Global M&A Just Hit a RECORD $2.8 TRILLION. Here's What's Driving It.

Global M&A hit a record $2.83 trillion in H1 2026, the highest total since records began, eclipsing the 2021 peak of $2.74 trillion. 

Deal values in Q2 alone were up 41% year-on-year, deal count up around 10%, mega deals continue to dominate, and small-cap and venture activity is up 200%. 

But the picture underneath the headline numbers is more complicated, and both think the drivers behind the surge may not last into 2027.

In this episode, Debs and Graham work through Bain's mid-year M&A report and unpack the themes behind the numbers. 

They open with market context: SpaceX post-IPO with the share price now below $160 and the first lock-up expiries approaching, the AI mini-correction of June driven by CapEx discipline concerns, Meta joining xAI in selling excess compute capacity, and news of a Chinese frontier model claiming performance at 10% of the cost of leading Western models. 

The M&A conversation itself focuses on the defensive posturing thesis. With geopolitical, business model, and AI-disruption uncertainty at unusual levels, large corporates are buying up smaller disruptive companies as insurance against being outmaneuvered. 

The 200% increase in small-cap and venture activity supports the read. Debs highlights the awkward setup for a typical M&A cycle: hawkish interest rate environment, frothy sector valuations, and low certainty, none of which usually correlate with peak deal activity.

The sector-by-sector split reveals financial services quietly lagging the broader market. Graham & Debs speculate on why, and neither has a strong answer. 

Europe is the standout regional performer, driven partly by the valuation gap versus the US (roughly 15x forward P/E versus 22x) and partly by the possibility that acquirers are moving now ahead of a mooted merger benefit test that could add a second regulatory hurdle to European deals.

The episode closes on H2 predictions. 

Debs is skeptical the second half will match the first, citing hawkish rates, frothy valuations, and the pent-up demand carrying over from 2025 already being absorbed. 

Graham expects continued growth from the existing pipeline but flags 2027 as the genuine question mark: once the current pipeline works through, whether the fundamentals actually justify M&A at this level is an open question.

Key Discussion Points:

• Global M&A hits record $2.8 trillion in H1 2026
• Q2 stats: deal values up 41% YoY, deal count up ~10%, mega deals dominating
• The defensive M&A thesis: uncertainty as a driver of acquisition activity
• Small-cap and venture activity up 200%: what it signals about corporate defensive posturing
• The sector-by-sector split: energy and industrials leading, financial services quietly lagging
• Europe outperforming: valuation gap, competition clearance, and the potential merger benefit test
• Market context: SpaceX post-IPO dynamics, AI selloff drivers, Meta's excess compute sale, and the Chinese model story
• H2 2026 and 2027 predictions: pent-up demand vs. fundamentals

Bain M&A Report: https://www.bain.com/insights/m-and-a-midyear-outlook-2026-a-winners-paradox/

WTBD Newsletter:

https://webmail.wallstreetprep.com/whats-the-big-deal

Follow Us On Socials:

LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/wall-street-prep/
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/wallstreetprep/
Resources: https://linktr.ee/wallstreetprep

Transcript

SPEAKER_00 0:00

Welcome to this week's episode of What's the Big Deal? We're going to take a look at MA this week, aren't we?

SPEAKER_01 0:05

Indeed, indeed. I know we've talked a lot about MA, but we're obviously we're in the in the financial services space. MA is a big, a big feature of a lot of our, certainly both of our former day jobs and a lot of people I hope who are listening to this podcast. And it's been kind of a crazy year for it. A lot of really interesting themes, both on the positive and some maybe foreshadowing on some slowdown that might come. So yeah, bit of an update on Q1, Q2 MA.

SPEAKER_00 0:34

Excellent. Before we dive into that, let's just uh provide a bit of context. Um, because you know, the public markets, what's going on with those, uh, they do have an influence on MA. So let's just sort of check in, shall we, with what's been happening in the markets. Um, Graeme, why don't you kick off? Uh, what what are the things that you think are particularly important before we talk about MA?

