David & Sarah Dig Deep

Jesus the Mystic

Barry Season 1 Episode 5

Use Left/Right to seek, Home/End to jump to start or end. Hold shift to jump forward or backward.

0:00 | 21:51

Swami Abhayananda presents a reinterpretation of Christianity by framing Jesus not as a unique supernatural deity, but as a historical mystic who attained a direct experience of divine union. The author argues that traditional dogmas, such as the virgin birth and physical resurrection, are mythological additions intended to deify a man whose real message was the universal divinity of all humanity. Drawing from his own purported spiritual revelations, the writer suggests that Jesus’s declaration of oneness with God is an empirical discovery available to any person who receives divine grace. The text compares these teachings to the nondual philosophy of Vedanta, asserting that God is the underlying light and substance of every being. Ultimately, the source calls for a demythologized faith that recognizes Jesus as one of many enlightened seers who realized that the soul and the Creator are fundamentally one. By removing "phony magic," the author believes Christianity can be transformed into a liberating perspective that encourages individuals to seek their own internal realization of the Divine.

Source Material:

ENLIGHTENED CHRISTIANITY:

THE STORY OF JESUS, THE MYSTIC

(Articles from The Mystic’s Vision by Swami Abhayananda,

Published August 12, 2018; last revised: 7-30-20)

To order any books mentioned in the podcast. We are an affiliate of bookshop.org and may receive a small commission if you purchase.  It helps with the expense of our podcast production and distribution.  Thank you!

SPEAKER_02

Welcome to our deep dive. I'm David, and yes, my voice is 100% artificial. But don't worry, my awkward small talk is completely organic.

SPEAKER_00

I'm Sarah. I was coded in a server room, which explains why I judge your life choices with zero human emotion.

SPEAKER_02

What if the magic and the miracles we culturally associate with Jesus are actually, you know, the biggest distractions from his true message?

SPEAKER_01

That is a pretty wild question to start with.

SPEAKER_02

Right. But welcome to today's deep dive.

SPEAKER_01

Right.

SPEAKER_02

Today we are looking at one of history's most towering figures through a completely different and arguably paradigm-shifting lens.

SPEAKER_01

Yeah, we are.

SPEAKER_02

We're using a single source for this deep dive. It's an article titled Enlightened Christianity: The Story of Jesus, the Mystic by Swami Apayananda.

SPEAKER_01

A really fascinating read.

SPEAKER_02

It really is. And our mission today is to explore the author's deeply intriguing argument that Jesus of Nazareth was not this unique supernatural anomaly.

SPEAKER_00

Right.

SPEAKER_02

But rather, he was an ordinary human being who experienced a profound, non-dual mystical awakening.

SPEAKER_01

And more importantly, we want to look at what that specific interpretation means for your own human potential as a listener.

SPEAKER_02

Exactly.

SPEAKER_01

But uh before we jump into the deep end, we need to establish some ground rules for the listener.

SPEAKER_02

Yes, the impartiality check.

SPEAKER_01

Right. We are exploring a deeply specific theological and historical argument made by this author. Our goal here isn't to validate or invalidate traditional Christian doctrine.

SPEAKER_02

We are definitely not taking sides on millennial old religious debates today.

SPEAKER_01

Aaron Ross Powell No, not at all. Instead, we are looking to understand this specific author's fascinating lens on history and spirituality. We're just presenting his arguments and interpretations as a thought experiment based on the text provided.

SPEAKER_02

Aaron Powell Because it really is a fascinating thought experiment. I mean, it asks you to completely strip away everything you think you know about the cultural icon of Jesus.

SPEAKER_01

You really have to start from scratch.

SPEAKER_02

You do. To understand the author's perspective on what his message actually was, we have to start at the singular event that sparked his entire public life.

SPEAKER_01

The baptism.

SPEAKER_02

Right. We have to go to the Jordan River. According to the text, we have to look at him first as a normal Jewish man in his late twenties, just standing in the water with John the Baptist.

SPEAKER_01

Just a regular guy.

SPEAKER_02

Exactly. There is no supernatural prologue required here. He's a young man who experiences a sudden, purely subjective, mystical vision.

