The Deep Dive

How Did Grading Turn The Hobby Into An Institutionalized Asset Class?

Matt

Use Left/Right to seek, Home/End to jump to start or end. Hold shift to jump forward or backward.

0:00 | 16:24
SPEAKER_00

So picture this. A sprawling Beverly Hills mansion, a massive block of like Fortune 500 tech shares, and um a piece of cardboard with Michael Jordan's face on it.

SPEAKER_01

Right, which sounds like a total joke.

SPEAKER_00

It does. It sounds absurd. But in 2024, Wall Street treats those three things exactly the same.

SPEAKER_01

Yeah, they do. It's wild.

SPEAKER_00

I mean, we are looking at real transactions where a 2007 Michael Jordan and Kobe Bryant one-of-one dual logament card just sells for twelve point nine three million dollars.

SPEAKER_01

Yeah, or you know, a vintage T206 Honus Wagner card moving for $7.25 million in a private sale.

SPEAKER_00

Right. It's like the standard architecture of global finance has just been flipped entirely on its head. Traditional physical wealth is now uh sharing space with printed paper.

SPEAKER_01

It really forces a complete recalibration of how we even define an asset. Because I mean, we aren't just talking about a niche hobby of collectors treating in basements anymore.

SPEAKER_00

Definitely not.

SPEAKER_01

This is a highly structured $15 billion plus dollar financial ecosystem. You have grading agencies standardizing the commodities, hedge funds actually diversifying their portfolios with cardboard. Yeah, and climate-controlled vaults securing these assets, plus corporate monopolies fighting over the supply chain.

SPEAKER_00

So for this deep dive, our mission is to explore exactly how pieces of cardboard became this institutionalized alternative asset class.

SPEAKER_01

Right. How we got from, you know, cigarette pack stiffeners to a $15 billion market.

SPEAKER_00

Exactly. And we've pulled together a massive stack of sources for this. We're looking at market research reports from Straits and Zion, financial analyses from SACRA, hard grading, and E Day data from Gemrate and Collector.

SPEAKER_01

We even have some incredibly aggressive legal filings from ongoing antitrust lawsuits.

SPEAKER_00

Yeah, it gets intense. So to really grasp the sheer scale of the financialization happening today, we kind of have to understand the historical friction, right?

SPEAKER_01

Absolutely. The market didn't just wake up one day and decide a piece of cardboard was worth twelve million dollars.

SPEAKER_00

Right. That doesn't just happen.

SPEAKER_01

No, it took over a century of basically behavioral conditioning. It started in the late 1860s when tobacco companies just needed a cheap way to stiffen their cigarette packs so they wouldn't get crushed in transit.

SPEAKER_00

Which is such a mundane origin story.

SPEAKER_01

Right. So they threw in these promotional cards and accidentally created the whole concept of the collectible. Then by the 1950s and 60s, it evolved into a total staple of American youth culture.

SPEAKER_00

Aaron Powell But the real lesson like the economic cautionary tale that totally dictates how Wall Street handles these assets today, that happened in the 1980s and 90s.

SPEAKER_01

Oh yeah. The infamous junk wax era. We see this all the time in traditional markets.

SPEAKER_00

A massive bubble.

SPEAKER_01

Exactly. A sudden spike in consumer interest leads to just reckless corporate overproduction. You had manufacturers like Topps, Fleer, Donruss. They saw kids treating baseball cards like lottery tickets.

SPEAKER_00

So they just printed more.

SPEAKER_01

They basically turned on their printing presses and left them running 24 hours a day. They completely stripped away the one fundamental principle that gives any physical alternative asset its value.

SPEAKER_00

Scarcity.

SPEAKER_01

Right. Scarcity. In the vintage era, cards were scarce organically. Kids put them in bicycle spokes or, you know, mothers threw them away. So surviving copies in good condition were actually rare.

SPEAKER_00

But in the 80s and 90s, we saw manufactured demand without manufactured scarcity.

SPEAKER_01

Yeah. Everyone suddenly believed these cards would fund their retirement. So the survival rate of, say, a 1989 Ken Griffey Jr. rookie card approached basically 100%.

SPEAKER_00

Because everyone just put them in those pristine plastic binders.

SPEAKER_01

Exactly. Millions were printed and millions were saved. The supply side of the economics entirely collapsed the market under its own weight.

SPEAKER_00

Okay, so if the market crashed so hard back then because of oversupply, why did everyone suddenly start caring about sports cards again in 2020? You don't just bounce back from a systemic collapse like that without a catalyst.

