State of the State

Thoughts around Rupert Lowe's rape gang inquiry, the Makerfield by-election, stories from the news in the UK this week, and the world cup. 

Thank you for listening, please share with anybody that you think might enjoy the podcast.  I will never ask for a penny from you, I am not here for money, fame or recognition, only to do what little I can to save my country.  Sharing the podcast is more helpful than you will ever know.  Thank you and God bless. 

Transcript

SPEAKER_00 0:16

Good afternoon, welcome back to the Flat Cap Nationalist Podcast. This is episode 16, the State of the State. So I'm going to take a little breakaway from the perversions of the State series just to speak about the week that we've had. So I've got a few things I want to speak about. I'm going to try not to be too angry, too uncharitable, because Yeah, I've got a feeling I'm going to have to go to confession after this one. Just because the the events of the previous week have had me thinking some very unchristian thoughts. So I'm also going to stop saying let's get into it because I listened to an episode back and it just pisses me off. So here we go. So I'll start off with Rupert Lowe's rape gang inquiry report, which was released earlier this week. It was absolutely atrocious. Now I haven't read the full thing. I've read bits of it, I've heard people sort of generally talking about the contents of it, I've heard you know, overviews of the most barbaric details of it. Over the coming week, I am going to read the full thing. Just haven't had the time to do so yet, as it's 219 pages long, and I've been incredibly busy. But the uh the interesting thing to me has been the response to this report. Uh first and foremost, so most of the political parties, reform included, are being mostly silent on the matter. Right now, reform especially are the ones that I was looking for on this one. Yeah, because this was a report that they promised to do. They could have done this report, uh they didn't do it. And they've been largely silent ever since. Zach Polansky, the disgenic freak that leads the Green Party, he's released a uh a post calling it bullshit, you know, it's BS that's just targeting Muslims. This tends to be the common refrain, doesn't it? This report has been released, the the entire inquiry was just an exercise in targeting Muslims. Nevermind the fact that while these rape gangs were and probably still are operating all across the country, that's not seen as targeting white English girls, is it? But uh no, simply reporting on the atrocities that have been committed, that's targeting Muslims. Well, so be it. Well, but in line with this, what we would expect, mainstream media has been silent on it. And it could be something to do with the fact that it's found that 85% of the perpetrators had a Muslim background in this kind of crime, which kind of flies in the face of an interview Emily Maitless gave with Rupert Lowe, asking him why you're focusing on Pakistanis and Muslims. Must be because you're racist. To be talking white English girls simply for the be the crime of being white English girls, is that not a racially aggravating factor? Okay. Now what I find particularly disturbing with the entire rape gang thing, aside from the obvious, you know, the the horrific suffering inflicted on our children, what I find particularly disturbing is that within the Pakistani Muslim community, so many of them knew that this was happening, right, and that they were comfortable enough to invite friends and family members over to partake in it. Now, there are very few people in the world that I love as much as I love my little brother. But if he came to me and said, I've got this little Muslim girl tied up in the back of my van, I've already had a already had a go on her. Do you want some? I would beat his face into the pavement until it resembled scrambled eggs. Or there's no tolerance for that kind of behaviour. Uh no, my my brother would never do anything like that, he's an upstanding guy. But if if there was even the suggestion that he's been abusing a child, and worse still, he's inviting me to partake in it as well, I'd murder him. I'd beat his face into the ground until he was no longer breathing. And that's my brother, who I love, like I say, more than the vast vast majority of people that I know. But er, yeah, Emily Mateis goes with the line, of course, that well actually white people commit most of this type of crime. Do they? No, in that sentence, this type of crime is doing a lot of heavy lifting because as this inquiry has revealed, more than 85% of the perpetrators are Muslims. Now this has been going on for 70 years. This has been going on since the 50s. Right now, according to the last census, Muslims make up about 6% of the population. So for them to be 85% of the perpetrators of this kind of crime, that's a massive overrepresentation, isn't it? Now, even if it was native white British people, it make up around about 70% of the population. If it was us committing these kind of crimes, and 85% of these kind of crimes were done by white British people, that would still be a massive overrepresentation. But the fact that it is 6% of the population at most, you know, this is the highest percentage of Muslims we've ever had in the country. And over the previous 70 years, 85% of perpetrators of grooming gangs are Muslims. That's like a 13 times overrepresentation, you know, proportionate to their percentage of the population. So this would imply that there's either something about Muslims, or specifically Pakistani Muslims, that thinks that raping and abusing children is okay. And this is actually, you know, condoned within their religion. Yeah, because these white British girls, they're not Muslims, therefore they are fair game, particularly if they are seen as already having been spoiled. Which you will see, you know, e even in the response from some of the community leaders or some of the family members of the perpetrators, you know, that these these girls were asking for it, and it the the police themselves insinuated these children are are prostitutes. No, there's no such thing as a child prostitute. That is a victim. But they attributed to lifestyle choices and the fact that you know these these girls were often from broken homes and easily manipulatable, easily groomed, and they were plow you know, plied with alcohol and drugs. And from the Muslim perspective, these girls were asking for it. They were just asking for it, therefore it's their fault. Now, this is barbaric, what a disgusting community. Emily Mateus' statement that most of these kind of crimes are committed by white people. I think she's referring to sex crimes in general. Right now, even then, these type of crimes, that phrase itself is doing a lot of heavy lifting because the vast, vast majority of these perpetrators have never been identified or brought to justice. So therefore they do not show up in statistics. Right, the race and ethnicity are not recorded, therefore, any data we do have about this, which is already unfavourable to these minorities, but any data we do have is heavily skewed in their favour simply by the fact that most of the crimes they commit of this type are not recorded. Not only are they not recorded, they are actively covered up by various levels of the civil service, by police officers, police forces in general, politicians knew about this, covered it up. Social services, social workers, care workers, the like. Which would imply that there aren't very many of them, but they loved it, they were so happy that now they had cause to say, see, white people do this as well. And I would advocate for no mercy, regardless of the race and religion of the people involved. Well, I have no racial bias in this, but it just so happens the vast majority of people doing this are actually Pakistani Muslims. The earliest, earliest grooming gang that was uncovered was in the 1950s. This was just after the first wave of Pakistanis arrived here following a flood in Pakistan. We took a lot of these people in. And almost the second they landed on our shores, they began raping children. That's indicative to me at least of a behaviour that is ingrained in these people. This disgusting community, it is ingrained within them. You go to a white Christian country and you say a little girl and she is fair game. You do what you like because she's not a Pakistani Muslim. And I will keep banging the drum on the fact that they are Pakistani Muslims because they're