Really Scary Real Estate

What Sellers Are Hiding From You: The Truth About Stigmatized Properties

Amanda Jenee Season 1 Episode 2

Use Left/Right to seek, Home/End to jump to start or end. Hold shift to jump forward or backward.

0:00 | 24:25

In episode two, Amanda Jenee breaks down stigmatized property law across the United States — and what sellers are legally allowed to hide from you about a home's dark history. Covering the state-by-state disclosure patchwork, the famous Ghostbusters Ruling of 1991, the Heaven's Gate house, the Watcher of Westfield, and the five steps every buyer should take before closing on any property. This is the episode that will change how you look at a listing. 

SPEAKER_00

You found the house. It checks every box that the price is right. The neighborhood feels safe. The inspection came back clean. You sign the papers. You get the keys. You start moving in. And then your new neighbor knocks on the door and they say, Oh, you bought that house. Did they tell you what happened here? They didn't. Because in most of the United States, they didn't have to. Welcome back to Real Scary Real Estate. I'm Amanda Janae, and today we are getting into something I think affects every single person who has ever bought or sold a home, or has even lived in a home, and most people don't even know it exists. It's called stigmatized property law. And what it allows sellers to hide from you is going to make you want to ask a lot more questions before you ever close on a house again. Real scary real estate where haunted history meets property values. Every week I dig into the dark side of real estate, the hauntings, the histories, the disclosures nobody wants to make, and the people brave enough to sign on the dotted line anyway. I'm Amanda Janae. Let's get into it. The National Association of Realtors defines a stigmatized property as a property that has been psychologically impacted by an event which occurred or was suspected to have occurred on the property, an event that has no physical impact of any kind. Let me translate that into plain language. As stigmatized property is any home where something has happened that makes buyers uncomfortable, even if that thing left no physical damage, no structural problem, nothing a home inspector could even flag. We're talking about murder, suicide, violent crime, the home being used for drug manufacturing, a death from a contagious disease, a previous tenant who is notorious. And yes, we are talking about hauntings, paranormal activity, the belief that the property is haunted. All of these fall under the stigmatized property umbrella. And here is the number that stops people cold when they hear it for the first time. A death in a home, depending on the circumstances, can decrease its value up to 25% and increase the time it sits on the market by up to 50%. Those are not made-up numbers, but those come from peer-reviewed research published in the Journal of Real Estate Research. 25% on what is likely the single largest purchase of your life. So here's the question that this episode is all about. If something happened in a house that could affect your decision to buy it, how much would you pay for it? Does the seller have to tell you? The answer depends entirely on where you live, and some of those answers are going to make you probably angry. Let's start with the broad picture, and then we'll zoom in on all the states that matter the most. That means in nearly two-thirds of the country, a seller can know that someone was murdered in the house, and they are under no legal obligation to put that in writing or say it out loud unless you specifically ask. Fifteen states require disclosure only if the buyer asks directly and the seller knows. Three states require proactive disclosure of deaths within a specific time window. Let's go through the ones that you need to know. California, the most protective state. California is the gold standard in this area, and it's where the whole modern conversation about stigmatized property law began. Under California Civil Code Section 1710.2, a seller or their agent must disclose any death on the property that occurred within the past three years. Any death, natural causes, accident, murder, suicide, it doesn't matter. If it happened within three years of your closing date, you get told about it in writing, usually on the transfer disclosure statement, which we call it the TDS. But, and this is important, if the death happened more than three years ago, California law does not require the seller to volunteer that information. They still can't lie to you if you ask directly, but they don't have to bring it up. California also has a privacy protection clause worth knowing about. Sellers and agents cannot disclose if a former occupant had had HIV or AIDS. This is specifically protected under the state and federal privacy law, regardless of how long ago it occurred. New York, the Ghostbuster State. New York has a specific law called the New York Stigmatized Property Law, codified in the New York Real Property Law Section 443-A. And the headline is sellers and real estate agents are not legally required to disclose if a property is stigmatized due to murder, suicide, or paranormal activity. However, sellers must answer it truthfully if you ask. So if you walk into a showing and say, has anyone died in this house? And the seller or their agent has to answer honestly if they know. But here's the catch that nobody warns buyers about. You have to know to ask. If you're not familiar with the property's history and you don't ask, the seller is legally protected in staying silent. So now, New York is also home to the most famous court case in the history of haunted real estate. And I have to tell you about it because it is one of the most delightful legal documents you will ever encounter. So in 1989, a man named Jeffrey Stambofsky, a New York City resident, falls in love with a Victorian mansion in the village of Nyack, New York. Beautiful home, good price. He puts down a $32,500 deposit and signs a contract for $650,000. Then after signing, he discovered something the seller, a woman named Helen Ackley, had not mentioned. Helen Ackley had for nine years been publicly telling everyone that her house was haunted by poltergeists. She had written about it in the Reader's Digest in 1977. She had given interviews to local newspapers in 1982. The house had been featured