There's a certain kind of visitor in Appalachia. They don't knock loud. They don't introduce themselves. They just end up there on the porch. Sometimes you don't even hear them come up the steps. And if you've been raised here, you already know. If something shows up where it shouldn't be, it didn't get lost. It came to tell you something. Or to see if you were willing to ignore it.
SpeakerThis is Killer Chemistry, a true crime science podcast exploring how military science developed for the bomb ended up contaminating the entire world. With your host, Callie Lyons, an author and investigative journalist who began covering this story more than 20 years ago.
Speaker 1In
In Appalachia, communication doesn't always move in straight lines. It circles, settles, and waits. A question might be answered with a story, not to avoid the truth, but to carry it in a way that can be held. Meaning isn't always stated outright. It's implied, layered, and shaped by tone, timing, and who's listening. What sounds like wandering can be precise. What feels indirect can be exact. There's a kind of economy to it. Things that matter most are rarely said first. You might hear the edges before you hear the center. And if you're not used to it, you can miss it entirely. Walk away thinking nothing was answered, when in fact everything was. The burden is shared. The speaker offers the shape, but the listener has to meet it halfway. Sit with it, turn it over, and let it settle. That's part of why stories carry so much weight. They aren't decoration, they are delivery. They hold contradictions, warnings, humor, and truth all at once, and over time they deepen. The same story can mean one thing the first time you hear it, and something else entirely years later. In that way, Appalachian communication isn't just about exchanging information. It's about building understanding slowly. Slowly enough that it lasts. There's an old story told in Appalachia.
Speaker 1
It was bitter cold, the kind that settles in your bones, and the wind cut like a knife through her coat. When she came within sight of the place, just a shape through the trees, smoke rising thin. She heard a rustle at her feet. She stopped, looked down. There in the frost lay a snake. Before she could step back, it spoke. I ain't got long, it said, its voice low and thin. This cold and it finished me. Ain't no food left up here, and I'm starving. Please put me under your coat and carry me with you. The girl shook her head. No, she said. I know you're kind. You're a rattler. If I pick you up, you'll bite me. And your bite's poison. The snake gave a faint rattle, more breath than sound. No, no, it said. You help me, I'll remember it. I'll treat you different, I swear it. The girl eased herself down on a cold rock, rested a moment thinking it through. She studied the snake, its markings fine and strange against the frost, and had to admit it was the most beautiful one she'd ever seen. After a spell, she let out a breath. I reckon I believe you, she said. Everything deserves a little kindness. She reached down, careful as she could, and lifted it. It felt near frozen in her hands. She tucked it under her coat and set off again toward her grandmother's house. She hadn't gone but a few steps when the pain hit, sharp and sudden in her side. She cried out and stumbled. The snake slipped loose from her coat and coiled easy on the ground, strength already back in it. How could you? she gasped. You promised you wouldn't bite me. I trusted you. The snake turned its head calm as ever. You knew what I was when you picked me up. What did you expect from a snake? The snake didn't change. The mountain didn't change. The terms didn't change. Only her willingness to believe them did. Not every danger has to hide. Some of them only need permission. And some don't ask at all.
The Ohio River wasn't a boundary in the late 1700s. It was a fault line. Along its edges, life didn't move forward. It held its breath. At Neil's station, sometime around 1790, warriors crossed the river and settled into a ravine to watch. That evening, two boys went out to bring cattle in. They never came back. And it kept happening. A man clearing land in Belpre, shot and scalped. A canoe drifting too close to shore, lured in by the sound of wild turkeys that aren't turkeys at all. Hunters follow the same call into the woods and log straight into an ambush. And then there was Major Nathan Goodale, a Revolutionary War veteran and commandant of the settlement. Taken in broad daylight, just yards from safety. And just like that, the settlement lost its anchor. Further downriver near Blener hasset Island, the Armstrong family learned the same lesson. This wasn't a series of events. It was a pattern. Concealment, mimicry, misdirection, a turkey call in the wrong place. A shadow where there shouldn't be one. A feeling, just for a second, that something isn't right. And when something like that happens again and again, it settles into the trees, into the river bends, into the way people listen, even when nothing is there. Because in a place like this, danger doesn't always disappear. Sometimes it just changes form.
Two hundred years later, the Ohio River looks different. DuPont Washington Works dominates the West Virginia side, while Ohio's sunny southern shore is home to the small communities of Belbury and Little Hawking. Part of the difficulty in envisioning just how close the Washington Works plant is to the Little Hocking Wellfield is a common misconception about geography. The Washington Works plant, after all, is in West Virginia, while Little Hocking's Wellfield is in Ohio. Since we're talking about two different states, one might have the impression that there is some distance involved. There wasn't. From the banks of the river and the little Hocking Wellfield, the plant stretches out on the horizon like a sprawling city. Even the sounds of the manufacturing facility are evident, muddled only by the hum of occasional river traffic. The distance between them wasn't miles. It was somewhere between a quarter and half a mile. That's all. Two places separated only by the water of the Ohio River. From the well field, you could see the plant, close enough to watch it, hear it. A state line ran between them. Boundaries are useful that way. They don't stop anything. They just decide who's allowed to be responsible.
