Chaos Chronicles: Democrats Flee, Jesus Casting Controversy, and Political Undercurrents

Today we dive into the political landscape's most heated battles and their implications for America's future. We examine the strategic moves, media manipulation, and cultural flashpoints shaping our national conversation.

• Texas Democrats flee state to block GOP redistricting, facing arrest warrants and $500 daily fines
• AP coverage shows clear bias in reporting on the redistricting conflict
• Bill and Hillary Clinton subpoenaed to testify before House Oversight Committee regarding Epstein files
• Nancy Mace and Marsha Blackburn leaving Congress to run for governor in their respective states
• DOJ releases list of 35 sanctuary jurisdictions, threatening litigation against laws obstructing federal immigration enforcement
• Rising socialism in American politics poses serious threats to both the Democratic party and America
• Controversial casting in Jesus Christ Superstar production deliberately targets Christianity
• Howard Stern canceled by SiriusXM after viewership plummeted following anti-Trump stance
• Programmer stands up to protect girlfriend during DC carjacking attempt, displaying true courage

We'll be taking our annual fall break for the next two weeks but will return with more trending news and conservative views. Keep an eye out for our upcoming live show where we'll answer your questions!

Chapters

• 0:00 Show Introduction and Current Events
• 4:10 Texas Democrats Flee State to Block Redistricting
• 14:51 Clinton Subpoenas Over Epstein Files
• 25:29 Nancy Mace Running for SC Governor
• 34:33 DOJ Lists 35 Sanctuary Jurisdictions
• 43:10 The Danger of Rising Socialism
• 50:08 Jesus Christ Superstar Casting Controversy
• 56:34 Howard Stern Canceled and Farewell

Transcript

Speaker 1: 0:01

it's the Elsa Kirk show, with Clay Novak serving up trending news and conservative views brought to you by the Elsa Kirk collection and refuge medical, and now it's time for the show oh hey, how are you Clay?

Speaker 1: 0:26

I'm good. We got another jam-packed show today and we're not even going to get to. Like it's crazy, folks. I mean it's Wednesday at 4.30 Eastern and there's developing stories that we can't even get to. I mean, today is the day. Just up front folks. There's shooting today at Fort Stewart, georgia, five soldiers injured. That's not even developed enough for us to comment on. So as much as is going on, we can't even get to everything. But I'm good, I'm busy.

Speaker 3: 0:54

How are you doing? I have actually not looked at social media or media in general, other than to prep for the show, our very specific topic. So I'm in the bubble, I am unaware of everything going on and, you know, my studio is a basement studio, so I am literally the basement dweller who has no idea what's happening in the world.

Speaker 3: 1:18

It's kind of nice, I kind of like it and it's cozy, warm in here. You know I don't know about you. Clay, like it and it's cozy, warm in here. You know I don't know about you, clay, you're probably a typical guy and you keep your thermostat set at your AC at like 60 degrees or something insane, and my husband is that guy. He turns it on like I don't know March 1st and it doesn't turn off until like November 28th or something insane. So I'm always freezing, so I like my little space down here.

Speaker 1: 1:45

I am basement as well, which is why always freezing. So I like my little space down here. I am basement as well, which is why always the quarters zip. I always have something on, but yeah, normally I'm cold air. I'm perfectly fine, totally happy with cold air, but the basement is a little chilly. Regardless, we do have a lot to talk about today, so let's get rolling right. After this Redistricting drama, media spin and the usual double standards, the AP throws shade, texas draws draws lines and we're breaking down who's actually playing fair or?

Speaker 1: 2:09

pretending to.

Speaker 3: 2:10

So get your popcorn ready and let's go do not be mocking me for that english voice. I knew you would.

Speaker 1: 2:19

I knew you were gonna get me on that one I was just gonna say, like, who did you import for this?

Speaker 3: 2:25

So, listen, I'm going to confess what I did here. So first of all, I did Let me backpedal slightly, I'll make it quick. I answered some questions. I made a video where I answered some questions that people have been asking in the comments section on a video that I told them go ahead, ask me questions, I'll answer them. And instead of me just reading off the questions and then answering them, I'm like, oh, what if I have my chat, my chat GPT guy, because mine's a guy, read them like ask me the questions. So that's what I did.

