Talking Rubbish - The Recycling Podcast

94. From Kindle to kindling - how Big Tech creates waste

therubbishgeek@gmail.com (James Piper, Robbie Staniforth) Episode 94

Use Left/Right to seek, Home/End to jump to start or end. Hold shift to jump forward or backward.

0:00 | 59:36

Amazon has announced that some older Kindles will soon lose support, turning devices that still physically work into obsolete products. It’s the latest example of a growing trend in tech, where companies phase out support and push consumers toward upgrades, creating mountains of unnecessary e-waste in the process. In this episode, we explore examples of planned obsolescence, the environmental impact of disposable tech, and what it could mean for consumers in the future. Plus, is wallpaper rubbish or not, will mass running events have to charge a bottle deposit, and why is James making friends at his local recycling centre?

Join hosts James Piper and Robbie Staniforth as they delve into the world of recycling, hopefully having fun along the way. One thing is for sure, they will talk absolute rubbish from start to finish.

We would like to have an evening Talking Rubbish to celebrate our 100th episode. It will be in central Bristol on the evening of the 3rd July, to let us know if you can make it, book your place on Eventbrite

Please take a moment to complete the Simpler Recycling tracker

We would love you to join our community on Discord

Special thanks to our sponsor, Ecosurety

To get exclusive videos and clips, follow us on Instagram, TikTok, Threads or Facebook; @rubbishpodcast or YouTube: @talkingrubbishpodcast

Or you can contact James and Robbie with questions or just general rubbish musings using the email address talkingrubbishpodcast@gmail.com or by texting them via WhatsApp on 07356 069 232

Relevant links and reports mentioned in the programme can be found on the Talking Rubbish Linktr.ee

Transcripts and episodes can be found on the Talking Rubbish website

Timestamps:
From Kindle to kindling - how Big Tech creates waste? - 03:17
Additions and corrections - 33:44
Rubbish or Not: wallpaper - 41:32
Rubbish News - 43:52
Will mass running events have to charge a bottle deposit? - 47:54
Residual Rubbish - 53:35

Music licence ID: 6WPY8Q4O2RPFIOTL

Send us a message directly…

 Music licence ID: 6WPY8Q4O2RPFIOTL

SPEAKER_01

Hello, welcome to Talking Rubbish, a weekly podcast, delving deep into the world of recycling and discussing the truth behind snappy headlines and one-sided stories. In this episode, we will discuss how Amazon killing the Kindle creates e-waste. Is wallpaper rubbish or not? And I have a question about how the London Marathon will deal with deposit return schemes. I'm James Piper, author of the rubbish book, and I'm joined by Robbie Stanford, my far from rubbish friend. Morning Robbie. How are you, James? How are you today? Really good. Oh, great.

SPEAKER_00

Always good. Always good.

SPEAKER_01

That's good. That's great. I'm not even gonna say that's good. It's amazing. We're pumped. Robbie, talking rubbish, recycle content is going from strength to strength. It's doing so well.

SPEAKER_00

I've even been listening myself trying to remember the odd thing that I've said in the past about certain items and whether they're rubbish or not. Because we've done so many now that it's actually quite hard to remember exactly which side we fell down on one or two of them.

SPEAKER_01

Yeah, one thing I noticed is that Castbox, and I don't use Castbox, but it's one of the podcast players, was suddenly getting a huge volume of listeners. It was um for a while it was our number one place people were listening to us. It jumped up to like a thousand subscribers. This is on Recycle Content, not the yellow, not this podcast, not the yellow umbrella podcast. And I was trying to work out why that had happened, and it appeared we were featured on the homepage of Castbox for a while. So I just went there and saw it and we were on the homepage. 52% of our downloads so far are from Castbox on Recycle Content. And if you compare that to this podcast, this podcast gets 3% of its downloads on there. So that just shows you what being featured does. It's amazing.

SPEAKER_00

Oh wow. Well, thank you, Castbox, for featuring us.

SPEAKER_01

Yes, thank you. So I don't know how we did it.

SPEAKER_00

No idea.

SPEAKER_01

But what it means is we might be getting new listeners because we've got a completely different listener base for recycle content to this one. So I reckon there's people who are listening to the little clips and they go, Oh, I might go and listen to that longer podcast. So if you've done that, welcome and we hope you're enjoying it. Do you know what's fifth in the list for recycle content? So Castbox is first, then I think it's Apple, fifth in the list.

SPEAKER_00

Presumably YouTube and Spotify are the next two, so Podbean? Okay, very good.

SPEAKER_01

Oh, you know your players. It's something that actually doesn't even appear in OG Talking Rubbish. It doesn't appear on our list of things people listen on, and it is Alexa. Ah, whoa, okay. I'm imagining people are hovering over their recycle bin with a I don't know, what item are we gonna pick? Toothpick. Blister pack. Toothpick. Toothpick's good. They're hovering over their bin with a toothpick going, I can't remember. Alexa. Oh, sorry if anyone's got Alexa in the background that's gonna start it running, isn't it? Okay, person here and Alexa, guys. Alexa, play talking rubbish, recycle content. And then what I've just done is massively boosted our Alexa numbers, Robbie. It's gonna be playing out across the land right now. Trash door. On this podcast, and on recycle content, we would like you to recycle your electricals correctly. However, there are times where you wish you wouldn't have to, and Amazon have created one of those occasions.

SPEAKER_00

Wow, okay, so we're moving straight from the praise of Alexa to dissing them in this section.

SPEAKER_01

Yeah. Oh no. Don't move us down. Sorry, Amazon Overlords. Sorry, we can't find talking rubbish. Oh goodness. From next Wednesday, as this episode goes live, which is the 20th of May 2026, all Kindle models released before 2013. So the Kindle is their electronic ebook. Don't call it electronic ebook. What does the e stand for? Kindle is their ebook. And any that are made before 2013 will stop being supported by Amazon and will basically have their store switched off, so you won't be able to download any new books. So you can read all your old books, but you won't be able to download any new ones. This is around two million devices, potentially creating over 600 tons of electrical waste. Wow. That is a lot. It is a lot, yeah. And it's not the first, and it won't be the last example of tech becoming unusable over time. One of the thoughts I had was ebooks became more and more popular. I'm trying to think when they became really popular. So this is like two million devices, but I'd imagine if you went into like 2013, 2014, 2015, the numbers would increase quite rapidly. And so over the next few years, they'll start switching off other models and the numbers will get bigger and bigger. This is a problem that compounds. It's not just now. I guess it's something that we're experiencing in tech everywhere. So we thought we'd look today at a few examples and the impact these decisions that brands are making have on our waste electricals. Just as a bit of a kind of hook to keep you going till the end, I will give you a hack that I think might keep your old Kindle running if you want it to.