Pakistani Muslims. The media has done a lot of uh coverage, you know, try trying to imply oh it's just men, it's just men. You know, this is the same thing that Jess Phillips does all the time. She was an MP, and a lot of this stuff was happening in her back garden, and people were trying to pressure her to support a rape gang inquiry, and she wanted to expand it, you know, away from the Pakistani Muslim community because her vote, you know, her victory in election was won by so few votes, and there was such a large Muslim base within her constituency that she didn't want to upset them. So she tried to divert attention away from the fact that it's Pakistani Muslims. She wanted to expand the scope of the inquiry to include all sexual crimes within all communities, so it would reflect very, very badly on men. Now I'd be in favour of doing this kind of thing also as a general kind of inquiry into sexual abuse. Yeah, I'm I'm not biased with that whatsoever. I'd be all in favour of that. But this one was specifically looking at what has this disgusting community done to our girls, and she wanted to divert away from it for her own benefit. This is Jess Phillips, you know, she's a obviously a rabid feminist, and when I say rabid, I mean she's got rabies. Just take a look at her. Take a look at her. She looks like when she was born, they threw away the baby and kept the afterbirth. And she is committed to protecting this sort of multicultural thing. Now she's gone now, she stepped down, she saw the writing on the wall. In good riddance, I say, right, and I'll strip her of her pension, and justice may have been done as far as she is concerned. Vile bitch. But we took these people in after a tragedy within their own country, and they repaid our kindness with rape of our children. That alone should be enough reason to no longer accept any people from Pakistan. I don't want a single Pakistani coming here after after what they've done to our country. Not a single Pakistani should come here. Right, and I I don't care what disgenic freaks like Zach Balanski or Posh Torts like Emily Maitless have to say. Right, they they claim it's all about targeting Muslims, but they don't have this attitude when it's Muslims targeting us. Yeah. And until it happens to them, they won't get it. Now it's not happened to me, it's not happened to anybody that I know. We've been sheltered from this, luckily now. There have been rape gangs in my city. This was uncovered by the inquiry. But until it affects these politicians personally, you know, it's like they're gonna keep trying to bury their head in the sand about it and shame us for having strong emotions about it. Because that's one more thing that they've tried to take from us is understandable and justifiable responses to absolute atrocities that have only been committed because of the policies that they pursue and enforced upon us many times against our will. And we were never asked, do you want Pakistanis to come here? We were never asked that. We did vote every time, going back more than five decades, or more than half a century we've been saying we actually want less immigration, and they keep ramping it up and then blaming us for the racial tensions between communities that come with that. The result of these rising racial tensions are things like Belfast. Yeah. Now I I I can't condone the violence from Belfast, you know, the riots and uh and burnings and all this stuff, but I can't, in good conscience, bring myself to condemn it either, because it is a natural and justifiable response to endless ramping up of racial tensions. And we've warned and warned and warned that this was gonna happen, these kind of things were gonna happen, and and the the pride, arrogance, and hubris of the state meant that they did not believe us, they didn't take us seriously, and they believed that they could legislate emotion away, they believed they could legislate human nature away. So when we warned them that these kind of things are gonna start happening, there's gonna be retaliation, they interpreted that as a threat and came down on us like a ton of bricks, and now you see the results of that, that that dereliction of duty from the authorities and the people entrusted to governors. So then you get to back end of this week, and a bloke up in Scotland went and stabbed five Muslims. Right now, immediately the media, government, politicians, the identifier and buyers reacts, oh a white man has done this targeting Muslims. Right, they never do that when it's the other way around. You'll have noticed this by now. There was a statement from Keir Starmer saying how Muslim hate is completely intolerable. You know, this is in line with what they do every time one of these communities is targeted. Never mind the fact that it's quite often the result of their own actions. So for example, when there was the uh the attack against the synagogue in Manchester, oh, this this hatred against Jews is intolerable, what did you expect? You know, you constantly go on, media and politicians about rise in anti-Semitism, but they never identify the fact that that comes down to the fact you keep importing Muslims who hate Jews. Well, the the implication being, no, no, no, it's just these horrible, bigoted, racist British people talks in synagogues and hating Jews. No, if if you import anti-Semites, you import Jew haters, which the Muslims are, you keep importing them by the hundreds of thousands year upon year. You keep doing that and you you don't take off the training wheels, you know, the stabilizers. You always say that because the Muslims are a minority, that essentially they are victims of everything. So there's no consequences when they do these things. So you bring in these anti-Semitic people, and then you're surprised when anti-Semitism rises. Similarly, you keep flooding various areas of the country with Muslims, right? And Muslims are largely incompatible with every other group in the West. So then you get rising cases of people thinking, you know what, I don't actually like these Muslims. These people are antithetical to our way of life. You class that as Islamophobia and wonder why that is also rising. There's a simple solution to this: stop importing fucking Muslims. But when a Muslim targets a synagogue, money is thrown at the Jewish community to protect the synagogues. But money's also thrown at the Muslim community to protect the mosques from retaliatory attacks. Right, so uh are they now going to do that for the Scots? Are they gonna go out of their way to protect the Scottish community from retaliation from Muslims? I highly doubt that. We'll wait and see, but I ain't holding my breath for that one. Even when there was a case of a Muslim setting fire to a mosque, his own mosque, maybe for insurance purposes, maybe for propaganda purposes, we'll never know because they don't really tend to give us the details on these things. But a Muslim set fire to his own mosque, more money was given to the Muslim community to protect the mosques, seemingly, from themselves. Ruperloe's inquiry also uncovered that uh 13,000 child rapists were let off with a warning letter from the Crown Prosecution Service. Now this was headed up by Keir Stormer. So Keir Stormer let 13,000, 13,000 Muslim paedophiles off with a warning letter. Instead of coming down on them with the full force of the law, the way that he threatens every every single patriot that dares to defy this liberal regime we're all suffering under. This guy did not come down with the full force of the law. He sent them a letter saying, put that child down. Now with a bit of justice, we'll be able to put together a timeline of who received those letters and what they went on to commit. And if it if it turns out that a single one of them following that warning letter re-offended that Keir Starmer has that child's blood and innocence on his hands, and he should be made to pay for those crimes. And due to the response from the authorities that turn a blind eye or actively covered up the atrocities committed by the Pakistani Muslim community all across our country, there are tens of thousands, perhaps hundreds of thousands, Muslim paedophiles roaming our streets in our communities. How do you know which one is which? Now, pretty much every time I've taken a taxi into town, driver has been some kind of Muslim, probably Pakistani. How do I know that he ain't a baby rapist? How do I know he's not a child rapist, a paedophile, or any other kind of rapist? Yeah, and this is not to smear all