Speaker 3: 2:57

But I had to confess which I'm doing again here that I not only gave my chat a name, his name is Oliver. Doing again here that I not only gave my chat a name, his name is Oliver, I also trained him to speak in the manner of Cary Grant. Judge me all you want, guys, I don't care, I don't care. Obviously I care, because I'm like defending myself. So, yes, so I still had that voice programmed in and I was like, oh, I'll just use it, cause I literally did it five minutes before we started.

Speaker 1: 3:25

So yeah, listen that, uh, you know I, I'm the guy I would go. You know I'm, I would have Samuel L Jackson or something like that. But but, uh, cary Grant's a good call. I like it. It's very distinguished. It's uh, you know he is. Uh, he's that guy I always love. It's one of my favorite memes where you've got Cary Grant dressed in a suit and an overcoat and a hat right, and then you've got like a modern kid in skinny jeans and some other stuff and it goes. Something wrong happened between here and here and I agree with that wholeheartedly.

Speaker 3: 3:54

Me too. Me too, Bring back Cary Grant, elegance and class. And oh, don't get me started. We got too many topics and I could talk about that one all darn day. So, yeah, we're talking about changing gears here. I can't, I can't even segue, we're just going right in this, this, right here. The Texas Democrats travel in protest. So over 60 Texas Democrat state lawmakers fled to Illinois, New York and Massachusetts to deny a quorum on a GOP redistricting session that could net Republicans up to five more US House seats and Greg Abbott Governor. Greg Abbott issued in-state arrest warrants and is pursuing removal of their seats. So you know right off the bat Clay. I want to ask you, is anything going to happen to? This? Is just like some, you know, lots of noise and once again, nothing happens, or what's going to happen here?

Speaker 1: 4:44

So I, and so there's you hit on a lot of them, there's. There's a couple of things in there too. So there's also five hundred dollar a day fines for each one of those members. For I don't know what they exactly call it, but I think it's something on you know delaying, you know impeding government process or something like that. But with that no one can. No one else can pay those fines besides the actual elected officials. So otherwise it's the bribery charge. So like if if say, you know some billionaire, philanthropist or whatever says, well, I'm just going to pay everybody's fine, can't do that, every one of those people who had their fine paid by somebody else would be taking a bribery charge. So there's, and the person who volunteers to pay the fine is also criminally liable. So there's that.

Speaker 1: 5:31

I would say that in most other states, in pretty much every other state, I don't think anything will happen. I will tell you that Governor Abbott has repeated with the exception of, maybe, florida, but Abbott has repeatedly backed up the things that he has said. He was one of the first people to start flying the illegal immigrants to other states. He's been adamant about the floating barriers in the Rio Grande River. He's done a lot of stuff. So I think he is one who will potentially follow through with this. I think that this is the second time that something like this has happened. I would love to see, because Governor Pritzker my home state of Illinois, you know, I think is complicit in this. I think that there should be. I think Governor Abbott should issue a state warrant for Governor Pritzker as a you know, as an accessory to this, if that's possible I don't know if it is or not, but if it is I think he should which would keep Governor Pritzker from ever stepping foot in the state of Texas ever again, which would be just a great statement to make like hey, we're not going to tolerate this.

Speaker 1: 6:38

I think something will happen. The bottom line is they have to come back to Texas At some point in time. They can't stay away forever will happen. The bottom line is they have to come back to Texas At some point in time. They can't stay away forever. I think that there's got to be some sort of enforcement. That happens. These lines are going to be redrawn, the quorum is going to be reached, the government process is going to go through. It's all going to happen. It's just a matter of how long do they delay this? And really, what other votes or what other processes within the state of Texas get impeded by this absence? And I think the voters Texas is Texas like that it's. It's a that state's got a personality like no other, and I think that the voters are going to hold them accountable overall. What do you think?

