The Armour Paradox: What Serial-Winning Coaches Know About Self-Compassion

This episode examines Hägglund et al.'s paper called "Wearing a Self-Compassion Suit May Offer a Performance Edge: A Qualitative Study of Serial-Winning High-Performance Coaches." The big ideas from the paper that are relevant to coach learning are The Armour Paradox, The Rumination Tax, and The Early Seed Effect. All three of these big ideas contribute to the two immediately applicable actions for coaches. As a coach or in any other role in your life, has the rumination tax ruined your day? 

The show notes for this episode can be found here: https://thecoachdeveloper.com/coaching-research-to-results-podcast-notes/

Transcript

SPEAKER_00 0:00

Here's something coaches say all the time. Don't let it get to you. Keep it in check. Stay in control. We say it to athletes who are visibly rattled, frustrated, or anxious before a big moment. And it sounds like solid coaching. Practical and no nonsense. The problem? Every time we say it, we're accidentally asking our athletes to suppress their emotions rather than regulate them. And the research is very clear on what that costs athletes and the people that coach them. You're going to want to hear this one. Welcome to Coaching Research to Results. I'm Beth Brightz, the coach developer. This is one paper, three ideas, and two actions for tomorrow in under 15 minutes. This is the podcast where coaching research gets off the shelf, out of your notes, and into your practice. Let's go. The paper is called Emotional Regulation, Current Status and Future Prospects, published in the journal Psychological Inquiry in 2015. The author, James Gross, is a professor of psychology at Stanford University and probably one of the most widely cited researchers in the world on the science of how people manage their emotions. The field has become one of the most fastest growing areas in all of psychology. Gross steps back, takes stock, and then introduces a new model for how emotional regulation actually works. It has very direct implications for anyone who works with people under pressure. Here's what he found. The big idea is something I'm going to call bottle versus reframe. And this might be the most practically important finding in 20 years of emotional regulation research. There are two fundamentally different ways people manage difficult emotions. The first is suppression. You feel the emotion, but you hide it, push it down, and soldier on. The second is reappraisal. You change the meaning of the situation before the emotion fully takes hold. Instead of this pressure will crush us, it becomes this is what we've trained for. Instead of we might lose, it becomes this is where we find out what we're made of. Here's what the research shows. Suppression does not actually reduce the emotion. The body's still running the stress response in the background. Cognitive performance takes a hit. Memory gets worse, and the social cost is real. Athletes who habitually suppress emotion are harder for their teammates to connect with, and that disconnection shows up everywhere athletes gather. Reappraisal, on the other hand, actually changes the emotional experience. It reduces the negative emotion, costs far less cognitively, and has no downside for memory. The reframe wins. And the coaches who teach it are giving their athletes a real tool for life. Alright, idea two. And this one might change how you think about an athlete who consistently falls apart under pressure. Gross introduces what he calls the extended process model of emotional regulation, and for coaches, let's think of it as a three-step check. For an athlete to successfully manage an emotion in the moment, three things have to happen in sequence. Step one, they notice the emotion and recognize that it needs to be regulated. Step two, they choose a strategy to deal with it. Step three, they actually execute that strategy in a particular situation. And here's the coaching critical insight. Athletes can fail at any of these three steps, and the intervention looks completely different depending on where the breakdown is happening. An athlete who doesn't notice how deeply anxious they are before a game or competition is failing at step one. They do not need strategy coaching. They might need emotional awareness coaching first. An athlete who notices anxiety but has no idea what to do is failing at step two. They have awareness, but no toolkit. And an athlete who knows exactly what they should do but can't execute it under competition day conditions is failing at step three. They need practice implementing the skill under realistic pressure, not more information about it. The sticky label for this idea is the three-step check. When an athlete struggles under pressure, the question isn't why can't they get it together? The question is, which step are they failing on? And that answer changes everything. Idea three. Let's talk about the emotional toolbox because this might change how you design or support, if you have access to a mental performance coach, mental skills work with athletes. Gross identifies five families of emotional regulation strategies. One choosing which situations to avoid or enter. Two modifying a situation to reduce its emotional impact. Three redirecting attention away from a trigger. Four reframing the meaning of the situation through reappraisal and five directly managing the physical response once the emotion has occurred. Most athletes and most coaches naturally rely on one or two of these strategies. But the research is increasingly clear that the best regulated athletes are not the ones who've found one perfect strategy. They're the ones who have a full toolbox and know which tool fits which moment. Here's a specific nuance that matters for coaching. Reappraisal