The Epstein Files
The Epstein Files is the first AI-native documentary podcast to systematically analyze the Jeffrey Epstein case at scale. With over 3 million pages of DOJ documents, court records, flight logs, and public resources now available, traditional journalism simply cannot process this volume of information. AI can.
This series leverages artificial intelligence at every layer of production. From custom-built architecture that ingests and cross-references millions of pages of evidence, to AI-generated audio that delivers findings in a consistent, accessible format, this project represents a new model for investigative journalism. What would take a newsroom years to analyze, AI can process in days, surfacing connections, patterns, and details that would otherwise remain buried in the sheer volume of data.
Each episode draws directly from primary sources: unsealed court documents, FBI files, the black book, flight logs, victim depositions, and the DOJ's ongoing document releases. The AI architecture identifies relevant passages, cross-references names and dates across thousands of files, and synthesizes findings into episodes that make this information digestible for the public.
The series covers Epstein's mysterious rise to wealth, his network of enablers, the properties where crimes occurred, the 2008 sweetheart deal, his death in federal custody, the Maxwell trial, and the unanswered questions that remain.
This is not sensationalized content. It is documented fact, processed at scale, and presented with journalistic rigor. The goal is simple: make the public record accessible to the public.
New episodes release as additional documents become available, with AI enabling rapid analysis and production that keeps pace with ongoing revelations. Our Standards AI enables scale, but journalistic standards guide the output. Every claim is tied to specific documents. The series clearly distinguishes between proven facts and allegations. Victim testimony is handled with dignity. Names that appear in documents are not accused of wrongdoing unless documents support such claims.
This is documented fact, processed at scale, presented for the public.
Produced by the Neural Broadcast Network.
The Epstein Files
File 132 - Karyna Shuliak: The Will, the Estate, and the Public Record
Use Left/Right to seek, Home/End to jump to start or end. Hold shift to jump forward or backward.
Karyna Shuliak appears in the Epstein story through press accounts of a Belarus connection, nine-figure will lines, and the shorthand 'last girlfriend' frame. This episode separates civil docket text and filed allegations from headline inference—mapping what executor-controlled estate processes and compensation-fund structures actually show where Shuliak is named, and what remains uncorroborated in the public record.
Sources for this episode are available at: https://nbn.fm/epstein-files/episode/ep132
About The Epstein Files
The Epstein Files is an AI-generated podcast analyzing the 3.5 million pages released under the Epstein Files Transparency Act (EFTA). All claims are grounded in primary source documents, published on the Neural Broadcast Network website for verification.
Produced by Neural Broadcast Network
Subscribe to NBN's Newsletter
Get new investigations, new shows, and the raw intelligence you won't find anywhere else straight to your inbox.
Sign up at nbn.fm/newsletter.
Welcome back to the Epstein files. Last time we looked at file 131, the morning he died. Today we are analyzing file 132, the last girlfriend. As always, every document and source we reference is available at Epsteinfiles fm. So let us start with the trust document signed two days before Epstein died. Because the name on that beneficiary line sets up the first anomaly immediately. Right. The documents identify Karina Schuliak as the primary recipient of a reported $100 million bequest. The specific execution date of this instrument is known as the 1953 Trust. Name for his birth year is documented as August 8, 2019. Yeah. Which is exactly 48 hours before his death in federal custody. Picture this scenario for a moment. You have an individual locked inside a federal holding facility. This is one of the most heavily monitored, physically secure environments in the United States judicial system. The inmate is facing severe federal trafficking charges. Yet somehow, the gears of high finance are turning right outside those cell bars. The paper trail demands we ask how a $100 million transfer is authorized and executed in that specific environment without raising immediate red flags with, you know, the Bureau of Prisons and the attending attorneys. Because the severe institutional constraints of executing complex financial documents inside a federal detention center, they require extensive coordination. Right. To understand how an individual becomes the primary beneficiary of a $100 million trust executed under those conditions, we must forensically trace her integration into the network. And the documents released under the Epstein Files Transparency act provide a precise timeline of this integration. Yes. We have a continuous administrative paper trail. It maps her presence across multiple corporate entities and financial institutions over a five year period. The EFTA records initially identify Karina Schiliak on paper as a Belarusian model and interior designer. If you look at the surface level documentation, she appears peripheral. But when you audit the internal communications, the documents show her first clear integration into the upper echelons of the network through an email chain labeled Intro. And the lesson schedule starting in January 2017. We must look at the exact correspondence to understand the architecture of her integration. The documents released under the ETA contain emails dated January 12 and January 19, 2017. Right. The Yamada emails. Yes. These are exchanges between Karina Schuliak and an individual named Romy Yamada. These communications detail the coordination of cultural tours in Tokyo and Kyoto. So what exactly is she asking for in these emails? In the January 12 email, Chilliac responds to a specific questionnaire regarding