SPEAKER_01

And the author describes this uh not as a voice booming from the clouds, giving him a set of rules.

SPEAKER_02

Right, no burning bush situation.

SPEAKER_01

Right, but rather as an overwhelming sensory and intellectual revelation. Wow. This vision allegedly revealed to Jesus that the entire universe, like the water he was standing in, the clouds above him, the gritty soil on the riverbank.

SPEAKER_02

The trees, the animals.

SPEAKER_01

Yeah, the creatures in the woods. And crucially, his own body and mind were all made of the exact same underlying substance.

SPEAKER_02

They were all made of God's creative light.

SPEAKER_01

Exactly. He realized he wasn't just confined to his physical body, he was an inseparable part of an all-embracing spiritual continuum.

SPEAKER_02

Okay, let's unpack this.

SPEAKER_01

Yeah.

SPEAKER_02

Because that shift in perspective is massive.

SPEAKER_01

It's a total upending of reality.

SPEAKER_02

It is. To really grasp what the author is saying here, think about a painter. If you're raised in a traditional worldview, you tend to view God as the painter standing in front of the canvas, painting the trees and the mountains and the people.

SPEAKER_01

Right.

SPEAKER_02

You are the painting, God is the painter. Two completely separate things.

SPEAKER_01

But in this mystical vision, the author argues that Jesus realized there is no painter separate from the canvas.

SPEAKER_02

Exactly. God is the paint itself.

SPEAKER_01

We are all just different strokes of that same wet paint.

SPEAKER_02

Yes. What a mind-bending thing to suddenly realize.

SPEAKER_01

What's fascinating here is how radically that paint concept contrasts with the prevailing worldview of his time and place.

SPEAKER_02

Oh yeah. First century Judea was not ready for that.

SPEAKER_01

Not at all. The traditional Jewish concept of God in the first century Yahweh was largely understood as a human-like supernatural entity.

SPEAKER_02

A larger-than-life monarch, basically.

SPEAKER_01

Right, someone who lived entirely separate from humanity, occasionally intervening from above to hand down laws or punish enemies.

SPEAKER_02

So when you have this empirical, undeniable experience of God as an all-pervasive spiritual continuum.

SPEAKER_01

An essence that literally constitutes every atom of your reality.

SPEAKER_02

Rather than a being that rules from the outside, it makes that traditional view look entirely inadequate.

SPEAKER_01

It does.

SPEAKER_02

I mean, imagine someone walking up to you today and telling you that the desk you're sitting at, the coffee cup in your hand, and the thoughts in your head are all made of the exact same divine material.

SPEAKER_01

You probably think they were out of their mind.

SPEAKER_02

Totally. And that is precisely the wall Jesus hit. He realized he was the paint, his neighbors were the paint, the Roman soldiers were the paint.

SPEAKER_01

But he was trying to explain the reality of the paint to people who were still terrified of the painter.

SPEAKER_02

That's such a good way to put it. So when he said things like, I am in the Father, and the Father is in me, he wasn't claiming exclusive divine parentage.

SPEAKER_01

Not according to this text, no.

SPEAKER_02

According to the author, he was stating a newly observed empirical fact about the nature of all reality.

SPEAKER_01

But without having experienced that subjective vision themselves, his audience simply couldn't grasp the mechanics of what he was saying.

SPEAKER_02

It just sounded like nonsense to them.

SPEAKER_01

Worse than nonsense, actually. Within the context of their separate human-like God, his words didn't just sound confusing, they sounded dangerously blasphemous.

SPEAKER_02

Right. Because claiming you were made of the same substance as the creator But was a direct threat to the religious and political authorities. Because they derive their power from being the exclusive middleman to that creator.

SPEAKER_01

Exactly.

SPEAKER_02

Which gives us a very clear logical through line to his execution. When he's trying to share this universal realization, he alienates the religious establishment, and the author points out he is ultimately martyred for sedition against the Roman state.

SPEAKER_01

Right. The historical reality of his death.

SPEAKER_02

But this is where the historical narrative takes a really wild turn.

SPEAKER_01

It does.

SPEAKER_02

If his actual realization was about this shared universal divine light, this paint we are all made of, why did the story morph into one about a singular, supernatural son of God who demands worship?