SPEAKER_00

Oh, whoa, great teaser. Okay, I don't have one of these devices, but I would like to know how to advise people because I'm sure I'll get lots of questions about it after this episode goes out. So I'm looking forward to that.

SPEAKER_01

Now, what Amazon is saying is keeping the older Kindles running is becoming a security issue. Now I just want to clarify it's not so much cyber criminals wanting to know how far you are through something like Lord of the Rings. Can you imagine? What can we do with this data? Changes 53% of the way through two towers. I think they've got bad things to do with their time.

unknown

Yeah.

SPEAKER_01

Depends on what you're eating. How to security proof my house. And then they'll be like, he hasn't got there yet. But as these Amazon devices, you are probably using your Amazon credentials to log in. And that is why the security can become an issue. So even though you think, oh, it's just an ebook, who's gonna care? Why are cybercriminals gonna care? You are connected to a store that's got your login details on. So it makes sense that they want to keep that safe. And this is what happens with tech, right? Devices built for a different time are not able to run newer and more data hungry software. And so we are all constantly upgrading our devices to keep them efficient and safe. I know we've talked about Tesla a lot, but Tesla had this where they sold cars on the premise that they could self-drive. You know, this is like 10 years ago, Tesla was saying we're gonna have self-driving cars. They've got this computer software in, they've got this hardware that allows them to self-drive. And then they built more and more sophisticated self-driving technology and realized the hardware they put in couldn't run the software they'd built to do the self-driving. So even though they'd sort of tried to future proof the car by putting hardware in it that they thought would run it, by the time they actually started rolling it out, they realized that actually the software was going to be way too big. And so they recalled the cars back in to get upgraded hardware to run the new software. And so within the within the Tesla forums, it was like, what hardware are you running? People would be asking as to how good your self-driving technology was. And when I say self-driving, I mean the very primitive version we have in the UK and a much more sophisticated version in the US.

SPEAKER_00

Yeah. Okay. So but that wasn't deliberate like inbuilt obsolescence, as the phrase goes. That was just they thought they had the tech in it, but then it proved to be wrong and they did the right thing by recalling them and upgrading them or whatever.

SPEAKER_01

That's right. And creating a load of waste, I'm sure. But uh I'm sure they sent that off for recycling or reuse, right? They must have done. So we throw away a lot of electricals. According to Material Focus, we throw away about 1.6 million tonnes of electronic waste each year in the UK, and only about a third of it is collected properly, you know, through the waste electricals collection systems, which is you take it back to a store, you take it to the civic community site, your recycling centre. And recycle your electricals, say that we buy over 500 million fast tech items each year. And we bin. So we buy 500 million and we bin 471 million.

SPEAKER_00

And I think that's a great example of where the count of something, thinking back to the big plastic count last week, is so important, isn't it? Because it's actually uh probably washing machines getting recycled that are very heavy and quite easy to recycle compared to smaller items, is probably slightly skewing the statistics. And this is a great example of where a count is important. We're talking about these tiny little electricals that seem incidental but actually add up to quite a lot of precious materials just not being recycled.

SPEAKER_01

Yeah, it's a really good point. Now, I wouldn't class an e-reader as fast tech, obviously, but then what the numbers tell us is we do have this drive to replace things. You know, we'll buy something and replace it. And so 500 million to 471 million, you're basically buying, throwing away, buying, throwing away. And companies, in terms of replacement, do this all the time. When they retire their old tech, they say, Don't worry though, it's fine that we're getting rid of this old Kindle, because we'll give you a discount on a new one. And companies do this over and over again, and that's how they try and reassure reassure customers that it's all okay and you're allowed to buy a new one because we're giving you a discount on it. And so this replacement strategy is baked into this kind of planned obsolescence or products becoming obsolete. If Amazon is no exception to this, if you wanted to upgrade to the newer Kindle hardware, at the moment they are offering a 20% discount on the new Kindle and an ebook credit, which is to the value of the Kindle you're trading in. So the email I saw was like $20. I don't know what it is in pounds. But there was a code that went out with the email saying your Kindle's going to stop working. You could put that code in, you would get 20% off the new device and an ebook credit for your new device.

SPEAKER_00

And do you know if you had to send in your old one, that that's not you just had to prove you had one, do you? Because I get these kind of emails all the time.

SPEAKER_01

Yeah, Amazon know you have one because of your registered. So I wasn't sure because I did have an older Kindle and I thought maybe I have one before 2013, but I didn't get the email, so I assume I didn't. So Amazon will know your device. You don't have to send it back to them because they're bricking it. It will stop working from next Wednesday. So they don't need you to send it back. They know it's not going to work. And to be fair to them, I understand that supporting 13-year-old hardware forever isn't realistic, right? I get that. Products would be so much more expensive if you had to bake in and we'll support it forever into the price. We'll have this team that's constantly rolling out security updates, constantly thinking about it. But maybe we should pay a bit more for our electricals. And maybe the law should force companies to continue supporting it. So I can understand that companies want to deliver us electronics in the cheapest way possible because that's how they make the most sales. But I do think there should be a law somewhere, and we'll talk about the legalities towards the end of this trash talk, but you should offer this much support for this length of time and build that into your price of the product.

SPEAKER_00

Yeah, I agree. It's like, isn't it just ridiculous that you've bought something, you own it, and now it just doesn't do the one thing that I bought it for, and it becomes totally useless. So, regardless of the kind of time scale, the fact that you own an item that is intrinsically reliant on someone else somewhere, some company somewhere, doing something so you can continue to use it is quite sort of dumbfounding and maddening, I'm sure, for many of those people who are quite happy with their frankly very long-lasting and in most cases a very good device that's lasted all this time.

