Genesis 9 Bible Study Lesson 3: Noah’s Drunkenness, Ham’s Sin, and the Curse of Canaan Explained

In this study of Genesis 9:18 to 29 we examine one of the most difficult and misunderstood passages in Genesis. What really happened in Noah’s tent? Why was Canaan cursed for Ham’s sin? We dig into the Hebrew text to correct popular misreadings, look at the ancient Near Eastern background of shame and dishonor, and address how this passage has been twisted historically to justify racism, something the text itself never supports. We also look at what this account reveals about sin’s persistence even after judgment and grace. Join us as we continue our verse by verse journey through Genesis.

Transcript

SPEAKER_00 0:06

And welcome back to our study through Genesis. Um, we're gonna be in Genesis chapter 9, verses 18 through 29 today. We're gonna look at Noah's vineyard, Ham's sin, the curse of Canaan, the death of a man who survived the flood. And it's gonna be a very important lesson. And as we look at this, we're also gonna look at one of the most misunderstood and most misused passage in the entire book of Genesis. As we look through this, um, all of this, I want to say something before we read the text. There's a passage here that has been used to justify some of the most horrific evil in Western civilization. For centuries, um, from the medieval period through the antebellum American South, this text was cited as a biblical justification for the enslavement of people. And the argument was that Ham was the ancestor of uh African people uh and that the curse of Canaan applied to them and that slavery was therefore divinely ordained. This interpretation is just wrong. It's a grotesque distortion of everything the text actually says. And so I want to hold on to that just for a second and make sure that you understand where we're coming from. Because when you read the text honestly, there is a genuine and important theology here. And so let's read this together and um and let's just get into the text. Starting in verse 18, it says, Now the sons of Noah came out of the ark were Shem, Ham, and Japheth. And Ham was the father of Canaan. Now he's the only son that's mentioned here. I want to make sure we note that. These uh these three were the sons of Noah, and from these the whole earth was populated. Then Noah began farming and planted a vineyard. He drank of the wine and became drunk and uncovered himself inside of his tent. Ham, the father of Canaan, saw the nakedness of his father and told his two brothers outside. But Shem and Japheth took a garment and laid it upon their both their shoulders, and walked backwards and covered the nakedness of their father, and their faces were turned away, so they did not see their father's nakedness. When Noah awoke from his wine, he knew what his youngest son had done to him. So he said, Cursed be Canaan, a servant of servants he shall be to his brothers. He also said, Blessed be the Lord, the God of Shem, and let Canaan be his servant. May God enlarge Japheth, and let him dwell in the tents of Shem, and let Canaan be his servant. Noah lived three hundred and fifty years after the flood, so all the days of Noah were nine hundred and fifty years, and he died. Now in these twelve verses we see again a vineyard, a tent, a sin, a curse, a blessing, and the death of the man who walked with God and survived the flood. So let's get started and break this down. Now, before the story even begins, Moses does something deliberate here. He writes that Ham was the father of Canaan. This is the first time we've been told that Ham is the father of Canaan. It's mentioned here before the incident and repeated after the incident in verse 22. So what Moses is doing, he's preparing the reader. He wants us to connect Ham's act with the curse that falls on Canaan. He is drawing a family line that will become enormously important in the rest of Genesis and really in the rest of the history of Israel. Canaan is the land that Israel will eventually possess in the future. And the Canaanites are the people whose practices God will describe as the reason for their removal. The mention of Canaan here is not accidental. It is the first thread of a history that will run for the next thousand years of biblical history. Now, look at verse 19. Verse 19 gives us a statement of enormous importance. These three were the sons of Noah, and from these the whole earth was populated. We're going to get to this a little bit more in chapter 10, and what's called the table of nations. But every human alive today traces their ancestry back to Shem, Ham, or Japheth. There's only one human family. That's important for us to know. All of us are descendants of the same three sons of the same one man. Now, this verse alone should demolish every racial hierarchy ever