SPEAKER_01

Well, the 2020 pandemic provided the perfect macroeconomic storm, honestly.

SPEAKER_00

Right, people were stuck at home.

SPEAKER_01

Exactly. You had an entire population stuck at home with unexpected disposable income since travel and dining expenditures plummeted. People began cleaning out their attics, rediscovering those old binders.

SPEAKER_00

Oh, so just craving a tangible nostalgic escape from a highly digitized lockdown.

SPEAKER_01

Yeah, precisely. But concurrently, the broader financial markets were highly volatile. So institutional capital was desperately hunting for alternative, non-correlated investments.

SPEAKER_00

So it was a collision of retail nostalgia and institutional capital.

SPEAKER_01

Right, which resurrected the market overnight. But the thing is, the market remembered the junk wax era. If billions of dollars were going to flow into pieces of paper, investors demanded structural safeguards.

SPEAKER_00

Because here's the dangerous thing about trying to build an asset class out of collectibles. A raw, ungreeted trading card is essentially an unverified rumor.

SPEAKER_01

That's a great way to put it.

SPEAKER_00

I mean, a seller on the internet might promise it has sharp corners and perfect centering. But Wall Street cannot underwrite a loan or build a derivative based on a subjective promise, right?

SPEAKER_01

No, absolutely not. To attract serious capital, you have to eliminate the subjectivity. You need a standardized metric of trust.

SPEAKER_00

And that's where the third-party graders come in.

SPEAKER_01

Exactly. That is precisely the utility of the greeting industrial complex. Companies like PSO, Beckett, SGC, and CGC stepped in to act as basically the central banks of this ecosystem.

SPEAKER_00

Right. So they authenticate the card, grade its microscopic condition on a strict one to ten scale, and then seal it in a tamper-proof sonic welded plastic slab.

SPEAKER_01

And the scale of this operation has become the backbone of the entire industry. If you look at the 2025 data from Gemrate, these major authenticators graded over 26.8 million cards in a single year.

SPEAKER_00

Wow. 26.8 million.

SPEAKER_01

Yeah, PSA alone accounted for over 19 million of those.

SPEAKER_00

So the plastic slab essentially commoditizes the asset. Exactly. It's like a graded PSA 10 is no longer just a fund collectible. It's a certified blue chip stock. A PSA 10 Michael Jordan rookie card in New York is recognized as literally identical to a PSA 10 in Tokyo.

SPEAKER_01

Right. And that uniformity provides the absolute market confidence needed for institutional money to flow in. It changes the fundamental mechanics of ownership.

SPEAKER_00

How so?

SPEAKER_01

Well the sources from Sacris detail how this market is now treated with the exact same financial reverence as fine art or vintage wine. You have hedge funds treating high-end graded cars as a legitimate alternative asset class.

SPEAKER_00

Which is wild to think about.

SPEAKER_01

It is. And they're carefully balancing their portfolios with sports and trading card game indices. But the mechanics get much deeper. You have platforms like Rally executing full securitization of individual cards.

SPEAKER_00

Okay. Securitization is where this crosses the line from a hobby into high finance.

SPEAKER_01

Oh, absolutely.

SPEAKER_00

Because Rally will purchase a million-dollar vintage card, spin it into an LLC, file it with the SEC, and issue shares. So a retail investor with $50 can buy fractional ownership of a Mickey Mantle rookie card.

SPEAKER_01

Right. Trading those shares on a secondary market exactly like they would trade fractional shares of Apple or Tesla, it provides immense liquidity to an inherently illiquid asset.

SPEAKER_00

Aaron Powell And the financialization extends to the credit markets, too, doesn't it?

SPEAKER_01

It does. Financial institutions like Collateral are now offering actual physical loans backed by graded trading cards as collateral.

SPEAKER_00

Wait, really? Like an actual loan?

SPEAKER_01

Yes. They are underwriting mortgages using LeBron James rookie cards.

SPEAKER_00

That is insane.

SPEAKER_01

But to do that, the lender has to analyze the historical volatility of that specific card, assess its liquid comp value in real time, take physical possession of the slab, and lock it in a secure vault.

SPEAKER_00

Aaron Powell So you're quite literally taking out a line of credit against cardboard.

SPEAKER_01

Exactly. But the moment grading companies turned chaotic cardboard into predictable liquid assets, they basically rang a dinner bell for Wall Street.

SPEAKER_00

Right. When a market generates billions of dollars with verifiable tracking, the fragmented traditional card manufacturers are suddenly swimming with sharks.

