AI and the 95% vs 5% debate

The industry is debating whether AI should be viewed as augmenting or replacing human-centric tasks. But we don’t yet have a framework to discuss the technical and business impacts of that spectrum of decisions.  

SHOW: 926

SHOW TRANSCRIPT: The Cloudcast #926 Transcript

SHOW VIDEO: https://youtube.com/@TheCloudcastNET 

CLOUD NEWS OF THE WEEK: http://bit.ly/cloudcast-cnotw

CHECK OUT OUR NEW PODCAST: "CLOUDCAST BASICS"

SHOW SPONSORS:

• [US CLOUD] Cut Enterprise IT Support Costs by 30-50% with US Cloud
• [VASION] Vasion Print eliminates the need for print servers by enabling secure, cloud-based printing from any device, anywhere. Get a custom demo to see the difference for yourself.

SHOW NOTES:

• The final 5% of AI success

HOW DO WE THINK ABOUT THE INVOLVEMENT OF HUMANS WITH AI SYSTEMS?

• What do we think AI systems should be capable of?
• What do we think human systems should be capable of?
• We know how to quantify error, but do we really know how to quantify error?
• Almost every question about AI comes down to augment vs. replace, and yet humans tend to skew towards the replace angle. 
• We like the thought of humans in the loop, but often don’t want to be bothered to interact with humans
• We haven’t yet created a framework to think about the human +/- AI involvement, because we haven’t really created it for general-purpose automation yet either. 

FEEDBACK?

• Email: show at the cloudcast dot net
• Twitter/X: @cloudcastpod
• BlueSky: @cloudcastpod.bsky.social
• Instagram: @cloudcastpod
• TikTok: @cloudcastpod

FEEDBACK?

• Email: show @ reasoning dot show
• Bluesky: @reasoningshow.bsky.social
• Twitter/X: @ReasoningShow
• Instagram: @reasoningshow
• TikTok: @reasoningshow