of them as rapists and paedophiles, but how do we know which ones are guilty and which ones aren't? Justice has never been pursued. And so for this, I would say until the Pakistani Muslim community denounces every known offender that they are aware of, boycott Pakistani businesses, boycott Muslim businesses. And let's hit them where it really seems to hurt them, in the pocket. Because these people know that they are harbouring vile, vile paedophiles, and they feel no remorse about it because they don't see our girls as having any inherent worth, particularly after they've already been despoiled, usually by a Pakistani Muslim. So until they take action against their own community, we should boycott them, make life as uncomfortable for them as possible, make it economically unsustainable for them to live here. Maybe they have to shutter their businesses and fuck off back to Pakistan. Best result for everybody, if you ask me. Now I was in favour, much like Rupert Lowe, of deporting the family members of these Pakistani Muslim paedophiles. I was in favour of deporting them. After hearing the details of this report, I'm in favour of executing them. And I I'm in favour of executing anybody that knew and covered up these crimes. And that goes for politicians, that goes for police chiefs, police officers, this goes for social services. You know, any of their employees. And in one case, this was used to help the paedophile obtain a visa and gain a right to stay here, which he then peddled up into a benefits claim. So we were paying this Pakistani paedophile to stay in the country, abuse an underage girl, and live on the taxpayer's dime. So when we win, and we will win, we will turn this tide. When we win, we'll put it to the people about bringing in the death penalty. Alright, and if we succeed in that, I will advocate for that to be applied retroactively to anybody involved in perpetrating these crimes or covering them up. And that goes to the very, very highest levels. That goes to Keir Starmer himself. Alright, and I I I personally would like to suggest um an execution method. Now never let it be said that uh the flat cap nationalist is not a man of culture without an appreciation for history. My proposed method, I would call it the Mussolini Panini. Now anybody that knows Mussolini's death, that's a brutal way to go, is it not? Yeah, strong up beating an awful way to go. I would advocate for that. Make it public, make it brutal. Yeah, put it on pay-per-view. Have a public gallery there, sell tickets, raise some revenue out of it. Yeah, make it a grand old day, and at the end of it, stack them free high and burn them on a public pyre. Yeah. Make a show to any dysgenic freaks that want to come in from Pakistan, Afghanistan, or anywhere else in the world, you want to come here and abuse our children, this is the fate that waits for you. Send a message to the politicians if you allow children to be abused in the most sedition. Ways possible, all in the name of electioneering and trying to gain votes from a community that we never wanted here. This is the fate that awaits you. Send a strong message. And failing that, failing that, at the very, very least, every single person that is paid by the government, whether it be the Prime Minister, whether it be a cabinet minister, a member of Parliament, somebody on the police force, social service, whatever it is, if you're living on public money and you are implicated in covering up these crimes, your pension should be stripped. You should be given the bare minimum, bare minimum to live on. You lose all the perks that you've accrued throughout your career. You go to prison and you're forced to do hard labour. That's something I'm very much in favour of. No more custody living in a in a soft cell with you know PlayStations and televisions and all this stuff. No, no, no. You will be put to hard work. Brutally hard work. You'll be resurfacing the roads. Yeah, don't care if it's the middle of August and it's a heat wave. You will be put to work. And if you refuse, you will be put to death. The time for soft politics, soft punishment, rehabilitation is over. Because we've seen where that gets us. We've seen how that kindness is repaid by people of this ilk. Yeah, we've seen how when we take people in from a flooded Pakistan, they immediately come here and start abusing our children, and we cannot let this happen again. We need to send a vicious message to anybody that would betray and hurt our people. I'd also be in favour of making foreign criminals leave the country. Ask them to leave. If they refuse to leave, force them to leave. Deport them back to their country of origin. And let that country of origin know that if they don't accept them back, they will be put to death. And all the ones that do leave should be given their well, made to give DNA and retina scans to be uploaded to an international database. So if these people try and claim asylum or get into any other country, they will flag up and that other country will be all too aware of the disgusting crimes that these people have committed. So they cannot go anywhere else. I include asylum seekers in this. You've claimed asylum here and you've broken our trust and you've betrayed our kindness by raping or murdering somebody. That's it. Nobody's ever going to take you in again. You go back to your country of origin. If you don't go back, we put you to death. And once you do go back, if you try and claim asylum elsewhere, nobody's going to take you. We need to get draconian on these things. Alright. I always describe myself as right wing. Increasingly, I'm starting to see the left-right paradigm as, you know, two ends of the same system. And I want to completely burn this system down after the way that it has betrayed us. I would just now describe myself as a paternalist. So for too long, I think, the teeth of the state have been bared against the native population. While the sunny side has been shown to every single outsider, every foreigner, every criminal, regardless of who they are, where they come from or what they've done in their lives. They are shown the sunny side. They are shown the mercy of the British state. While any kind of discontent by the native population, the patriots of this country, is met with the full force of the law. It comes down like a ton of bricks. The teeth of the state are bared against its own populace. And this should be reversed. You know, the teeth should be bared against the outsiders, you know, and within the country, the government, the state, should be doing whatever it can to foster a sunny environment, you know, a good standard of living with cohesive communities that look out for each other. Right? And I I kind of think the more the state gets involved, the less relevant that community is. Yeah, which is why we end up in the situation that we're in now. And I I think we need a complete reversal of the roles of many different departments of government. So the civil service, you know, the home office, which is seemingly staffed almost exclusively by Muslims these days, it rubber stamps people to come into the country. It doesn't ask questions, really. Just, yep, you can come in, you can come in, you can come in. Oh, you like to Tommy Robinson post 15 years ago. No, no, no, no, you're bored. Well, that's the attitude they take. And the way they've got it set up is it only takes a few minutes for them to approve somebody to come into the country. And even so, there's a massive backlog because there's a lot of people wanting to come into the country. So they say yes to the vast majority. And it takes them a few minutes. If they want to reject somebody, it takes about half a day and the backlog piles up, leading to, you know, they they are essentially pressured to rubber stamp anybody that wants to come in. I think this should be totally reversed. I think, regardless of how many people are queuing up trying to get here, the default position should be no. And you should have to justify why you are saying yes to somebody coming in. There should be a cr a crystal clear, hard-cut case of why this person deserves to come into our country. Or do they have a skill that we need? That should be effectively the only requirement. Much like the Australian system used to be before their white government betrayed them as well. And people should get the message. No, oh, government should send the message. If you try to come here, the chances are we are gonna say, on your bike, turn around and fuck off, unless you've