Cases Unsolved Podcasts
Updating to check Spotify. Case Unsolved explores the mysteries that never got answers. From vanished people and abandoned investigations to baffling crimes that still haunt detectives, each episode revisits a case where the truth remains just out of reach. Through witness accounts, evidence reviews, and unanswered questions, we uncover the stories behind the files that remain open and the families still searching for closure.
Cases Unsolved Podcasts
Testing publish modal
Use Left/Right to seek, Home/End to jump to start or end. Hold shift to jump forward or backward.
John, I just want to formally extend my gratitude to Universal Music Group. Traditional friends of the tech industry, you know, no surprise that, you know, it would be be LA'd with them. But uh, so there was this song, AI Drake. I posted this song as part of my article. And of course, I downloaded the video first. But one thing, by and large, more and more as I post videos on Shitekari, I do usually host them myself. And the reason is because videos will just disappear if you embed them from someone else, right? And you'll get you have a broken link, no one wants broken links. Obviously, broken links are a scourge on the web generally. But if something is embedded in the page and part of the article, I don't want that to break. So I like a few years ago, I actually went back all the way to being in Shitechari. We got the original videos of almost everything that I posted and I host it myself. In this case, I did not embed my own video because I was like, there's a good chance that this is gonna get taken down. Uh, if it gets taken down, I don't want to be a part of that. But then number three, if you load the article and there's a black box that says video unavailable, this video is no longer available to due to a copyright claim by Universal Music Group, it kind of makes the point of my introduction. So they they they accommodated me, they came in a couple days later. There's now a black box on the article, and you know what? It's gonna stay there.
SPEAKER_01I can't say I'm the biggest Drake fan in the world, um, you know, because I'm not, but the song is an absolute sensation. And I guess if it weren't AI generated, is it that good? I don't know.
SPEAKER_00Yeah, there's it's hard to separate like the novelty factor in your head from appreciating whether or not it's a good song, right?
SPEAKER_01But it's like a nationwide or worldwide, you know, pop sensation, you know. And it's like the first one. I think that's that's the thing that has really opened people's eyes.
SPEAKER_00Yeah, the first one that's broken through, to be clear. There's been there's been a lot of these floating around, but yes.
SPEAKER_01Right. But if this is the first only the first one that's broken through, where is where is this going in the future in terms of how people are going to make original mashups from you know, and if if the music industry thought sampling a beat was a problem before, now they're simulating the vocals of an artist, right?
SPEAKER_00I mean No, but that that's that is exactly what I think is interesting, because this gets back into a lot of these lawsuits and copyright questions that are going on, which is when you're sampling a beat, you are literally copying the beat, right? Even if it's a very small section. Whereas this other stuff, it's it's new production. It's so is this so it's down because of a copyright claim, but is this a copyright violation? It's not clear, it's not clear that it is.
SPEAKER_01Very much so, right? And it's because the AIs have abilities that humans just don't, right? Uh it's like, you know, there's always the the trope of the person with a quote unquote photographic memory, which really doesn't exist, but it ai uh can be fed the entire text of a novel. And of course, all of these AIs have been fed the text of thousands of novels.
SPEAKER_00They've been fed the text of Daring Firewall, as you hired the other day.
SPEAKER_01Right, fed the and Stratechary. I'm a little ahead of you, and uh, I was surprised. I was expecting to eat, I was expecting Strategary to perhaps be more better fodder for the AI.
SPEAKER_00No, well, but a lot of it's behind a paywall, so I think that the part of the thing. Yeah, it's funny because I unlike the website, I mean, not that anyone cares, but like the website rankings things, Stratekery is always relatively low, I think, to the actual number of readers, in part because Strategory is successful when I get people to stop reading the webpage and to read like an email, right? Forwarded or whatever it might be. But sorry, continue.
