between 40 and 50%. And I can't remember what it was, it might have been Channel 4, the BBC, possibly RTV, who knows. But they went out and they did surveys a couple of years ago asking people what percentage of the British population do you think is black or gay or whatever. And largely based on advertising and the media, they thought, you know, the gay population was anywhere between 15 and 25%. When actually it's around about 1%. And the black population was anywhere from 25 to 50%, even though it's 4%. Well, this speaks to a massive over. Overrepresentation. Now we were forced to accept that representation matters. So when we say, okay, we now feel severely underrepresented, don't care. The establishment doesn't care. Yeah, because the Equality Act and this whole equality in representation, it's always been a myth. It's always been a way to open up a crack to put more and more diversity in place. Right? And if you complain about it going too far, because now, you know, despite us being 65-70% white British in this country, you watch an advert, it ain't 65-70% white British, is it? But it doesn't count because it's us. And this is what I mean. This one-sided arbitration by the establishment is always used to basically eradicate Western normality. Think about how the establishment prostrates itself for diversity, how it celebrates Eid, Ramadan. Now, Christmas doesn't really count, does it? Because they've completely bastardised Christmas, they've taken the Christ out of it and they've taken the mass out of it. It's now just a massive commercialised endeavour. Which is something they'll never attempt to do for Diwali or Eid. Yeah. They they won't do this. They will put out grovelling statements pandering to these different communities. They won't do the same for Christians. Because in the West, Christian is part of the normal experience. Yeah, and they don't want to celebrate that, they want to destroy that. It's always weaponised against us, this kind of diversification and this celebration of diversity as a strength. When actually it is not. Okay, now you look at Africa, one of the biggest problems with Africa is diversity. That's a strange thing to say, is it not? Because virtually every country in Africa is by a long, long margin, majority black. But that's not that how they see it. Right? Because they still identify themselves by their tribal groups. Yeah. They break themselves off into tribes. Even when they come to the West, they still live by this standard. I mean, you can find quotes from Conservative Party leader Kemi Badanock. Nigerian anchor baby dropped here so that she had access to the NHS and could come here at any time, raised for 16 years in Nigeria before coming over and somehow becoming the leader of the Conservative Party. Right? You can find quotes from her talking about her ethnic enemies. Ethnic enemies? It's 2026. When was the last time you had an ethnic enemy? I don't have an ethnic enemy. You know? And why? Because we unified. England unified. UK unified. Now, there's people that don't like that. There's plenty of Welsh, plenty of Scots, plenty of Irish that despise us. Yeah. But by and large, we've unified, homogenised. Whereas these African countries, they still see things through a tribal lens, which is why aid workers will tell you this. Whenever aid packages are sent over there, whenever money is sent over there, whoever receives that money, so they do, let's just say we send a load of money over to the Congo. Now whoever receives that money, whoever is in charge of that money when it gets there, could be millions or billions of pounds. They will disperse that among their own ethnic group, their own tribe, and it disappears, and nothing gets better. Right? Africa's too diverse. They haven't unified. Diversity, my friends, is not a strength. Unity is. Okay, which is why it makes me laugh. When you've got the very same people that are pushing diversity as a strength, and diversity built Britain, even though, you know, between you and me, diversity didn't even build their own countries, did it? These these diverse lands from where they come. Yeah, they they didn't even build their own homelands. But I'm I'm supposed to believe they built our civilisation. Yeah, okay. Okay. But yep, they're too diverse. Too many different tribes, and they identify themselves by the tribes. Yeah, they refuse to work together. They're always trying to one up each other. That's why it doesn't matter how much aid is sent to Africa, how many supplies they are given, you know, how much infrastructure we provide for them, how much aid work we do, how many schools and hospitals we build, how many, you know, clean water sources we provide, nothing ever seems to improve. I mean many places there are worse off than they were 50 years ago when the West really started sending mass amount of AIDS over there. Many of these places, the crises have gotten worse over the years. There are too many special interest groups we'd call them over here, but there's too many, too many groups over there to pander to. They cannot unify, they cannot come together to solve issues because they're all in it for themselves, they all advocate for their own groups, and this is no different to what plays out over here. Yeah, think about Sunak. Everything Rishi Sunak did was to try and cram more Indians in here. Badanor is proud of the amount of Nigerians she's managed to shoe on into the country. All these Muslim MPs that only advocate for Muslim causes, the rest of us be damned. Right? They they'd move here and then try to turn our country into their country. Which to me, if you were to come over here, for whatever reason it might be, maybe you like the weather. I can't think why that would be, but maybe you do. Or maybe you just want better economic