SPEAKER_01

That's a very philosophical question. Do you own it? Because I think something that has happened with tech is more and more it is designed as a rental model. You know, do we really own our mobile phone if you're replacing it every two years and you're on a contract for the two years that you have it? Do you really own these devices if you if companies can switch them off overnight? If companies can say, I'm just going to remove access to a store. Yes, you might have bought it, but do you own the content that's on it? I think a lot of tech now would be considered as a rental model if we actually looked at it properly and how it functions. Books specifically have this problem, ebooks, and they they have this thing called digital rights management. They call it DRM. So if I buy a book, Robbie, if I go out now and buy a book, finish reading it, I can just pass it on to you, right? I can say, that was a really good book. Robbie, have a read of this. And I actually encourage this in the front of my book because I acknowledge that books are really difficult to recycle. So I have like a page at the front where you can write your name and you pass it on and then they write their names. There's like a lot of spaces just to put names in to encourage people to pass it on. Digital's a bit different. You know, I can only pass a real book on once, and then you can pass it on once, but it takes time. We've got to read it, right? Takes a lot of time for us to do it. But obviously, when you're into digital, I can pass it to millions of people. I could just download a copy, email it to millions of people at once with no loss of quality, no degradation. The book isn't getting ripped because it's on my computer. And so when digital was taking off, companies had to solve for this. They had to say, actually, we need to make it so that people can't just give away our book. And so they created this thing, digital rights management, which basically means you're only ever borrowing the thing you're buying. You are being given a license to the book from Amazon in this example. And Amazon is saying, we're giving you this license, but we can revoke that license at any time. We can revoke this book. At any time. Is that what it really says? Well, I can give you an example because in 2009, Amazon actually remotely deleted copies of Are You Ready for the Irony of These Books?

SPEAKER_00

Yeah.

SPEAKER_01

Copies of Animal Farm and 1984. It's the most Orwellian thing. They remotely deleted copies of those books from Amazon Kindles after refunding the purchase price. But just to prove that you didn't own the book, they just deleted it. Now they didn't do it for that reason. They actually revealed the reason behind it was because they they were unauthorized reproductions of the books, and so they actually didn't have the rights to sell them in the first place. Um I'm not entirely sure how it happened. I think it was sold on Amazon, you know, like they have marketplace and stuff. So maybe it was like someone else had essentially photocopied in the digital world, you know, photocopied the books, put them in the store, people have bought them. But God, what an irony that the books that they reached into our Kindles and deleted. Yeah.

SPEAKER_00

Real life mirroring fiction.

SPEAKER_01

Yeah, so I guess that's just a good example of us not really owning the content that we're buying. And it's the same. I mean, how many of us have been, and I this certainly happened to me a lot. You've been watching Netflix and you're halfway through a series and then suddenly it disappears and it's moved to a different streaming platform. And you're like, what? I was halfway through that.

SPEAKER_00

Yeah. That has happened to me a lot. The more common one, actually, I find is they say it's going next week, and then it's like, no, we can't go out for dinner tonight. We've got to stay in and watch the last two episodes of X on Netflix.

SPEAKER_01

Yeah. Absolutely. And we're all getting used to this. Like, we're getting used to not owning things. Uh it was quite funny because when we moved house, I've got, you know, I have a fairly substantial DVD collection that I bought over my teenage years. And when we were moving house, there was this big discussion about whether we take it with us or not. I decided to put it in envelopes and remove reduce the size of it significantly to just the discs. But I'm delighted that I've got that because occasionally I want to watch a film and it's not on any streaming service. And I'm like, oh, I've got it on DVD, I'll just go get that. I'm going to start getting frustrated when the PlayStation stop putting disk drives in, which I suspect is the next one because it's going to become harder to watch them. But it is amazing how often I turn to that hardware and go, I'm glad I've got that. Yeah, so we've talked a bit about the Kindle, but Amazon are not the only company doing this. There are many examples. Just this year, Netflix has ended support for over 87 million older devices. Now, this was a bit of a snappy headline that's got a bit, but basically, they stopped supporting the PS3. And everyone went, Oh, well, there were this many PS3 sold. And it's like, yeah, but how many people are actually using a PS3? Sure, I am for my DVD collection. But it was a bit of a misleading headline, but they did switch off support for these older PlayStations. Uh, Google discontinued some of the older Nest Thermostats so they couldn't be connected to the app. Uh after just three years on the market, Spotify discontinued an item called Car Thing, which I hadn't really come across. Basically, Spotify created a screen for your car which controlled Spotify. So basically to make your car a bit techie. It literally was on sale. I mean, it's three years from start to finish, but I think the public sale was like just one year within that. And originally they said no refunds. It's not going to work, and we're not going to give you any refunds. And they did change that position after backlash and a class action lawsuit being filed. So very nice of them to change that position, but it did take quite a lot, I think, for them to say actually we'll give you a refund. But imagine that there were people who bought this product and then a month later it didn't work. They were saying no refunds.

SPEAKER_00

Yeah, but James, just be a little bit careful. We're calling out all of these podcast streaming platforms, mate. Sorry to ask Spotify Overlords as well.

SPEAKER_01

Carl, you watch our Apple numbers boost as well. How can we criticise Apple? Apple actually did the opposite. Do you know about this? Apple, um Apple one day put U2's album on everyone's like phone and iPod. Yeah. And that was a real that was really scary in terms of what you can just add an album I didn't ask for, didn't pay for, don't want to my phone or iPod. It was very scary. And so they did the opposite of removing but it got everyone just as worried because it was it just showed what that I don't own the thing that I thought I owned. Okay, that's all of them. We've annoyed Spotify, Apple, Amazon, Podbean, we're coming for you. Right. I think we should give two personal examples that have impacted us, Robbie. So I I came up with Sonos, because for me, I think this is worse than Amazon. This example. I think this is from a corporate stupidity perspective. Oh, really? This is up there. Sue me if you want to, Sonos, because I think this is crazy. And I love Sonos. I have them all over my house. I think they're great. But this single act was so irritating and frustrating. So what they did was they really wanted you to upgrade your hardware. Okay. Now Sonos, for anyone who doesn't know, makes speakers, and the appeal of those speakers is that they can get they all connect. So I can just say to Spotify, play this song, and I can play it throughout my house or just in individual rooms or whatever. They're all just connected into a into a network of speakers. In 2019, Sonos launched a program they called the Trade Up Program. So they wanted you to upgrade to their latest speakers. Now they had forever sort of put themselves as like it doesn't matter when when you buy the speakers, they'll all connect to each other.

SPEAKER_00

Okay, no matter what generation and small ones, big ones, they all work together, yeah.

SPEAKER_01

But they did actually break that promise in 2022. They created a new app and the new app didn't work with the old devices. But that's a different problem. That's not this trade out program. So with this trade-out program, they said we will give you 30% off when you upgrade to a new speaker. But you had to press a button in the app that killed your old speaker. So what they did was they said, if you want to buy a new speaker, put in the serial number of the code of the one you want to kill. And then you buy a new one and you get a 30% discount. But the 30% discount only becomes active if you press a button in your speaker, in your app that kills the old speaker. And they called it recycle mode.

