Notting Hell

Thoughts around the Notting Hill carnival and the imposition of foreign cultures over the British people.  Thank you for listening, God bless. 

Transcript

Copy Transcript Copied

SPEAKER_01 0:29

Good evening. Welcome back to the Flat Gap Nationalist Podcast. This is episode number 24. First up, my apologies for the sound quality on the previous episode. I was trying a new mic setup and the mastering on the podcast provider, hoping to give you a better listening experience, but uh yeah, listen to it back after publishing and uh the sound quality was a bit shit, wasn't it? So I want to try sort that out, make this one a little bit better. And if it's still got the same poor quality, I'll go back to the previous setup. Since the episode in which I took a couple of shots at the Jewish diaspora, there's been a noticeable drop-off in listenership. Maybe it's the topic of family didn't really appeal to some listeners, maybe it's because I've insulted the people you're not supposed to insult, but I'm not here pandering for popularity, I'm gonna speak my mind. And uh for those still listening, thank you very much. I really do appreciate it. So over the past week or so, this is not the main meat of the episode, but uh over the previous week there's been comments by Benjamin Netanyahu's son with regards to the Falklands Islands and how Britain is a hostile nation to Israel. He's come out and said the Falklands belong to Argentina, and Margaret Thatcher begs to differ. And all this basically because Britain doesn't wholeheartedly support Israel and everything that it says or does. And this is it's very interesting that we are classed by the Israelis as a hostile nation. And let's not forget, in the Falklands War of 1982, a lot of the equipment used by the Argentinians was supplied to them by Israel. So er, yeah, not exactly what I would call a friend of Britain. Not usual, only a friend insofar as they can use us for their own ends. And they you know they want us to help fight the fires that they start. So um, yeah, not a fan of Israel, me. Not a fan of Palestine, not a fan of Israel. To be honest, I don't really care for countries outside of the West, outside of the Anglosphere. Yeah, primarily concerned with the UK, with Britain, with England, but also, you know, Europe as a whole. I love I love Europe. I love the Anglo Sphere. And in recognition of that, I want to celebrate, I've got my first Australian listeners. So, yeah, welcome. Thank you for listening. I do appreciate it. Australia has been infected people. The Jewish, the Israeli tactic of comparing everything to the Holocaust has of course spread away from them because people have seen yeah, they can play on past sympathies and victimhood in order to cudgel other countries, other peoples into acquiescing to their demands. So we've got uh Lord Sika or Seeker, I don't know how to say his name, because well, he's an Indian fella. He's a Labour peer, 75 years old, I believe he's some kind of accountant, so how he got a peerage, I don't know, and I don't care. But he's made quite a habit of saying that any pro-nativist policy would be the road to Auschwitz. So he's recently fired off at reform who have come out with a policy of saying basically that uh social housing should be prioritised for British people and that foreign nationals living in social housing should be evicted and eventually deported. Great, yeah, that's very mild, if you ask me. I don't think there should be a single foreign born person taking advantage of British housing in this way. But when saying that they should be, you know, prioritised for the British people, of course, Lord Sicker has to come out and say, oh it's the it's the first step to Auschwitz. Yeah, a few years ago, he asked if the next road to Auschwitz would go through Clacton after Furalds proposed to deport legal immigrants as well as illegal immigrants. A policy of course he's he's tried to distance himself from since then, but this guy he loves using that uh that tactic of implying anything, anything pro-native, anything for the benefit of British people, is somehow akin to setting in motion the next, you know, the the the fourth reich, as it was. And it's a laughable tactic that's obviously used along the lines of the race card in order to silence people and shut them up and make them feel ashamed for their pro-nativist points of view. And yeah, it's been overplayed by Jewish groups, by Indians, by pretty much everybody, yeah, to a point where it's not an effective tactic anymore, so they should just stop trying it. I did uh I did hear Richard Tys talking to the media about this policy, and they were obviously dumbfounded at how how such a blatantly racist proposal could possibly be, you know, coming out of the mouth of a prominent politician in 2026 that you know British social housing should be for British people. Now Tys, obviously being a milk toast civ, couldn't bring himself to say British people. He couldn't say it should be to encourage British children. You know, the the production, the uh the birth of British children, no no, he had to temper it by British born. Now, you know my feelings. There's a huge difference between British and British born. Anybody can be British born, but to be British you actually have to come from a particular lineage. Right? But of course the media do this thing where once you say such a thing, you know, oh well it should be priority for British