constructed. There is no superior lineage. There is no inferior bloodline. We are all cousins, all of us, without exception. Now, Acts chapter 17, verse 26, it says, and he made from one man every nation of mankind to live on all the face of the earth. So to deny this is to deny biblical teaching. One man, one family, one race, Genesis chapter 9, verse 19, and Acts chapter 17, verse 26. They say the same thing, which means before we can even get to the curse of Canaan, the text has already established that every racist reading of this passage is self-refuting. Now, next, let's look at the narrative. The narrative moves quickly from the covenant and the blessing to a very human moment. It says then Noah began farming and planted a vineyard. He drank of the wine and became drunk. The man who walked with God for 600 years, the man who built an ark for a century in obedience to God's word, the man who waited patiently inside of the ark for the word of God before stepping out, the man whose worship opened a new chapter of creation, that man gets drunk in his tent. And this is one of the Bible's most honest moments. If you notice as you read through scripture, the Bible doesn't airbrush its heroes. It doesn't pretend that righteous people are perfect people. Noah, the most righteous man of his generation, messes up. And this matters enormously because if Noah can fall, that means no one is beyond the reach of sin. And the flood, as we established in Genesis chapter 8, verse 21, did not fix the human heart. The first farmer of the new world plants a vineyard, and the fruit of the new creation becomes the occasion of sin. Now, there are some ancient Jewish commentators, including several found in the Midrash, that suggests that the serpent from Genesis chapter 3 had a hand in Noah planting the vineyard. Now, whether that is literal or symbolic, the point is the same. The enemy did not stop after the flood. The enemy just found new ground, new attacks. Augustine saw Noah's drunkenness as a warning. He said, The righteous man is never fully safe from the temptations of life. The new world did not remove the old enemy. And even the greatest servants of God are capable of the deepest failures. Now there's a question worth addressing here, and it was simply this was Noah actually sinning? See, the text does not explicitly call Noah's drunkenness a sin. It simply records it. The permission to drink wine is not forbidden anywhere in Scripture. Drunkenness, however, is consistently treated as a moral failure throughout the Bible. Proverbs chapter 20, verse 1: Wine is a mocker, strong drink is a brawler, and whoever is intoxicated by it is not wise. Ephesians chapter 5, verse 18, do not get drunk with wine. In Galatians chapter 5, verse 21, drunkenness is listed there among the works of the flesh. And so the New Testament is consistent. Wine itself is not sinful. You can look at the wedding of Cana, the Last Supper, Paul telling Timothy to use a little wine for a stomach's sake. But drunkenness, which is the idea of losing self-control to intoxication, is consistently identified as a failure of wisdom and character. What makes Noah's situation significant is not just drunkenness, it's that the drunkenness created a situation of vulnerability that became the occasion for a much greater failure. Not Noah's, but his son's. And so we read here that Ham saw the nakedness of his father. And this is one of the most debated acts in Genesis chapter 9. It says Ham, the father of Canaan, saw the nakedness of his father and told his two brothers outside. So the question is, what exactly was the sin? What did Ham do that was wrong? And again, this is one of the most debated questions in the history of the Genesis interpretations. And I want to lay out the major positions honestly before we draw our own conclusions. Position number one is that Ham simply looked. This is the most straightforward reading of the text. That Ham walked into his father's tent, he saw that he was naked, saw that he was drunk, and rather than immediately retreating, he went and told his brothers. In this position, the sin was not the accidental seeing, but it was the telling. He publicized his father's shame rather than covering it up. And this reading is supported by the contrast with Shem and Japheth in verse 23, who walked backwards to cover Noah without looking, which is the honor due to a parent, which would require we would require the covering of their shame, not going around broadcasting, hey, look what dad did. Position number two is that Ham committed a sexual act. There are some scholars, including a number of serious Hebrew scholars, that argue that the phrase saw his nakedness of his father is a Hebrew idiom for sexual violation. The phrase uncover the nakedness appears frequently in Leviticus