America's Most Dangerous Cult Leader: Dr. Anthony Fauci leaves a legacy of millions dead, misinformation, and mass panic.

As the liberals begin to pretend they are responsible for ending the irresponsible mandates in the name of COVID-19, Anthony Fauci is being proven wrong at every turn. Drunk off attention and power, Fauci irresponsibly spread misinformation based on speculation and his personal opinion. The facts show that in his 40-year career at NIH he has unethically caused national melt-down, death, and destruction. By the very definition, Fauci is a cult leader who cares about attention, media coverage, and power versus the health of our country. 

Transcript

Copy Transcript Copied

SPEAKER_01 0:00

America's most dangerous cult leader, Dr. Anthony Fauci, leaves a legacy of millions dead, mass panic, and economic consequences we will likely continue to feel for several decades. You're listening to The Last Gay Conservative, I'm your host, Chad Law. Yeah. Man, does that pump me up every time? Hello, everybody. How are we doing? Let's go, Brandon. Man, what a crazy world it is out there. It's always so disappointing to see these things happen that could have been completely avoided had we not elected this clown. He can form a plan about as well as he can form a sentence. Guy is so inept. Well, we'll talk about that on our next episode. Today, I'm gonna talk a little bit about Dr. Fauci, who, in my opinion, is probably the most dangerous. Well, he's on the way out, so maybe not anymore, but he has been throughout this entire COVID process the most dangerous person and threat to our country ever in all of history. And I really do believe that. I go to Starbucks every morning, usually early, like around six. So I usually don't see very many people, and trust me, I like it that way. But I went in at seven a few days ago and there was a pretty good sized line. The yoga class next door had just gotten out, so was filled with a bunch of yogis, odd people. Nonetheless, I'm looking around in this line and I'm like, why does everyone have a mask on? I don't get it. And so I waited until I got up to the register and I'm like, hey, are you guys still requiring masks? Because, you know, as we know, the mask mandate in California ended on February 15th. However, there are still some private businesses that are requiring masks in order to do business uh inside or within their establishment. I mean, I haven't been wearing one for months. I mean, you know, in Orange County, we're kind of in a great little bubble here where people don't really enforce it except for the occasional Karen. So the guy at the register is like, um, no, mandate's over. And I'm like, well, what's with all these people? Like, do they not watch the news? Do they not know the mandate's over? And he just kind of shrugged, which they know what I do there. They're familiar with the show. I have a lot of the staff there who are fans, and then another handful that hope I die. So even if they sense a hint of politics from me, they usually shut down right away because they don't want to get into it with their co-workers or customers, etc., which is respectable. So, anyways, in my my nicest voice possible, trying not to be antagonizing at all. I go up to this cute blonde, probably 25-ish, got her yoga mat, and you know, just really cute, nice, but big old mask on. And I said, Hey, can I ask you a question? I said, Why are you still masking? You know the mandate's over, right? And you can't get more liberal than this response. She says, Yeah, I know the mandate's over. But I think that might just be political. And even so, COVID's still out there and very dangerous. And there's a lot of unmasked, unvaccinated people that put us all at risk. So it's better to be safe than sorry. I did everything I could to hold my eye roll back. And I just nodded and said thank you. But it really shook me. I mean, I just couldn't believe this young woman, so cute and just seemed like she had a good life, wanted to keep her face halfway covered all the time, out of fear, when a lot of the country is getting back to normal, you know? And I realized right then and there that these people, especially in the blue states, like in California, they have Stockholm syndrome. Seriously. Two and a half years straight of messages of fear and hope, scientific and political disinformation, fear tactics up the wazoo, overreach, so far that you're worried about going outside. And if it's someone who is just getting their information from local news or CNN or what they read on Facebook, how can you blame anyone? I mean, COVID is the enemy and it is a killer, and we're all at risk from being killed, right? Well, we know not, but that is in the heads of these people who have been following these politicians and Dr. Fauci blindly. I forgot how scared people were. I mean, honestly, these people are so vulnerable, so scared, they were completely paralyzed by fear. And it's still having its effects, even though we're supposed to be again getting back to normal. And you know, my heart does break for these people. You know, we it's really easy for us to sit there and go, oh, stupid liberal, blah, blah, blah, which is true. But on the flip side, like this isn't a political thing, this is a human thing. Like when you're scared for your life, which is not dramatic, these people have been made to feel like their lives are at risk from this flu. And it's sad, you know. It also explains a lot while why Newsom and all these blue state democratic leaders are, you know, like to keep things shut down and closed as long as possible. Gives them total control and gives them even more control to influence the next election. You know, if they can drive the situation to the breaking point and then come save it, they may have a greater chance of being re-elected or keeping their party elected for future generations. It was the ultimate liberal experience, this whole COVID thing. And I'm realizing this now as the mandates are going down and I'm seeing what's happening in the blue states. But Newsom and all of these other out there socialist politicians, they all got their wish. They got their own little Moscow for a while, and they loved it. It was the ultimate liberal experience. Seriously. They got to test the impact of mass payouts through their unemployment systems. They got to test total isolation of the people. They got to control information and limit the democratic process. They didn't even consider any of what their constituents wanted or needed because they were mini dictators. And as bad as they were, they were only empowered to do all this and spread so much fear because of what they were learning from Dr. Fauci. After that Starbucks conversation, I knew right away this guy is a cult leader. He's a cult leader and he understands what being a cult leader is like. You know, I just said to my team the other day, this is step aside Jim Jones. There's a new leader in town. Of course, the younger team's like, who? Who's Jim Jones? What? But you know, this Dr. Fauci guy, he's been touted as this world-leading expert in virology, vaccinations, immunology, and a whole slew of other things. You read about him online, it sounds like you're reading about Dr. Martin Luther King. Pictures with diplomats, nothing but praise, rave reviews. And you have to wonder how this guy has lived so long and been in his position for so long, going unscathed. And again, it's because as a cult leader, whether he knows it or not, he uses his influence to keep himself in power and also in a position where no one can question him. Most cult leaders end up falling. But the situation with Bauchi is very different because instead of something spiritual, something that's not tangible, he's talking about things that we can see and feel, like the effects of COVID or vaccinations. So it's a lot less, I guess what I would say is it's a lot harder to prove that it's a type of cult leadership or obsession with followers because it's not some pie in the sky BS like most traditional cult leaders. Now, do I think Bauchi is going to give people Kool-Aid or make them put on Nikes and do mass suicide? Absolutely not. But I undoubtedly believe that he is responsible for thousands, if not millions, of dead people. You know, it's he passes the buck always. Science, science, science. And then he claims he is science. So what does that mean? You know, when you're at a point when you, others, leaders are convinced you have the answers, you have the ability to calm people down. The weak woke, I always say woke is the past tense for weak, but the weak, woke, they're gonna just follow blindly. They're gonna do whatever it is that they think this guy's gonna say, or or anyone. You know, I I always say there's only so many lions in the world. Most of you are probably lions, but the majority of people are sheep. The problem is that lions have been recognized now, and they're continually being shamed or shut down or ridiculed for being not so sure, or for maybe taking some additional influence over sheep and saying, let's take a step back and look at this. I mean, just look at this. The four top traits of a cult leader, they require obedience without question, vaccines. He has one great enemy that he's convinced others of as well, COVID. He claims to be the contact between people and God, in our case science, as if it were divine powers. He's the one he said, he's science. He requires varying degrees of conformity. Oh, look at the lockdowns.