people, yeah, married British couples looking to start a family. But what about non-British couples? What about same sex couples? And of course they do this because they see this kind of universality. Well, it suits them among men, you know, among people. There are no differences between people, so what does it matter if it's a Somali family or a British family taking up the social housing? What does it matter? Well, it matters because we want to preserve our demographic, our culture, our way of life, and we don't want to prioritise the needs of people that have come here to live at our expense. It's very, very simple. And of course, one of the replies to this line of thinking is, well, British people, you know, they claim benefits too, they they take up resources and live in social housing. Yeah, they do, they do. But at least they're from this country, this is their country, and these welfare programs were put in place for their benefit. Now, I don't think people should be permitted to exist entirely on social programmes unless they absolutely must. Yeah, with with severe medical needs, medical impediments to participating in the workforce. But it's even more outrageous that people can come from overseas with no plan to support themselves, and in a lot of a lot of cases, no intention to support themselves. Yeah, I wouldn't do it. I wouldn't move to a different country with no intention of supporting myself, and to be fair, most countries would require you to have some kind of plan in place to support yourself. Yeah, it's a coming back to Lord Sikka's comments about it being the road to Ausstreach. Now, India is one of the most nationalistic countries on the planet. Yeah, it's one of the most I mean i if you have Indian ancestry, you can claim citizenship there. But they reserve the right at any time to remove rights from you. Yeah, let's if you're not full blooded Indian, they can prevent you from doing all sorts of things. But you'll never hear people like this condemning the Indian way of doing things because, hey, that's their prerogative. There's their own sovereign nation, they're permitted to do this. And so are we. Yeah, see, it's not some scandalous racist policy. It's simple common sense that in Britain, Britain British people should be prioritised. As regards same-sex couples, you know the the benefit of social housing is it gives families a head start. Now, correct me if I'm wrong, but two males or two females, they they can't breed between themselves, can they? Yeah, and you know my feelings also, I don't I don't think gay couples should be allowed to adopt. It's uh it's well known and proven that the best environment for children to grow up in is with a loving mother and father, preferably married, for stability. And yeah, I I I feel gay couples for the authorities to release a child into the care of a gay couple is deliberately and willingly releasing them into a suboptimal standard of living. And and this is not to say that straight couples are perfect and they get it right all the time. They obviously don't. But when you know the golden standard of how children should be raised, releasing them into suboptimal conditions is a dereliction of duty as far as the social services are concerned. And of course you have the Lib Dems. What's the point of the Lib Dems at this moment in time? You know, they always get what is it, ten, twelve per cent of the vote, if that. They never get a sniff of power unless they can go into coalition with somebody. What what is the actual point of the Lib Dem party? But anyway, the Lib Dems come out and they go, Oh, Faraji's saying he would deny housing to single mothers. Of course, they they always have to angle it from this, you know, victimhood perspective. They have to take what they see as a victim, whether it be a single mother, a gay couple, a foreign couple, and play things from their point of view. They will never side with the nativist family. And this is a major, major issue. Is it any wonder that native families are on the decline because they get no support, nobody is campaigning for their vote, nobody is trying to support them specifically. It's always at the expense of them. Yeah, back up the gays at the expense of the straight couples, back up the foreigners at the expense of the native couples. It's really perverse. And for them to make such a big deal out of what is a common sense policy like this, just g just goes to show you how lost these people really are, how backwards they are in their thinking. Speaking of backwards, we had the Notting Hill Carnival this weekend, didn't we? Oh that's oh I completely forgot. As I do every year. Yeah, it might surprise you to know, but I don't have it marked on my calendar. But they they have it down in London every year. Notting Hill Carnival where we can celebrate Caribbean and you know African culture. Wonderful. Now just go and have a look at how debauters this gathering looks. And you get crowds of hundreds of thousands parading through the streets and it's it's advertised and celebrated as this marker of diversity and and our shared culture. And I I I see it as one of the solidifying emblems of multiculturalism. And I'm against multiculturalism, right? As I think most sane people are. But the idea with people coming here was they come in small numbers, integrate and whatever. You know, they they integrate with the population, reproduce within a couple of generations, you know, you can't tell the