SPEAKER_01 0:56

Uh, I mean, two things that I want to I want to talk about quickly. One is just what's going on with SpaceX. I mean, I know this is well covered, but I haven't followed it super, super closely. So I want to get your take on where it is now. And then uh this happened, this happened more last week than than this week. Markets have rebounded a little bit. But we just had a bit of a a bit of a sell-off in in the AI and the overall AI space last week, just with people I think kind of rightly questioning is this big CapEx wave slowly, not not sl not coming to an end rather, but is it starting to slow down? Um so first of all, on SpaceX, I think as we, I mean, we we talked about this and everyone's talking about it. I mean, the valuation was was just nuts. Uh it still popped, obviously, after after listing. It feels like a lot of that was due to some of the technical buying that we talked about. You've got as because because SpaceX was fast admitted into NASDAQ, you've got all the pension funds, index tracking funds, you know, whatnot, who literally just had to buy the stock, kind of driving it up. And it's come down, it's come down since then. So where are we now? And what do you expect to happen when we have the first wave of employee lockup expiring, which sounds like is actually pretty soon.

SPEAKER_00 2:13

Yeah. So um, yeah, just to kind of recap, yeah, we had a huge pop. It was considered a very successful IPO. And but remember, we did predict that because of course from Ian the best IPO in history. Like Yeah, yeah. But it was really oversubscribed. And that oversubscription drove a huge increase in the share price. Um, very much technicals, no change in the fundamentals at the moment, uh, really. Um, but it's come back a little bit. We're now at just below $160 per share. Um, and you know, really the expectation is that over the next couple, over the coming months, the share price will probably ease back a little bit because we are now at the point where the lockups, uh which you know, the existing shareholders and that's employees, but also some of the early stage investors, they are gonna now be in a position to start selling their shares. And remember, the original IPO only listed about 5% of the share count. So as these exiting shareholders sell, it massively increases supply in the market, and you do get a drop-off in the share price. Um that's kind of, as I say, just a technical impact. So um that's gonna sort of play out over the coming months. Um we predicted that the share price would be volatile and it has been moving around a lot. There's been lots of other things happening in the market at the same time, which will have had you know had some impact on SpaceX as well. You mentioned the AI sell-off. Um, we had in June uh really a bit of a correction uh for the AI stocks. Um it is in the context of a strong year-to-date performance, you know, and it was very much only a correction. Usually we consider that to be 10% fall in share prices or less. Um, but yeah, so we've had a bit of a correction, and uh that's been triggered, as you say, by concerns over, you know, the discipline around capex spending, whether or not, you know, there is too much capacity in the market. That is really the market's very sensitive to both bottlenecks in terms of capacity, but also oversupply. Um and that keep you know, that balance between supply and demand and capacity is hugely important when we've got such a concentrated market, so focused on that AI theme. And then kind of adding to that, um, and I know people don't like to think about the bond markets when they think about the equity markets. It's maybe not as thrilling talking about bond yields, but we have got an interest rate environment which is much more hawkish. We have the Fed now talking about interest rate rises, uh a difference in approach to what they consider, you know, would be uh influencing their decisions around interest rates. Um and that puts pressure on a lot of things. And probably we'll we'll come on to that when we talk about the MA sort of impact, you know, sort of looking out on the MA horizon as well. Um, but yeah, in terms of the equity markets, they do react to what's happening in the bond market. And when there's concerns around interest rates being, you know, either increasing or just more hawkish uh tone around those, it does tend to cause the equity markets to pull back. So it's been an interesting few weeks, shall we say, Graham?

SPEAKER_01 5:12

It has, and there's been some some interesting news that's just come out, even well, last last week, this week as well. I think it was even even today, Meta announced that they were going to start selling some excess compute. I don't I don't know if anyone was really aware they even had any excess compute until until they mentioned it now, because I feel like the story that we've all been sold is that there's just been this compute scarcity. You have to spend all the CapEx to build all the AI dentist data centers and whatnot. But in the last couple months, we've had uh we've had XAI sell off their spare capacity. We're having Meta doing the same thing. And like I don't know enough about the technical details of the compute that, say, Meta is putting up for lease to know that you know, can you have can you have one, you know, one data center that runs literally every model? I know there's a lot more specialization in GPUs, TPUs, that kind of thing. So what I don't know is is this a all compute is created equal, or is this more of a, all right, we've got some excess capacity in one area that doesn't influence all the capex spend over here. But I think in any case, if you if you are bearish in any way on the capex spend and the capex cycle for for this AI build out, then like let's think about what that's gonna do to the valuations for NVIDIA, Broadcom, TSMC, all the companies we talked about, what was it a couple a couple months ago? Because ultimately everyone else's CapEx is their revenue, right? So let's let's see what happens. So it's it's interesting because I think we talked a couple weeks ago about we are maybe entering a market where the valuations for a lot of these businesses feel like maybe they've started to slow down in their in terms of their exponential growth. Now we've finally had some signs of, you know, there's there's been a mini correction. Will there be another one yet to come? It feels like it's too early to tell. I don't know what the impact yet of this like excess compute capacity is gonna be. And then I think the other thing that's gonna be interesting, and we've already seen OpenAI delay their their IPO. I don't know yet exactly what Anthropics plans are gonna be. But there was news literally today about another Chinese model that claims to have performance that's basically as good as some of the Frontier models at literally a tenth the cost. So as we think about IPO valuations, run rate revenue, if you are IPOing off a run rate revenue of X, but that's based on that's based on your customers having to use your model because it's the best. If they can go use another one and acquire it for 10% of the cost, then why wouldn't they do that? So it's gonna be an interesting finish to the year in this space, I think. So lots to keep our eyes on and keep tabs on.