SPEAKER_04 8:35

I've been involved in a number of cults, both as a leader and a follower. You have more fun as a follower, but you make more money as a leader.

SPEAKER_01 8:43

You know, this authority that we gave him was really fortified because his medical research is highly regarded, and he's been in his post running the NIH for 40 years. He's a doctor and a scientist who still treats patients, and the media and the left has painted him to be some dedicated civil servant that's given up all this opportunity so he can save the world. But for those of us who are paying attention, if you remember the onset of COVID, you know, late 2019 into 2020, we watched this guy go from a little garden gn with a white coat on, from that to basically becoming a reality TV star, getting snippy and aggressive, but always using terms like maybe, I don't think, could be, not real definitives. And then as his power grew, he started becoming more definite. The camera time on this guy was insane. And you could almost watch the god complex come out of him with every minute that he was on the camera. Seriously, his eyes twinkled. It was like he belonged. He loved the attention, he loved the media attention. He went so far as publicly disrespecting a sitting president. He interrupted and emotionally attacked senators.

SPEAKER_03 9:53

Senator Paul, I have never lied before the Congress, and I do not retract that statement. This paper that you are referring to was judged by qualified staff up and down the chain as not being gain of function. What was let me finish.

SPEAKER_02 10:16

Right. You're saying that's not gain of function?

SPEAKER_03 10:18

That is correct. And and Senator Paul, you do not know what you are talking about, quite frankly.