SPEAKER_01Right. But you know, or or you know, they it has, you know, perhaps if it's been, you know, it seems according to the Washington Post analysis, the Google one is is been fed up to some certain date the entire corpus of Daring Fireball. So their abil its ability to mimic my style uh is inhuman in terms of its ability to keep all of that in its proverbial head at one time. And so uh humans have been able to. I mean, and I always say, I mean, writing is the one thing I feel like I can maybe give younger people advice on, but read as much stuff that you love to read as you want and think critically why do I enjoy reading this, you know, and then use that to infuse your own writing. That's the the nutshell of my advice to somebody who wants to write is you've got to be a reader first. Think about what it is that you love about the stuff you love to read, and don't copy it, but just let that infuse your style. Every writer is inspired by writers they like, every musician will tell you they're inspired by the musicians they like, every filmmaker is inspired by the filmmakers who came before them, who they love and who they watch their movies over and over again. But the ability of AI to duplicate that it isn't like anything we've seen before. And like you said, it is fair. Is it copyright? Because they're not actually copying it, it's just that it it they AI has the ability to replicate things that we once thought were unreplicatable without copying.
SPEAKER_00But the the answer here, because it's not like this is going to go away, right? People are calling this a napster moment, and it does feel like a napster moment because the solution to napster was ultimately to do something better, to figure out a way forward that sort of made sense. And yeah, I don't know, we're sort of rehashing a bit of what we got into last episode. But number one, uh you know, we should be able to know for sure what sort of is from Drake and what isn't. And this, by the way, I think is gonna be there's always been this issue around user-generated content sites, whether that be social media, whether that be YouTube, whether that even be Spotify, where it's very easy to walk up and sort of create an account. And part of the problem with this, with this person is they did sort of put it on Spotify. I think that one of the things these platforms are going to have to start doing and is going to be a differentiator that they provide and will preserve the relationships with genuine creators is a much stronger verification process. And that is in some respects not ideal because they benefit from basically not having to put in any costs into the upload process. So you just get content sort of like crazy. But I do think that's gonna have to change. Like, like, like the these platforms are going to have to make a shift in response to the fact that generating content is now zero cost, and uh and it's on them, I think, actually more than anyone to to solve this problem.
SPEAKER_01It's constantly surprising though what AI generated blank can come up with, right? And it is I I get the Napster thing, it it seems it makes Napster seem so simple in hindsight, right? It was just distribution of copies, but there is it's not a bad analogy though, because there it is clearly a sort of can't put the toothpaste back in the tube sort of scenario, right? Like there's there's whatever the path forward for the you know, if we're just talking music for the music labels, it's not somehow make this not be possible because it is possible and it's going to keep happening.
SPEAKER_00Yeah, one thing by the way, this is sort of an orthogonal take. Um, Netflix's earnings were came out this week, and one of the I'm not surprised, but it was, I think, a pleasant surprise. Well, I'm not shocked, but it was a pleasant surprise. The extent to which their ads are, you know, kicking ass, right? So they had this basic with ads was their plan where you have the fake HD, it was like 720p and only one stream, and it cost it was cheaper than their regular basic plan. But because they're making so much money on ads in the US and Canada, that plan was actually making Netflix more revenue than their standard plan, which is $15.50 a month, and it is real HD in two streams. And so they upped that plan to being basically the same uh real HD, two streams. And it seems super clear that they woke it up to it's actually in our interest to push people into this free plan. And it also, by the way, actually makes it possible we might see a free Netflix down the line where it's just sort of ad supported, and the main the main thing you get for sort of paying is maybe 4K or or the ability to download or sort of um, you know, no ads, obviously, is is sort of the the the biggest allure. But it's really interesting because there's a bit where if Netflix gets there, the there it's almost shifting more towards the YouTube direction, where obviously there's this big distinction, which is Netflix is all paid for content and produced content, and YouTube is all this user-generated content with some of the other stuff sort of sort of on top. But the business models end up being kind of similar, where there's a ad-free version, and then YouTube also has the pay and don't see ads, which by the way is like the biggest bargain on the internet. I it boggles my mind when anyone does not have YouTube premiums. But but it's interesting because also you might have this issue where YouTube is starting to have more costs in terms of user-generated content. User generated content might start getting more expensive for these platforms precisely because this verification function may become more of a burden than it's been sort of to date. I mean, there's always been the cost of moderation, has been a cost of having, you know, user-generated content. But if you have to actively have some sort of verification and program, the economics of it do start to break down just a little bit more. And it's not to say Netflix will be YouTube, it's obviously not going to be, but it's just it's interesting how there's sort of a convergence in some respects about the overall cost structure of these businesses.