SPEAKER_00 8:02

Absolutely. I just I can just see from what you're saying that it's just not gonna take much to move the needle on so many US stocks. It's gonna be an interesting journey as we get more data.

SPEAKER_01 8:13

And to move the market, by the way. Actually, I just I just remember this is something. Well, I was talking to one of my buddies uh a couple weeks ago, and he was talking to a friend, I don't want firm this front this friend works for, basically saying he was aware of a lot of people buying puts on on the NASDAQ in essence, right? Just kind of taking a view that just because you obviously can't short SpaceX yet and you just don't have the capacity to get the shares. If you're taking the view that SpaceX is such a big, big component of the NASDAQ, if you're taking a view on that technical buying stopping and the share price coming down, actually some people made some money uh shorting the Nasdaq. And again, I don't know what what level they were shorting it at. I think you got to have really, really strong conviction and a really good, you know, kind of inside line into just the pace and the quantity of that technical buying in order to make that call. But the fact that you're you're basically shorting one stock by shorting the entire market is kind of nuts.

SPEAKER_00 9:14

It's but it's a reminder that the markets find a way, isn't it? Because I remember when we were first talking about SpaceX, we said the the free float's too small for you to short that stock. Hedge funds would not touch it. Uh, but as you've said, they've found a way, uh albeit by having a short exposure on the entire index, uh, not just not just on one company. Um, but that's yeah, super interesting. Um, and um I think probably some of the uh concerns that we're having about the market uh we you know are relevant to the MA uh discussion that we're about to have. So let's dive into that. Um in terms of um MA, I know we did uh earlier in the year looked at the MA uh review for Q1. Uh it was mega deal central, if you remember. We had pent-up demand because of 2025, you know, things were on hold with what was happening with the US markets and sort of tariff discussions. So Q1 was an absolute blinder, wasn't it? It was amazing.

SPEAKER_01 10:14

It was.

SPEAKER_00 10:15

What about Q2? I've got more of the same grain.

SPEAKER_01 10:18

It's been it's been more the same for the most part. If you compare Q2, MA, MA value, we're up 41% compared to compared to this time last year. So we're still we're still proceeding at this breakneck pace of MA. It's still the mega deals, though. So Q2 value up 41%, deal volume or deal count up, I want to say 10%, 9%, 10%. So we're still we're still favoring the the mega the mega MA deal. So it continues to be that that kind of tail of two halves. I think some of the themes are are the same, but we've got some differences emerging maybe in terms of the the motivation for for some of this MA. I think a lot of it, we were talking just even before, before we started recording the episode, a lot of this feels like defensive posturing on behalf of some of these, some of these big public companies. If you I guess if you think about like what's what's going on in the world right now, there's a ton of uncertainty. There's geopolitical uncertainty, there's business model disruption uncertainty from MA. If you're a if you're a large player and you're trying to protect yourself against the disruption from, you know, say a new new AI startup who you think might might come and take a piece of your pie, the easiest thing you can do is just buy them up. Right. So again, we're looking at this Bain report. And actually we'll we'll link to this. Let's let's put a link to this report in the episode because actually I think it's a it's a it's a free report. You can grab it from Bain's website. It's actually quite quite a quite a useful resource just to go through some of the high-level stats and then and then industry by industry. It's also got some stats on the the deal size. So we've been talking about the mega deals, but also what's been up a lot in terms of both value and count is the is the really the really small cap, you know, kind of startup, startup MA, for lack of a better word, where you've got a big public company buying a small one. You know, presumably these are companies that are developing disruptive technology that a large corporate just wants to wants to buy to protect itself. So it does feel like people are excited about MA, but it also feels like people are just are kind of taking this opportunity now to say, all right, I don't know, I don't know what the world looks like. So I'm gonna do everything in my power, both through looking at my own internal processes, looking at how I can integrate AI into my business myself, and what else can I buy to make myself as defensive as possible, knowing that I don't know what 2027 and beyond looks like. Like it feels like it feels like that's the motivation right now.