difference between an ethnic and a and a native. But this isn't what happens when they come here in huge numbers. Right, and just the term multicultural itself is antithetical to integration because it it it sets out you know the barriers between cultures. Is there is the native culture, there is the imported culture, yeah, and then there's this kind of weird hybrid culture where the two meet. I find it particularly disgusting, we we're always bashed overhead with how you know multiculturalism is a great thing. But it isn't, you know. Can you point to one tangible benefit? Of course, people always go to the food argument. Yeah, I felt I'm pretty sure we've spoken about this before, but you can't speak about immigration and multiculturalism without saying, oh yeah, but the food, you know, the takeaways that I can have, I can have Thai food I can walk down the street and I can choose if I want Thai food, Italian food, Indian food, Greek food, you know, Urdu, Afghan food, I don't bloody know. There's all kinds, you can get anything. And I just I don't see this as a marker of success. I don't see this as some kind of wonderful benefit to our country. Yeah, I like British food. I like meat, veg, gravy. Yeah, hearty meals that get us through the winter and they're lighter meals in the summer. I could quite easily go the rest of my life without eating curry or I never know. So many different ethnic foods and I I don't even try 'em, I don't even eat 'em. I've had many, many different types of foreign food. But after a while they all amalgamating to some kind of generic slot. You know, give me a shepherd's pie any day of the week. Give me a nice Sunday roast. Yeah. Give me a nice beef stew, we've got plenty of options. And we've got good food here. Regardless of what people say, regardless of the old stereotypes, back from when we were on food rations. We've got great food here. I don't need to be culturally enriched by Indians and Thai people and Pakistanis and Caribbeans whose idea of flavouring food is just dumping a load of seasoning on it to a point where you can't tell if it's beef or chicken. Yeah, I don't need that to enjoy food. I'm a lorry driver, so I like my grub. And I can tell you, this foreign slop doesn't really do anything for me. Well I'm not here to talk about food. Now this this carnival seems a celebration of our shared culture, according to the talking heads and the the media and the politicians. Take a look at it. Take a look at the barbarism on display, the debauchery. It's disgusting, it's disgraceful, I don't share any part of that culture. Well, but this is what they tell us. Sadiq corn, Mayor London will tell us it's a wonderful celebration of diversity and shared culture, bollocks, corn, you know nothing. It's none of those things. I mean, it takes place across the bank holiday weekend, and it is just a drugs fest. Drugs and public sex. That's basically all it is. It's disgraceful. Now they have the so-called family day. This just means, like with pride events, you take your kids along and get them to partake as well. Yeah, which o over the last couple of years, there have been more and more videos emerging of young kids being encouraged to twerk publicly because that's that's pretty much what this festival is. It's a load of black people dressed up in full you know fancy colours, making a lot of noise, playing crap music at an obnoxious volume, and passing this off as some kind of culture, some kind of enrichment, as we're so often told that it is. And they get the kids involved, you know, and and they encourage them to say twerk to this just awful music, and they'll be rubbing up against people and police officers and lampposts and you you name it. You know, imagine living in Notting Hill. You imagine living in that area, and every year you know you've got this debaucherous, you know, degenerate filth parading through your streets and being celebrated, and you're not supposed to have an issue with it. Never mind the fact that you'll come out of your front door and there'll be people pissing in your garden, uh shissing in your garden, having sex in your garden, and you're not supposed to have an issue with this, and oh no, it's all good fun. Look at all the bright colours, listen to the the loud noises. This is culture. This is what's you know the the very best that London has to offer. At one point London was one of the most beautiful, well cultured and well respected cities all around the world, and now it just plays host to Palestine marches and the Night Hill Carnival, you know, it's it truly is shocking. And for such a you know celebrated event, the the crimes that take place are truly shocking. I mean this this past weekend, almost six hundred arrests, right, including drugs offences, weapons offences, somebody was found with a handgun, air stabbings, stabbings happen every year. Now apparently this has been a good year, there are only two stabbings. Right, there's something like 19 sexual assaults or 59 sexual assaults, and people lose track, and you get different figures reported all over the place. But it's that bad, it's that prevalent, you know, sexual abuse, sexual assaults, that uh the carnival actually had its own designated area for sexual assault victims. Uh, if if this were some kind of pronativist event, say a Tommy Robinson rally, and every year they knew, right, there's going to be five hundred and something arrests, and there's going to be multiple