interests. But then you try and advocate for special carve-outs for your own group. Maybe, yeah, we know you uh you're a nation of dog lovers, but we don't like dogs, so we want to ban them from certain areas. We we don't want them in the countryside anymore, even though we never go to the countryside. Well, that that to me says you've got an intent to subjugators. And we're supposed to just stand back and let that happen. No, no, this needs to be called out. Well, the Equality Act needs to be repealed, and we need to advocate so that only British natives could be MPs. Only British natives could be on ju on the jury. We need to do these things and protect these institutions, right? Protect our judicial system. Right, because uh I don't know if it's escaped your notice, people, we currently have a man of Ugandan descent in David Lamy, who says it's his he was put on this earth by God to make sweeping changes to the British judicial system. He believes he was put here with a God-given mission to deprive the British people of their right to a jury trial. Now, when this first came up, dead against it, after seeing our juries have been perverted and subverted by foreigners yet again. Maybe it ain't the worst idea in the world, because how we can have the Manchester Airport lads, clear as day, on film, battering coppers and nothing happens to 'em. Well, if that were you or I, yeah, they'd throw away the key, wouldn't they? Yeah, but because they've got their own their own in-group members on the jury, they get away with it. So now it would appear, thanks to the efforts of all these outsiders, that justice, whether you have a jury or not, is well and truly dead in this country. And we're going to turn that around, ladies and gentlemen, because we deserve to live in a country that is just. Yeah, we are a Christian country, we're built on Christian values, and one of those key values is justice. And once again, to return to more sort of material secular economic factors, a report came out recently that found that among young people, right, in in the younger demographics, there is a huge disparity in the number of natives versus non-natives that are being hired. Right, for every 27 non-native people employed in this country, right, given an employment opportunity, there is only one native-born employee. Right. The establishment has turned around this week and said, Well, immigration is not to blame for youth unemployment. Well, this report would beg to differ, because out of 28 jobs, one of them went to a native. The other 27 are going to people that are being imported to do those jobs. And this is made possible by laughably low salary thresholds. Yeah, the amount you have to earn to stay in this country is ridiculous, particularly when minimum wage keeps creeping up. Minimum wage sets the absolute minimum value that you can pay somebody to do a job, which is why now, in 2026, you earn more to stack shelves in Audi than I was getting paid to drive a lorry five years ago. Yeah. And every time the minimum wage threshold creeps up, it naturally pushes everybody else's wages up a little bit as well. Because why would why would you do a stressful high-risk job when you could make the same money stacking shelves? Makes no sense. So everybody's wages slowly rise. The gap between minimum wage and sort of what they're class as skilled workers is closing over the years. But with these wages going up, it just opens up more and more and more jobs that foreigners can do that will qualify them to stay in the country because they'll earn above that low threshold. Now, every time you go to a petrol station, near enough every time, anyway, certainly around where I live, everybody in there is Indian. Everybody is Indian. And this made me like I'll I'll give you a little story actually. So I was having a conversation with somebody, leftist, and I was saying, I'm just really tired of going in a petrol station and they don't understand me. Now I don't have the easiest accent to understand. Even people in my own hometown sometimes look at me gone out when I say, Oh mate, how you doing? They look at me like, what did you just say? But it frustrates me. Petrol station, Indian mum beyond the counter, I'm asking for 30 gram unbelief or a lighter, box and box of filters, whatever it might be. And he can't understand what I'm saying. That frustrates me. And even more than that, I was saying, I hate the fact that you can walk in through the door, and immediately you can smell sweat. Yeah, and and I'll be perfectly honest with you, quite often, smells like sweat and shit. And it ain't nice. And you know, without even looking behind the counter, you know exactly who's behind them. And I made this point to his leftist. And she said, nope, that's just a racist trope, I don't know what you're talking about. And I said, No, no, no. Are you telling me you you have never been into a petrol station and you've known immediately that the man behind the counter is gonna be an Indian man just by the way that the place smells? And she said, Well, well, it's just their food, it's it's it's the things that they eat coming out of their pores. So, oh okay, so you acknowledge there is a smell then. I'm not just being some bigoted arsehole. There is actually a smell of sweat and shit in the air. She had no comeback to that, so she called me a Nazi and ended the conversation. But er, where was I going? Oh yeah, yeah. Why do we need foreign born petrol station attendance when we've got hundreds of thousands of unemployed young people in this country that could be doing these low-level retail jobs to get themselves a foot on the employment ladder? Yeah, they could be doing that, but these jobs are overwhelmingly going to foreign born people. And I'm I'm sorry. If we needed brain surgeons and we had