SPEAKER_00

Oh my word. What an absolute own goal that is.

SPEAKER_01

And so what they said was, oh well, we don't want everyone posting speakers back to us to prove that they've been recycled, etc. etc. But they stopped you selling it to a selling it on a marketplace, giving it to a friend. You know, they stopped you doing anything with it. They literally killed a perfectly good product with a button in an app that allowed you to get 30% off a new product.

SPEAKER_00

That's crazy. And it could have just been used in like Bluetooth mode, presumably as a standalone speaker for the rest of its life or whatever, for years and years and years.

SPEAKER_01

Yeah, but it's dead. It's bricked. It literally can't do anything. It was crazy, unbelievable. After a few months of some serious backlash, as you would expect, they did U-turn on this, and you can now get a discount without having to do anything to your old device. So if you put in the serial number of your old device, you can get a discount on a new one, up to 30%, and you can sell that on, you can give it to a friend, you can keep it, it doesn't matter. They're just saying because you're a loyal customer, you can buy a new speaker, basically. Um, so what they said in the statement is customers still receive a 30% discount on new Sonos products, but they can now choose what to do with their old device. Continue to use it, give it to a friend, donate it to charity, responsibly recycle it at the local e-waste facility or send it back to Sonos via a prepaid shipping label. They fixed it, and I'm happy, but the fact that a boardroom thought it's a good idea for us to create intentional e waste just to sell more products is so frustrating.

SPEAKER_00

Just goes to show what some of the motivations are within these companies, doesn't it? So my example, and I don't wish to blame you here, James. Oh Was a product that you recommended to me. And if I'm honest, it has served me well. I've had it for nearly ten years now, it must be. Must be sort of eight or nine years. And it's a bike called Fun Moof, which is the correct pronunciation. Then again. Fun Moof.

SPEAKER_01

Is it? I thought it was Van. I knew it wasn't Van Moof. I've been saying Van Moof. But you're saying Van Moof.

SPEAKER_00

It's an F sound, because it's Dutch. But anyway, let's Van Moof is uh what most people in the UK call it. It's a Dutch bike with lots of tech and electronics inside it. Had this bike, as I say, for nearly 10 years. James, you had one. I took one ride on it and was like, I've got to get myself one of these. My daughter had recently been born and needed an e-bike so I could get up the Bristol Hills with her on the back. And it's a very cool bike. Cool security features like uh integrated kick lock for security and uh an alarm tracking and also a free replacement service because they were so confident in their security features that if it got stolen, they would replace it for you. And mine did once get stolen, and they did replace it for me. So I am living proof that that was a great service. And it's also got really brilliant smart features in the app. You can unlock it, you can change speed, it's got integrated lights you can turn off and on using your phone, change the assistance level that it gives you going up those tough Bristol Hills, but it's probably a bit too clever for its own good, is what I must say. And the issue came, actually, to be fair to Funmouth, when they filed for bankruptcy and it was then bought out by McLaren, which was great news. So there was a small window of about six months to a year or so where there was no company to go and speak to if you had any issues. So it was great that a subsidiary of McLaren bought it out. However, the bike is still working, but they no longer support any of the parts, they no longer offer any online support from the company. So they've published all the articles for this bike. It's the S2 model, and I think they're up to about the S6 model by now. So unfortunately, I if it breaks down, I it's gonna be a very niche and novel activity trying to find someone to get this thing repaired and keep an electronic bike on the road. And the one big feature that was a huge selling point of it was the tracking. Previously that just came because there was a SIM card within the bike that operated on the 2G network so that you could find out like Apple Find My Phone type thing, you could find where the SIM was. But unfortunately, it became permanently defunct and irreversible, a bit like that button you mentioned earlier on the Sonos. If you didn't pay a subscription for it by just last week, actually, and I forgot to go and buy this subscription. So now don't let the criminals know, but I don't actually have tracking on this very clever bike anymore. So maybe I'm being a bit pedantic, it has served me nearly a decade and it's been a great bike, but it is one of those things where because of the high technology and support costs um involved in it, just eventually it becomes defunct.

SPEAKER_01

Do you remember mine was stolen in the city centre? And um and it had that tracking feature on it. So basically you go into the app, you say it's been stolen, and it suddenly loads up a map going, This is where it is. And it was in a construction site.

unknown

Oh, really?

SPEAKER_01

Oh yes, I remember this. And there was the beep in the middle of this construction site, right? And in the middle of the construction site was just a white van. On its own, it was just like nothing had actually been constructed on this construction site, it'd just been demolished. So it was imagine just a square that's got nothing in it except a white van dead in the middle, exactly where my bike is. I saw a police car. So I called the guy, I pulled the police officer over and said, look, I'm really sorry to serious to you, but my bike's been nicked. You can see on this map that it's in the centre of this construction site, and there's just a white van there. It must be in the back of that van. Would you mind just going and having a look? Police officer drives into the construction site, goes and chats to the white van driver who proceeds to open his white van, and I can see there's nothing in it. So I was like, oh, that's weird. Um my bike. My bike's gone. So I got home and I was really, really confused. And I got onto Google Maps to have a look at this construction site. Realised there was an underground car park under it.

SPEAKER_00

Oh no.

SPEAKER_01

My bike was in that underground car park.

SPEAKER_00

Oh, dad.

SPEAKER_01

And this poor white van driver was like, What?

SPEAKER_00

I haven't stolen anyone's bike.

unknown

Yeah.

SPEAKER_01

Meanwhile, below the ground, someone had. Anyway, never saw it again. But they did replace it. You're right. That was a very good uh, well, not a great business model for them. They went into administration, but a very good business model for me and you who got our replacement bikes. Great example, Robbie. So remember everyone, I'm not a lawyer, but I did say I'd quickly chat about the legalities of this. Um, I think what's happening is there is a distinction between physical products and their digital stores or environments that they're in. So there is a lot of protection for us as consumers on physical products. That's why I'm not sure Spotify had a good case in terms of their screen because that was a physical product that was stopping working. But Amazon is saying, well, you can still read your old books. We haven't turned that off. We're just turning off your ability to read new books. And a lot of that, the environment and the software, is covered by T's and C's. So I wanted to see what Amazon says in their T's and C's for the Kindle. And there is a line that says availability of Kindle content. The catalogue of Kindle content on the Kindle store, including any subscription content, is constantly changing. And new Kindle content may be added and existing Kindle content removed at any time. So I think they cover themselves with the T's and C's that they're allowed to do this. And UK law does not currently guarantee lifetime support for any pro for tech products. But I do think there is increasing pressure for minimum support periods, which as I said at the start, I would fully support.