SPEAKER_01 10:24

And weekly, he got himself on TV to tell everyone how wonderful and pat himself on the back. I recently heard an interview where he claimed the reason he's on every network and in every newspaper is because he's trying to get as much information out to the public so they can use it for public safety. Well, that's a crock. We know in today's tight closed digital internet-based media that one source can serve them all. You don't need to go and have your face on every single channel for public safety. And I want you to think about something really quick. Just let's backtrack a little bit. Think about seeing him on TV for the last two years. Now, without looking it up, can you remember one thing that he said? One recommendation, one assertion, one bit of information that you go, oh yeah, Fauci said that. That was right. He said this. Oh yeah, that happened. No, not once. I mean, I watched the guy every day for two years, and I to this day cannot tell you one thing he said I acknowledged and understood and then saw happening. Never. I can't go back right now and say, oh yeah, Fauci said XYZ and XYZ happened. I mean, can you? I can't find anyone who can. Actually, just the opposite. You know, I mean, it's it's crazy to think that when someone's in an authority position that way and is supposed to be delivering unbiased, unfiltered, scientific and medical information that's relevant to the situation. And you've got a guy who's essentially preaching without citing any data, without any research, and he clearly believes his own lies and he clearly thinks that he is the answer. It's very, very scary. I mean, now that information is flooded our inboxes and our browsers and our televisions with actual true verifiable research data around the last three years, it's completely decimated almost everything Fauci has stated. And to be honest, I think regardless of what side the information came out, it would do so because he never really said anything of substance and in a finite terms. His credibility is so destroyed, this guy. You know, not that they'll do anything, but he should have been citing his research, talking about the data, but he wasn't. He may have it. That doesn't make great TV. And he doesn't want to disappoint his throngs of fans, right? And we're getting more and more information just from the time that I recorded this to the time that you guys are listening to it. I guarantee more information has come out. So we wanted to know what's going on because we haven't really seen him around in the limelight in a while. And so we we reached out to his team. Uh, one of my press people reached out to his team and said, Where is this guy? And here's a response we got. Dr. Fauci is on a much needed break from COVID and is pursuing other passions within media. He's currently in talks today with Andy Cohen, developing the real sciences of Wuhan.

SPEAKER_04 13:06

Wadu Jung Huadu Pang Yo Niao.