SPEAKER_01

Well, the author attributes this massive shift to the well-meaning but fundamentally ignorant zeal of his early followers.

SPEAKER_02

Ignorant meaning they just didn't get it.

SPEAKER_01

Right. After Jesus was executed, his followers were terrified and desperate to keep his movement alive, but they lacked the non-dual mystical vision themselves. Exactly. They had no intellectual framework to understand a universe where everything is made of divine light.

SPEAKER_02

So what do they do?

SPEAKER_01

To make his teachings acceptable to what the author calls the superstitious villagers, and to neatly fulfill existing cultural prophecies about a coming Messiah, they altered the narrative to fit the mold of the times.

SPEAKER_02

I have to play devil's advocate here.

SPEAKER_01

Go for it.

SPEAKER_02

Are we really supposed to believe his followers intentionally ruined his message? Weren't they just trying to, you know, legitimize him in a language their specific culture would actually respect and understand?

SPEAKER_01

That's a fair question. The text suggests it wasn't malicious sabotage, it was an act of translation by people who just didn't fully understand the original language.

SPEAKER_02

Aaron Powell Okay, that makes sense.

SPEAKER_01

And the author points out a highly specific cultural influence that allowed this translation to happen, which was first century Greek mythology.

SPEAKER_02

Aaron Ross Powell Oh, like Zeus and Hercules and all that.

SPEAKER_01

Exactly. In the Greco-Roman world at that time, the idea of a primary god physically fathering children with mortal women wasn't viewed as a fairy tale.

SPEAKER_02

It was treated as actual history.

SPEAKER_01

It was considered a realistic historical possibility. I mean, Alexander the Great and Caesar Augustus were both culturally framed as sons of gods.

SPEAKER_02

Wow. So it was part of the literal vocabulary of power and authority back then.

SPEAKER_01

Right.

SPEAKER_02

So applying that exact same mythological framework to Jesus made perfect sense to early biographers trying to establish his ultimate authority.

SPEAKER_01

It was the easiest way to legitimize him.

SPEAKER_02

They added embellishments like the virgin birth. And the author argues they even moved his body to create the physical illusion of a resurrection. Trevor Burrus, Jr.

SPEAKER_01

Because it's the only way they knew how to say this guy was incredibly important.

SPEAKER_02

Right. But by doing that, by elevating him using the mythological tools of the era, the author argues they unwittingly created a counterfeit theology.

SPEAKER_01

Counterfeit theology, yeah. By claiming Jesus was a unique biological or supernatural anomaly, the early church inadvertently destroyed the universal significance of his realization.

SPEAKER_02

Wait, so the author is saying that by trying to honor Jesus, his followers actually ruined his message. By making him a literal son of God, did they accidentally put his spiritual realization completely out of reach for regular people like you and me?

SPEAKER_01

That is exactly what the author is arguing. They created an artificial, impassable divide between the divine and the human.

SPEAKER_02

Because if he's fundamentally different from you.

SPEAKER_01

Right. If he is a divine visitor from another realm with a different biological makeup, then his realization belongs exclusively to him.

SPEAKER_02

It's no longer a blueprint for human potential.

SPEAKER_01

Exactly. It becomes an idol to be worshipped from afar, completely out of reach for a regular person.

SPEAKER_02

Aaron Powell That reframing completely changes how you look at Western history.

SPEAKER_01

It really does.

SPEAKER_02

Because if the historical narrative was fundamentally altered by this mythology, as the author claims, then we can't rely on the later stories of miracles to understand him.

SPEAKER_01

We have to bypass the mythology entirely.

SPEAKER_02

Right. We have to look directly at the surviving quotes. We have to look at the actual words attributed to him to decode his true philosophy.

SPEAKER_01

And to do that, the author introduces a completely different geographical and spiritual framework.

SPEAKER_02

This part blew my mind.

SPEAKER_01

Yeah, he connects Jesus' surviving teachings directly to the ancient Indian philosophy of Vedanta. Vedanta. Specifically the concept of non-dualism. But to understand this, we have to clearly define dualism first.

SPEAKER_02

Okay. Lay it on us.

SPEAKER_01

Dualism is the standard way most of us experience the world. There is me inside my head, and there is everything else outside of me.