stabbings, there's going to be double digit sexual assaults and unsold drugs offences. You'd think they'd still let them march? You'd think they'd still let it go on. Somehow I have my doubts about that. This has been going on, I think it's something like sixty years now, and initially it was celebrated as some kind of wonderful anti-racist event, some kind of march forward for societal cohesion and you know improved race relations. I don't see it as that. I just see it as an embedded part of the cultural domination that we're subjected to. Yeah, I see it as something that has been forced on us. Because you can't honestly tell me that the locals want this parading through their area year after year after year, with all the crime that comes with it, all the businesses that have to be boarded up, with all the you know, the sexual assaults and stabbings that come along with this so-called carnival, this so-called festival. Yeah, i it's no. No, we just have to put up with it, because they'll never they'll never move to ban it. Because any attempt to do so would obviously be perceived as racist, would it not? All the way back in 1976 there was a race riot at one of these things. And it started because the police tried to apprehend the pickpocket and people at the festival, presumably ethnic people, jumped in to defend the pickpocket, and this escalated into a full-scale riot, which ever since then has been used as you know a cudgel in the race relations war. It's been used to drastically alter the way that police respond to this event and the way that they carry out their duties in regards to arrests and and keeping the keeping the peace and keeping people safe to a point where now you don't have to look very far to find videos of people randomly coming up to police officers and twerking on them or stealing their hats and and the police, you know, because the majority of the people involved are black, they just have to smile and laugh and you know not show any signs of disdain or or you know any sign that this conduct might piss them off. They just have to smile, grin, bear it, put up with it, and same again next year. This is an expected part of being a police officer, you know, around this event. And the numbers of police officers involved are astronomical, up to 7,000 coppers forced to police this event just because of the high levels of crime. And if this was an event cased towards any demographic other than the Afro Caribbean part of the population, you think this should be allowed to go on? You think it'd be celebrated in the way that it is? I I really don't think so. You know, you can't even have a small gathering of people turn out for a St. George's Day parade. Yeah, and when I say small number, I mean less than fifty people, without being faced, boxed in on all sides by riot police ready just in case things kick off from you know a few people waving the flag of their nation, singing a couple of songs and having a beer and a good time. Yeah, but hundreds of thousands of Afro-Caribbeans and sadly enough the people of the British public that have been suckered into accepting this debauchery as some kind of cultural enrichment. Hundreds of thousands of them, and this is allowed to go year after year after year, and the levels of crime just escalate all the time. It wasn't always always this drug fuelled outdoor sex parade that it is these days. It hasn't always been like that. But at the same time it's never been what you'd call a nice, positive, peaceful event. But of course the media goes into overdrive to spin it as some kind of great positive thing. Yeah, the the BBC and the police have both come out and said despite the high numbers of arrests, it was an overwhelmingly positive, you know, celebratory event. And well, yeah, that that doesn't really mean anything. I mean, Brixton rioters, they they felt elated with the things they were doing. You know, when they stormed the Winter Palace in Russia, they would have felt elated at what they were doing. It doesn't mean it's an objective. Relatively good thing though, does it? You know, I'd I'd feel pretty good about tearing down the houses of parliament brick by brick. Doesn't mean it's something that we should get behind, does it? Although I I'm sure I could gather a lot of support for that. They go into overdrive to cover up the sheer scale of crime and abortiony. They twist themselves in knots so that they can they can show it to be you know this wonderful, enriching event. Now compare this to the United Kingdom watch in September last year. About this time last year, and there was between one and three million people in London supporting Tommy Robinson and patriot movements across the country. And there were something like twenty-seven arrests, something like that, across the course of the day. More than half of these were far left agitators, and bearing in mind this was in a climate as well where you've got the police just looking for a reason to arrest people. But this was okay, it was called mostly peaceful, but they made a bit of a meal out of the arrests. Never mind the fact that most of the arrests came from people opposed to the movement instead of people partaking in the movement. Yeah. Contrast that with the saying coming on 600 arrests this year for Notting Hill. But no, no, overwhelmingly positive. I'm sorry, tell that to the people that got raped, tell that to the people that got stabbed. You know, a boat lost his life after a