The story of C8 might have turned out quite a bit differently, if not for the actions of some key people. The tenants and their attorney, Rob Ballot, were responsible for discovering the local pollution from Washington Works and calling in the authorities. Another crucial figure to the local story is Robert Griffin, an engineer who served as the general manager for the Little Hawking Water Association. He had been paying attention long before anyone told him he should. Unconstrained by state-line mentality, he understood something simple. Water doesn't recognize jurisdiction. So when in 2001 he learned that the West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection had entered into a consent agreement with DuPont over the testing of water supplies, a public meeting was held in Lubeck, West Virginia. Griffin attended. He listened. And then he asked a question that changed everything. What about Ohio? It was a reasonable question, which is exactly why it was a problem. Little Hawking had not been included. No place in Ohio was, and there were no plans to include it. So Griffin made the request. But the simple request for sampling was denied. The testing was limited to West Virginia, nothing beyond. So the Little Hawking Water Association tried to test the water on its own. This effort ran into a fundamental problem. The only labs that could test for it were under contract with industry. This technology was proprietary. The absence of proof didn't end the question. If anything, it made it sharper. Because once you start asking whether something is in the water, you don't stop. Griffin didn't. He kept pushing, asking. Because he understood the system he was responsible for could not act on suspicion. It needed a number. And that number wasn't easy to get. Requests had to be made, repeated, formalized, pushed forward again and again until they could no longer be ignored. Because without that number, nothing changed. No action. No acknowledgement. No responsibility. This wasn't routine. It was a fight to get something that should have been available from the beginning. Meanwhile, the contamination expanded through air emissions, through rain, through groundwater movement. The Ohio River did not contain it. It moved through systems no one had fully accounted for, not just across the water, but through everything connected to it.
In January 2002, the results came back. C8. This forever chemical was in the water. There wasn't time to sit with it, no space to wait for a complete explanation, no clear guidance on what it meant. But there was one thing that was clear. The people drinking the water had a right to know what was in it. So Griffin made a decision. He wasn't going to wait. The results weren't held. They weren't reviewed behind closed doors. They weren't filtered. They weren't delayed. They were posted immediately, made available to anyone who wanted to see them. There was no strategy to it, no messaging, no attempt to soften what the numbers showed. Just the results as they were received. And in doing that, the Water Association did something the system around them had not. They made the information public before they had all the answers. Because waiting for certainty would have meant waiting too long. In Lubeck, West Virginia, the water utility closest to the plant on that side of the river, contamination was expected. In Little Hawking, Ohio, it was worse. Shortly after, the community became one of the most studied populations in environmental health history. Not by design, by exposure. The Little Hawking Water Association acted immediately. The most contaminated well was removed from service. The remaining wells were pushed harder. The system was strained, not because it was designed to handle this, but because it had no other option. Likewise, the office was tasked beyond functioning like a utility. It became ground zero in the crisis. Eventually, expanded sampling in Ohio revealed contamination in Belprey, Tupper's Plains, Pomeroy. Three additional water systems, all connected, all drawing from the same watershed. All affected. Whether anyone had intended to look there or not. All the while, DuPont claimed there were no human health effects from exposure, but the impacts on laboratory animals were undeniable. A lack of information created a void that undermined any real conclusions.
Griffin would describe the situation by telling a story. He said it was like coming home and finding a stranger on your port. You don't remember hearing him walk up, didn't hear the boards creak, didn't hear a knock. But there he is. Sitting there like he's been there a while. You don't know why he's there. You don't know what he wants. You don't know how long he's been there, or how long he's been coming and going without you noticing. And maybe nothing has happened yet. Maybe he hasn't said a word. Maybe he hasn't done anything at all. Does he intend to do you harm? You don't know. But that doesn't make it right. Because you know one thing, he doesn't belong. And now the question isn't whether he's supposed to be there. That's already been answered. The question is what you're going to do about it. Do you leave him there because you don't have proof of what he's doing? Do you pretend you didn't see him because no one has told you it's a problem yet? Or do you act because you already know? And once you've seen him, you can't go back to not knowing he was there. In 2003, at an EPA risk assessment hearing, Griffin made another simple request. Please give us answers we can believe in. Under different circumstances, the responsibility he bore might have belonged to elected officials. Here, it belonged to the general manager of a small rural water company run by the people drinking the water. His leadership was consistent throughout the crisis, and that changed the outcome.
Here's a bit of practical magic or ways you can use the science to protect your loved ones. Because at the center of all of this was a number, not a feeling, not a suspicion, not a story, a number, something you could point to, something you could measure, something you could act on. For a long time, people didn't have that. Even when something felt wrong, there was no way to prove it. No way to check. No way to know. Fortunately, the situation is vastly improved thanks to the Environmental Working Group. If you want to know what's in your water, you can look it up. The Environmental Working Group maintains a public database of tap water across the United States. You can search by your zip code, see what contaminants have been detected, see how those levels compare, not just to federal limits, but to what independent scientists consider safe. And that distinction matters because federal standards don't always reflect the latest science. In some cases, they don't exist at all. So what you're looking for isn't just whether something is present, it's how much. And once you have those numbers, you can act. Because when something shows up where it shouldn't be, and no one with authority is willing to name it, someone still has to decide what to do with it. Do you leave it where it is because it hasn't been officially confirmed? Or do you pick it up anyway, knowing exactly what it is, and carry it anyway? Because the most dangerous thing about the water in Little Hawking wasn't that it was contaminated, it was that for a long time the only people who could prove it weren't the ones drinking it. By refusing to sample water supplies beyond the state line, while already knowing that the contamination had moved beyond that boundary and into those waters, industry, along with state regulatory authorities, was doing something else. They were delaying the evidence, holding it back. And in doing so, they were stalling the very system that is supposed to respond. Because that system, at its best, can only act on what can be measured, not suspicion. It needs data, a number. And that number was refused because they already knew what it would show.
Well, that's it. This wasn't a failure to understand, it was a decision. An Appalachian might say, this was a two-headed snake. One telling you nothing was wrong, the other making sure you couldn't prove that it was.
SpeakerFor filler resources and more practical magic, visit our Ko Fi page. Links and contact information can be found in the new show notes.