works beautifully at low to moderate levels of emotional intensity. But as intensity climbs toward the high end, reappraisal becomes harder to execute and less effective. At high intensity, distraction is a better first move. So telling an athlete to think about it differently when they're already at 10 on the anxiety dial is asking them to do something the research says is quite difficult in that state. Getting them to redirect their focus entirely may work much better in the moment. It all depends on where they are in the intensity scale. Let's complicate things a little, shall we? I just told you that reappraisal is generally better than suppression, and the evidence for that is strong. But there's an important caveat here. Gross cites research by Shepson colleagues showing that at high levels of emotional intensity, reappraisal is not just harder, it's physiologically more effortful and less effective. People actually shift their preference from reappraisal to distraction as emotional intensity climbs. So the advantage of reappraisal is real, but context dependent. It is most powerful before the full emotional response has fired. What does this mean for coaching? Timing matters. A pregame reframe, a team talk that changes the narrative before the stake spike, a quiet conversation with an anxious athlete in the hour before competition, or earlier, depending on what they need. Those are high-leverage moments for reappraisal. Trying to reframe mid-match or mid-competition when the emotion is already at full intensity is a much harder ask. In those moments, a physical routine, a focal point, or a deliberate attention redirect may serve your athlete far better. Keep that in mind. I think I discovered this quite accidentally when coaching a high school team. This was a team that was relatively new, played for the fun of it, and became competitive quite quickly due to their love of learning and willingness to help each other. They were a real mix of athletes from grade 9 to 12 who probably would have never met each other if rugby hadn't divinely intervened. As a result, there was a real spread between the athletes who had experienced different points in the three-step check and those who hadn't. We had managed to win the semifinal and we were into the final against the five-time defending champions. They had all the experience, all the hunger, the best player in the league who would go on to a decorated international career, and looked destined to win against this upstart team. As a coach, my internal struggle was how to figure out what each of the athletes needed before we got to the field. In fact, we started preparing a few days out. We exposed nervousness and put it out in the open. Then we reframed or reappraised it as caring, like nervous means you care. And then we imagined what it would feel like when we stepped onto the field, how to keep the butterflies flying information rather than all over the place. It was only after that that we discussed the strategies and tactics for the game. As a coach, I figured that the biggest stumbling block would be the emotional one, since playing a final was something we'd never done. Even though our program was new and the athletes didn't know rugby all that well, I felt confident, and more importantly, so did they, that they had enough rugby abilities to pull off the win. Focusing on the emotions and the gravity of the situation first paid off. The story has a happy ending for the good guys, winning 6'5 that day. Let's apply this research. Action one is to think of one athlete who struggles emotionally under pressure. Run them through this three-step check in your head. First, do they seem to notice when their emotions are affecting their performance? Or do they seem caught off guard by it? Second, do they have any go-to strategies? Or do they just white knuckle through? Third, if they have strategies, have they actually practiced using them under realistic pressure conditions or only in calm training moments? You don't need to do anything with this information today. Just knowing which step your athlete is failing at will tell you exactly where to direct your energy in the future. Action two, map the emotional toolkit of your most pressure tested athlete. How many genuine regulation strategies do they have? One, two, five? Do they have strategies that work at low intensity and strategies that hold up when the intensity is really high? If the answer is mostly I just pushed through it, that's important information. In a future individual session, try building out one additional tool together, specifically something designed for high intensity moments when reappraisal becomes difficult to execute. Connect with a mental performance coach to expand the athlete's toolboxes too. The goal is not one perfect strategy, the goal is flexibility. The big takeaway today, the next time you hear yourself telling an athlete to shake it off or just keep it together is your cue. What you're really asking them to do is suppress. And suppression has a cost that you can see in their performance and in their relationship with teammates. The smarter move is to help them reframe before the pressure peaks and to understand where in the three-step check they're getting stuck, and to build out an emotional toolkit that gives them more than one way to manage what they're feeling in competition. I'm Beth Barts, the Coach Developer. You'll find show notes and the full library of episodes at www.thecoachdeveloper.com. If any idea from today lands for you, like, subscribe, and share it with another coach this week. That's how research actually travels. See you next time. This podcast was produced by Ann Reifenstein at RECETA sources. Original music created and recorded by Sean Patterson at Vinyl Safari Studio.