police chase, dived in the canal, and drowned. Yeah, tell that to him. Overwhelmingly positive. I can't help but feel it. It gets the the push that it does, you know, from the Mayor Sadiq Khan because he just loves seeing anything that isn't British being paraded around. You know, not a word about the Palestine marches, but very, very quick to condemn any kind of patriot movement. Very quick to condemn any kind of nativist sentiment. But when it comes to truly degenerate behaviour, as long as it's not British people or celebrating British people, and as long as it can use it as you know a weapon against British people, saying this is our shared culture, this degenerate, barbaric, dirty, you know, sexualised, criminal enterprise. This is our culture. As long as it can use it for those purposes, he's more than happy to go along with it. And the cost to us as taxpayers is astronomical. It's somewhere in the region of £20 million just to police the event, and a further million to clean up after it. You can't expect these people to clean up after themselves, can you? And uh it's such a waste of resources and it's a corrupting influence on kids that are taking along to it. You know, I don't think parents should be encouraging kids to go along to it, even the so-called family day that saw the best part of 170 arrests this year. It's not like they tone down the behaviour for the benefit of the kids and the families. No, they don't. It's just the police response is a little bit slacker on these days. You know, so they can portray it as some kind of family event that you should absolutely take your children to. And they do this so that kids are exposed to this kind of culture while being denied access to their own culture. And it really is sad because you see them begin to adopt this and this kind of culture, this style of dancing, and you see them getting an affinity for this kind of music that's just it's got a lot of rhythm, but it's soulless. You know, there's no class to it, there's no art to it, it's just degenerate noise. And you see kids driving around blasting it out of their cars, you think to yourself who could possibly enjoy this? Who could possibly enjoy this? But it's it it's some kind of you know cultural keystone to play this music and to to dress in this way and to dance in this way. Yeah, never mind the fact that you're eight years old and you're a little white girl. Yeah listen to this black music and twerk and jump around in a sexualised manner. This is how you get, you know, social points in this day and age. And it's portrayed as our culture, and it's positively, absolutely not our culture. But once again, it's the celebration of anything outside, anything other than the native culture, the native populace. Yeah, the celebration of anything that comes from outside these borders, and it's used from within to poison the well. Yeah, to say, oh, you don't actually have any culture. I remember last year, Sadhid Khan giving this speech where he said, you know, Notting Hill Carnival is so diverse, and let's face it, diversity is so much more fun. And you've got to understand when these people say diversity, they're not actually talking about true diversity. They're talking about different skin colours being used as foot soldiers in their cultural race war against the native people of this island. Yeah, because Sadiq Khan is a Pakistani Muslim, and he would like nothing better than to see us, the British people, alienated from our history, our culture, our heritage, all of this. Alright, dispossessed of our lands. Because once you can sever that connection, which they've been doing very successfully, once you can sever that connection, it makes it a lot lot easier to turn the country Islamic, which is ultimately the aim of Muslims. Now I don't care whether they they say that's what their goal is or not. You know, Khan, while he's over here, preaches, you know, LGBT rights and diversity and yeah, you know, multiculturalism. You can guarantee, being the fervent Muslim that he is, he has to grit his teeth when he praises the gay community. He has to grit his teeth as he celebrates any other culture but the Islamic one. Yeah, but he does it because he understands its use in the culture war, he understands its use in demoralising and severing the British population from their past, their ancestral heritage. Yeah. So everything the mayor of London does, everything he has been he has done as mayor, has been done with that in mind. He's turned the capital into a place where natives don't feel welcome anymore. And this is not the only place either, that's that's been turned against the natives by the Islamic invaders. Look at Birmingham. Birmingham has been overrun for quite a long time by pretty extreme Muslims. Yeah, and they've been helped into positions of power by a leftist coalition. Yeah, the same kind of thing that brought in the revolution in Iran, 1979. They've used the left to get a foothold of power. They've used porous borders and weak immigration policies to stack the numbers so that Birmingham, you know, the second city of England, is now you know it it will it cannot be won by natives. It's got a radicalised, highly motivated Islamic population that will turn out in force to vote for what they see as their path to power. It's gotten to a point now where they're seeking an injunction to make sure that anybody that hangs up a Union Jack or St. George's flag could possibly face two