got something that we need. But instead, it seems to be, well, it is the case. The default position is yes, unless there are exceptional circumstances. You also need to be really, really thorough background checks into everybody that comes here. And if there is no background information, then it is a by default, no, you cannot come in because we don't know who you are, we don't know what you've done or where you've come from. Okay, so I would be in favour of draconian checks being carried out, like combing through every detail, and if there is anything at all that is disfavourable, you ain't coming in. I also think we need to hold these civil servants to account. So if you rub a stamp, you know, a hundred people to come into the country and five of them go on to commit serious crimes, you know, sexual crimes, murder, violent crimes, whatever it might be, the person that approved them to come into the country should be punished. Okay, whether this is a reduction in pension, whether it's six months in prison, whatever it might be, these people, there needs to be an incentive for thorough checks to be carried out to ensure the safety and integrity of our community and to ensure that the people coming in are decent and are going to be law-abiding. People that work hard and contribute give more than they receive from the state. At the minute, there's no such thing in place. You know, it's like with these judges, quite often a a judge will let a foreign rapist off with a slap on the wrist. Yeah, or somebody that commits a violent crime, if they're foreign or from some kind of minority background, they'll be treated with kid gloves and they'll go out and do things again and again and again. Those judges need to be held to account. Right. There needs to be exceptional circumstances for why this man is not going to prison. And the the excuse that, well, he's from a a culture that doesn't understand that this is wrong. Okay, well, if he doesn't understand that rape is wrong, or that you know being violent towards a child is wrong, if he doesn't understand that, he should not be in the country. Yeah, it's not difficult, it's quite a natural thing to do. Animals do it all the time, they protect the young. You see a child, you should your natural inclination should be to protect that child from harm and from exposure to things that are gonna fuck with their psyche. If you don't understand that rape of a child or of a fully grown woman or anybody else, if you don't understand that rape is wrong, that is all the more reason you should not be on our streets. Okay, so I've spent half an hour ranting about that. So I want to also, during this one, speak a little bit about the Makerfield by-election. So I'm fairly sure most of you will have heard about it, most of you'd be thoroughly sick of hearing about it. I kind of know that I am, and I imagine that's how many people on the ground in Makerfield feel also. But let's let's have a look at the results there, shall we? So it was a massive, massive Labour victory. Okay, and I mean massive. So Makerfield, at the 2024 election, there were 76,845 registered voters. Uh there was about 600 more registered voters this time around, 2026, but uh around about 5,000 additional people voted in this election compared to the previous one. And I thought it's quite interesting to do a breakdown of where these additional numbers went. So, Labor they gained 6,670 votes, which seems kind of unbelievable, doesn't it? After everything that's happened, everything that the Labour Party has done over the last couple of years, they actually gained close to a 10% vote share over the previous election. I found that to be incredible. Um reform, they gained about 2,700-ish votes for 34.5% of the vote share, up 2.7% on the previous election. Restore came in, 3,111 votes, that's 6.8% of the uh of the vote. Some people were disappointed with that, some people were over the moon with that. I'm fairly happy with that. Well, it's the first by-election they've actually contended, and already they've posted 6.8% in an election, which incidentally is about the same percentage that the Lib Dems got in the previous one, and they're obviously a far, far older party. They finished uh third, Restore. Worth noting, um, it took Nigel over 10 years to get that same kind of result in any election. Right, so there's definitely teeth to the Restore movement, and I would not be disheartened by this whatsoever. Obviously, expectations need to be managed a bit because there were people thinking you know it's conceivable to get 15, 20, maybe 25 to 30% of the vote. It didn't happen, but the support is there. You know, also worth noting, the Conservatives got just short of a thousand votes, so they lost about three and a half thousand compared to the previous election. The Greens got three hundred and eight votes, so they lost fourteen hundred. You know, that's been a bit of an implosion, hasn't it? Earlier in the year the Greens were riding the crest of a wave, and it looked like oh, these could be a serious contender, and that seems to have died a little bit of a death, the more exposure that uh that disgenic freak Zach Polansky has been given to the media, which is why he's largely been silent recently, because people started scrutinising his, frankly, lunatic policies a little bit more closely. One more thing to say about uh Zach Polansky, and it's not overly charitable, but it is about the nicest thing I can say about him, is he's got a face only a mother could love, and by all accounts she hates him. The Lib Dems, they had a bit of a crash as well, all the way down from 2,735 votes last time to 163 this time. They got 0.4% of the votes. So Ed Davy, Lib Dems, just pack it in, just give it up. You know, you you're never you're never gonna get anywhere near power. Look at that 0.4% of the votes. Now for a left-wing party in a constituency that has voted Labour for 120 years, for a left wing party that isn't the despised Labour Party to get less than half a per cent of the vote, that's a really, really bad showing from the Lib Dems. Yeah, the Greens got less than 1%, yeah, the Tories 2.2%, and as I say, Restore 6.8, which I'm pretty happy with. So the narrative going into the election was that reform could possibly win it, but Restore was gonna steal votes from them and split the right. Now you all know my feelings on this. I I think it's bollocks, you know, the there was never any split there because I I don't see reform as a right-wing party. They're centrist at best. You know, they got the same view on nationality as the left-wing parties do, in that if you spend enough time here, yeah, you're British, you know, economically they're not all that clear what they want to do. You know, they're not dedicated to the kind of sweeping tax cuts that Restore want to implement. Yeah, I d I really don't see how there's much appeal. Now, now think about it, if Restore and Reform combined, they would have got just shy of 19,000 votes. So there still would have been, you know, nearly 6,000 votes short of where they needed to be to beat Labor. And I've seen a lot of people pouring scorn on the people of Makerfield for continuing to vote Labour. There are, of course, reasons that this this constituency has always voted Labour. You know, it is right right in the north, it's Wigan, Greater Manchester, and they've always been sort of more left inclined in that part of the country simply because the vast majority of their industry was propped up by government payments. Add to that the fact that many of them, many of them, have come out to vote for Burnham, who they see as a likable local fellow. Never mind the fact that you know he's as as left wing as Starmer, if not worse, at least he's seemingly human, you know. Yeah, he actually seems like he's got blood running through his veins, yeah, not silicon and microchips. So he's got that in his favour, you know. Well I I I think Andy Burnham is a disgrace. I think his role in covering up grooming games is despicable. The fact that he failed to prosecute police officers that he identified as having covered up or failed in their duty to the people in in relation to the grooming gangs, I think it's revolting. I think he's a smoke gay northern twat. And yeah, I've got zero respect for Burnham, but at least at least he's human. You know, and that that is that really is the best I can say about the bloke. And what a sad indictment that is on any political candidate that, well, you know, at least I know, I know that he