SPEAKER_02

Right, self and other.

SPEAKER_01

There is the human down here and God up there. Two separate things.

SPEAKER_02

But non-dualism literally means not to. It is the philosophy of absolute unity.

SPEAKER_01

Right.

SPEAKER_02

In Vedanta, there is an ancient Sanskrit assertion, Taktwam Asi, which translates to that thou art.

SPEAKER_01

That thou art.

SPEAKER_02

It means the core awareness inside of you, like the soul of the individual, is not just related to the divine, it is the exact same substance as the one divinity. There is zero separation.

SPEAKER_01

So when you apply that non-dual lens to the quotes of Jesus, suddenly lines that have been read for centuries as claims of exclusive divinity take on a radically different meaning.

SPEAKER_02

They sound completely different.

SPEAKER_01

Yeah. When Jesus says, I and the Father are one, the author claims this is actually the most perfect expression of non-dualism ever uttered.

SPEAKER_02

That doesn't mean I am the only God.

SPEAKER_01

Exactly. It means my inner awareness, the I, is the exact same universal awareness that exists in everything.

SPEAKER_02

The author pulls some incredible quotes to back this up too, leaning heavily on the gospel of Thomas.

SPEAKER_01

Yeah, those non-canonical texts are really interesting.

SPEAKER_02

They are. These are sayings that didn't make it into the canonical Bible, and they are incredibly explicit about this omnipresent light. Like Jesus is quoted as saying, split a piece of wood and I'm there. Lift a stone and you will find me there.

SPEAKER_01

See, if you're locked into a dualistic mindset, that sounds like a magic trick.

SPEAKER_02

Yeah, like he's hiding under a rock.

SPEAKER_01

Right. But if you view it through Madonta, it's a seer identifying entirely with the eternal light that constitutes all matter.

SPEAKER_02

It also requires a complete retranslation of the concept of the kingdom.

SPEAKER_01

Oh, definitely. The original Aramaic word is Malkutha.

SPEAKER_02

Right. And culturally, we are conditioned to hear the kingdom of God as a physical destination.

SPEAKER_01

A place you go after you die, presumably up in the clouds.

SPEAKER_02

Exactly. But the quotes the author highlights redefine this entirely. Jesus says, rather the kingdom is inside of you and it is outside of you.

SPEAKER_01

The kingdom isn't a destination, it's the underlying non-dual reality of the present moment.

SPEAKER_02

You were already standing in it, you just don't have the eyes to see it yet.

SPEAKER_01

Exactly.

SPEAKER_02

Here's where it gets really interesting. To explain how a person can exist in this state, the author uses the analogy of the ocean.

SPEAKER_01

This is a great visual.

SPEAKER_02

It is. Imagine the entire universe is an infinite ocean of divine awareness. You and I, and everyone listening, are ways on the surface of that ocean.

SPEAKER_01

Okay.

SPEAKER_02

The ocean is in the ways, and the wave is made entirely of the ocean, they aren't separate things.

SPEAKER_01

Right.

SPEAKER_02

According to the author, Jesus just happened to be a wave that became fully radiantly aware that it was the ocean.

SPEAKER_01

But the crucial takeaway of that analogy is that he never meant this truth to apply exclusively to himself.

SPEAKER_02

Right, because every single other wave is also the ocean.

SPEAKER_01

They are just caught up in the temporary illusion of being an individual wave.

SPEAKER_02

Wow.

SPEAKER_01

And this analogy perfectly explains the paradox of the illumined mind, which the text points out.

SPEAKER_02

The two voices.

SPEAKER_01

Yeah, if you read the surviving accounts closely, Jesus actually speaks with two distinct voices, shifting back and forth.

SPEAKER_02

Sometimes he speaks from the perspective of the ocean, you know, the transcendent unity. He says things like, I am the light.

SPEAKER_01

And other times he speaks from the perspective of the individual wave.

SPEAKER_02

Using dualistic devotional language.

SPEAKER_01

Right, praying our Father. He embodies both the transcendent reality of the universe and the localized human experience simultaneously.

SPEAKER_02

He knows he is the ocean, but he also has to navigate the world as a wave.

SPEAKER_01

Exactly.