years in prison. I wish I was making this up. But this is true. Yeah, two years in prison for flying the flag of your own nation, and this coming at a time where the civil service, a lot of civil servants in Whitehall, have said that the flying of the flag, you know, the Raise the Colours campaign that saw huge, huge numbers of St. George's flags and British flags raised all across the country. It made them not feel just uncomfortable, but it made them fear for their lives. Can you imagine that? Now, of course, I would suggest that if you work in the civil service and the sight of the flag of the nation that you serve makes you fear for your life, you might be in the wrong country. Well, I've never heard of a native person, an English person, a British person, being so fearful at the sight of our flag that it made them, you know, afraid that they might not live to see their grandch, you know, their grandkids be born or something like this. Now I've never heard it from a native person, so of course these are foreigners. Now, what are foreigners doing in the Home Office? What are foreigners doing in our civil service? Particularly foreigners, with such a disdain for the native people that they cannot stand the sight of our national flag. It makes them fear for their lives. Now let's assume this is legitimate. Yeah, no, I don't I don't believe for one minute that it makes them fear for their lives, but they they say it and they phrase it in this way. It's emotive language. Yeah, the same as the the bloke we spoke about earlier, talking about the you know the first step to Alfreds. It's emotive language that are designed to shut you down and make you think, you know, what we're doing here is really, really bad. So I don't believe for one minute it actually makes them fear for their lives. What it does is it makes them fear for their privileged position in society, you know, where where you can leverage foreign ancestry and belonging to some kind of minority group, you can leverage that into social power, you can leverage that into favourable treatment by a system that is geared towards giving you that special treatment. That's what they fear for, is the loss of the power that they've managed to usurp from the native British people. But let's just say it's a valid position and they actually do fear for their lives. Well then would it be valid for me to say that I don't want to see the flag of Pakistan raised because it makes me fearful for for my life and for the future of my country? Bearing in mind there are huge contingents in the Pakistani community. They've not only sat by while their compatriots raped and molested young girls and women, but have also made it explicitly clear that they are here to take over, that they are here to breed us out, to overrepresent themselves in our politics, to a point where we can no longer make democratic decisions. We the natives will no longer have any kind of democratic influence, and then they will turn this country into a Muslim country and use that as a cudgel to force us to convert or die. Yeah, because I can find a lot of a lot of videos from many different mosques all across the country where they explicitly state that this is their intention. So if I came out along the lines of the civil service and said, actually, I don't want to see the flag of Pakistan, I don't want to see it flying over, you know, Westminster Abbey or whatever to celebrate Pakistani Independence Day. Is that a valid position also? Oh no, no, of course that's some kind of racism, isn't it? Yeah, these people they they try to write rules that they themselves will not abide by. And also, just quicker quicker side, I think it's a bit of a joke that Pakistan celebrates its independence. Yeah, the Pakistani community in this country celebrates their independence from Britain while living in Britain and suckling at the teeth of its institutions, while proclaiming how proud they are that they broke free of the colonial yoke. Yeah, okay, Pakistan. And I I I find it laughable. I really do, but you can't expect any kind of consistency from these people. They are in it purely for the benefit of their own people. And we see this with pretty much every single ethnic group in the UK, and this is seen as natural and it's okay, it's perfectly fine. Yeah, why wouldn't the Pakistani community advocate for the benefit of more Pakistanis? Why wouldn't the Muslims advocate for their own group? Why wouldn't the Jews advocate for their own group? Now why wouldn't the Afro-Caribbeans advocate for their own group and celebrate their culture or like thereof with their debaucherous, disgusting, obnoxious annual carnival? Why wouldn't they do that? It's their group. They're in it for themselves. There's only one ethnicity of you know, one group of people in this country that cannot advocate for themselves and and and find any kind of support by the law, and that is British people. As we have seen in the response from multiple high-ranking politicians and lords and peers and members of parliament, we've seen their response to a milktose policy like British housing for British people, in which you cannot even advocate for the benefit of people that are born in this country. Let alone belonging to the long line of ancestral heritage of this country. You can't advocate for them in in any way without it being say the the the first step on a long journey to the fourth reich. It's absolutely laughable. And we let these