SPEAKER_01

And that inevitably triggers consolidation.

SPEAKER_00

Which brings us to fanatics.

SPEAKER_01

Right. And consolidation is a very polite word for what fanatics executed. What we saw was an aggressive structural takeover of the entire trading card ecosystem.

SPEAKER_00

So fanatics was already a sports merchandise and apparel giant.

SPEAKER_01

Right. And when they looked at the trading card market, they didn't try to outdesign or outmarket the legacy rivals like Topps and Panini.

SPEAKER_00

They bypassed the traditional competition entirely.

SPEAKER_01

Exactly. They recognized that the entire industry relied on a single bottleneck, which is intellectual property licenses. So fanatics went straight to the source.

SPEAKER_00

Meaning the leagues themselves.

SPEAKER_01

Right. They approached Major League Baseball, the NBA, the NFL, and their respective player unions and offered them a structure that traditional card makers simply couldn't match.

SPEAKER_00

They offered them equity.

SPEAKER_01

Exactly. Instead of just paying a flat licensing fee to use the logos, fanatics gave the leagues and the players a percentage ownership stake in their new trading card division.

SPEAKER_00

Wow. So they align the incentives perfectly.

SPEAKER_01

Exactly. If you're the MBA, why would you grant a license to Panini when you literally own a piece of Fanatics?

SPEAKER_00

Makes total sense.

SPEAKER_01

Right. And in exchange, Fanatics secured exclusive 10 to 20 year licensing deals, which locked out the competition overnight.

SPEAKER_00

That is ruthless. But that equity for licensing play was just the foundation, wasn't it?

SPEAKER_01

Yeah. Once they secured the moat, they engaged in relentless vertical integration. Fanatics then bought tops for $500 million just to acquire their manufacturing infrastructure and brand prestige. Then they expanded into the secondary market by acquiring vaulting and auction companies, launching Fanatics Collect. They partnered with the grading services.

SPEAKER_00

So they control everything.

SPEAKER_01

Pretty much. They control the printing presses, the primary distribution, the grading pipeline, the high-tech storage vaults, and the live resale auctions.

SPEAKER_00

Okay, let's unpack this for a second. Let me play devil's advocate. Sure. A monopoly sounds scary, right? But if Fanatics is controlling everything from the printing press to the high-tech security vaults, doesn't that actually solve the counterfeiting issues and make the hobby safer and easier for the average collector?

SPEAKER_01

Well, efficiency is the standard justification for vertical integration, but the Jones v. Fanatics antitrust lawsuit really outlines the severe cost of that efficiency. Aaron Powell Right.

SPEAKER_00

We have to talk about that lawsuit. Yeah. Because the legal filings paint a pretty dark picture.

SPEAKER_01

Aaron Powell They really do. They paint a picture of a corporation acting. And this is in the plaintiff's own words, like a mafia.

SPEAKER_00

A mafia.

SPEAKER_01

Yeah. Yeah. The lawsuit alleges that Fanatics is systematically starving the secondary market by dictating strict minimum price floors to local independent card shops.

SPEAKER_00

Aaron Powell So if a local mom and pop shop decides to sell a box of cards below Fanatics' mandated price, just to you know clear inventory.

SPEAKER_01

Trevor Burrus Fanatics doesn't just send a warning. Because Fanatics has an absolute monopoly on the primary supply, they can simply blacklist that shop.

SPEAKER_00

They cut off the supply line entirely.

SPEAKER_01

Exactly. Which instantly puts an independent business out of business.

SPEAKER_00

That is brutal.

SPEAKER_01

The plaintiffs argue this crushes competition, stifles product innovation, and essentially artificially inflates prices for the end consumer. It's a textbook case of the tension between corporate efficiency and competitive fairness.

SPEAKER_00

Yeah. Fanatics is using its exclusive licenses to force the entire supply chain to submit to its financial terms. And though, just to be clear, we aren't taking sides here.

SPEAKER_01

Right, of course not.

SPEAKER_00

We're simply reporting what is alleged in the legal filings from the sources, but it highlights just how high the stakes have gotten.

SPEAKER_01

Absolutely.

SPEAKER_00

But here is the craziest pivot in this whole deep dive. While these corporate titans are spending millions in legal fees fighting for monopoly control over sports cards, the actual sales data reveals they have a massive blind spot.

SPEAKER_01

This is fascinating.

SPEAKER_00

The biggest growth in this $15 billion market isn't actually in sports cards at all.