breathes. Yeah, he he's got a heartbeat. You know, he does he doesn't have to plug in at night to recharge like Starmer and he doesn't photosynthesise like someone like Diane Abbott was. You know, it's anyway, you know. I I personally don't want to pour scorn on the people of Makerfield. Uh I might be a little bit partial. You know, uh for a long time I've thought the three, in no particular order, but the three nicest areas of the country, in my opinion, are Newcastle, never met a jewelry that I don't like. Um the Peak District, yeah, anywhere around sort of Ashbourne, Bakewell, anywhere between there, the people are just beautiful people, lovely people. And when I was on General Hawledge, I delivered all over the country. The people of Wigan always struck me as particularly warm. And I very, very friendly, funny, down to earth, salt of the earth people. Always had a soft spot for the people of Wigan. If I knew I was going to Wigan, I knew okay, when I get to where I'm going, I'm not going to be met with some bell-in that's going to make life hard. Just because he's bored. You know, really, really thoroughly decent people up there. You know, and also with their proximity to Manchester, where Andy Burnham has served as the mayor, er, yeah, I can see how they might be partial, not only because he's a local fella and not some southern, you know, android like Stormer. But because in Manchester, he's apparently managed to have some great successes. Now, I I personally haven't been to Manchester for a long, long time. Uh the last time I went up there was a bit of a shithole. But apparently he's made some massive improvements. Unfortunately, the reason he's been able to do this is because he's been able to secure basically funding from Westminster to make it happen to try and make Manchester the London of the north. And there's obviously benefits to investing in it and providing employment and cleaning the place up, although I don't, to my understanding, outside of the centre itself, there haven't really been many major improvements. But people have seen what's happened, and they'll think, okay, you know what, he's kind of managed to kick start Manchester again. If he can do it for Manchester, there's no reason he couldn't do it for the country, right? So if we we elect him to make a field and he can mount a challenge to Keir Stormer's premiership, topple him and become the Prime Minister, hey, we might be in for a smoother ride. And while I think this is ludicrous to believe, I I'm a lorry driver. I have time to listen a little bit more in depth to you know political discussions and conversations and theories and all these kinds of things. That the average person who works in an office or a factory or on a building site, they're not going to have the time for these things. So I don't know, I'm not I'm not the most insightful of people. I have my I form my own opinions based on the information that I'm given, as do the people of Makerfield. And if the information that they are given is Andy Burnham's a local lad and he's had some great successes in Manchester, why would they not vote for him? You know, I I don't want to pour scorn on these people. I don't hate these people. I don't hate the voters of any party really. You know, I I think the Green Party voters are crazy, but I don't hate them, and I certainly don't hate the people of Makerfield for doing what they think is right. Added to that, the fact, as I've mentioned, a lot of them will have voted for Andy Burnham, not Labour. So they are voting to get Keir Starmer out. And that's a sentiment I'm sure we can all agree on. And in fact, as of the time of recording, on the 21st of June 2026, it looks like in the next few days Keir Starmer may well announce that he is gone. And good riddance to the scumbag. I just hope he doesn't leave the country, because when we take power, he needs to be held accountable for everything that he has done. Everything that he has done. I found it interesting though, seeing uh Nigel Farage's reaction, you know, he he was a little bit disappointed that reform didn't crack uh 18,000 votes. I think he said he was aiming for, you know, and uh the the fact that over the previous two years reform only managed to gain 2.7% of the vote tells you that something is going wrong, something is not translating well between the leadership and the voter base of Restore uh of Reform, sorry. And the the the narrative they tried to push was well, it's because Restore are taking votes from us. Now I would say once again, this this is not the case, you know. Restore hasn't stolen votes from reform. The primary reason being that nobody's entitled to anybody's votes, and people will say, you know, vote for any of the right wing parties to get Labour out. Well, if we had done that, we still wouldn't have got Labour out. Alright, Burnham still would have won, and we would have potentially destroyed the Restore Party in the crib. Yeah. We would not have seen the Restore project get off the ground if they had been reduced to nothing in this election. But as it stands, 7% is not a bad showing at all. And Farage needs to get this into his head. I don't think he will. I think he's too proud, too stubborn, you know, and he certainly won't admit that Restore exists because of him. The mainstream media are parroting you know similar lines that uh no no no uh restore are the breakaway group. No, they're not a breakaway group. You you kicked them out, Nigel. You got rid of Rupert Lowe because he wanted to deport the families of the perpetrators in the rape gangs. And that was beyond the pale for you, you said it yourself, and you're never gonna get away from that. You know, for all the shaming reform voters like to do towards us, they cannot get away from the fact that Nigel Farage went up on stage and he admitted that that was the reason Rupert Lowe had to go. And he said the way we did it was more brutal than other people would have been with it. But that's the way it's gonna be. Okay. Okay. So you you admit then that the smears, the political, the attempted political assassination against Rupert Lowe. Was your way of getting rid of him because he was talking about mass deportations. You're now trying to parrot the same policies, mimic, restore policies, because you've seen that there's huge appetite for that. Yeah, maybe not in Makerfield, but we always knew that was going to be the case. You know, they voted Labour for 120 years. They've never elected anybody else through the economic collapse of the 70s, you know, through both world wars, through everything, the Blair years. You know, Gordon Brown under Stalmer, they've never chosen anybody but Labour. So it should come as no surprise that they've stuck with Labour yet again. Yeah. But Nigel's position is reform have shown they are the only party that can beat Labour. Really? Because you didn't beat them here. You know, you you lost to the Greens in Gorton and Denton. So you you've not exactly got a great track record of winning here. You know, even in the local elections. Yeah, you gained massively, massively, all across the country in loads of different councils. But not by the margin you were predicted to. You didn't win as many as you were supposed to. You know, the Tories and Labour comparatively did very well. You know, restore, yeah, okay, you you gained huge amounts, but you should have gained a lot more. And the fact that you didn't shows that there is a disconnect between the leadership and the voter base. Now people are losing belief in reform, and I think that's a good thing. They can't come quickly enough. You know, reform is offering us snail meat. But we want stake. We want to deport the Boris wave. Reform runs them as councillors and candidates. We want to push back against Islam. Reforms say we'll lose if we do that. We want to drastically reduce the welfare bill. Reform agreed with Labour in lifting the two-child benefit cap, a policy that was mostly aimed at appeasing Muslims that were abandoning the Labour Party. We want mass deportations to the tune of millions. Reform was still talking about net zero migration, which is essentially the one-in, one-out scheme that's been applied to illegal immigrants crossing the channel. It's that policy applied to legal immigration too. You know, one in, one out. Well, that's not good enough. You know, that essentially stagnates our demographic as it is. And given the fact that many of these people will have more and more and more children, particularly when compared