SPEAKER_00

Yeah, and given the amount of times you said the words Kindle content, they're definitely clear about it.

SPEAKER_01

Okay, I promised at the start I would tell you how I think you can keep your Kindle running. And this is a thing called side loading. Ah, okay, here we go. Okay, so what you do, and I haven't tried this because I haven't got an old enough Kindle, but this is what I think you can do. You stick the Kindle in aeroplane mode. You want to get off the servers because Amazon like to delete side-loaded things. So you just want to get offline. It's not going to work anyway, so you might as well just keep it in airplane mode. Then you need content you actually own. So there's a couple of websites here, ebook.com and Smashwords are the ones I found where you can find books that are um DRM free, so they don't have that digital rights management. And major publishers typically will always be DRMs. So this is going to be self-published books, uh, but there's loads of them. I went onto Smashwords, download a couple of books last night. Then you download the file to your computer and you connect your Kindle to your computer via USB. And then you'll need to access it with some software. So Caliber is one of the open source tools you can use. And that'll transfer the eBay ebook into your Kindle and it'll form part of your library. So you can download new books without the store, but my recommendation is get it into airplane mode, plug it into your computer, download a book online and transfer it in.

SPEAKER_00

Okay, wow. And this is all perfectly legal, James. Of course.

SPEAKER_01

Yeah, side loading's fine. I mean, at best you're removing a warranty of a device that doesn't work anyway. I think it's fine. Of course, you could skip the ebook altogether and just go for apps. And if you go somewhere like bookshop.com and use their app on a tablet, for example, then you're generating money for local bookshops. So that might be a better solution. Ditch the ebook and move to a different device, your phone or tablet, and download from a place that's giving back to local bookshops.

SPEAKER_00

Yeah, great idea. I mean, it's such a shame. Weren't the original Kindles just a great example of something that proved to be slow tech? I remember thinking it was a fad, like people wouldn't move from books, but look how prevalent they are now, and they were perfectly designed for the job. And these other features of the newer ones seem to be ones that aren't necessarily really needed, at least by everyone. Um and I wonder if there'll be a swing back to lower tech and more reliable goods. I saw the other day the Kodak Charmerer. Have you heard of this?

SPEAKER_01

Um I hadn't until you mentioned it. But uh I'm gonna give you some info on it, but you go for it first.

SPEAKER_00

Oh, wow. Okay. Well, it's a 1.6 megapixel camera with no zoom, no editing, no undo, and it's sold out in minutes, apparently. It's like a sort of keychain retro thing um that you can carry around with you. Hopefully it's not a fad. You know, it is a small and relatively cheap device, but it just goes to show that maybe that's a sign of things to come in a world where we've spent decades seeking perfection and automation and editing our lives or whatever through very smart cameras on our phones and stuff. Maybe there'll be a swing back to more simplified and cherished devices that don't rely on lots of software and things like that to keep them running.

SPEAKER_01

Yeah. It's great that it's a low-tech device. Um, what's the other thing that current products are doing, Robbie, that annoys us on this podcast?

SPEAKER_00

Oh gosh, now you're asking me.

SPEAKER_01

You got anything you can think of that really winds us up? We've done two episodes on it, perhaps. Oh gosh, now you're really putting me under pressure. No idea. Okay, if you go on the Kodak Charmera website, let me read the headline for you. The cameras are sold in blind boxes. Oh no! Whether it's a party gift, a collectible item, or a shared surprise among friends, it adds an element of surprise and fun. With seven uniquely vintage designs, including one secret edition, every unboxing is a mystery awaiting to be revealed. So even when we think, oh great, we got a low-tech device. They still screw us with the blind box. Oh man, that's so annoying. Yes, the secret edition features a transparent shell that shows off the camera's inner workings, and the probability of drawing the secret edition is one in 48. There you go. Oh no, man. So what's the takeaway from all this? Robbie should visit websites before he starts promoting low-tech products, and that's definitely one of them. But also, it's not really about Kindles. It's about this quiet shift in what it means to own something. More and more the things we buy are not really ours. They're temporary, conditional, dependent on a brand or company deciding they're still worth supporting. And when that support ends, I think products just become waste. Perfectly functional devices just get turned into waste. 600 tons in this one case. And if we went through and did all the tonnage of the sonos and the how many codec cameras you have to buy to get the special one and all those things, you would work out how much waste is actually being created. There just doesn't need to be. As with all things, it only works because we accept it. It only works because we buy stuff, we ri we upgrade, we replace, we move on. And maybe we shouldn't, maybe we should ask better questions. How long will this thing I'm buying last? Can I repair it? Do I actually own it? Um, you know, the most sustainable device is one that you're going to keep using. And if companies don't design for that, then it's on us to push back. Additions and corrections. A while back the Scottish were pretty annoyed at me as they'd misunderstood a discussion we had on battery fires. And now I'm not sure I'm welcome in Ireland following similarly strong views on DRS in episode 92. So we're gonna have a DRS heavy additions and corrections. Let's just talk about DRS, Robbie. Okay. And to the Irish, I'm so sorry. I'm actually going to Dublin in a week for a wedding as this episode goes out. So I really, really need the Irish to forgive me because I'm heading. At least with Scotland, I wasn't planning on going. So I was like, well, I'll let that die down a bit. But um, yeah, the Irish are fuming about my views on DRS. With that in mind, I want to be really clear about what we said. We were talking about the difference in finances between EPR, extended producer responsibility, and DRS. And DRS means at the moment it is cheaper to use plastic and aluminium in DRS than glass in EPR. And if we don't engage with the scheme and get up to a 95% return rate, that situation is made worse, as in the difference in cost between EPR and DRS is made worse by unclaimed deposit. As I said in the episode and I stand by, in year one of the Irish scheme, unclaimed deposits could have funded the whole system. And I just want to be clear that is not me saying the Irish scheme is rubbish. It is not me saying return rates are not going to get better because I said they would. But it is true that there is a pile of cash unclaimed that could make the difference between EPR and DRS bigger if they decide to use it to lower producer fees. And I fear this will be true in the UK. I fear for a couple of years in the ramp up, money will be compounding and generated on a much bigger scale than we're seeing in Ireland that doesn't have a home. Because at any point someone could claim their deposit, so you've got to keep it in a bank account. And over time it's earning interest and you're using that interest to fund the scheme, and then that is lowering producer fees. And that makes glass in an even worse situation. And we've actually seen some moves in DRS, haven't we, in the last few weeks, just as some additions. So in Ireland, the deposit is 15 cents for single serve bottles and cans and 25 cents for larger formats, but the UK has just announced that there will be a 20p flat fee on everything.