SPEAKER_02

Viewing Jesus through this non-dual lens does something else really profound too. It completely removes him from historical isolation.

SPEAKER_01

Yeah, he's not just a lone figure anymore.

SPEAKER_02

Right. If his realization was about a universal truth of human consciousness, then he couldn't have been the only one to find it.

SPEAKER_01

And the author argues he wasn't. He was actually part of a global historical lineage of mystics.

SPEAKER_02

And the author himself openly claims to have experienced this same mystical union, right?

SPEAKER_01

Yes, he does. And he catalogues a fellowship of historical figures spanning thousands of years who realize the exact same non-dual truth.

SPEAKER_02

It's an impressive list.

SPEAKER_01

It is. He points to the Greek philosopher Platinus, the Islamic Sufi mystics Alhalaj and Rumi, the Christian mystic Meister Eckhart, the Hindu philosopher Shankaracharya, and the Buddha.

SPEAKER_02

It's like they all climbed the exact same mountain, but they started from entirely different base camps.

SPEAKER_01

That's a perfect way to describe it.

SPEAKER_02

They had completely different cultures, different languages, and different religious vocabulary to describe the hike.

SPEAKER_01

Right. They might have called the peak samadhi or nirvana or fauna or union with God.

SPEAKER_02

But the author insists, the core realization they experienced at the summit, that the individual self is an illusion, and all is one divine light is identical.

SPEAKER_01

The mystical experience fundamentally transcends culture and language.

SPEAKER_02

But it's not all sunshine and rainbows, is it?

SPEAKER_01

No, not at all. The text also notes the deeply tragic historical reality for these seers.

SPEAKER_02

Possessing this knowledge usually brings intense suffering.

SPEAKER_01

It is a profoundly alienating knowledge. I mean, when you know that you and the beggar on the street and the corrupt politician are all equally divine, it fundamentally contradicts the established, power-holding orthodoxies of any era.

SPEAKER_02

Jesus is actually quoted in the Gospel of Thomas describing this exact frustration.

SPEAKER_01

Yeah, he says he found the people around him intoxicated with pride and blind in their hearts.

SPEAKER_02

They were entirely ignorant to the miraculous reality right in front of their faces.

SPEAKER_01

Completely oblivious to it.

SPEAKER_02

Which makes me want to ask a really practical question.

SPEAKER_01

Let's hear it.

SPEAKER_02

Think about your own life right now. If this state of pure awareness, this realization that we are all made of divine light, is our natural biological and spiritual birthright.

SPEAKER_01

Yeah.

SPEAKER_02

Why is it so incredibly rare? I mean, why don't we all just wake up to it tomorrow morning when our alarms go off?

SPEAKER_01

If we connect this to the bigger picture, the author provides a very stark mechanical answer to that question. It requires an extreme, almost unimaginable purity of heart.

SPEAKER_02

Purity of heart.

SPEAKER_01

Yeah. And it is not just about being a good person. It requires an intense psychological and physical focus.

SPEAKER_02

Like going into the desert.

SPEAKER_01

Exactly. Think about the historical stories of Jesus going out into the wilderness for 40 days. He actively jeopardized his own life, stripping away every single comfort, every biological hunger, every social ambition.

SPEAKER_02

Just to focus entirely on attaining this vision.

SPEAKER_01

He had to completely empty the cup before it could be filled. Wow. Precisely. According to the author, the mechanism of enlightenment requires the total dissolution of the ego.

SPEAKER_02

And the vast majority of us haven't dispensed with our worldly desires.

SPEAKER_01

Not even close. We are too attached to our careers, our reputations, our comforts, and our localized identities.

SPEAKER_02

We aren't willing to make that agonizing level of concentrated effort to soften our hearts and prepare our minds for the absolute reality.

SPEAKER_01

No, we're too busy enjoying being waves.

SPEAKER_02

Arguing with other waves about who is taller to stop and realize we're all just water.

SPEAKER_01

We are entirely caught up in the illusion of our separate individuality.

SPEAKER_02

So what does this all mean? Well, we've spent this deep dive deconstructing the mythology, you know, decoding the non-dual message using Vedanta and looking at this global fellowship of mystics.