to white British people, the demographics are still going to change. They're still going to be unfavourable. Reform MPs, councillors, and members, we call us Nazis and the like for wanting the things that we want. But also turn around and pretend to offer us the same things and say, well, resource policies are so similar, they may as well be the same thing. You may as well vote for reform. Not a chance. You know my feelings, people. I believe a reform victory would soon turn into a reform betrayal, which would demoralise the right wing of Britain, push it into apathy. Any hope of turning the ship around would be lost. Reform they promised the rape gang inquiry when it was politically expedient to do so, and they didn't do it. They sneered at the inquiry we got for not having statutory powers, despite the fact that it wouldn't have had statutory powers when they promised to do it in the first place. Reform or containment, that's all they are, nothing more. That's why they took in so many Tories who themselves represented a mass containment project over the last decade and a half. So no, Nigel, reform are not the party to vote for. Yeah, reform of containment, and we're done with containment. We're about breaking out of containment. You want to drag us back into it, and we're not putting up with it. So reform voters, you know, many of you guys are more aligned with restore than with reform. You just don't have the confidence that we'll get the numbers we need. This was something I saw countless times, you know, in discussions about this coming election. Well, the election that's just gone at this point, was I want restore, but I just don't think the numbers are there. So I'm gonna vote for reform until Restore's numbers are there. Well, my friends, if you don't take the plunge and vote for Restore, the numbers are never gonna be there, are they? Yeah, and and even if at the end of the day, about 10 years from now, if we look back at this particular point and say all that Restore accomplished was holding reform's feet to the fire and dragging them, kicking and screaming to the right, that would have been worthwhile. Now, do I think that's what's gonna happen? No. I think eventually Farage is gonna admit defeat and he's gonna tuck his tail and run away like he usually does. Yeah, he's a weak man, he doesn't have the stomach for what needs to be done. He's enjoyed his position as the sort of unelectable right wing face of British politics. He's enjoyed that for years, and anybody that's tried to you know occupy the same space, he has thrown them under the bus and destroyed them. Tried to do that with Rupert Lowe, when Rupert Lowe started outshining him and showing you know this is what the right wing of Britain wants. He tried to do it and he failed spectacularly. But now that it started the same lot for Raj may well end up, you know, being the uh the leader, he might well end up being the Prime Minister. Suddenly started playing it safe, you know, suddenly started tempering his positions and watering them down, incidentally, just after Muslim Zair Yusuf bought his way into the party, 250 grand, and Nigel sold the nativist base. Not only that, but look at these numbers, right? In this election, reform 34.5%. They got 15 and just over 15 and a half thousand votes. Restore got 3,111, so about a fifth as many votes. Right now, when when Rupert Lowe was in reform, he represented the best part of their parliamentary representation. He's the one that has done the most work, he's the most relatable, he's the most outspoken, and he is the bravest. And after the 2024 general election, Rupert Lowe was 20% of the parliamentary representation of the party, and Nigel threw him away. Now, obviously, since then there have been defections to reform, so they have more MPs now. But at the time, he threw away 20%, a fifth of his parliamentary party, threw him away for talking about mass deportations, which was something that pretty much everybody in reform was on board with. All the members, you know, the voter base, that's what they wanted. And that was certainly the impression they had that reform was going to provide for them was mass deportations. Rupert Lowe spoke about it a little bit too candidly, and suddenly he had to go and we had to make up these horrible smears against him and try and get him thrown in prison, you know, because I've just be on the pale. Threw away 20% of the parliamentary representation, and now restore Apollin at about 20% of what reform are. So it kind of tracks, you know, kind of tracks that reform threw these votes away. Yeah, as many of us wanted what Rupert Lowe was saying. That's what we've been dying to hear for decades. And that was that that was incomprehensible to Freud. So he's only got himself to blame for this so-called split. And now you get you get wet melts like Paul Thorpe and uh Jeff Taylor, delusional old Burke, saying, Yeah, we need to unite, we need to you know unite the right, otherwise we'll never win. It's like, well, we were united, and then what happened? Yeah. So you want us to unite with somebody that threw away the best, bravest, strongest part of the parliamentary representation of the party we all voted for, threw them away, uh, disregarded all the people that voted for reform because of the things that Rupert was saying, threw those people away, right? And they tried to put Rupert in prison. So they tried to do that to him, a colleague, yeah, a fellow soldier in the battleground that is the parliamentary building. What do you think they'd do to us given the chance? And you want us to unite with these people, jog on, mate. Paul Thorpe, you stay in Spain, mate. Yeah, no, I know I know you say you're over there for because you're running away from political persecution. You're running over there because you've got the means to be over there. You made your money, you are flipping watches and all the like, and you wanted to live in Spain, but you also want to have an influential voice and be seen as somebody. Just stay in Spain and keep you keep to yourself, you spazzy doofers. I'm not interested in a single word you have to say because you think you, living out there in Spain, you think you can tell us that we have to vote for a man that has betrayed us repeatedly and spat in our faces and called us every name under the sun and try to throw good people like ourselves in prison, or actual political persecution. You want us to vote for that guy because you've you've banked the drum for him for a long time. Same as a lot of us did, but you you don't have the humility to admit that you were wrong about it. Yeah, you you wanted us all to back Ben Habib. Why? Why would we do that? Why would we back Nigel? No, you stay in Spain, enjoy the sun and just log off, mate. Yeah, Jeff Taylor, you do the same. Just sh just shut your delusional mouth. You you do not own our votes. Right? And no amount of speaking to us in a condescending, matter-of-fact manner is going to change that. You don't own our votes, and and the person you were advocating for threw us away. Right, just completely discarded us. So, to any wet melt like that, yeah, Jacob Rees Morgan, all the Tories, you know, that want to talk like they are somehow the solution, tough talking, Robert Jenrick, fuck off. Right, and reform you I find them particularly embarrassing. You go and have a look at them, they're trying to copy Restor's branding. Yeah, even down to the colour scheme, they're copying the slogans, the messages, the policies, everything. While also saying Restorer, bunch of nobodies, bunch of racists, bunch of Nazis and the like. Yeah, job on pal. There can be no compromise now. Right? Every single day this week, I went seeing news stories about foreigners importing, you know, imported into this country, some of them given asylum, yeah, treated with mercy, some of them just coming illegally, but still stabbing and raping us. They've seen a story about that every single day. This is going on all the way across Europe as well, but if you notice it, you're the problem. Yeah. Also seen, you see, this one, the uh kid at Cambridge Zoo, three-year-old boy thrown into a crocodile enclosure by some random lunatic. Right? Now they as if that wasn't bad enough. The local MP came out and said, uh, oh, don't speculate about this. It's funny you mentioned that, because until you said don't speculate, I'd have accepted the the story. No, I I wouldn't have thought too much about it. You know, it it wasn't plastered all over the news until they