SPEAKER_01Yeah. It's just again a side note on a side note, but I was checking on which family subscriptions everybody's using and which ones I should keep. And I double checked with my son, like, hey, you're still using our family thing for YouTube Premium. And he's never freaked out so badly. He was like, Oh my god, don't cancel that. Like, I think I I could cancel anything else, like, oh, if I canceled Disney Plus, he'd be like, okay, you know, or one or the other, even Netflix, maybe, but YouTube Premium, he was like, Don't do that, I'll come home and kill you.
SPEAKER_00I was totally wrong on YouTube Premium. I thought it was a bad idea when they did it because, like, you're you're sort of filtering out your best customers, which are attractive to advertisers. Right now, there is a certain self-interest bias in here, which is I love YouTube Premium so much I can't imagine if it didn't exist. So maybe that's part of the motivation. But it's also YouTube is so big, they're totally fine without having some number of subscribers that are willing to pay. And the pri you know, they I think they keep raising the price. And yeah, I mean, it's funny that it just seems like this, you know, it's just it's fascinating that Netflix may end up in the same place, a free tier where you pay to not have ads. And uh, I think like if you go back even a couple of years, or especially before YouTube launched premium, the idea that one day YouTube and Netflix might have the same business model would have been crazy. But that very well may be where we end up.
SPEAKER_01Right. And it's fascinating to compare with our other recent topic, HBO, where for years and years and years the comparisons with Netflix were always to HBO and the can HBO become Netflix faster than Netflix can become HBO. It's super fascinating because that made a lot more sense and was like, yeah, it seems like a natural rivalry. Whereas Netflix being compared to YouTube didn't seem like something that we'd be talking about, even though now that it's happening, it's like, oh, it does kind of make sense. And I guess the big lesson to come out of it is you always have to try stuff to see how it works rather than go with your intuition. So, like, like you, my intuition would be something that is entirely ad-based. You don't want to offer an ad-free version because you'd be losing your quote unquote best customers. Whereas it seems like lots of things that do that and try that, it works out fine. Where the ad product keeps making the same money from ads because plenty of good customers don't want to pay, and you just get this separate segment of people who are super happy to pay to make the ads go away.
SPEAKER_00Yeah, and vice versa, right? I think in retrospect, it's funny how out on a whim I felt by saying that Netflix should have ads. And now it's like now it's like, can you imagine if Netflix had not instituted ads, right? It's and it has no and it and to your point, it doesn't have any impact on the regular Netflix subscribers. It's still totally fine. And you know, I I think it's it's a reminder, it's easy to get very precious about this stuff. And at the end of the day, these are big companies, it's a huge market, and uh yeah, the to your point, it being dogmatic is is actually where it which is arguably Netflix's biggest problem, is they were too dogmatic for too long about this point, and the fact that Netflix effectively with this ad, and you can see why they want to push people there because they can it's basically they can raise prices indefinitely because the price that's being raised is the attractiveness to advertisers, the amount they can charge per ad, which is not felt by the consumer. It's actually a win-win, it is a good thing for everyone.
SPEAKER_01Yeah, I I saw people freak out at the news that they're making more money per user with the lower price thing with ads, because people who don't want to see ads on Netflix are freaked out because they're like, well, if they make more money, they're just gonna make us all do that. And I don't think that's gonna happen. I think they're happy to let people who really feel strongly about paying the Nazi ads make less money from them per month. Oh no, they'll raise prices.
SPEAKER_00Yeah, they'll happily raise prices, but but that's fine. Like, like if it's important to you, you should be happy to pay. You can't have your cake and eat it too, right?
SPEAKER_01Yeah, they'll they'll keep the product, you just might have to pay more, you know. And it's it's not that, oh, I'm gonna be forced to see ads. It's more like you're gonna be forced to pay two or three dollars more a month, and then a year later another two dollars.
SPEAKER_00And no, I I've always this has always been very clear to me. The end all be all of business is not making your customers happy. And the way I always put it is it would make my customers very happy if I made Sha Techari free. And that's definitely not what I'm going to do. So that I'm I'm pretty clear that's not the end all be all.
SPEAKER_01Right, right. Yeah, free food would be great too, but that there's no way to run a restaurant.