SPEAKER_01 13:12

I had to. But you know, these people, these cult leaders, just like Fauci, they thrive most in times of fear or panic. And he's been doing this for 40 years. And people, Americans, people, humans, become desperate for answers. And when that's the case, you generally give your trust to the highest bidder. It's the person or the organization that makes you feel safest. Well, we only learned of one person. We didn't get an alternative. And so he won, regardless of truth. And so between Fauci being such a con artist and then this phenomena of the Tinder swindler and uh inventing Anna, you know, I see those and they're huge deals and they're wildly popular, and people think, oh wow, they're incredible. But when you look at Fauci, this isn't taking, you know, millions of dollars from a handful of desperate lonely women using your charms, which happens all the time. This isn't faking it till you make it, tricking all the major banks in Manhattan. This is one man using sweeping generalizations to impact how hundreds of millions of us live. I mean, with so much information out there that disproves what he's saying. How did this little dweeb, seriously, this tiny little dweeb, convince us as a nation, 300 million people, that he is science? I've seen all kinds of cult and con stories and situations, but for someone in disguise, a cult leader in disguise, and I'm sure he doesn't think of himself as a cult leader, but he has all the traits of one, to engage millions of people on this scale, when the timing is right, I guess the enemy has to be great, people have to be scared. He came across this sort of small, older, hunched over man, someone who's dedicated himself to saving lives in medicine. You know, we literally needed him to lead us back to health. And he was the only option that was presented. And that's what we thought he was doing. But I mean, if you look at him and his life, guys from Brooklyn, good student, captain of the basketball team. They really liked him as captain, from what I read. Comes from an upper middle class family. He got a great education, had a very above average upbringing, but nothing crazy. But from what I read, his time as captain of the basketball team was definitely a highlight in his life. And this is purely me just speculating, but I know from life experience that there's always things, especially in our adolescence as men, that shape future decisions and desires. Like when we get those first hits of what it is we like, it stays with us, whether that's sexually, whether that's career-wise, whether that's communication, friendship, whatever it is, when you get those first hit, in his case, attention, for being a coach or sorry, captain, it's it's something that follows you. And let me tell you, I've got a sister who's a doctor. Science and medicine are not necessarily careers known for being in the limelight or having media attention. I would assume that his undergrad and graduate years, you know, as well as his rotations and fellowships, they were probably pretty lab focused or research-focused, not uh frontward-facing, you know, not a lot of media. And out of his residency, he started at the NIH in 1968. I mean, the dude is old. And if you look at his movement throughout the organization, it was very clear he was being groomed to be a leader. And he's had that same position since 1984. Interestingly enough, though, in 1983 is when he really took center stage and he began to crave this media attention and sensationalism like nothing else. And you can see it and you can hear it in his tone, in the way he acts, in the way he talks, all of it. And so in 1983, during the AIDS and HIV pandemic, history tells me that this attention probably triggered the attention that he got somewhere in life. Maybe like my, you know, speculative answer that it was the high school basketball team. But he got that attention and he got that obsession and that addiction with it during this HIV AIDS pandemic. And as I go through this and talk to you a little bit about how dangerous this guy is, just remember there's two schools of thought on Fauci, especially on his handling of the pandemic. One, our school of thought, or mine, I'm not assuming that you all agree with me, talk about ego, but my school of thought, you will hear a lot of people saying it just doesn't feel right. One person, no real published data, telling us what to do, then changing, flip-flopping. I don't think so. I don't buy it. And the other train of thought, and this comes from a lot of his undying fans that just love him and think he's a savior, they believe that the nature of science is mistakes. And the guy makes mistakes doing the best he can trying to keep people safe. And I get that. And if it was one time, or if he actually came out and said this was a mistake, I get it. But these mistakes have led us to massive amounts of death and destruction, panic, the spread of misinformation, and even the financial and economic impacts of these mistakes are huge. It's devastating. And all we want to know is what was the process? How was the data reviewed and weighed? Was there any data? And in almost every single one of these big giant mistakes, there's provable suppression of outside scientific work. He's excluded other experts in the field and he muzzles and shames anyone who disagrees or offers another opinion and so on. Other scientists are afraid because a lot of grants and funding come from NIH. So if they speak out against him, they know that he'll put them on a black book and they'll never be able to get funding that way ever. I mean, even during the COVID pandemic, in a few instances, he admitted to saying what he calls quote unquote noble lies. One of them was not masking in the early months of the Wuhan virus. And he's saying because he didn't want to create a bottleneck of mask supply. Like that's his call. And so, you know, risking everyone because you're worried about mask supply, then calling it a noble lie. Yeah, that's pretty fishy. So for what I say is these aren't mistakes. These are intentional moves. Intentional moves this guy has done in order to keep himself on top, in order to keep everyone watching him, keep the cameras on him, because that's what he's obsessed with. He's obsessed with being the one, the almighty, the spokesperson, the hero. But the challenge is that when you put yourself in that position, we have to ask ourselves, aren't you responsible then for the consequences? If you don't want a team or a panel or to show any research and you just want to speculate your way through a pandemic, shouldn't you be held accountable? That is dangerous and extremely unethical. That does not happen in the scientific and medical community. It shouldn't happen. And when it does, people get stripped of their licenses, they get their funding pulled and all sorts of other repercussions. But because he works for our awesome federal government, he gets promotions. The bottom line is that the guy completely disallowed us from being able to have a second opinion. We're dealing with an illness, but we weren't allowed to have a second opinion. It was discouraged, it was frowned upon, and you were attacked for doing so. I don't know if you guys know this, but I have, you know, my older sister is a plastic surgeon. She specializes in neonatal cranial facial reconstruction, but it's a very specialized area of medicine where she basically rebuilds skulls, bone, and tissue features of premature babies that are underdeveloped when they come out. And she is often the second or third opinion when desperate families are looking around for the right answer of how to help