SPEAKER_00 12:57

For sure. And I think um, yeah, although the report you're referring to, it has a really interesting chart, and hopefully we can pop that on the screen uh for those of you watching. Um, but it does, it highlights, yeah, the increase in in deals, uh in deal value compared with last year, up 41%, as you said. But yeah, for me, the big standout statistic actually was the the the smaller deals, venture capital uh and corporate venture capitals, as you say, companies going out and sort of buying a stake at least in another disruptive company, that defensive posturing that you mentioned, that's up 200%, albeit small numbers. So that can be a quite volatile statistic. Um but I think that's really interesting in an environment where you have got uncertainty, you've got more hawkish environment on interest rates. Yeah, if I was looking to buy a house, yeah, what would I want? I'd want a friendly interest rate environment and I want cheap property and I want certainty. We've got none of those things in the markets at the moment for companies. So you know, the fact that we have got such robust, you know, sort of deal volume, deal value uh is really interesting, isn't it? And as you say, definitely there's something behind that, and it seems to us like it is to do with, you know, defensive moves around uncertainty and particularly AI. Also, it always seems to come back to AI at the moment, doesn't it, Graham?

SPEAKER_01 14:18

It it does, but I guess it's hard for it not to right now, right? When you think about a technology that is this transformational and this disruptive, it's really, it's really back to the early days of the internet, where you have this new thing that's gonna change how everyone, how everyone behaves, how everyone buys, buys the stuff that powers their daily life, even. It does it does feel much we're very much on on the kind of next wave of the internet almost, right? Where we've got this technology that is just so incredibly disruptive. And I don't think I don't think anyone credibly can say, you know, with with a huge degree of certainty exactly what it's gonna disrupt, how it's gonna change stuff. I think we can with kind of a high degree of certainty to the near-term things that we've seen already and kind of project that out. But over the next, say, five years, I think it's kind of it's almost tough to make a really credible claim right now about exactly what can get replaced and displaced by AI. So I think everyone right now is just saying, okay, I'm gonna do everything I can to protect myself. Yeah. Now, one of the things that that I found interesting about going through this report is they've also got a sector by sector split of MA, MA value. And I want to make sure, I want to make sure I'm I'm quoting my numbers right. It is MA value, and value is up across the board sector by sector. The one, the one where it's it's not or not that much, is financial services. And this is this is global MA, I believe. It doesn't say it's not. So let's just assume for a second this is this is global MA. Europe has been a big driver of MA. There have been some big bank deals in Europe. So let's just assume for a second what you can read into that is actually American MA is down in financial services. Right? If we're flat, basically flat year on year, we know it's we know it's up in Europe. That implies, that implies a decrease here in the US. I don't have a great read on why that would be the case. Because if everyone is taking this defensive posture, say buying up, buying up companies that have AI technology to help protect their business model, I don't know why that's not the case in financial services. And I don't know if that, if that kind of factors into financial services are or appear to be, or they think they are more resilient to disruption by AI, if they think that actually AI is only or can only be a benefit to them in terms of say taking people and processes out and making them more efficient rather than rather than wholesale losing losing customers to a new startup. I guess if you're a bank and you're you're underwriting, you're underwriting a mortgage, are you are you just are you just kind of thinking, you know what? AI is not really going to change that. People are still gonna buy houses, they still need a mortgage to need a mortgage to buy the house. An AI startup isn't all of a sudden gonna start underwriting mortgages. Or yeah, who knows, maybe, maybe it could, but like I I don't have a great sense for why that's the case.

SPEAKER_00 17:27

No, I don't either. I mean, uh my fallback you use financial services is to think about regulatory capital and you know whether the capital constraints prevent them, you know, being able to do any kind of sort of MA reach. But um, I'm not aware of anything there either. But hey, let's throw it out to out to our audience, you know, whatever they what are their thoughts? Do you have any suggestions to why uh financial services are not seeing the same level of uh increase in deals uh that we are seeing in the other sectors? Um and we are.

SPEAKER_01 18:05

Up across the board, fees are up. So there is there should in theory be capital to go out and and make some acquisitions, but just doesn't seem to be happening at the same pace that it is in other industries. And it seemed that one seems a bit funny.