chapter 18 in the context of prohibited sexual acts. So under this reading, Ham committed a sexual violation of his unconscious father. Origen and several other early interpreters held a version of this view. If that's the case, it would explain the severity of the curse that follows, which seems somewhat disproportionate if the sin was merely gossip. Now, position number three is this that Ham violated his father's wife. There is a very small group, I want to say very small, very small, group of scholars that understand the nakedness of his father, is referring to his father's wife. In Leviticus chapter 18, verse 8, uncovering the nakedness of your father's wife is specifically prohibited. Under this reading, Ham slept with Noah's wife, which would also explain the severity of the curse. Now, we have to ask the question: there's a lot of opinions here. What can we say with confidence, though? Ham did something, we know this. Ham did something that violated the honor and dignity of his father. It was serious enough to provoke a prophetic curse. Shem and Japheth's response of uncovering without looking establishes the right response that it was protective of their father and honoring of their father, not what Ham did. The text leaves the precise nature of Ham's act somewhat ambiguous. And we should not be more specific than the text allows. What is clear is this that Ham saw vulnerability in his father and he exploited it. Shem and Japheth saw vulnerability and they protected it. That contrast is the moral heart of this passage. Now the response of the two other brothers is described with a with a beautiful economy. It says, But Shem and Japheth took a garment and laid it upon both their shoulders and walked backwards and covered their father, covered the nakedness of their father, and their faces were turned away, so they did not see their father's nakedness. They did not rush in to see him. They didn't discuss the situation with themselves or other people. They didn't make it a story to tell of all those around them. They took a garment, they placed it on their shoulders, deliberately sharing the act between them. They walked backwards into the tent and they covered their father without ever looking. And this is one of the most beautiful pictures of honor in all of Genesis. There's two sons who protected their father's dignity at the cost of their own comfort, who chose covering over exposure, who chose honor over gossip. And Proverbs chapter 17, verse 9 says, He who conceals a transgression seeks love, but he who repeats a matter separates intimate friends. Shem and Japheth concealed, Ham repeated, and the difference defined their legacy. Next, when we read that Noah awoke from his wine and knew what his youngest son has done to him, the text says his youngest son. Now this has caused some confusion since Ham is listed as the second of the three sons in verse 18. So some scholars suggest that the youngest here may refer to the youngest in terms of a social position, or it refers to Canaan, Ham's son being the actual actor. The most common understanding is that the youngest is used loosely and refers to Ham himself. But the mention of Canaan throughout this passage suggests that whatever happened involved him in some way that the text does not fully explain. Now, the verse has caused this next verse has caused more harm than any other verse in Genesis. That's what it says. So he said, Cursed be to Canaan, a servant of servants, he shall be to his brothers. Now, before we look at what this means, let me state clearly what it does not mean. What this curse does not mean, it does not mean that Ham, um uh Canaan is cursed, not Ham. It does not, it does not extend. It does not curse all of Ham's descendants. Canaan is one of four sons to Ham. The other three are not cursed. It has absolutely nothing to do with African people. Cush is the biblical ancestor most commonly associated with African people, and he is not listed here as one who is cursed. The curse falls on Canaan alone. That's really important. It does not authorize slavery of any ethnic group. The servant language refers to political subjugation of the Canaanite people within the context of Israel's history, not to slavery of any racial group. This passage cannot be used to justify slave trade or any form of racial slavery. This interpretation was invented to serve political ends and has no support in the text. In the history of the Jewish interpretation or in the early church fathers. Every serious scholar who has ever written about this or uh of the tradition has rejected the racial interpretation of the curse of Canaan, even predating American slave days. It was not the historic Jewish reading, it was not the reading of the early church. It was actually invented in the medieval period