people have their say. There's very little pushback. There's very little pushback. Every time they try to compare you to Hitler or you know the Nazis or anything like this, anytime they do that, there's no pushback. Then you're supposed to just accept that because, well, you know, the Nazis were white people and you're white people, and the Nazis, well, they were very nationalistic and you're nationalistic. So obviously you're a Nazi. You know, i i it's this really kind of zoomed out, low resolution view of history. It's low resolution they they want to talk all nuance and details when it comes to disparities between communities. For example, how as Nathan Kaufner's pointed out, if it was based purely on academic achievement, you know, many universities would have hardly any black students whatsoever because they don't get the grades. Then they want to talk nuance, then they want then they want to talk about, you know, socioeconomic factors that impact black kids' abilities to do homework and study and learn and the environment that they grow up in, and somehow they they find a way to turn it back on you, the white man. And they they do this consistently. That's why they give they give very little consideration to you know the Chinese, the Japanese, you know, nationalities that that succeed at a higher rate than native white British people that consistently get higher academic scores. They kind of want to leave those out of the conversation, yeah, because it it opens up questions then as to you know the the type of people that create certain results. So it comes back to this idea of universality, you know, people are just people, and yeah, this is a refrain you'll probably have heard, you know, over the years many, many times. Now it doesn't matter where you go, once you've travelled enough, you'll see that people are the same wherever you go. I remember being hit over the head with these bollocks years ago, and it's absolutely not true. People are not the same wherever you go. Yeah. The blue egg liberals, you know, in their tank tops and whatever. Yeah, with their different pronouns and septum piercings and the like. Go and do that stuff over in the Middle East and see how far you get. Yeah, see how long you hold fast to the belief that people are the same wherever you go. They're not. People have tolerances for different things. People have different belief systems, people have different attitudes towards women and different attitudes towards responsibilities and rights and yeah. People are not the same wherever you go. And people, I I still firmly believe this. People are what makes the nation a nation. A nation's character is defined by the people within that nation. And I don't think it's the other way around. You know I I I don't think you can take some backwater savage from Papua New Guinea, drop him into middle of Cambridge, and he's going to come out okay in five years' time. I simply do not believe it. But it's something, you know, well when you look at how dire the situation is in Africa as an example. You know, it's always posited by the establishment and academics and all kinds of different people, usually on the left, that uh the reason for the sorry state of Africa is because of the damage done there by Europeans. Well, Africa was screwed up long before we ever arrived there. A lot of the problems that it faces now, it was facing back then. Yeah. A lot of the infrastructure advancements and improvements in quality of life that they have on that continent are thanks to the intervention of the West. Slavery, of course, is condemned as the ultimate original sin. But aside from this, yeah, Africa owes a lot to the Western world. And I would die on that hill. Yeah, we have nothing to apologize for. I never had a slave, but I've certainly sent aid and had my taxes taken away from me, even when I could really have used them and sent over to Africa to help build hospitals and schools for 'em. Not that you ever get a word of thanks from them. Yeah, I've donated to water aid and sent medical supplies over there and clothes and you name it. Yeah, we've helped out in many, many ways. But despite all the aid that they were given, they just cannot make headway. Yeah, and then uh of course some of them will say, well, it's because of the inhospitable environment. It's a very, very tough place to live. With all the you know the the bad climate and the dangerous animals and water shortages, this, that and the other. You know, it it's it's a miracle really that they've survived there as long as they have. But you know, the people, I maintain it is the people that makes a nation what it is. Yeah, when Europeans were involved with Africa, when we were running African countries, they flourished. Yeah, Zimbabwe when it was Rhodesia. Finest place in Africa to live. Because of the people. Yeah, when they chased all the whites out and the the farming went to shit and they couldn't grow anything, they begged us to go back. Yeah, well, it's one of the worst places to live now. Would you want to live in Zimbabwe? I certainly wouldn't. Yeah, South Africa. People were better off under apartheid, like every ethnic group was doing better under apartheid than they are under the current administration of the ANC, which is all black and seeks only for the advancement of the black population of South Africa. It's the people. The people make a place. All it is. Yeah, and if you you want to blame it on environmental