SPEAKER_00 18:20

Yeah, and uh the industries where we do see the huge increase is energy and industrials. And energy, you know, there's been some big deals, you know, around, you know, sort of energy supplies, data centers, industrials again, things like cabling and infrastructure. So I I think you know, those where we have seen the big deals, they are ones that at least feed into the AI theme. Um but it is interesting, isn't it, that we see that big variation uh across the sectors. I think another thing that you mentioned there, Graham, was about uh Europe and those the relative uh sort of influence of the different regions on the deal stats. And I think what really jumps out uh is uh again, we can put the charts on the screen, um, is the fact that there's been such an increase in deal volume related to European targets um relative to Asia Pacific and America's, which was really surprising to me, albeit we have spoken previously about the differences in valuations, you know. I think P multiples in Europe are around sort of I don't know about 15 times versus in the US, forward P multiples about 22 times. So there is that huge valuation differential. So from a US perspective, it does make European uh companies attractive targets. Um, but is there something else going on behind the scenes that makes European companies, you know, acquisitions of European companies easier or more interesting or more exciting?

SPEAKER_01 19:46

Well, one thing it's interesting, one thing reading through this this BAIME report, and I'm this is the first I've heard of it. So actually curious to see if you have as well. If you haven't, I'm I'm interested in just learning more about what this is all about. But obviously, anytime you do you MA, you've got to get your regulatory sign-off or competition clearance in Europe. It sounds like Europe is also considering, in essence, a second test for MA, where in addition to clearing competition, you also have, I think they're calling it like a merger benefit test. Like, is this merger beneficial? Now, I have no idea what that test entails. Is there a societal benefit? Is it you can only lay off so many people or you've got to hire so many people? Like I don't know what's gonna factor into that. But I'm wondering if people are just pushing up again on this note of uncertainty, right? We don't know what European MA is gonna look like in six months or a year, whatever the time, what whatever the time frame on this is. So let's buy Europe now while we can. And it's cheap.

SPEAKER_00 20:50

Yeah. Okay. That that was completely news to me, Graham. Really interesting. Europe's always been challenging, you know, with MA. They are generally quite reluctant uh to allow their businesses to be acquired by particularly foreign buyers. They are have lots of red tape around, you know, making big transformations, headcount changes, location changes that companies often want to do post-MA in terms of uh synergy and creation. So yeah, but it sounds like they're putting down some extra barriers there, extra friction. Um, and people are trying to get ahead of the the new rules.

SPEAKER_01 21:26

Potentially, potentially. So I'm gonna do a bit more, a bit more digging on that, see if I can find out what it's all about. But it was the first I'd heard of it, and I thought it was I thought it was interesting. So uh so what do you what's your what's your prediction, Debs, for the second half of the year? All this, all this being taken into account.

SPEAKER_00 21:44

Okay, I acknowledge that Bain, who produce support, probably know a huge amount about deals which are already in the pipeline. Um, but I think I'm a bit skeptical about extrapolating Q1 and Q2 into the second half. It feels like H1 has benefited from the pent-up demands, you know, this defensive manoeuvring around uh AI. But going into the second half, you have got the uncertainty, you've got more hawkish interest rate environment, you've got what are really quite frothy valuations in some sectors. It for me doesn't feel like H2 is going to be quite as thrilling as H1. But what about you, Gray?

SPEAKER_01 22:24

Um, let's think. Um Right. Given the given the long, the long lead time on a lot of MA transactions, I suspect there's probably a lot, a lot more still in the pipe that's already been identified and currently being worked on that just has to work its way through. So my if I had to, if I had to actually put money on it or make a real bet, I would, I would anticipate that we're gonna continue to see growth, but just not at the same level as we have in the first couple quarters. And then I think the open question is around 2027. And in the beginning of the year, once we've worked through the current MA pipeline, do we finally start to see these numbers come down a bit? I mean, not finally start to see them come down. It's not it's not like we're anti-MA or anything, but it does feel like there are some kind of one-time reasons for this big spike we're seeing right now. Because to your point, it doesn't really match up with the the kind of fundamental, like fundamental value drivers that you tend to see typically drive MA volumes like this. So interesting. That's my that's what I would say.

SPEAKER_00 23:29

Absolutely. Well, we'll watch that space. Uh thanks to all of you who have been uh listening into our discussion around uh the latest MA update. I hope you found it useful. Don't forget to add your comments if you've got a view on what's been happening with Financial Services MA. We look forward to hearing from you. That's it from myself. And over to Graham.

SPEAKER_01 23:48

Thanks everyone, and we'll see you same time next week.