these babies, their families, develop healthy and oftentimes stay alive. And so, you know, I talk to her and it's like the thing is that nothing bad can come out of a second or third opinion. The worst, worst possible thing that could happen, the worst is that your opinion agrees with the original doctor and they're on the right track. The best thing that can happen, you have some answer, some technology, some technique that the first doctor wasn't aware of, and you get to save a life, or you get to ensure that a small child grows and develops in as much normalcy as possible. That's called medical integrity. You should suggest your patients get a second opinion. At the top clinics like Cleveland Clinic, Mayo Clinic, you don't have one person. Your entire case is looked at from every perspective from a team of specialists top in their field who work together to diagnose and to treat areas of individual challenge and also systemic challenges. Tony Fauci could never work at any of those places. You have to play well with others, and you actually have to make decisions based on fact, not speculation. So when you come out and you deny an entire country's right to their second opinion, you have to be held accountable for the results. I mean, in Fauci's case, people getting kicked out of their homes, doctors won't let them in to be seen, groups targeted for spreading the virus, thousands of people dead, horrible clinical trials, killer drugs. Did you think I was talking about COVID? See what I did there? No. 1983, HIV epidemic. It's just crazy how history comes full circle. And the hardest part of all of this is that for COVID, I don't think many people knew. That he had done this before. And I also don't think people realize how hard the gay community was hit. There's an article in the American Institute of Economic Research that the Dr. Fauci published an article in the Journal of American Medical Association documenting one of the first cases of the immunodeficiency's disease appearance in an infant, and the author sounded an alarm about the possibility that routine close contact as within a family household can spread the disease. The article was extremely speculative and promoted heavily this new theory. If indeed the latter is true, then AIDS takes on an entirely new dimension. If we add to this possibility that non-sexual, non-bloodborne transmission is possible, the scope of the syndrome may be enormous. Although the article reiterated the need to be cautious in accepting these findings, as they awaited more evidence, the discovery, quote unquote, should at least alert us to the possibility that we are truly dealing with AIDS in children as transmitted through routine interaction. Well, clearly, this is his start. This is what he does. This is what he loves and feeds off of. But you can see he's using caution and possibility. And there's not one factual finding cited. Not one. Referencing a case of an AIDS baby and speculating from there that it must have happened by normal contact, hugs, holding hands, sitting next to someone on the bus. There's not one definitive in the article. In proper Fauci form, he gets to splash his opinion around without being held accountable for any of it because he says possibly and cautiously. That's not how it works, especially in science. You don't get to publish your personal hypothesis, especially knowing that it can have a treacherous impact before any actual findings have been made. That is so unethical. It is so dangerous and so deadly. And this man sits back and enjoys it and laps up every second he's controlling these people and the country. He loves the power, he feeds off of it. And of course, and especially back then, you know, the mass media scours these journals for these types of stories all day long. There's no internet to look. Going back to the Institute of Economic Research, they write right here, press accounts noticing Fauci's article immediately sounded the alarm. Household contacts can transmit AIDS. The AP queried the next day. Does AIDS spread by routine contact? And quoted Fauci as their lead authority. New York Times did exactly the same thing. Now, any responsible scientist, doctor, researcher, shit, any human would immediately jump up and down and say, Whoa, stop the bus. That's not what I meant. Print a redaction. This was a medical journal, a medical hypothesis that hasn't even been tested. But no, he didn't want to do that. It would remove all the praise and attention on him. He loved being noted as the expert, even though he knew he was wrong. Had we known now, it really goes both ways because had we known now what we knew then about Fauci, I don't think he would have the same pull with COVID. Or maybe he would. I don't know. The fact that no one really knew about this is even scarier to me. But also, had we known then what we've learned now, as his desire for attention and his ego grew over the last 40 years, maybe we could have saved a lot of lives within the AIDS and HIV epidemic. Eventually, hundreds of newspapers decimated the distressing theory from Fauci's article. Pat Buchanan enlisted Fauci as the centerpiece of a rebuttal against human health services Secretary Margaret Heckler, who told him there is no evidence at all that the general population is threatened by AIDS. I mean, at this point, the country is in all out mania, pure insanity. People are disowning HIV-positive members of their families. Hospitals won't treat them. Homophobia and hate against the gay community rockets in the big cities because you know it's only conservatives and right-wingers that hate gays. Oh no. Even Congress brought Fauci's article in and entered it into the congressional record, along with all sorts of other sightings of homosexuals causing the virus and recommendations on social ostracization. Fauci's article opened the door for people to vilify HIV and AIDS patients. That piece in the journal was absolutely the catalyst for one of the worst hate campaigns against gays ever. Families were torn apart, gay people were homeless all over the cities, countless amounts of lives were lost. And just like COVID, job loss, houses lost, sickness untreated, costly protective measures that are ineffective. It's not about the fact that you're right or wrong about masking. It's about acting as the one and only authority on it. That is this guy making recommendations that can hurt more than they can help without any backup. I just get so fired up because you can't say these things without backup or any research. He's done zero. Everything he said on TV to us was a lie or a speculation or an assumption. Not one thing was based on actual science. Not one. The crazy thing is that there's uh there was another leading immunologist at the time. His name was Ari Rubinstein. And even before Fauci wrote the article, he had done research on AIDS in babies in utero, utero, and they found that it was passed what they call vertically from the mother who had HIV or AIDS prior to getting pregnant. Sent the whole paper, all the research, everything to Fauci. Never even opened it, never even acknowledged its presence. Think of what that person, Dr. Rubenstein, could have done instead of spread fear and lap up all the attention possible, living in the limelight. American Institute of Economic Research goes on and says, although his speculative commentary had triggered a national frenzy over unfounded fears of AIDS transmission through routine contact, Fauci himself emerged relatively unscathed from the episode. He did so by deploying an all-too familiar, the political pivot executed in front of his fawning news media. Not even two