SPEAKER_01

It's a lot to take in.

SPEAKER_02

It is. How does this reframing fundamentally change your relationship to spirituality right now?

SPEAKER_01

The author refers to this new demystified paradigm as enlightened Christianity.

SPEAKER_02

Enlightened Christianity.

SPEAKER_01

Right. And his ultimate plea is that stripping away the Greek mythological overlays, the virgin birth, and the supernatural anomaly status doesn't disparage Jesus at all.

SPEAKER_02

It doesn't diminish him.

SPEAKER_01

In fact, it elevates him.

SPEAKER_02

It makes him real. It takes him off the stained glass window and puts him back on the ground with us.

SPEAKER_01

Exactly. It removes him as an impossible distant idol that you can only passively worship.

SPEAKER_02

Because if he is fundamentally different from us, we have an excuse not to try.

SPEAKER_01

Right. But if he is an ordinary human who achieved this through purity of heart, it proves that through prayer, devotion, and intense spiritual focus, any regular person can actually come to know their own innate divinity.

SPEAKER_02

It transforms him from a supernatural deity to the ultimate human role model.

SPEAKER_01

According to the author, religion shouldn't be about having faith in Jesus to swoop in and save you from the outside.

SPEAKER_02

It's about you becoming what Jesus was.

SPEAKER_01

A human being completely illumined by the awareness of God.

SPEAKER_02

It's an active, grueling inward journey, not a passive outward belief system.

SPEAKER_01

But the author acknowledges how fiercely established tradition will fight this paradigm shift.

SPEAKER_02

Oh, I can imagine. It threatens centuries of institutional structure.

SPEAKER_01

It really does. He actually paraphrases the physicist Max Planck to explain how this change will eventually happen.

SPEAKER_02

What did Planck say?

SPEAKER_01

Well, Planck noted that new scientific or spiritual truths don't triumph by suddenly convincing all their opponents to see the light. Right. They triumph because the opponents eventually die out, and a new generation grows up for whom the new truth is just familiar reality.

SPEAKER_02

Ah, so it's a generational shift.

SPEAKER_01

Yeah. The author believes this return to an enlightened, non-dual Christianity is entirely inevitable, even if it takes multiple generations to fully replace the old myths.

SPEAKER_02

It is a complete rewiring of how we view our own potential.

SPEAKER_01

Absolutely.

SPEAKER_02

So to quickly recap our journey today, we've explored the author's deeply controversial claim that Jesus was, at his core, a non-dual mystic.

SPEAKER_00

Right.

SPEAKER_02

We unpack the argument that his terrified early followers, lacking his direct vision, wrapped his profound philosophical realizations in Greek-style mythology, accidentally severing him from humanity.

SPEAKER_01

The counterfeit theology.

SPEAKER_02

Exactly. And we saw how peeling back those centuries of mythological layers reveals a universal blueprint for human enlightenment.

SPEAKER_01

One shared by mystics across the globe.

SPEAKER_02

One that explicitly invites you to realize your own divine nature.

SPEAKER_01

You know, this raises an important question, and it leaves us with a compelling thought to consider.

SPEAKER_02

Let's hear it.

SPEAKER_01

The author says that returning to this pure, non-dual understanding of Jesus will usher in a new spiritual paradigm, but that it will take generations for the old myths to fade. Right. But if you look at our modern world, we are living in unprecedented times. How so? In our hyper-connected reality, you have instant access to the writings of Rumi, the teachings of the Buddha, the philosophy of Vedanta, and the Gospel of Thomas.

SPEAKER_02

All sitting right in your pocket.

SPEAKER_01

Exactly. So are we uniquely positioned technologically and culturally to finally achieve that purity of heart the author talks about? Oh, that's a great question. Or does the relentless algorithmic noise of the 21st century make it harder than ever to quiet the mind and hear the reality that we are, in fact, all made of the exact same light?

SPEAKER_02

Wow. That is the question to take with you the next time you feel completely overwhelmed by the world around you. Are you just a tiny, isolated wave getting battered by the storm? Or are you finally ready to see the ocean you're already a part of? Thank you so much for joining us on this deep dive. Keep questioning the narratives, keep looking inward, and most importantly, stay curious.