on a haunted homes walking tour of Nyack in 1989. The same year she sold it to Stambovinsky. She had told the entire world. Except the buyer. Stampovinsky sued to get his deposit back. He wanted out of the contract. The first judge dismissed the case. The legal reasoning, buyer beware. In New York at the time, it was a buyer's job to investigate, not the seller's job to disclose. Stampovinsky appealed, and the appellate court, in a three to two decision, ruled in his favor. The opinion, written by Justin Rubin, has become legendary in real estate and contract law because of what it said. The court held that because Helen Ackley had personally and repeatedly represented her house as haunted to the public. The house was, and I am reading this directly from the ruling, haunted as a matter of law. Haunted as a matter of law. Those are actual words from an actual court opinion, and they are now taught in property law classes at law schools across the United States. The justice also wrote, and this is the part that I love, that applying strict buyer beware rules to a house possessed by poltergeist quote, conjures up visions of a psychic or medium routinely accompanying the structural engineer and terminus man on an inspection of every home. The court gave Stambivinsky his deposit back. The case is formally known as Stambiskyver's Ackley. It is informally known as the Ghostbusters Ruling. Alaska One year. Alaska requires sellers to disclose a murder or suicide that occurred on property within one year of the sale. One year only. If it happened 14 months ago and you don't ask, you might never know. South Dakota must always disclose. South Dakota requires sellers to disclose if a homicide or suicide occurred on the property with no time limit attached. That is one of the stronger protections in the country. New Jersey, ask and you shall receive. New Jersey requires sellers to disclose any deaths on the property of if the buyer has asked. And this is genuinely interesting. New Jersey is one of only a handful of states where the law specifically mentions paranormal activity. A New Jersey seller must disclose if the property is purportedly being haunted. If the buyer asks, you have to ask, but they have to answer. Florida, fully protected. Florida law actively protects sellers from lawsuits related to non-disclosure of deaths or stigmatized events. A seller in Florida can now know that three people were murdered in a home, disclose nothing, and face essentially zero legal consequences as long as there's no physical damage that was hidden. Florida is about as seller-friendly as it gets on this issue. Texas, written into law. Texas has language in its seller disclosure statute, specifically in the Texas Property Code section 5.008, that explicitly states there is no duty to disclose certain types of deaths when they are unrelated to the physical condition of the property. Texas literally written, you don't have to tell them into that code. Most other states, in the majority of states, the answer comes down to this. The seller cannot lie to you, but they are under no obligation to volunteer information. Buyer beware, which means, and I want you to really hear this, in most of the United States, if you want to know the history of a property you're buying, the responsibility for finding that out is yours. I want to give you some real examples of what this looks like in practice, because I think the state law breakdown can feel abstract until you put a face and a front door on it. In 1959, a doctor named Harold murdered his wife with a hammer in their Los Felices home where she slept, then attacked his teenage daughter, then took his own life. The house sat essentially untouched for decades, frozen in time, with the family's belongings still inside. In the 1990s, a man named Emily Cesno bought the property for about $1.2 million. He later transferred it to a man named Rudy Enriquez. Then it was acquired by a man named Cody Pollock for $2.3 million, reportedly about one-third of what comparable properties in that neighborhood were going for. A roughly 6% discount tied entirely to the stigma. Even in California, which has the strongest disclosure laws in the country, the death was far outside the three-year window. The seller had no obligation to bring it up. The buyer had to know to ask. The Heaven's Gate House, this is in Rancho Santa Fe, California. In 1997, 39 members of the Heaven's Gate cult committed mass suicide in a rented mansion in Rancho Santa Fe, California. The property was later acquired for development. A home was built on that site. Here's the real estate lesson. The original property was demolished. A new structure was built. Does the stigma follow the land? In California, the three-year disclosure window applies to deaths on the property. But a new structure on the same land creates a complicated gray area that real estate attorneys still debate. The answer to that question is not settled, and that uncertainty alone should tell you something. The OJ Simpson connection, so that's in Brentwood, California. When O.J. Simpson's Brentwood home, where Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman were murdered, went on the market, the stigma was so severe that the property was eventually demolished. A new home was constructed and given a different address entirely. The goal was to sever the association. The stigma faded a little more as time passed and fewer buyers had a direct memory of the case. Real estate appraisers who specialize in stigmatized property say that the most murder-related stigma dissipates within six to seven years, when the surrounding neighbors have mostly turned over and the news cycle has moved on. The Lizzie Borden House, Fall River, Massachusetts. This one breaks the model entirely. The Lizzie Borden House in Fall River, Massachusetts, where Andrew and Abby Borden were killed with the hatchet in 1892, sold in 2021 for around $2 million, in a market where the average home was worth a fraction of that. The notoriety had become the value. The house is now a bed and breakfast. People pay to sleep in the room where Abby Borden was murdered. I'm not making that up. You can book it online right now. The Watcher House, Westfield, New Jersey. This one is more recent and more chilling than a murder. In 2014, a couple named Derek and Maria Bratas purchased a six-bedroom home in Westfield, New Jersey for $1.3 million. Shortly