months after his JAMA article, Fauci publicly contradicted its most irresponsible claim and never acknowledged his own central role in promoting that claim to begin with. In an interview with the Baltimore Sun, he says, it's preposterous to suggest that AIDS can be contracted through normal social contact, like being in the same room or sitting on a bus with someone. The poor gays have received a very raw deal on this. In short, this is why we call him Bauchy Flip Flop, because he just follows the political wins and the press doesn't notice because they're unethical too. Doesn't this sound just like COVID, guys? I mean, really? Doesn't this sound just like COVID? I mean, he just he uses the fact that he's small. And for us, he was a lot younger then, but you know, 40 years now, little Italian grandpa can manipulate the media. And we also have to remember that journalists, most of them are lazy, and most of them don't ever want to get questioned by a source. And so they love bureaucrats with credentials like Fauci because they can print whatever and never have any risk of blowback. And because of that, they hold on to every word like it's gospel, you know, and and these weak, woke kids and people that follow everything he has to say and they'll defend him to the death. Again, total cult leader. They will defend him to the death. They will never admit wrongdoings. It's crazy. I mean, I heard someone tell me, well, it was just merely an article in a medical journal. You know, the press did what they wanted with it. No, the press literally printed what he wrote. No subtext, no misrepresented context, verbatim what he wrote, citing him as the expert that he claimed in the same article. Of course, the double standard there, because they deny almost everything they can't find on CNN.com. But they're right, it was a medical publication. And maybe this first time didn't have harmful intentions. Maybe none of them did. Maybe it's just an addiction that he has. It's an itch that he can't stop scratching, media attention, cameras, being held up as the world's leading scientist. But we're never looking at the impact. Two months after that article in 1983, the country was in hysterics. And then once he got all this attention and credibility, he's now the new talking head for AIDS and HIV. So what does he do? He goes on tour promoting AZT, an antiviral treatment that literally kills you. Poison. And it was killing people faster than AIDS was. And he pushed it for a long time. Absolute poison. And not poison like some people refer to chemo as poison, which is medically controlled, and the reward often outweighs the risk. This was just straight poison. Might as well have been giving HIV and AIDS patient cyanide. If you want a little bit more context to this time, you should really see the movie Dallas Buyers Club with uh Matthew McConaughey. The character that he plays is very powerful. It's a true story. He contracted HIV and was given 30 days to live. He was not gay. He got it from a prostitute who uses intervenous drugs in the movie. He got convinced by a group of doctors at the hospital to get on this AZT trial, clinical trial, which is exactly what Fauci was out touting as the premier treatment of AIDS and HIV. And at one point in the movie, the doctor, one of the other doctors that doesn't like what's going on with the AZT, looked at him and says, AZT is killing every cell in your body rapidly. So he immediately goes off of it and goes down to Mexico to get treatments that actually work that the FDA don't allow. And, you know, there's supplements, a protein, you know, other things. And he actually starts to feel better. A lot more happens. But the bottom line is that he actually ends up getting in big trouble for using these drugs because they're helping. And he went from 30 days to live to seven years. Meanwhile, getting arrested by the feds, et cetera, et cetera. It's a true story, which is why I am citing it and quoting it. If it was just a Hollywood BS thing, that's one thing. But it's a true story that gives absolute insight to what medical professionals, especially Fauci, were doing for AIDS and HIV patients, essentially killing them. Again, when we draw outside the lines for our own health, we shouldn't be chastised. And we certainly shouldn't be getting arrested or in something enforced by law. I mean, sounds familiar, right? Hydrochloroquine and ivermectin, just for an example. It just shows that Fauci is shoulders deep in the thick of this big pharma push for medicine that doesn't work but makes a lot of money. He did the same thing with Ebola. I'm not going to get into Ebola right now because I don't have time, but I will tell you, he did the same thing with Ebola, just on a much smaller scale. When I'm writing this and I'm looking at all the data, and we did a lot of research for this episode, I kind of understand how the FBI feels when someone commits an act of terror who's been posting about it and telling people about it for five years they have egg on their face. I feel like our entire country has egg on their face. This is all information we should have known before we exalted this guy. There were no red flags. How is that possible? How do you become the highest ranked public health official in the country when you have demonstrated the most unethical, unorganized, poorly researched delivery of information as something as serious as AIDS and HIV? Only in the federal government can you get promoted and not fired for pulling such a stunt. I just, you know, it's incredible. And it's 40 years later, and people are still waiting for some sort of apology or explanation. He's never offered one. He's not sorry. He loved it. He still loves it. To Tony Fauci, it doesn't matter whether or not he's helping or not. The only thing that matters to him is that he's on TV and that he can control the actions of other people using his authority and using his power. He's an evil person, absolutely evil. And I'm not being dramatic. I cannot stress this enough. He is an evil person. He shuts down other colleagues. He suppresses information from the public so he can stay as the savior. And he touts himself as being the only authority on these issues, limiting people's ability to get a second opinion. It's very, very dangerous. Think about this, okay, as an example. Have you ever watched a briefing like after a major crime, something happens, even a car chase, something happens, and they have a big press briefing? Have you ever watched one where there's just one cop or one spokesperson? No. It's always a multi-agency cooperation. You'll hear from FBI, local police, sheriff, ATF, Secret Service, et cetera. It doesn't matter, but it shows a united front, but it also ensures that every angle and opinion is covered. But we're so enamored with this guy. I mean, especially the liberals in this country that love bureaucrats, they're also weaker in nature, which I hate to say it, but it's true. So of course they broadcasted Fauci's word like gospel, and it became the new form of control. The liberals own the media and the information. So even if there were second opinions out there, they would have had no alternative to broadcast. And they're scared, just like everyone else in this country, about speaking up against something that doesn't exactly line up with what the liberals and the Democrats are pushing. See, what he knows is that most people are the victims of the last thing they heard from someone. And so his whole take is say anything, just say something else on top of it sooner. So there's no question. And the flip-flop thing, it's like, okay, yeah, we know he flip-flops.