and was later weaponized to serve the interest of slaveholders. And so we must name this clearly and unapologetically. The Bible was not the source of slavery. The Bible was used through deliberate misreadings to justify what scripture actually condemns. Now, let's look at what the text is actually saying. The curse falls on Canaan, Ham's son, and its curse is of servitude to his brothers. So the question comes up: why Canaan and not Ham? Now, there's several explanations behind this that have been offered by careful scholars in the field. First, in the ancient world, a father's sin could result in consequences falling on his descendants. The sins of the father affecting the children is a principle that we see throughout the Old Testament. Ham sinned against his father. The curse falls on Ham through his son in the same way that Ham violated a father-son relationship. Second, the curse on Canaan specifically anticipates the history of Israel and the Canaanite people. When Israel enters the promised land under Joshua, the Canaanites are there and in many cases they're subjugated. Leviticus chapter 18 describes the sexual immorality of the Canaanites as the reason for their removal. And so the curse of Canaan in Genesis chapter 9 is a prophetic anticipation of that story that is rooted in a pattern of moral failure that began here with Ham. Now, third, some scholars noted that Canaan may have been personally involved in the incident with Noah. The text mentions Canaan twice in verses 18 and 22 in a way that may suggest that he was present at the time. If Canaan participated in Ham's act, the curse on him is not arbitrary. It is the direct consequence of his own participation. Now, look at the blessing of the other two, of Shem and Japheth. In verses 26 and 27, he also said, Blessed be the Lord, the God of Shem, and let Canaan be his servant. This is one of the most important blessings that we find in this narrative. And it's almost always overlooked. Noah does not say, Blessed be Shem. He says, Blessed be the Lord, the God of Shem. Now, uh, this blessing is not primarily on the person, it's on God. The greatest thing Noah can say about his son is not that Shem will be great or powerful or wealthy, but that the Lord is his God. And this is theologically explosive because through the line of Shem will come Abraham, and through Abraham will come Isaac, and through Isaac will come Jacob, and through Jacob will come David, and through David will one day come Jesus. And so the blessing of Shem is the continuation of the promise going back to Genesis chapter 3, verse 15. Remember, all of chapters 4 through 8 have been tracing the genealogy of the seed, the seed of the woman, tracking now through the line of Shem, moving toward the one who will crush the serpent's head. Now, Luke chapter 3, verse 36 traces this genealogy of Jesus through Shem. When Noah says, Blessed be the Lord God of Shem, he is prophesying in the line which the Messiah would come through. This is very important. And then we read this, it said, May God enlarge Japheth and let him dwell in the tents of Shem and let Canaan be his servant. The blessing on Japheth is for expansion. And the Hebrew word used there is to enlarge. It's a wordplay on Japheth's name itself. May the one called expansion truly expand. Japheth is traditionally understood as the ancestor of the Indo-European people, a broad family of nations stretching from Persia to Greece to Europe. And history bears out the expansion that's predicted here. But the most remarkable part of Japheth's blessing is the second phrase, let him dwell in the tents of Shem. Shem was giving God's blessing, the covenant line, the promise of the Messiah. And Japheth is blessed to dwell in his tents. That means he is to share in the blessing. I'm not sure if you can see it yet, but you'll catch it. This is a picture of Gentile nations being brought into the covenant blessing of Israel, which would be into salvation through Jesus. It's very important. And Paul makes this explicit in Ephesians chapter 3, verse 6, when he says, to be specific that the Gentiles are fellow heirs and fellow members of the body and fellow partakers of the promise of Christ Jesus through the gospel. The Japheth people group, the Gentiles, are dwelling in the tents of Shem. The church today is made up of every nation sharing in the covenant promises that ran through that one line, building to the Messiah. Noah prophesied this in Genesis chapter 9, verse 27, and Paul explained it in Ephesians chapter 3 and the history of the church. Now, in the next verses in 28 and 29, we read that Noah dies. That Noah lived 350 years after the flood, so all the days of Noah were 950 years and he died. And he died. The drumbeat of Genesis chapter 5, it echoes one final time, and he died. The