a huge shortage of them, by all means, yeah, let's import some brain surgeons then, because we need them. But when it comes to petrol station attendance or working in a shoe shop, we have young people to do these jobs, young people that would happily do these jobs, yeah. But equally, we're bashed over the head with, well, you know, British kids are just lazy and they're and they don't want to they don't want to do these jobs, so we need the immigrants to do the jobs that the natives won't do. Well, you know, if you actually paid a decent enough wage, yeah, for for people to build a life on and buy a house and and start a family, because quite often the people that come here from overseas, I've worked with many of them. They'll live in a house with six, seven, eight other immigrants, and they'll all chip in, cheap living, and they'll send as much money as they can back home with the the express purpose of buying a house in Romania or India or Nigeria. And once that's done, they'll just say, Ah, see you later, thanks. Gone. Yeah, meanwhile, the people that could be doing those jobs and saving money towards developing their lives here, buying a home and starting a family, they're just left on a strappy, right? And they are shamed for doing so. Well, no, I want as many young people working as possible. Yeah, work gives you a sense of purpose, gives you a bit of self-esteem, a bit of pride. In a good way, not in a gay pride way. But equally, they're being priced out of the market because our job market is open to the entirety of the world. Meaning people can come here from anywhere, and if, hey, if you're if you're not willing to do the job for that wage, or there's a bloke who lives in some dusty shithole in the Middle East or the far, you know, the far reaches of Mongolia. Uh not that we get many Mongol immigrants, but you know what I'm saying. There's somebody out there who will be willing to do it for that, because even just stepping foot in this country represents a massive step up in the quality of life. Yeah, now that gap is closing, they're slowly but surely collapsing the quality of life in this country. The more they try to import the third world, the more they're turning us into the third world, and as a result, the quality of life is getting lower. Not supposed to acknowledge that, but hey, that's what this podcast is for, is it not? Now I realise I've rambled quite a bit and I've come away from the initial premise of this episode being a one-sided arbitration, but I hope that you can see that er the Equality Act is a lens through which we're supposed to view the world, and it's also a weapon that has been used against us. It's certainly not in our best interest. I hope I've got at least a few of you on board with the idea of abolishing the Equality Act. Right, we need to be putting our own people first, and we should make no apology for that because guess what? That's what everybody else does. So I'm going to leave it there for the err the meat of the episode, and I just want to address a couple more things I've seen people saying over the last week. So, I seen quite a few people, and this has been led by leftist rags, online newspapers, magazines, but also seen quite a few, supposedly right-wing people saying it too, and that is, well, you want to vote for a store, but Rupert Lows from a privileged background, right? He went to a boarding school and he knows nothing about the real world. Why would I vote for that? And this to me, you know, I I can't blame this particular person for thinking this way, because we are absolutely steeped in leftist resentment in this country, to a point where we don't even realise it. We absorb it from the through the air that we breathe and the water that we drink. It's that prevalent in this country. He knows nothing about the real world because he comes from a rich background. Well, I think he's achieved more in life than many of us ever will, and I think he's got a pretty good understanding of success. And although it's often scorned by leftists, the and that they call it trickle-down economics. But if you you can help people become successful, a rising tide lifts all ships. Some faster than others, and some don't rise as high, but a rising tide will lift all ships. Right now, if you want somebody that knows a lot about the real world, well, you're more than welcome to go and vote for Angela Raynor. Yeah, she knows lots about it. You know, council estate, left school with more babies than GCSE's benefits and all that lot. Yeah, yeah, she she knows what it's like to struggle and to be financially not so well off. She probably knows more about what you are referring to as the real world than Rupert Low does. So go go and vote for her, if that if that's what you want. But I would encourage everybody to get away from this leftist, resentful way of thinking. Right? It's this leftist class division. It's how they divide us. Now I'm not saying that everybody in you know the the middle classes votes the same way and the working class votes a particular way. We are not monoliths. And this is kind of the problem, is we've been treated for decades as monoliths. Oh you're your working class, oh you vote this way then. You vote for leftist policies because you're working class and leftists, they're for the workers. Well, actually, there's a lot of leftist politics that are really, really stagnating things for the working class and making life difficult for us. Yeah, if you if the working class, for example, 30 years ago voted right wing to keep people out or close down the borders, very, very limited immigration. Or what you would find at that point, house prices wouldn't be so astronomically high. Yeah, because we have a limited supply of houses, but an unlimited supply of people willing to move to