SPEAKER_01

No, it's not. The 2025 data across eBay and Gemrate is definitive on this. Trading card games or TCGs and non-sport grading have completely overtaken sports cards.

SPEAKER_00

By a lot, right.

SPEAKER_01

A staggering amount. The authenticators graded 16.8 million TCG and non-sports cards last year compared to just 10 million sports cards.

SPEAKER_00

That is a massive gap.

SPEAKER_01

And get this Pokemon alone accounted for over 16 million of those graded cards.

SPEAKER_00

Which is wild. And the secondary market sales totally reflect that dominance. If you look at single-card transactions on eBay for the entire year, the Pokemon character Charizard generated $74 million in sales.

SPEAKER_01

$74 million.

SPEAKER_00

Yeah. That outsold Michael Jordan, who sat at $70.5 million.

SPEAKER_01

It's unbelievable.

SPEAKER_00

I mean, a cartoon dragon is outperforming the greatest athletes in human history. We have to explain why this shift is happening.

SPEAKER_01

Well, it comes down to what drives the underlying value of the asset. Sports cards are intrinsically tied to human performance, which makes them inherently volatile. Right. A highly touted rookie's card might skyrocket after a playoff game, but the asset value can plummet to absolute zero if that player suffers a career-ending injury or gets involved in a public scandal.

SPEAKER_00

So the investor's capital is basically held hostage by human frailty.

SPEAKER_01

Exactly. TCGs, however, operate on the strength of intellectual property. The source is actually quote an industry adage that captures this perfectly. Charizard will never tear an ACL.

SPEAKER_00

That is brilliant. So modern sports cards are kind of like investing in highly volatile tech startups.

SPEAKER_01

Yes, exactly.

SPEAKER_00

One bad quarter or one bad injury, and you lose everything. But Pokemon cards are more like a currency backed by a gold standard because there's this massive utility floor.

SPEAKER_01

Yes, that utility floor is the critical differentiator because there are over 100 million people globally who actually use these physical cards to play the competitive trading card game.

SPEAKER_00

Right, it's game first.

SPEAKER_01

Exactly. The game's mechanics require players to constantly build and rotate their decks with specific cards to remain competitive. That creates a relentless organic baseline of demand that sits beneath all the collectors and Wall Street speculators.

SPEAKER_00

So it's organic demand versus manufactured scarcity.

SPEAKER_01

Precisely. In the sports card market, a manufacturer might take a perfectly average card of a bench player, stamp a gold foil one of one on it, and declare it where.

SPEAKER_00

Which is just an artificial creation of value.

SPEAKER_01

Right. But Pokemon relies on cross-generational cultural permanence and actual gameplay mechanics to drive value.

SPEAKER_00

And the long-term stability of that is backed up by the data. I mean, the Pokemon TCG Index has delivered a 3,821% return since 2004.

SPEAKER_01

Which is staggering. That completely outpaces the SP 500, and it does so without relying on the manufactured scarcity that drives the sports market.

SPEAKER_00

Right. It transcends the American-centric boundaries of baseball or football. It's a globally liquid asset.

SPEAKER_01

It really is.

SPEAKER_00

So to you, the listener, if you have a shoebox of old cards sitting in your attic right now, you need to look at it a bit differently.

SPEAKER_01

Yeah, you really do.

SPEAKER_00

You aren't just storing childhood nostalgia.

SPEAKER_01

Yeah.

SPEAKER_00

You might be sitting on an unregulated index fund. We've seen how a hobby of flipping baseball cards with friends has mutated into this high-stakes financial ecosystem of climate-controlled vaults, hedge funds, and corporate monopolies.

SPEAKER_01

It's completely rewritten the rules of what an asset is.

SPEAKER_00

It really has. But to wrap this up, I want to leave you with one final thought based on where this is all heading. Because right now, the value of these physical cards relies entirely on humans grading them and sealing them in plastic, right? Right. But the industry is rapidly shifting toward a fully digital ecosystem. Fans are buying graded cards, never even touching them, and just having fanatics store them forever in a dark, climate-controlled vault.

SPEAKER_01

Yeah, just trading the digital ownership certificates on their phones.

SPEAKER_00

Exactly. So here's the question to mull over. If the physical cards are just locked away forever and we are only ever interacting with digital certificates of ownership, at what point do we stop calling this card collecting and start admitting we are just trading commodity tickers?

SPEAKER_01

That is a fascinating question. When does the cardboard just become a concept?

SPEAKER_00

Exactly. Something to think about next time you see a piece of cardboard sell for $12 million.