Speaker 3: 7:18

Yeah, you know, I think you're right. I agree completely. Texas doesn't really mess around, so that'll be. That'll be really interesting to watch and you know it's funny.

Speaker 3: 7:25

As part of my show prep for this, I really just typed in and clicked on the first article about it that came up, which was from the AP, the Associated Press, into Boyle a little bit, because I'm so keyed in and I'm sure you are too now at this point, I'm so keyed into language choices, the words chosen and what their intention is with these words, and I'm noticing words in this article right away that are just low-key, inflammatory, and it was kind of boiling my blood a little bit and I want to kind of share with you that I'm trying to see if I yeah, I did. So some of the things that they're they were saying, like some of the language that they're using in this article, is things like no holds barred battle and blew the lid off of redistricting, and you know all of these things and the the bias, and what I'm really getting at is the very clear and obvious bias. Ap has learned nothing from their battles with Caroline Levitt there, and all of that stuff. And you know these are the kind of things that are really aggravating me and a lot of people. Honestly, it's the media, and you probably could give me any topic at this point that we talk about and I can bring it right back around to what's the media. And you probably could give me any topic at this point that we talk about and I can bring it right back around to what's the media doing, what's their role in all of this. And you know, and of course, and it's not just the media, it's the politicians, everybody that's involved.

Speaker 3: 8:55

But the irony is is like, if this was the, if this was the other way around, if this was reversed and it was the Republicans doing what these Democrats are doing, the, the response from the media, which, as we know, fuels the response of the people you know it would be a very different story. And you know, and my whole point here is that we need to be so much more and more hyper aware of those things and of the behavior of the media trying to be inflammatory and make something that is not what they're saying it is. You know, think about it. And that would be my only advice Like, think about it that way, like if we turned it around, if you reverse this whole story. Flip the names, you know what would the reaction be from the media and how would that affect your reaction. So that's the thing that kind of gets me, because now you know in that same article they're talking about, you know other states following suit, but when they refer to that one, you know, like California, a couple other ones too.

Speaker 3: 9:51

When they refer to those states, it's very favorable, like, well, this is, you know, this is just in response to what they're doing, what those people are doing, and you know the reality is this is something that has been going on forever, is something that has been going on forever. You know this, or I shouldn't say, for this has been going for a long time. Democrats, republicans, different states, they all do this. This is a normal part of. Is it good, bad, right or wrong? I mean, I don't really know, it just is. So it's not new. This isn't like some dirty trick that Trump is pulling that they've never seen before.

Speaker 1: 10:21

Yeah, yeah, illinois is one of those states and, in fact, pritzker was on Colbert last night and which is hilarious because you've got, you know Pritzker, who is Chris Christie, fat and a potential, you know they talked about him as a governor and he's on a failed show with Colbert, who's on his way out, and Colbert even called him out in the districting lines within the state of Illinois because they are, you know, gerrymandered. It's clear, right, there's lines drawn for specific reasons in specific places. California is another one, new York is another one. It happens, you're right, it happens all the time in every state, some states it's where you've got. Texas is a great example. You've got other states Michigan, ohio, pennsylvania, some of the battleground states where it is. This is debated every few years for very specific reasons, and that is to make those swing states, those battleground states, go one way or the other. And so it's more of that Now I will tell you you talked about the inflammatory language in the AP article there was an incident here in Illinois today where, because everybody knows now where those Texas politicians are staying and they are there was a bomb threat.

Speaker 1: 11:36

Call to their hotel. Right, we show up bomb squad dogs, all that. They clear 400 people out of the hotel. Clearly, no device was found. There was no real threat. They clear 400 people out of the hotel. Clearly, no device was found. There was no real threat. They all went back to their rooms.