SPEAKER_03 34:58

Change anything that you're doing on a day-by-day basis. Right now the risk is still low. It was just bad. It is bad now. I think these numbers are so stunning. If you're a healthy young person, that there is no reason if you want to go on a cruise ship to go on a cruise ship. It is not a good idea to travel in the United States. People should not be walking around with masks. Well, if one mask is good, it makes common sense that maybe two masks are better. If you look at the evolution of the virus in bats and what's out there now, it's very, very strongly leaning towards this could not have been artificially or deliberately manipulated.

SPEAKER_02 35:45

Are you still confident that it developed naturally?

SPEAKER_03 35:47

No, I'm not convinced uh about that. I think that we should continue to investigate what went on in China.

SPEAKER_01 35:55

We need to look at the damage that's been done. The insanity is what he is saying doesn't change his delivery. Like no matter what he's saying, he's overly confident and overly sure of himself and just flip-flops no matter what. That's why I'm calling him a cult leader, because he'll do anything to stay ahead and sacrifice anyone to maintain control. So for Tony, when we're stuck working at home, no child care, no money, he doesn't care. He doesn't care that he told people to go on a cruise, go travel early on, and then they ended up at sea for weeks, not being able to dock with hundreds of sick people. He really doesn't care that his own NIH funded the most dangerous studies possible in virology, illegal in the US, but through a nonprofit he was able to give money to and funnel through into the Wuhan lab. He doesn't care that his medical advice he gave unnecessarily ended up with thousands, hundreds of thousands of people dead. It all led to more stage time and to control without consequences, and we empowered him to do it. And when other states, the good states like Florida, decided to go and do their own thing, he doubled down and pushed the politicians in blue states to continue to shelter in place. I mean, just the amount of assistance alone the government had to shell out in 2021 to help people during the pandemic is one of the largest influences towards this inflation that we're feeling. Prices are higher because of some of the things that he said and how long he drug it out. Nothing he said made a positive impact, not one, except for maybe pushing the vaccine. Other than that, not one. I mean, he shut down the use of hydrochloroquine and it resulted in unnecessary deaths. There was a very in-depth study done at Henry Ford Health Systems in Detroit, and it found that a significant decrease in mortality rate was associated with using hydrochloroquine. And the research was published in the International Journal of Infectious Diseases. Basically, what they said was in a multi-hospital assessment, when controlling for COVID-19 risk factors, treatments with hydrochloroquine alone and in combination with azithromycin was associated with reduction in COVID-19 associated mortality. Then he goes on to tell us that we'll be protected 100% from getting or spreading COVID with the vaccines. Then all the vaccinated people started getting sick. This was way before Omicron, the variant that they used that penetrated the vaccines and boosters. Oh no, it was happening prior to that. You know, the vaccines then went from 100% to just keeping your symptoms lower and reducing your chances of hospitalizations. Well, if that's the case, why weren't we giving a choice? Why were we be why were we basically being forced to take it? Then they take 800,000, which is a huge pool of veterans who had been vaccinated, and they showed a real difference in efficacy. The efficacy rates dropped 35 to 85% from March to September 2021. I mean, by the end of September, Moderna's two so two-dose COVID vaccine measured 89% effective in March, went down to 58% effective. The effectiveness of shots made by Pfizer and BioNTech, also two doses, fell from 87% to 45%. And the JJ single dose vaccine plunged from 86% to just 13% over six months. Like nothing was adding up, you know. But Tony had everyone engrossed in his suggestions. And no matter how big or small, nobody questioned it. They actually started using the term misinformation as Fauci's sort of racist, like the left uses. He uses spreaders of misinformation. He did more, in my opinion, of schmearing politicians and other experts that were offering different opinions than really actually coming out with well-researched medical advice. I mean, everything that he did, especially now towards the end, has just been last ditch efforts to keep eyes on him. You know, how many opportunities and suggestions did we lose by listening to one person, cult leader? What's the motive, people say? Well, I think he just craved attention. And like many doctors, he had a massive God complex. Pretty much everything that's come out now has shown that everything he said was BS. I mean, it's crazy to see. The big scary death numbers and the peaks and valleys that they used in order to make these lockdown decisions, all of them were wrong. We now know. John Hopkins University just came out with a study. Shelter in place, the draconian measures that he recommended had no positive impact on the mortality rate. The death numbers he talked about all the time. Death, death, death, death, death. Now we know that probably only 10 to 35% of all COVID-accredited deaths were actually a direct result of COVID, because the CDC has now come out and said most of the COVID-accredited deaths were with people that had two or more other diseases or health issues. Studies now show that disposable cloth masks don't work, don't deter in getting or spreading the virus. That's why the government recently just started handing out free N95s. Of course, they started doing that before the study came out in mainstream media. The effectiveness of the booster for Omicron was wrong, pushed everyone to get this booster. And the CDC has come out and said it's yeah, it's done nothing for Omicron. It's a blatant attempt to shut people down so you can continue to push and peddle your own personal opinions and feel like God. A lot of these now misinformation spreaders are actually backfiring on Fauci and on the blue states on the left because they are looking, like in the case of Joe Rogan, for example, took, you know, national headlines, they're trying to run him out of town. A lot of people actually went in to see what was this quote unquote misinformation, and they realized that these were legit scientists offering a very, very well-researched and credible exclamation explanation. But you know he won't accept defeat and go back to work. He's going to take credit for all of it. He will never admit we're safe, though. He will continue to go on and on about vaccines. He'll be on CNN and MSNBC as a contributor for all things medical. And we must realize that whether we're in a pandemic or not, war or not, recession or not, we can't allow this level of insanity again. I mean, we literally brushed the surface of what a Marxist United States would look like during these three years. How did it look like? How did it feel exactly? It doesn't matter who's president, Congress, Supreme Court. We allowed our representatives to act, destroy, and decide for us. We can't do that again. We let the same politicians who don't respect elections and our legislative process accept an opinion of one as gospel. We allowed that to happen. We made huge mistakes by relinquishing our power. Not one single vote was cast in response to COVID regarding its management. We accepted the media's denouncements of misinformation when it was what we were getting all along. And most importantly, we let down our guard for a man with a history of mass panic, death, and destruction that has gone all without sympathy or explanation. The UK just announced that it is ending all COVID-related restrictions. Boris Johnson, who's the Prime Minister, was very clear to the country that COVID cases will now be treated like any other respiratory disease.