said that, and then suddenly it became what do you mean don't speculate? Because that's the that's the typical language they use when it's a foreigner or a Muslim or somebody that shouldn't have been here. Don't speculate, don't speculate. Well, I'm sorry if you're not giving us the details, all we have is speculation. So what they did, they came out and said a man from Norfolk has been arrested for throwing a child into the crocodile enclosure at Cambridge Zoo. Now the child has survived, but he's got serious injuries to his arm. You know, thank God that that little kid has survived, because that could have been I mean the one of the worst news stories of the year, could it not? But this whole idea of don't speculate. Now remember, I said earlier about the bloke that up in Scotland stabbed a bunch of Muslims. We knew immediately white man because they told us that specifically. But when it's this kind of thing, don't speculate. And don't put another little cherry on top of it. That case, the kind of person capable of going up behind an innocent little boy who doesn't know, has had no prior dealings with, not that you know you have many dealings with a three-year-old, goes up and throws him into the crocodile enclosure at the zoo. He has been released on bail because he is not fit for a police interview. I'm sorry, mate, but if he's not fit for a police interview, and if he's the sort of person that's going to throw a child to crocodiles, he is not fit to be in our society. He is not fit to be released on bail. He should be in a secure unit, a side ward, this is what they're for, or he should be executed. There's no speculation about whether or not he did it. He did it. And when you're dealing with a fully grown man throwing a three-year-old child to crocodiles, yeah, no, there's there's no motive that could possibly make that okay. So that man, as as far as I'm concerned, signed his own death warrant. Yeah, if we put it to the people and we get the death penalty reinstated, I don't care if he's mentally deficient. I don't care if he's got learning difficulties, I don't care if he's mentally ill. In fact, if he is mentally ill, to the degree that he would do something like that, that is all the more reason for that man to be swiftly executed. Likewise with them two quiz that uh adopted a baby and he ended up dead, murdered, abused, tortured, sexually abused, the works. Right, and the entire process every step of the process they fast tracked it's two gay blokes to be able to adopt a kid because it's it's seen as this like really virtuous thing to allow homosexuals to adopt a baby, and that they don't want to do the requisite checks and put a hold on it and say, mm, actually, i is this suitable? Because they don't want to be accused of homophobia, right? So it can take years, years and years and years to adopt a baby in this country, to a point that when people finally do get approved for adoption, the baby is actually seven or eight years old. Baby was less than a year old, they got an a baby, a proper, proper baby, approved in no time whatsoever. And the checks performed were minimal, presumably because that that would leave them open to accusations of, oh, you're only checking on this baby because we're gay and they therefore you are homophobic. This this whole thing needs to stop. You know, these protected characteristics can no longer be used as a shield, surely. After some of the things that we've seen. You know, you don't want to be accused of homophobia, you don't want to be accused of racism or sexism, so atrocities occur. You know, the the Manchester arena bombing. One of the guys, one of the security guards here, saw the bomber looking suspicious, looking sweaty and flustered and panicked, and he thought there was something wrong, and he wanted to report it, but he thought that he might be accused of racism if he did. So he didn't report it. And what happened? A load of children got blown up at a pop concert. Because that's just the world we live in now, right? So we we need to go to whatever lengths it takes to get rid of this system where where people are scared of being labelled, you know, some kind of phobic, some kind of ist, racist, sexist, whatever it might be. And let's just apply standards. You know, you you see a bloke at a pop concert with a backpack, it looks like it might be ticking, you know, and he's sweaty and nervous and bit rabbity. Well, go and investigate, do your job. And if it turns out like, no, he's just, you know, for whatever reason bought him bought a massive backpack to a concert at an arena, and he also happens to be a foreign man or a black man or whatever, he wants to call you racist, so be it. Them kids will still be alive. Alright, the the checks that should have been performed on this baby. Yeah, Preston Davy his name was. The checks that should have been performed on him, but weren't, because they didn't want to be accused of homophobia. If they'd been carried out, that baby might still be alive today. Right, so the for the two monsters that did that, one of them got life, one of them got like 20 years. And I can only hope that prison justice is carried out on them, you know, brutally and swiftly. You know, I I don't know, I don't want to advocate for violence. But uh we've just seen too much of this. You know, how many children have to suffer? How many babies have to suffer and lose their lives in the interest of appeasing these different minority groups that are treated with kid clubs because they've got a so-called protected characteristic. This needs to stop. You know, the the the life of that baby was worth far more than the lives of the two gay pieces of shit that killed him, right? I started this one calling them a couple of queers, and I'm not gonna apologise for that because that's one of those one of those things, isn't it? We used to call them queers years ago, and then they decided that was offensive. That was offensive to call them queers, and then 20 years later they loop it back around and they identify by queer now. You know, maybe queer means something different, I don't know. But this is what they do, they keep changing the language, you know, so that they can always keep you on the back foot of some no matter what you call them, you're some kind of racist, some kind of homophobe. You know, there's a lot of black people, you had the M-word, and then they watered it down to Negro, Negro was the polite term, and then Negro was deeply, deeply offensive, so people called them coloured people, and then coloured people that that was the acceptable one. And then that they started saying, No, no, no, no, you can't call me coloured, that's offensive, you know. I'm a black man. Okay, you're a black man then. No, no, no, no, you can't call me a black man, I'm a person of colour. Is that different substantively to coloured person? Person of colour, coloured person. You know, same with the gays, you know, you used to call them queers, puffs, faggots, whatever it was. That was like, nah, no, no, those things are all offensive now. Oh, right, okay, well, we'll call you homosexual then. And and that's too, you know, too scientific, too, you know, studious to call them. So we'll just call you gays, and then they they reclaim it, they go back around and they're like, no, no, no, I'm queer. Okay, you're queer then. Just stop changing the language of queer and stop killing babies. Well, I I don't me personally, I don't think gay people should be able to adopt babies. They shouldn't, you know, the the the best environment for a kid to grow up in is mum and dad. Yeah, stable, happy, married, mum and dad, and that is it. That is the way it's always been, it's the way we are designed biologically. And if you're you're some kind of a government agency charged with the protection of children, and you were signing them off into a care, you know, the the care of a gay couple, whether it's two blokes or two women, automatically you're signing them over to a less than optimal circumstance. They're going to grow up with two dads or two mums, and they're going to be deficient in many ways because we take many, many things from mum, and we take many things from dad. And no matter how many times they try and tell us that there is no difference between men and women, it's simply not the case. The people I know that grew up without a dad seem to have very specific kinds of personality defects and issues. These are things that can be overcome, of course they are. You know, and I don't want to besmirch