SPEAKER_00

Yeah, no matter what the size.

SPEAKER_01

Yeah, now this means, and this is one of the aluminium industry's criticisms of it. If you're buying a pack of 24 cans of soft drink, the deposit on top of the purchase price, which when I looked yesterday was about £8. So you're buying, you're spending £8 on a pack of £24 cans of soft drink, you're gonna pay £4.80 on top of that as your deposit, which of course you will get back if you return it. But as we said in our DRS episode many, many months ago, this is gonna drive more plastic because people will buy a few two-litre bottles rather than a pack of 24 cans. I do think people will look for value. And so I don't disagree with a 20p flat fee. I think it keeps it much simpler. I think it's it just makes sense to just have it as a flat fee. But it will drive people to buy bigger formats in plastic than smaller formats in aluminium. I'm confident of that. And what they've also done, as well as the 20p flat fee, is talked about packaging needing to be a certain size to get into the reverse vending machine. Just after I'd read this, I went to my local shop and they at the end of the aisle had a load of biggies, which is the giant version of buzzballs that we talked about. We talked about in our buzzball episode. Yes. We discussed this back in episode 57. They're massive, they're like the size of a football, these biggies. They're 1.75 litres, so they're in scope for DRS. They're made of PET, so they're definitely in scope for DRS. They won't get in a reverse vending machine. They look like a football. So this got me thinking: does Exchange for Change, the people in charge or the government, have the power to dictate our packaging? Are they going to be able to say to Buzzball, you're not allowed to put that on the market, you now need to change your packaging? So I turned to policy advisor extraordinaire, Robert Stanehoff, for the answer.

SPEAKER_00

Well, yeah, so I've been doing a bit of digging on this, and you're right that they won't meet the most of the reverse vending machine specs. In fact, I think any of them. So they'll have to be returned via manual returns, like over the counter. So there is going to be an option to return some of these things manually. So wherever you turn up with your biggies, should you be drinking that kind of thing, um, you need to go to a place where they allow you to manually return it. Because alongside other items, too, that that don't fit the spec of the machine, but are between 150 milliliters and three liters, they absolutely do have to have the deposit. They're not exempt. They will be part of the system, but they will be manual. And so, no, Exchange for Change and the government don't have any existing powers to try and ban them per se. But there is a general assumption that many of the retailers will simply start to delist some of these products because they become inconvenient. You have customers returning to the store saying, Here's me biggie, where do you want it? And it's a bit of a nightmare for the cashiers or whatever to take it over the counter. And so, as it stands, they absolutely are in scope of the scheme, but they must be collected by retailers who have to accept them at return points, even if it's not via these reverse vending machines. So it's definitely a problem that's coming down the track for the likes of Buzzballs, and they're going to be having to think about a different, probably clever way of marketing their drinks if they want to continue to be listed at these supermarkets.

SPEAKER_01

We'd like to take a moment to thank our sponsor, EcoSurety, who are on a mission to rid the world of unnecessary packaging. They help brands navigate the tricky world of extended produce responsibility, but that is not all. They also collaborate on some incredible recycling projects and consumer awareness campaigns for those tough to recycle materials. If you're an organization looking to make smarter packaging choices, check them out at ecosurety.com. Best thing you can do to help our podcast to grow is to tell your friends and family about it or to leave us a review. And if you leave us a review, you could be Robbie's review of the week.

SPEAKER_00

And so this one came in from Shy on email. Straight into the bin box.

SPEAKER_01

And before you say the review, Robbie, I just need BIM influencers to put themselves in my shoes. So for a number of weeks now, including today, I think, I have been giving legal disclaimers to a lot of my comments. Saying, look, I don't know what I'm talking about. I'm not a lawyer. Please don't sue me. The only people I've actively asked to sue me, I think, are Sonos today. So now BINFluencers have that context. Let's hear the email.

SPEAKER_00

Not sure if I should thank you or sue you. Oh God.

SPEAKER_01

Oh my god. I thought this is the end. I read that line. I thought we're gonna have to stop the podcast. I think that was the subject line.

SPEAKER_00

That that was the header, yeah. Anyway, it goes on to say, thank you, as I've learned so much from your excellent podcasts, and sue you for potentially turning me into that dinner party boar who starts every conversation with. I was listening to this podcast about rubbish.

SPEAKER_01

I don't think they have a case. I think we're fine. Thank you so much for that email. I really enjoyed it. I laughed a lot. I panicked a bit. That's great. You can follow us at rubbishpodcast, you can email reviews or otherwise, talkingrubbishpodcast at gmail.com, or you can WhatsApp us. Also join our Discord. It's the easiest way to engage with us and listeners of the show. And the link to all those things is in the show notes. Rubbish or not. I was at my local recycling centre at the weekend, which will also form the basis of my residual rubbish today. It's amazing. You go spend five minutes at the uh recycling centre. Not allowed to say dump anymore, am I? But you're gonna spend five minutes at your local recycling centre. You're like, oh, I've got all the content I need for a whole episode. Maybe I should be hanging out there a little more. It's great. Well, someone had turned up with a load of like DIY waste, they'd obviously been stripping a room out in their house. And one of the things that included was wallpaper, and they were asking someone where the wallpaper should go. And I thought, well, seeing as this guy's asking, maybe other influencers would want to know too. So, Robbie, is wallpaper rubbish or not?

SPEAKER_00

Right. Well, I feel like you're trying to catch me out here. So I'm gonna put in my own disclaimer or clarification that if you're talking about used wallpaper, then I think it's just it's too mixed up with other substances. It can't be recycled. It's there's paper with glue, quite a lot of it. It's probably in tiny little pieces, or at least some of it is. Good luck to you to if you can get them off in an entire sheet of this stuff. And I honestly don't think that this paper mills are gonna want this stuff because the glue to paper ratio is very, very high. So I'm gonna confidently say if we're talking about used wallpaper, that it's rubbish.