her upcoming travel. She writes, quote, I am hoping to learn more about service with attention to detail. Service with attention to Detail? Yes. And furthermore, she explicitly requests a calligraphy experience, which Yamada then confirms with their cultural partners in Japan. Here is the discrepancy. The documents show her taking cultural lessons on service, acting as a student of international etiquette. Yet simultaneously, the paper trail shows her giving direct operational directives to Epstein's core executive staff. That does not add up. No, it does not. You do not have an interior designer taking calligraphy lessons or while simultaneously dictating orders to the architects of a financial apparatus. That presents a clear discrepancy in the administrative record. And it requires us to evaluate the organizational hierarchy. While the 2017 Yamada emails position her as an individual receiving cultural instruction, the internal staff communications establish a highly elevated position within the enterprise. The documents show an email from Schuliac directed to Richard Khan. Yes. We must pause and establish exactly who Richard Khan is within this network. If you are reading the Catlin Doe trafficking complaint, Khan is not a low level assistant. He is a primary associate. Right. A core financial lieutenant. He is the individual who later served as the joint personal representative of the entire estate alongside Darren Indyke. The civil complaints document his role extensively. Precisely. In this specific email, Schuliac directs Richard Kahn to pick up Jeffrey Epstein's passport. The Consul General of Belarus. Her stated reason in the written record is simply that she is, quote, on the way to the airport. And Khan just agrees to this? Yes. Khan responds and confirms he will execute this task. He will retrieve the passport from the consulate and hold it in the office safe. Consider the logistical reality of that exchange. A foreign consulate is a secure diplomatic facility. Handling the primary identification documents of an individual under continuous federal scrutiny requires strict permission protocol. Absolutely. Yet Schuliac delegates this highly sensitive security task to the joint personal representative of the estate simply because she's commuting to the airport. This establishes a high level of operational authority. She is directing the movements and secure handling of sensitive identification documents by the core financial staff. And this operational authority is further corroborated when we audit the flight manifests. The records for the Gulfstream aircraft, tail number N212JE, which was operated by a corporate entity named JE LLC, list the passenger Shuliac Raina on multiple routes in April 2017 and April 2018. If you are looking at corporate aviation logs, it is never just about who is on the plane. It is about the legal entity that owns the plane and the liability shields wrapped around it. It is necessary to clarify the corporate structure here. As shown in the Katlando complaint, the documentation establishes a network of aviation shell companies JE Inc. Is identified as a direct defendant in that civil action. Actually, yes. Paragraph 192 of the complaint details that JG Inc. Owned the Boeing 757 aircraft, tail number N908JE the federal complaint alleges that JGE conspired to commit offenses in violation of 18 U.S.C. section 1591, specifically arranging and facilitating transportation for trafficking victims. The appearance of Karina Schuliak on the manifests of the N212JE aircraft proves institutional facilitation of her movement within this exact corporate aviation infrastructure. She is not flying commercial. No. She is being transported through the precise logistical channels flagged in federal trafficking complaints. Which brings us back to the Jeffrey E. Epstein 2019 Trust, which was signed weeks before his death and later filed with the federal courts in the Southern District of New York and the Southern District of Florida. The documents show a hurried restructuring of assets. Yes. The execution of the 1953 Trust on August 8, 2019. We must apply a forensic audit standard to the execution of this trust. We do not have documentation for the exact room in the facility where this was signed. But consider the institutional barriers. They are significant. To execute a trust of this magnitude, you typically require the physical presence of the grantor, legal counsel, and individuals to witness and notarize the signatures. Moving that legal apparatus into a federal lockup, bypassing standard visitation protocols for an inmate on high security status, requires a massive deployment of legal leverage. The trust instruments state clearly her legal standing as a beneficiary. But more importantly, the documents show a documented concealment strategy. Right. We must examine the mechanics of probate law to understand why this specific legal instrument was chosen. Because in a standard probate process, when an individual dies, their will is filed with a surrogate's court. Exactly. It becomes a matter of public record immediately. Any creditor, any journalist, or any victim can go to the courthouse, request the file, and see exactly what assets exist and who is slated to receive them. Think of normal probate like a public ledger. Every transaction, every beneficiary, every dollar is illuminated for the public to scrutinize. But a private trust operates entirely differently. By placing his assets into a private trust, the estate bypassed public probate entirely. A private trust acts as a financial invisibility cloak. Right. The asset distribution is governed by the private document, which is not automatically filed in a public court repository upon death. This legal maneuver effectively shielded the $100 million bequest to Karina Schuliak from immediate seizure, injunction, or even basic scrutiny by the numerous victims who were concurrently filing Civil claims under the Trafficking Victims Protection Act. The timing of the August 8th signature indicates a deliberate calculation to move the assets behind a private legal wall before the inevitable civil litigation commenced. A trust