this country for a better life. And what that does is it pushes house prices out of reach for many, many people. Okay, now when you do get on the housing ladder, your mortgage is going to be a lot bigger. Meaning you're gonna have to devote far more of your paycheck to paying the mortgage than previous generations would have. The resultant effect of this is you have less money available to spend in the economy, less to save, less to invest. So if the working class had acted as a monolith and voted right wing decades ago, things might be better. Yeah, but we're not a monolith. Most working class people are socially conservative and they're tricked into being economically left wing, and this is entirely against their own interests. So I would say don't resent people that have achieved things, don't resent rich people, don't resent people that have more than you. I want people to do well. Okay? I don't want people pulling the ladder up after them. That's the difference. Yeah, I want people to be at success, and then I want those people to help other people be successful, and that is what Rupert Lowe and Restore are promising. I've also seen a similar sentiment expressed, but from a place of yeah, not so much resentment but confusion. Saying, I'm just I'm just a working class lad. You know, I'm I'm a scaffolder, or I'm a plumber, I'm a I'm a lorry driver, whatever it might be. What's in it for me to vote for Restore? You know, because they they talk a lot about enabling business and slashing taxes and regulation that stifles growth. You know, these are concepts that the average person working a dead-end job, you know, doesn't really consider. There's not a lot there on the table for them. But what is in it for the working class? Higher wages, when you don't have to compete with the rest of the world for the same jobs, your wages will go up. Just have a look at the economic impacts following the Black Death. Yeah, when huge amounts of the workforce were just wiped out, wages rose because they have to. It takes the power out of the hands of the establishment and the big businesses, puts more power in the hands of the workers. Okay. House prices you've already discussed. You have more disposable income, better economy, you'll have the ability to spend more in the economy, buy things, go on a holiday, treat yourself to the new car, whatever it might be, save. You can save more money if you've got to spend less on a mortgage. Invest. You can invest your money, play the stock market, yeah, or help a start up business, whatever it might be, go for bonds, you've got options. Options that you don't currently have because you've been stifled by sky-high mortgages. Now, all these things at the moment, saving, spending, investing, they're all punished by the establishment. They don't want you to have any ability to save money. Because, as I said in the last episode, the state, the establishment, is envious of every penny it hasn't managed to take from you yet. Yeah, it doesn't want you to be able to save or invest. It doesn't really want you to have money to spend. Because if you've got money to spend, it means they haven't taken enough from you. So I would say let's try and get away from these resentful politics where we despise people that have achieved. Now I'm just going to finish this off. We're talking about the bloke that owned the company I work for, recently sold it. About 50 years ago, he took a loan from his mum and his brother, and he went out and he bought a lorry. And he worked hard, really hard, and he earned enough money to buy another truck and pay somebody to drive it. And they worked hard together and they built this company up till it had over 500 trucks on the road. Huge, huge company, right? Really successful. He's recently sold that business for hundreds, and I mean hundreds of millions of pounds. Now on paper, it's probably a billionaire. When he sold his business, the taxes that he paid, well, that's more than me and probably ten other people would pay in ten lifetimes combined. Millions, absolutely millions, tens of millions in tax for selling a business that he that he built. In addition to that, he provided 50 years of stable, reasonably well paid and employment for thousands of people. Meaning overall, if you you factor in all the taxes that have been collected through you know, his income, his corporate taxes, the national insurance that he pays and wages to his workers, the income tax that his workers pay, and all the taxes that they pay on everything they buy, this guy's contributed more to the economy than you can possibly imagine. And I'm supposed to be resentful of this guy. My boss gave me a good company to work for. Are they perfect? No. Long hours sometimes yeah, short hours other times yeah, absolutely. But by and large, stable, reasonably well paid, enables me to have a roof over my head. Enables me to eat and have a car you know, drive places and take holidays, all these things made available because one man decided to build something really, really good. A leftist establishment would have you resent this man that I think is an absolute legend. I'm very grateful to I'm not gonna name him but I'm very very grateful to him. And uh now that he's sold up and he's moved on to other pastures because he won't stop working. He will not stop. The man is a machine. So he's gonna go and set up something else and he's gonna employ more people and he's gonna pay more taxes. And I'm supposed to resent this guy. I think not anyway that is all I've got for this week. I think this is the longest episode I've done so thank you for staying with me people I look forward to speaking to you on the next one aiming for around Thursday but possibly next Sunday in the meantime have a great week God bless you all catch you soon. Goodbye