SPEAKER_01

I agree. The GTP ratio is too high.

SPEAKER_00

GTP ratio, I like that. Glue to paper.

SPEAKER_01

It's gonna be glue to plastic, though. We need like a better way of it.

SPEAKER_00

Yeah. Yeah, not quite clear enough. But I'm sure the paper mills would like us to be highlighting the fact that the GTP ratio is something people should be considering.

SPEAKER_01

And of course, uh, you mentioned unused stuff. I guess if you've got any extra unused wallpaper, like you just bought too much for the space, I would be looking to use that in some craft projects or advertising it online. You never know. Someone might just want a little off cut and it might be really helpful for them. So advertising that on a swap site or social media or something. Rubbish news. My news this week was shared by DJ Blagg on Discord. Thank you for this. And sometimes I do pick my news just because I like. Like a pun that's in the news story, and that is exactly what has happened here. So this was the news that the Lib Dems are pledging £5,000 in rewards to people who provide tip-offs about illegal waste. Now I need to be clear, it says up to £5,000 with no detail on how they're going to calculate this. So I suspect not many people will get the big the big money. I think you'd have to find an Oxfordshire fly tip for that and then get the people prosecuted and get them thrown into prison, and you might see £5,000. But still, it's a moment to show us their intent that they are very keen to sort out the fly tipping issue. And as we know, fly tipping incidents are on the up. They're up by 9% to about 1.26 million, I think. Um, and there are already a few schemes in place where you can get rewards for getting people prosecuted. Yeah. So Merton Council, which I think is somewhere in London, uh, will pay you £100 if your report results in a fine. You can get £500 in East Hampshire. I didn't get anything for my reports a couple of weeks ago. Nothing. I did four reports. This could have been two grand in East Hampshire. One of them had someone's address on it. I mean, I literally could have. That's that's just giving someone the waste criminal.

SPEAKER_00

You could have even done the prosecution yourself.

SPEAKER_01

Yeah. Now here's the pun. Are you ready, Robbie? This is the best pun I think will ever be said on talking rubbish. And we've said some puns. Greenwich, who offer £100 in rewards, call suspected fly tippers, people of bin trest. And as I said on Discord, I have never wanted anything more than to be called a person of bin trest.

SPEAKER_00

Oh, very good. Not in this context, though. No, not in this context.

SPEAKER_01

Just an interesting person. Okay, I'll just be a bin tresting person. That's better than person of bin trest.

SPEAKER_00

So I've got an update. Some news from the Birmingham bin strike. So why have I got it? It could be over. But anyway, at time of recording, Birmingham City Council and Unite have agreed a deal which could be put to a vote. So it still needs to be approved by Unite members, just to be very clear. And it follows more than a year of industrial action, which began on the 6th January 2025, when 350 workers staged this series of one-day walkouts, which then eventually became this all-out strike on the 11th of March. However, because of these local elections and it's currently Labour run, it's prevented voting in terms of the council voting on this to make a final decision because of pre-poll restrictions, the perder period before the pre-election period and during elections. It's a policy change, so the vote can't take place at the council. We think as soon as the council sits again and they are able to vote, it's very likely that they'll vote in favour and that it will be over very quickly. Now, the full specifications of the deal are not quite clear yet. Again, they can't publish those, they're confidential at the moment because it could be seen as political sort of point scoring during the election period. But suffice to say, I think we can be pretty confident that both sides will claim victory because that's what always happens when these strikes end. So I'm sure we'll give an update just to say, yes, it has ended as soon as we can. But thank God it's nearly over. I was in Birmingham just this week, and uh I must say it's strange coming in on the train knowing that all of these bins and all of this recycling is just not taken place for an entire year.

SPEAKER_01

I've um I've entered it for next year, Robbie. Are we doing a talking rubbish entry? Is this the plan?

SPEAKER_00

Oh my god, you're gonna have to give me a much more of a sales pitch than that.

SPEAKER_01

I think we decided I was gonna be dressed as an aluminium can, you were gonna be dressed as a plastic bottle, we're gonna raise money for waste aid. Hey, if we get in, that's what we gotta do.

SPEAKER_00

I just cannot imagine myself running a marathon. I I think 10k is about the longest I've ever done, and that was a struggle.

SPEAKER_01

Well, we'll call it walking rubbish.

SPEAKER_00

Very good. Okay. With a pun, you can get me in.

SPEAKER_01

Very good.

SPEAKER_00

Very good.

SPEAKER_01

I watched people grabbing bottles to take a drink and then throw them down onto the road, and I was thinking, how is this gonna work in a deposit return scheme? So again, another deposit return scheme question that I'm hoping my policy expert can answer.

SPEAKER_00

Yeah, well, this is one that's pretty straightforward. I reached out to someone who will remain anonymous. More to come on anonymity in the next section, actually. They say that it will definitely have to have a deposit. The only exemption, and we talked about sizes and shapes and things not being a valid exemption, is if there's a closed loop event where it's genuinely the material can't get outside of the event. Now, we don't know the exact definitions of that and how it will work in practice, but the London Marathon, you can just quit halfway through and walk off with a plastic bottle. So it's not a closed loop event in any way, shape, or form. The organizers will definitely have to be charged a deposit for the bottle by the producers of the bottle wherever they're getting them from, whoever the supplier is. Now, how if and how they charge it to the runners to say everyone is gonna be supplied with at least three bottles of water or five bottles of water, and therefore we're gonna bake it into your entrance fee, is up to them. They don't have to pass it on as the organizers to the people taking part in the event, but they are gonna be paying it themselves up front. So they need to decide are they gonna stump up and swallow the cost of this? Now, it's not free to enter it, so I imagine they can quite easily bake this into the entrance fee because they have so many people every year trying to enter into the event. So I I think it might be a moot point, but definitely seeing the plastic lining the streets was a big concern and worry, just the optics of it. I know it was cleared up very quickly, but it just looked terrible. And we have a mutual friend, don't we, James, who took part in the marathon. He actually ran it ridiculously quickly, it was like under three hours.

SPEAKER_01

He did it in two hours fifty something, and I said, That is ridiculous. And he went, Yeah, I had to go slow because of the heat. It's like that is not walking rubbish.

