The Wilmington Standard Daily Update

Daily Update March 26, 2026: A Troubled Bridge Over These Waters

The Wilmington Standard Season 2 Episode 72

Use Left/Right to seek, Home/End to jump to start or end. Hold shift to jump forward or backward.

0:00 | 3:05

Give Us Your Feedback

A billion‑dollar proposal for a new six‑lane Cape Fear Memorial bridge is on the table, and someone has to pay for it. Wilmington Standard Daily Update breaks down the WMPO’s unsolicited public‑private partnership bid from Delivering Bridges LLC, the billion‑plus price tag, and the hard choice between a regional transit tax or a user toll. We walk through what each option would really cost local drivers and businesses, why government “solutions” are getting more expensive and less effective, and whether the private sector should take the lead on keeping this critical link open for our region.

If we want a new bridge, someone has to pay for it. This is the Wilmington Standard Daily update for Thursday, March 26, 2026. Port City Daily reported yesterday the Wilmington Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization, WMPO for short, received an unsolicited bid and project proposal from Delivering Bridges LLC. The private company would design, build, operate, and maintain a new six-lane, fixed-span bridge. The target opening date is 2031. The cost of the project would be over $1 billion. While the North Carolina Department of Transportation is bringing $300 million to the table from state and federal funds, the deficiency has to be made up somewhere. Government funding for these types of huge projects are certainly becoming harder to find, which leaves just two options, institute regional transportation taxes, or put in a toll. A tax would spread out the cost of the proposal to the three counties who are impacted the most by the bridge. Given the current amount of the shortfall, the estimated number of drivers in the three counties, and a quick, non-official, back-of-the-envelope computing, such a tax could result in $1,200 to $1,500 per driver over a 10-year period, or an extra $120 to $150 a year. The problem with taxes is that it is never a 100% throughput, which means that in order to get a reimbursement level of $150, we actually have to charge at$200 to account for government red tape and inefficiency. Additionally, we have to ask the question, is it really fair for people in the far reaches of the three impacted counties to pay the cost of a bridge that they would rarely, if ever, use? Delivering Bridges LLC is proposing another option, a toll of around $2.50 per car each way. From that, they would recuperate their investment in about the same time span and operate and maintain the bridge. Because it is a private company whose income depends on the functionality of the bridge, we can rest assured it would be maintained better than any public road overseen by NCDOT. A toll is actually a tax itself, a user tax. If people and businesses want to use that bridge and the convenience it gives to downtown, they need to pay for it. Downsides, of course, include a steeper transportation cost for businesses routinely going over that bridge and possibly more wear and tear on the Isabel Holmes Bridge located upriver as drivers seek to avoid the toll. We need a new bridge. Costs and maintenance are skyrocketing even with the recent fixes. Bridges are not free to build or maintain. Will we again turn to government to fix a problem? Or will we look to the private sector to come up with a solution? Either way, troubled waters ahead. For the Wilmington Standard, I'm Reuel Sample. Thanks for listening.