man who walked with God, the man who built the ark, the man who found grace in the eyes of the Lord, the man who sacrifice pleased God, the man who received the everlasting covenant, he died 950 years. He lived longer than any man in Genesis, except Methuselah. And the sentence of Genesis chapter 3, verse 19, still claimed this man. You are dust, and to dust you shall return. That means the flood didn't exempt Noah from mortality. The covenant did not exempt him from mortality. His righteousness did not exempt him. The sentence of Genesis chapter 3 stands over every person, regardless of their standing before God, until one came who was not subject to that sentence, one who had no sin of his own, one who took the sentence on himself and broke it and defeated death. Romans chapter 6, verse 23 says, For the wages of sin is death, but the free gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus, our Lord. Noah, Noah died. But the God of Noah, the one who walked with him, who shut the door of the ark, who smelled the soothing aroma of a sacrifice, who made an everlasting covenant, he didn't die. And in Christ, neither will anyone who belongs to him. The death of Noah, I believe, is the perfect ending to the chapter that has been unflinchingly honest. Genesis chapter 9 began with the blessing and the commission. It moved through permission to prohibition. It established the sanctity of human life and the institution of capital punishment. It gave us the rainbow covenant and the everlasting pledge, and it ended with a drunk and violated person, a curse, a blessing, and a death. In that you see the whole range of the human experience, from the height of the covenant relationship to the depth of moral failure. It's all compressed into these 12 verses. And what exactly is the point? Genesis chapter 9, what it's doing for us, what Moses is writing, it's a visual for us, something that we can read and take in of the post-flood world. A world with the covenant in the sky and sin even in the tent. A world with God's promise overhead and human failure underneath. A world where the greatest men of God are capable of the deepest failures. A world that despite all of that is held up by a God who said, never again, held up by a God who keeps his covenant, even when his covenant people do not keep it themselves. Now, I want to spend just a moment on the apologetics of this passage because the stakes are really high. Again, one of the most common charges against Christianity is that the Bible was used to justify slavery and racial hierarchy. And that charge is historically accurate. The Bible was used in that way. But was the Bible correctly interpreted when it was used that way? And the answer to that question is absolutely not. So let me lay out the biblical case for you very clearly, because these discussions always come up with us and accusation against Christians almost every time I have conversations with atheists or people of other religions. First, Genesis chapter 9, verse 19 says, all humanity descended from three brothers. There is one human family. So there is no biblical basis for a racial hierarchy whatsoever because the Bible teaches that there's only one race. Second, the curse falls on Canaan alone, not on Ham, not on Cush, not on any people associated with people from Africa. The racial application of this curse has no textual basis whatsoever. Third, the curse on Canaan was fulfilled in the history of Israel's relationship with the Canaanite people. It is a prophetic word about the specific historical situation. It's not a universal statement about any one ethnic group. And fourth, the New Testament explicitly and repeatedly demolishes every form of ethnic hierarchy. Just think about Galatians chapter 3, verse 28. There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free. There is neither male nor female. You are all one in Christ Jesus. In Acts chapter 10, verse 34 through 35, open his mouth. Peter said, I must certainly understood now that God is not the one to show partiality, but in every nation the man who fears him and does what is right is welcome to him. Revelation chapter 9, verse 7, after these things I looked, and behold, a great multitude which no one can count from every nation and all tribes and peoples and tongues standing before the throne and before the Lamb. Every nation, every tribe, every people, every tongue standing before the Lamb. The Bible does not teach racial hierarchy. And people who claimed it did were misusing the text for their own ends. And the church's calling, our calling, is to read the text honestly and correctly without misreading it, and to demonstrate with our lives and our communities the truth that in Christ there is no Jew or Greek, no slave or free. Now there's also a positive application to this