SPEAKER_00

He did say that what wasn't shown was the gamification of throwing the bottle of water into a giant bin further down the road, and apparently the uh audience, the spectators lining the streets would see a runner with a bottle coming towards the bin, and they would do the if you manage to throw it in the bin. And so he was too tired to remember whether he got them all in. I think he thinks that he did. So there was a bit of um taking care of one's own rubbish, but certainly the pictures did show many, many people, probably in dire straits. I know I would be if I was the one running the marathon or even walking it, unfortunately, just tossing them on the side of the street. And I don't think the deposit return scheme is going to be a panacea that magically sorts this issue out.

SPEAKER_01

So uh London Marathon did actually give a few interesting comments here just because you don't need to take bottled water. So if we do get in next year, Robbie, we have to remember this. There will be water refill stations at the start, finish, and at five locations along the course. Um, so they encourage you to bring your own hydration vest or running bottle and just fill up at the refill stations. If you do choose to get bottles, then Buxton make the water bottles or made the water bottles this year. They're made of 100% recycled plastic, excluding the cap and label, which is the usual exclusion. They are collected separately and returned to Buxton to be recycled into new bottles. And these are actually smaller bottles, they're 250mm, uh specially produced for London Marathon events, um, which is designed to help water save water and plastic by not having them too full.

SPEAKER_00

Oh, because people only want a small sip while they're out in the water. Multiple times, yeah, yeah. Okay.

SPEAKER_01

Um but again, because you want it multiple times, like they've put what seven refill stations in. So let's say you take seven, you're much better off bringing your own bottle. Uh they also provide Leucusade, which are also made from 100% recycled plastic and are also collected separately. Um, and they use compostable cups at the Lucasade energy drink stations. And again, those cups are collected and sent for industrial composting, which is the only time we like composting in a closed loop event where you can guarantee that it will be composted. But yes, thank you so much for that information, Robbie. And that is actually super interesting that they are gonna have to pay the deposit somewhere in the chain. I suspect they won't be passing it on because how will we get our sub two hour time if we're having to throw a 20p at someone? It's just not gonna happen. Residual rubbish. This is something that has happened to us this week that has made us feel like an emoji. As I said in my rubbish on up this weekend, it involved a trip to the recycling centre to recycle a load of cardboard and some plastic. And I was very, very impressed. So this was the Bristol Avonmouth Recycling Centre, and they've introduced a new role which I'm gonna call the general waste checker. Oh, it'd be so good. So they had new signage everywhere. So this was around the general bin saying so massive letters, the word stop, and then it said underneath in smaller letters recycling going to waste. So stop, recycling, going to waste. General waste here gets incinerated. We only accept sorted, non-recyclable items as general waste. Your bags will be checked, and everything else can be taken to the correct bay. And this guy was amazing. He was looking through everyone's baths going. Okay, that goes in bay 10, that goes in bay five, that goes in bay two. And luckily I got it mostly right. I think there was one thing he sent me off to go and recycle that I didn't think could be, but he thought it could be. But he was amazing. So I have emailed uh Bristol Waste to find out if there is an increase in recycling, decrease in general waste from introducing this role. Presumably the costs of having someone do this are offset by the reduced or increased money coming in from recycling, reduced fees for incineration. So very, very impressive. I really hope they've got this at every site, and I really hope other councils roll this out because it was working so well. And this is how I overheard the guy with the wallpaper because he was asking the guy, can I put this wallpaper in here?

SPEAKER_00

Okay. Oh, very good. Isn't it just great when you see people in the recycling industry taking pride in their work and just demonstrating expertise? That goes here, this goes there. It's brilliant. My emotion this week is is dumbfounded, actually. A shrug, perhaps. We've talked about anonymity a little bit earlier when I was mentioning about the deposit return scheme and the marathon. There is a mystery out there. Who is the waste whisperer? So this is a leading recycling publication, Let's Recycle, who have a new writer. Now, this first article was suspiciously similar to comments you've made on this very podcast, James, particularly in relation to DRS that's come up a few times today. But also they mention that their partner thinks they have, and quote, I quote, an unhealthy interest in bins. Now, I'm pretty certain if I spoke to Ellie, that's exactly what she would say. They also mention a dislike of litter and vapes and nitrous oxide canisters, all topics that are regularly covered on the podcast. And this is the compelling proof, I believe, James. They also sign off with, I have a feeling not everyone will agree with me. So please tell me what I've gotten wrong, what I have gotten right, and most of all, tell me why. Which is literally the additions and corrections section of this podcast. So, James, and I've been asked this directly, privately, are you the waste whisperer? No.

SPEAKER_01

Now I read it, and all I I as I was reading it, I thought, am I the waste whisperer? It's my comments. It's literally. I mean, I could have written it, right? I read it and thought it was me. And now I but I don't have time to write up as well as do a podcast. So it's definitely not me. But yes, it is someone who has quite I I would agree with you, suspiciously uh similar views to me. Okay, well, that was a compelling denial.

SPEAKER_00

It's definitely not me. Is it you? I'll be keeping an eye out for the next article to see just how closely it matches your views again. Is it you though? No, it's definitely not me either. It's not me, folks.

SPEAKER_01

But very good. Yeah, the waste whisperer. It's like Bridgerton, isn't it? The whose lady whistled down. It's the same, but way more boring.

SPEAKER_00

Okay. I'm I'm looking James in his eyes now. Do you promise it's not you?

SPEAKER_01

I promise it's not me. Okay. I promise. It's funny you should say their partner mentioning they have an unhealthy interest in bins, because I was actually entering us into an award last night, Robbie. Oh. Um which I will talk about if we get shortlisted, but who knows? I mean, I just thought I'd enter us into a podcast award. And I said, Ellie, could you just read the award entry? It was bin day, of course. Just uh I promise this happened in this way, but just as she read the line that I'd written in the award submission, which was, you know, we make bin day the best day of the week. I went, Oh bloody hell, it's bin day. She didn't because it was like late at night. I was like, Oh bloody hell, I gotta put the pins out. She went, Are you joking? You've literally just written it's the best day of the week.

SPEAKER_00

Oh, that's amazing. Well, there we go, BIMFluencers. Even we at times have to really lean in and put that effort into making sure we do the right thing with recycling.

SPEAKER_01

Particularly at 11 o'clock when you put your dressing gown and slippers on. As always, thank you all for listening. Thank you for the reviews and engagement. We love getting the opportunity to do this podcast. Join our Discord, follow us on social media at rubbishpodcast. You can email talkingrubbishpodcast at gmail.com or you can WhatsApp us. Everything we have discussed today can also be found on our link tree, and the details to all of those things can be found in our show notes. There is nothing left for me to say other than see you next binge. Bye. Bye.