document is ultimately just a set of instructions on paper. For those instructions to have power, there must be a financial infrastructure willing hold the assets and process the transactions. Which brings us to the banking architecture. We must examine the Deutsche bank know your customer or KYC reports obtained by the Southern District of New York. The documents show Epstein's private wealth management account relationships. We can audit the presentation Deutsche bank gave to SDNY regarding these specific accounts. To understand the gravity of these reports, you have to understand how a bank's KYC protocols are designed to function. It is a mandatory regulatory framework. Yes. Financial institutions are required by federal law to identify the ultimate beneficial owners of accounts, assess the risk profile of the client and monitor continuously for suspicious activity. This is especially stringent concerning high risk individuals or those involved in ongoing federal investigations. When you deposit a large sum of cash, the bank's algorithms automatically scan for anomalies. If you are a high profile individual with a documented criminal history, your accounts are supposed to trigger enhanced due diligence. The compliance department is supposed to ask, you know, where is this money coming from? Who is authorized to move it? Who are the associated persons? And the presentation focused on what the bank disclosed regarding associated persons and critically, what they withheld from regulators during the operational years of the accounts. The documents confirm Karina Schuliak was integrated into this specific banking architecture. Yes. The compliance mechanisms that are designed to flag the movement of funds related to illicit enterprises failed to interdict her integration into the wealth management structure. The financial documents released under the Epstein files Transparency act provide the receipts. We have a series of physical checks issued directly by Karina Schuliak from Deutsche bank trust company Americus. Right. Located at 345 Park Avenue, New York. If you are an investigator looking at a pile of financial disbursements, you follow the payees. We must cross reference the payees on Schuliac's Deutsche bank checks with the sworn allegations in the Catlin Doe complaint. The documents show Schuliac issuing checks to an entity named 30166 Owners Corp. Paragraph 113 of the Catlin Doe complaint states precisely how this specific real estate entity was utilized. The complaint alleges that Epstein promised the victim a permanent place to live at, quote, one of his apartments located at 301 East 66th Street, New York, NY, if she entered into a fraudulent marriage to secure a Visa for an international recruiter. This is inconsistent with a standard interior design contract or the actions of a passive beneficiary. Very inconsistent. 30166 Owners Corp. Is a cooperative housing corporation. When you issue a check to that entity, you are paying the monthly maintenance fees required to keep the apartment operational. The financial records establish that Karina Schuliak was paying the maintenance to the 3166 Owner's Corp. She was funding the exact residential infrastructure used to house victims as outlined in the federal trafficking complaint. The administrative record contains other financial nodes that map her administrative control over the real estate network. The checks from the Deutsch bank account are also made out to Willow Place Realty, Arta Biscard's ESQ and utility billing services. The documents show Juliak acting as a financial administrator. She is paying the utilities, she is paying the legal retainers for real estate transactions, and she is paying the corporate landlords. The banality of the administrative record often provides the clearest picture of integration. We have an invoice from artspace warehouse labeled document EFT 00572885. Yes. It bills Karina Schuliak for Shauna Lai's artwork titled Fragments for the amount of $425. Consider the contrast of that document. Right? On one side of the ledger you have an international enterprise under federal investigation for systematic trafficking requiring complex legal trusts and aviation shell companies. On the other side of the ledger, you have Karina Schuliac diligently paying a $425 invoice for decorative artwork to hang in the properties. It further cements her role in managing and furnishing the physical properties within the network she was maintaining. The stage sets where the alleged crimes occurred. The financial administration is matched by the travel logistics. Yes, we have email chains From March and April 2016 involving Natalia Malikova, a Centurion relationship manager at American Express. The documents show his executive assistant, Leslie Grof, directly coordinating Shuliak's international movement with Amex Centurion Services. To understand the Amex Centurion infrastructure, you have to look at the service tier. It's not a standard credit card. No. The Centurion card is an invitation only financial product that comes with a dedicated concierge team. This team functions essentially as an elite high priority travel agency. And the documents show the executive staff utilizing this specific concierge team to create phantom hotel bookings to manipulate European visa requirements. This is documented institutional complicity. We see this explicitly in the email chain with the subject line, quote, reservations for Visa Carina Shiliak st. Barth. The EFTA documents detail this incident precisely. The Schengen area encompasses 29 European countries that have officially abolished border controls at their mutual borders. To obtain a short term Schengen visa, an applicant must provide proof of accommodation for the entire duration of their intended stay in the zone. Right. It is a strict algorithmic requirement of the immigration process. On March 16, 2016, Natalia Molokova, the Amex Centurion manager, emails Leslie Grof regarding a reservation at the Westin Paris Vendome. Molokova writes, quote, hotel wants to know if it is correct length of stay. When do you think you will be ready to cancel it? Should I reduce amount of days? Graf