passage that's worth drawing out. And that is the contrast between Ham and his brothers. It's also a contrast between two ways of responding to human vulnerability and failure. Ham saw his father's failure and he used it against him. Shem and Japhet saw their father's failure and they covered it. See, we live in a culture that celebrates exposure. Social media exists in large part to broadcast other people's failures. Cancel culture is Ham's response, elevated to a social principle. See the failure, tell everyone, and watch the consequences of the fall. Genesis chapter 9 commends a different way. When we see someone in failure, we cover, we honor, we protect, we walk backwards, we don't look. This doesn't mean covering up genuine abuse or injustice. It means that the reflex response to another person's vulnerability or failure should be protection, not broadcast. 1 Peter chapter 4, verse 8 says, Above all, keep fervent your love for one another, because love covers a multitude of sin. Love covers. Ham exposed, Shem and Japheth, they covered. And the blessings and cursing of Genesis chapter 9 reflect exactly the difference. Now I also want to make sure that you see the New Testament fulfillment here. The blessing of Shem, blessed be the Lord, the God of Shem, is a promise with a very specific fulfillment. Again, Luke chapter 3 traces the genealogy of Jesus backward through David, through Abraham, through Shem, through Noah. The Son of God entered human history through this line. Every name in Shem's genealogy is just a step forward in the long journey of the seed of Genesis chapter 3 toward its ultimate fulfillment. And Noah's blessing, blessed be the Lord God of Shem, was his way of saying the promise runs through you. The Messiah will come from this line. The Messiah will walk, he will make himself known, and he will be one of Shem's descendants. 4,000 years of history confirm that. And the most remarkable prophecy in Genesis chapter 9 is verse 27. It's been fulfilling itself for the last 2,000 years. Let him dwell in the tents of Shem. The people of Jepha uh of Japheth, broadly, the Indo-European nations share in the covenant blessings of Shem. The church of Jesus Christ is predominantly composed of these people who are Gentiles. European Christianity, American Christianity, the vast expansion of the gospel through what were historically the people who came from this other line. It's the people of Japheth dwelling in the tents of Shem. And this is expanding. The fastest growing Christian communities in the world today are in Africa, descendants of Ham. In Asia, descendants of various sons of Shem. And Japheth, the tent of Shem is expanding to cover the entire, uh, to cover the entire world. Because the God of Shem, Jesus Christ, is not the God of one people. He's the God of every nation that will call on his name. Revelation chapter 5, verse 9 says this. It says, and they sang a new song saying, Worthy are you to take the book and break its hills, for you were slain and purchased for God with your blood men from every tribe and tongue and people and nation. Every tribe, every tongue, every people, every nation dwelling in the tent of Shem, around the throne of God, because of the blood of the seed of Shem. Now let me bring all this together. Genesis chapter 9 begins with the recommissioning of humanity. It gives us the theological foundation for the sanctity of human life. It establishes the most unconditional covenant in the Old Testament. It puts a rainbow in the sky as God's pledge to his own faithfulness. And it ends with a drunk man in a tent and then the death noticed. The new world is not Eden. It never was. Genesis chapter 9 refuses to let us pretend otherwise. But here's what Genesis chapter 9 also shows us. The God who makes covenants keeps them. The God who puts his bow in the sky looks at it and he remembers. The God who blessed Shem's line sent his son through that line. And the God who watched Noah die is the God who defeated death in Christ. The new world needs a new heart. The new covenant needs a perfect mediator. The death that ended Noah's story needs a resurrection to answer it. And Genesis chapter 9, with all of its honesty about human failure, is pointing us toward the one who provides all three. Now, in our next lesson, we'll move to Genesis chapter 10. One of the most fascinating things that we're going to study, it's called the Table of Nations. 70 people groups spreading across the earth, all from the three sons of Noah. One of the most remarkable documents in the entire ancient world. Really a document that stands alone. And a picture of the God who numbers the nations and sets their boundaries according to his own purposes. Now I hope that you've enjoyed this lesson. Until next time, I hope that you have a blessed day.