SPEAKER_00 42:56

From this Thursday, it will no longer be law to self-isolate if you test positive. And so we will also end the provision of self-isolation support payments, although statutory sick pay can still be claimed for a further month. If you're a fully vaccinated close contact or under 18, you will no longer be asked to test daily for seven days. And if you're a close contact who is not fully vaccinated, you will no longer be required to self-isolate. Until April 1st, we will still advise you to stay at home if you test positive. But after that, we will encourage people with COVID, with COVID symptoms, to exercise personal responsibility just as we as we encourage people who may have flu to be considerate towards others. It's only because levels of immunity are so high and deaths are now, if anything, below where you would normally expect for this time of year that we can lift these restrictions.

SPEAKER_01 44:07

They have no leg to stand on anymore because they ran on solely one thing and one thing only, saving us from COVID, and it's not happened. And it doesn't need to happen. We can live with it. Every scrap of evidence coming out proves them wrong on every level. So now, as we embrace for Biden's, you know, proclamations of destroying COVID, which are sure to come up in his State of the Union address, he's got no choice. Meanwhile, he has a higher death rate, worse economic impact, and nothing to show for his draconian measures. Nothing. Don't even for a second believe that Fauci or Biden or any blue state leader like Newsom had anything to do with removing these mandates. They were, and in some cases still are facing mass uprising from Americans and have very low chances of re-election. Nonetheless, we need to remember emergencies are not the time to abandon our democratic process. This is the time we need them most. We could have all been back to work, traveling, going to the movies, and so much more had we took power back from these dictators in blue. As for Fauci, I believe that he will be shown in history as one of the most dangerous men in America. He's a power-hungry, ego-obsessed cult leader who tricked hundreds of millions in believing he had answers. Meanwhile, he lied, caused mass panic, suppressed very valuable information that could have made people healthier and lessened the death toll, and was responsible for millions of Americans dead throughout his 40-year career. We can't underestimate these bureaucrats and politicians anymore. We need to hold them accountable. Fauci needs to be held accountable. Had we done so, we would have saved countless lives and businesses and most of all, our sanity people, our sanity. I know the pandemic is winding down. I know mandates are coming to an end. And I know Fauci will soon be irrelevant. And that is exactly why I'm doing this episode. We cannot allow him to be irrelevant. We have to hold him accountable. We have to hold the politicians accountable. We have been lied to and we have been taken advantage of. And more importantly, we've been put in a situation where we never had the opportunity to receive a second opinion. This is dictatorship and cult leadership at its finest. And moving forward, I hope that all of us get the strength to say no if this ever comes close to happening again. You are listening to The Last Gay Conservative. I'm your host, Chad Law.