anybody that was unfortunate enough to not grow up with a dad, likewise with a mother. If you grow up only with your dad, then I you're going to be deficient in certain areas, emotional development, emotional intelligence. You're going to be deficient in these areas. And again, it can be overcome, but naturally, the way we're supposed to be, is man and woman. If you're not a married man or woman, you should not be able allowed to adopt babies. Now I'm not saying they killed this baby because he was because they were gay, but in my world, they wouldn't have been able to adopt him anyway. Preston would still be alive. Might be a bit draconian, might be whatever. I'm Catholic. Those are my beliefs, and I'm going to stand by him. I was at mass today. It was one of the best masses I've been to. You know, and they were talking a lot about being proud to be Christian and not cowing away from my beliefs. So I'll be very, very open with you guys. You know, I I'm Christian, I'm Catholic. I I say my prayers daily. You know, I love Jesus Christ. I love God. I try my best. I fail quite often, but I try my best to be a good Christian, to be a good Catholic, to follow the example set for us by Jesus. Yeah. I I love God the Father, and I want everybody to enjoy the benefits of a Christian society. I'm not going to cow away from that, and I'm not going to be shamed, you know, for for not wanting the proliferation of homosexuality and transgenderism through everything. I'm not going to cowtow to Islam. Yeah, because Islam is a false religion. But immediately, this has put me potentially on a on a hit list for Muslims because I've disrespected their religion. Don't care. False religion, built on barbaric principles and the way the Muslim community conducts itself and protects its own, even when they've committed the most heinous crimes against children. Disgusting. So I'm going to be loud and proud about my Christian faith. Yeah, and I'm going to strive every day to be better, to be a more faithful servant. Of Jesus Christ. And I want you all to know that. I'm proud and I I'm gonna be outspoken about it. Not always on the podcast, but in my day-to-day life, I'm never gonna shy away from that. I'm never gonna denounce Jesus. And why I bring this up now is because does it not seem that the further we get away from biblical principles, the further we get away from Jesus, the worse society has become. Even Richard Dawkins would admit this. You know, the more we withdraw Christianity from society, the worse everything gets. And you don't even have to be a believer to see that. You know, you don't even have to believe in God or Jesus to bl to see that that is the case. You know, the standards, the principles, the values instilled in us by you know the the Christian nation we we grew up in, the more that those values are withdrawn, the worse things are getting. So if you are a Christian, if you are Catholic, please be strong, brothers and sisters. Please be outspoken. Please do not back down on your beliefs and your values. Yeah, if we can reinstate them widespread, you know, across society, we can heal the wounds that this country has suffered at the hands of godless communists and Muslims and every disparate minority group that's come in and cause us harm. We can heal from this. And we can ensure a safer environment for our children and grandkids to grow up in. That's what I want. I want your kids to be safe. I want my kids to be safe. Yeah, I don't want any more children being harmed in this country. I don't want children being harmed anywhere. But we can actually make a difference in this country, and we need to start being vocal about it because for too long now, you know, people of a Christian faith have been shamed into silence and blamed for all the wrongs and the evils of the world. There has never been a more benevolent force in the world than Christianity. And I I believe that as a kid, I believe that still, and I'll believe that to my dying day. Now, I wasn't gonna talk about the football, but uh I've rambled enough about a lot of things that kind of pissed me off. So a little bit more light-hearted. First up, big congratulations to the England football team. Winning 4-2 against Croatia, who I see as being the toughest, toughest game in our group. Good victory. Oh, I wasn't convinced we were gonna win that one to be honest. Now apparently, England's third favourite to win the tournament. That's the case, well, colour me shocked. But good result all the same. 4-2 against Croatia. I will take that, thank you very much. Also, big congratulations to the United States team, yeah, team USA. I believe this is the first time since 1930 that they've won two consecutive World Cup games, and they're through to the quarterfinals, so that's great to see, not only as the host nation, but as a country that I've got a lot of love and affection for. I'm glad to see the Americans doing well. Now, really, really didn't take long for the uh the politics to come into it, did it? Now I saw uh there was a game between was it was it France and Senegal or something? Well, I couldn't I couldn't tell the two teams apart. The French team, I was like, every single one of these, they look African. Well, they've got two players on their side. It was like, okay, one of them's a Frenchman, I think the other one's Spanish, but uh it's hardly a team for France to be proud of, is it, if you ask me anyway. So Senegal played France, don't know what the result was, don't care. But uh yeah, it just looked like two African teams playing each other, much like when Arsenal played PSG in the uh Champions League final, just looked like two North African teams playing each other. Um you got uh insufferable bitch Emma Hayes, the uh I think she's the manager of the women's England women's football team. I don't know. They keep telling me she's the most successful football manager in England at uh well I'd never heard of her until this competition because I don't follow football, especially not women's football. No offense, ladies. But they they insist on getting her on because of course you can't have you can't have a panel of just men talking about you know the the nation's favourite sport now, can you? So they bring in Emma Hayes and uh I swear that that woman is on commission for how how many times she can say position and possession. I was listening to uh listening to her speaking during the half-time gap in the England Croatia game, and it was just a non-stop barrage of position, possession, position, possession. It's not the the only two words she knows that make her sound like she knows what she's talking about. You know, she's drawing some crap little drawings on a chalkboard, you know, a whiteboard or whatever, and uh that doesn't really mean anything. She's not great at explaining anything, but oh, we're supposed to, yeah, this woman really knows her stuff. Gets off the screen. You know, and I know my mum would agree with this sentiment. She hates having the women commentating on the men's game. And I'm in agreement, you know, but it it really didn't take her long to uh get political with things, did it? You know, it's it's stupid bitch with her observations. Or yeah, I I I'm sorry to keep referring to her as a bitch, I don't think that of all women, um, but it it's just the uh the working class parlance that I grew up with when uh a woman makes a really, really stupid statement, which is stupid bitch. Anyway, Cape Verde versus Spain, they managed to eke out a draw. Yeah, somehow. Spain didn't batter Cape Verde. Cape Verde is a windy little rock somewhere in Africa, and uh at one point it was colonised by the Portuguese. According to Emma Emma Hayes, Cape Verde managing to get a draw somehow against Spain is a win for immigration. No, no, no, no, keep your politics out of the sport. I thought that's what we were supposed to do. We shouldn't be singing the praises of immigration because Cape Verde managed a draw with Spain. But correct me if I'm wrong, would it not be a win for colonisation? Never mind the fact it wasn't a win for anybody because it was a draw. But yeah, surely, you know, Cape Verde, would that not be a victory for colonisation? So, well, you heard it from Emma Hayes, the most qualified and successful manager in England. Um, yeah, that boys fire up the empire and let's get going again. You know, I might maybe we'll get a draw with Cape Verde. Anyway, that's enough rambling for me. Remember, people, Christ is king. I'll catch you on the next one. Goodbye.