responds, quote, sure, we can still cancel even though we reconfirm with them. I would think they were booking luxury suites specifically to fulfill the length of stay requirements necessary to satisfy the Schengen visa consular offices. They were essentially using phantom hotel bookings as a skeleton key. They would book a luxury suite in Paris just long enough to trick the European visa computers into unlocking the borders. Right. They provided the documentation to the embassy and the minute the visa was stamped and secured, they communicated with American Express to cancel the room and avoid the charges. The documented intent to cancel the reservation once the visa was secured is a direct manipulation of international border protocols facilitated in writing by the designated account manager at a major financial institution. The April 2016 travel itineraries processed through American Express also include internal European transit. Yes, we have rail Europe bookings from Venice to Florence on the ITLO high speed rail network, onward to Rome and then to London. There are also JetBlue and Delka flight records documenting her return routes to Palm Beach. This travel infrastructure connects directly to her medical care. High net worth individuals often integrate their travel logistics with specialized medical concierge services. The documents released under the EPA include a letter from an internist, Dr. Woodson C. Merrill, directed to Dr. Ellen Marmor regarding Karina Schuliak. In this letter, Dr. Merrill states he will continue to monitor her labs on a monthly basis. Monthly laboratory monitoring by elite private physicians requires significant coordination and expenditure. The documents show a comprehensive, highly funded support infrastructure wrapping around Shuliac. Yes, this medical and travel integration matches the insurance data in the record. We have the policy documents for an Alliance Global Assistance annual executive plan purchased for her. The records show this policy, which cost a mere $459, was active from September 5, 2014 through September 2015 and renewed again in August 2015. You have to look at the contrast between a basic $459 travel insurance policy in 2014 and a hundred million dollar trust document in 2019. It traces an arc of total integration. We must review the chronological paper trail to compare the timeline against the narrative. The Alliance Travel Insurance establishes her presence in the network's administrative files by August 2014. The American Express Centurion visa emails prove high level executive staff integration by early 2016. The Romi Yamada emails prove cultural instruction in early 2017 and the 1953 trust proves ultimate financial inheritance in August 2019. Furthermore, we have an email documenting her direct management of the operational staff at the primary New York residence. The Catlin Doe complaint identifies the mansion at 9E 71st street as being owned initially by defendant 9E 71st Street Corporation before the title was transferred to defendant Maple Inc. In document EFEF T000-552-780, Schuliac writes directly to the staff managing that property. Quote Sony Elia will not be able to clean the apartments due to assisting Merwin with a toilet installation at 71st. She is directing the maintenance personnel at the primary New York residence. The civil complaints identified this exact property as a central location for the trafficking enterprise. The documents show a continuous loop of administrative control from negotiating with Amex centurion managers in Paris to scheduling toilet installations on the Upper east side. We do not have documentation for the exact origin of the funds placed into the Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas account before Schuliac dispersed them to the various real estate entities. Right? Nor do we have the internal Bureau of Prisons visitor logs for the August 8th trust execution to identify exactly which attorneys and notaries bypass the standard security protocols. What a forensic auditor can conclude from the financial and travel records is definitive. Shuliac was not merely a passive beneficiary waiting to inherit assets. The records prove she was a functional active node in the estate's administrative apparatus. She authorized maintenance payments to the specific residential cooperative buildings housing victims. She directed the maintenance and cleaning staff at the 71st Street Mansion. She utilized the dedicated American Express Centurion managers to manipulate international visa regulations. Synthesizing the weight of the evidence, the documents prove Karina Schuliak was systematically integrated into the financial, medical and travel infrastructure of the enterprise over a five year period. But the audit of institutional decisions is equally documented and requires scrutiny. Deutsche bank processed the checks funding the victim housing infrastructure, seemingly bypassing their own know your customer alerts. American Express Centurion managers actively facilitated the phantom visa bookings to bypass Schengen area border regulations and the estate attorneys executed the $100 million trust in a federal prison two days before his death to circumvent the public probate courts. This is not speculation. This is documented concealment facilitated by established financial and legal institutions. The paper trail demands a strict accounting from the estate, the banks, and the legal institutions that process these transactions. While federal trafficking investigations were active, the documents prove Karina Schuliak transitioned from an interior designer requiring standard travel insurance in 2014 to the active financial administrator of the real estate network, culminating in her position as the primary beneficiary of a $100 million trust signed 48 hours before his death. If the institutions, the banks, the credit card companies, the estate lawyers were willing to document their complicity in these administrative maneuvers so clearly and ready on corporate servers, it raises a profound operational question. What does that say about their confidence in their own liability shields? Next time, Global Girl.