after closing, they began receiving letters from someone who signed them. The Watcher. The letters claimed the house had been watched by the Watchers family for decades. They referenced the Bratis children. They asked what the new owners had brought to feed the house. The family never moved in. They spent years in legal battles trying to sell the property, demolish it, and convert it, all blocked at various turns. The previous owner had received a letter from the watcher before the sale. They did not disclose it. There is now a Netflix series about this case. The house eventually sold at a significant discount. The identity of the watcher was never confirmed by authorities. Okay, so now you know the landscape. Let me tell you what you can actually do about it. Because here's the thing: even in states with the weakest disclosure protections, there are ways to find out what happened in a property before you close. You just have to know where to look. Step one, ask directly and in writing. In almost every state, a seller cannot lie to you when you ask a direct question. So ask the question: not, is there anything I should know? That's pretty vague. An easy to sidestep. Ask specifically, has anyone died in this home in the last 10 years? Has a violent crime occurred on this property? Has this home been associated with any paranormal activity or local folklore? Ask it in writing, in your offer, or in a supplemental questionnaire, a written question requires a written answer. That answer becomes part of your transaction record. Step two, search the address. Before you even make an offer, search the property address in Google News. Search it in local newspaper archives, search it in public court records. You can also use services like Diedinhouse.com, a legitimate platform that searches death records, news archives, and public databases to generate a history report on any address in the United States. It costs a few dollars and takes about 30 seconds. County public records are also searchable in most states. Homicides are documented in police reports that are often publicly accessible. Step three, talk to the neighbors. This sounds old-fashioned. It works. Before you close, knock on a few doors, introduce yourself, ask if there's anything you should know about the neighborhood, the block, the specific house. Neighbors often know things that the sellers don't have to disclose that records don't capture. This is how a lot of the buyers find out about the watcher type situations, because someone on the street already knows. Step four, hire a real estate attorney in transactions over a certain dollar amount or in markets where stigmatized property history is a real concern, particularly in states with weak disclosure laws. A real estate attorney can add disclosure language directly into your purchase contract. You can negotiate representations from the seller about the property's history as a contractual term. If they lie, you have legal recourse. Step five, know your state's laws before you start even looking. This one sounds obvious. It almost never happens. Most buyers don't know what their state requires sellers to disclose until after something goes wrong. 30 seconds with Google before you start touring homes could change everything about how you approach the buying process. If you're in California, you have some of the strongest protections in the country for recent events. If you're in Florida or Texas, you are largely on your own. The law is not working for you the way you might assume it is. My verdict on astigmatized property law in America is that it is a legal framework that was built around protecting sellers and agents, not buyers. And most buyers have no idea. I've been in real estate long enough to know that um disclosures is one of the most uncomfortable parts of the transaction. So sellers don't want to say things that reduce their sale price. Agents don't want to kill the deals. The law in most states doesn't make them, and so information disappears. So do I think sellers should be required to disclose deaths and violent crimes? Yeah, I do. I think buyers have the right to know what happens in a place where they're going to sleep, raise their children, and likely pour their life savings into. That's not superstition, that's informed consent. But I also think this stigma is deeply personal. So a house where someone died peacefully at 94 years old after a long life is technically a stigmatized property. So is a house where a murder happened 40 years ago and a neighborhood has completely changed around it, those two things are not the same. So there are buyers, and I've met them who will walk the property knowing it's full dark history and say, give me that discount. Those buyers do exist. They close, they live there, and most of the time nothing happens. The data says stigma fades in six to seven years. The Lizzie Bordenhouse says sometimes it doesn't fade. Sometimes it multiplies. My take, the law should require full disclosure. Until it does, in your state, in your market. The responsibility falls on you. Ask the question, do the research, talk to the neighbors. Because the scariest thing about astigmatized property isn't what happened inside. It's finding out after you've already closed on your home. So that's episode two of Real Scary Real Estate. I'm a managine. All state and disclosure laws and sources referenced in today's episodes are linked in the show notes, including dietonhouse.com, which I genuinely recommend bookmarking if you're actively househunting. Next week we're leaving the legal world and going somewhere far darker. We're going to Salem, Massachusetts, and I'm not talking about the witch trials, even though we will absolutely get into those. I'm talking about the real property history of a city that has built an entire economy on its haunted reputation, where Airbnb searches are surging year over year, where you can go can right now go book a stay in a building older than the United States itself. Salem is a real estate story that nobody is telling the right way, and we're gonna fix that. Subscribe so you don't miss it. And if today's episode made you want to Google your own address, leave a review. It takes two minutes, and it means everything to an independent show like this one. So I will see you next week. Stay curious, stay skeptical, and always, always read the full property history before you close.