factors and the climate and the shortage of resources and all these things. Well, let me remind you that our rejects, our criminals that we banished to the arse end of nowhere in Australia. They turned that place into a paradise. Yeah, they built up around the coast and they turned it into a place where millions of people would love to live. Yeah. They did that despite it being w one of the most hostile places on earth. There are plants there that will murder you. Yeah, i i it's a place where putting your shoes on without checking them could cost you your life. That's how how hard it is to live there. Yeah, there's all kinds of animals, sea life, plants, you know, you name it. Anything that can kill you, you can find it in Australia. Yeah, those people, so despite being the rejects and the criminals of England and the British Isles, they were able to colonize it and turn it into a wonderful place. Yeah, an absolutely beautiful place. Of course that's being wrecked now by the newly arrived third worlders. But until that happened, what a place to live. Fantastic place. Yeah. The Aborigines, they'd been there for a long time and done fuck all with it. Yeah, you get you get a bunch of Anglo-Rejacks turn up, and look what they managed to do with it. People make the argument, yeah, but they they were given all the all the resources of you know colonial powers in order to administrate themselves and and construct. Have we not given those things to the Africans also? You know, I I I think it's it's high time that these countries started taking a bit of responsibility. And I I would advocate the same for my own people. We need to take responsibility for what's happening on our island. And I believe a lot of it starts with rejecting multiculturalism and asserting that you come here, if you want to integrate, you integrate. No more multiculturalism, no more hanging on to your previous culture, yeah, no more idolising Pakistan and its independence from the UK while you're living in the UK. Now, if Pakistan's so great, go and live there. But no, you you've come to us. And there are two reasons that they come to us. One of them is because they realise that they have failed to turn Pakistan into a good place to live, it's a shit all. The other is because they want to turn Britain into a Muslim place. But don't forget this. So the people make a nation what it is. If we become the minority and we're bred out by all these disparate third worlders, these economic chances that have come here to live at our expense, as to take everything that's ours, passed down to us by thousands of years of ancestral lineage, they take that away from us. They take control of this place. It will cease to be what it currently is. So the compassionate argument falls apart. You know, I see this. We have resources to take care of people, we have the NHS, you know, we we can afford it, we can take anybody in the world and we can help them. And it's our duty to do so to atone for the sins of colonialism and slavery and oh the rest of it. You've heard these arguments a million times. Okay, but what happens when these systems collapse? Because they will collapse without proper management and without, you know, guarding access to the NHS, to social housing, to schooling, all these things, all these institutions that people love so much, they will collapse if we do not protect them. Alright? And at that point, they'll be useless. They won't be able to help anybody, they won't be able to help you, they won't be able to help me, they won't be able to help refugees from war torn countries, they won't be able to help anybody. So the compassionate thing to do if you want to preserve a society that can take care of people when they really, really need it. So sometimes you've got to be cruel to be kind. And in all honesty, I said before, I'll say it again, I don't think teaching the Africans and the third world to stand there with the hand out, you know, waiting for us to solve their problems for them or give them money and hope that they can solve it themselves, they're never gonna learn. And if they never learn, they're never gonna fix the problems they've gotten to where they are today. Right? So you've got to be cruel to be kind, and sometimes withholding that, it will force them to find their own solutions. Because they rejected our solutions, remember? When we colonized these places and ran them and brought order to chaotic places, well, they got tired of that, they rejected our rule, which is their right to do so, so we left. But they're still there with the begging bowl, they still want the resources, they still want the investment, they still want all the benefits of being a colonial entity without being run by us. And then they go one worse than that, and they come over and they call us Nazis and racists, and they've still got the begging bowl out. Yeah. I don't know. I'm rambling, but these are all the thoughts that uh came to mind after seeing the all too familiar scenes of the debauchery of the Notting Hill Festival. Notting Hill Carnival, everybody, mark it on your calendar so you know when not to go to London. Looks like an absolute hellhole to me. And my thoughts and sympathies are with the people that live there and have to put up with this year upon year. So uh I thank you for listening, guys. Feel free to contact me at flatcapnationalist at gmail.com. I look forward to speaking to you on the next one. God bless, goodbye.