Speaker 1: 11:48

But that's being turned into, you know, hey, people did this because the language being used by the Texas Republic, the GOP politicians, is inflaming. You know, is inflammatory, is raising the level of violence. But on the flip side, you've got the, you've got the AP article doing kind of the same thing. People do it all the time. Now, the most inflammatory in this entire thing is everybody's new favorite idiot is Jasmine Crockett. So one of the five seats that everybody expects to be flipped is, in fact, I think her entire district goes away in this whole thing. So she's really upset and everybody's pointing the fingers at President Trump as opposed to Governor Abbott, which is weird, but but they are and so she got into a little bit of name calling with him. I think she called him a piece of you know piece of shit and you know he responded with his normal she's not a very high IQ person, kind of thing, but that's you know.

Speaker 1: 12:39

That raises the level too and, like I said, the bottom line is all of these people are going to have to come back to Texas. They're all going to have to assume their responsibility as an elected official. These redrawing districts are going to go through. That's why they left was to prevent that from happening. But they can't stay away forever. It's just a matter of does anybody get arrested? Is there any you know? Is anybody removed from office Because that's on the table right now? Is there any you know? Is anybody removed from office because that's on the table right now? That's being discussed as well. So, yeah, want to see how that pans out, as whatever plane lands back in the state of texas and those people are you know, and this plays out however it's going to play out. But but the reality is it's all going to get redrawn right, yeah, absolutely.

Speaker 3: 13:18

And you know, to be honest with you, I'm not even saying if it's good, bad, right, wrong, whatever, for wrong whatever, for them to be arrested for all that. You know, our New York reaction is to say, good, arrest them. But you know, the flip side of that is it's like, well, then this, this sets the precedent. Remember that, guys. It sets the precedent.

Speaker 3: 13:35

So the next time around because I know, and I can't cite a, for instance, but I feel pretty confident in saying that Republicans have done some version of this as well, in different states or different times, you know, and maybe they haven't, I don't really know, but I would suspect that they would this is a tactic, you know, this is a political tactic that gets used. So I will go under the assumption that at some point, somewhere, republicans have done either the same or similar, attempted to delay this or stop it from happening. So, you know, again, sets a precedent. So if you want this to happen to them, then we have to be prepared to have it happen to us. You know, and again, I say it a million times, clay, I'm so tired of us and them and they and we, and lines and aisles and all of that stuff.

Speaker 1: 14:20

I just get exhausted, and so here we are, moving on to the topic, and you could classify this as a hey, somebody opened Pandora's box by going after President Trump, and now all bets are off and there's no protection for former presidents anymore, whereas maybe even 10 or 15 years ago this the Clintons both former President Clinton and former Secretary of State Clinton have been subpoenaed over the Epstein files and those among many, many others, and they're going to have to testify in front of the House Oversight Committee. Formal subpoenas have been submitted.

Speaker 3: 14:57

Yeah, october 9th for Hillary and October 14th for Bill. Now my question is can they, will they? My feeling is yes and yes. Just plead the fifth. Yeah, like what happened. Yeah, so is this going to be a big nothing burger, like what's the?

Speaker 1: 15:14

likelihood. Yeah, so they are one of, or two of, let's see. Who else do we got? I got the list here.

Speaker 1: 15:20

So you've got FBI Director Comey, fbi Director Mueller, who, I think, when they went to serve his subpoena, they put him in a memory care facility. So he has got Alzheimer's or dementia to such an extent where he's going to be of zero value whatsoever. Now, ok, people don't jump to conclusions. He testified in front of Congress in 2019. I thought it was much more recent than that and if you remember that testimony, it was very much like Biden at the debate, like he was bumbling right, and that was six years ago and for those of you that have ever been around, dementia or Alzheimer's like that stuff progresses pretty rapidly. So six years ago to now, he could be in a state where he is of little value, Regardless.

Speaker 1: 16:06

So, james Comey, robert Mueller, attorney General Merrick Garland, attorney General Loretta Lynch, eric Holder, alberto Gonzalez, department of Justice Bill Barr, doj, jeff Sessions all subpoenaed over this, along with both of the Clintons. So you know, going back to plead the fifth, I think they absolutely will. Um, I think that the you know, the public image is, uh, is gone anyway. Like you know, and I know, every time somebody pleads the fifth, whether they're doing it out of an abundance of caution, whether doing it out of exercising personal rights immediately. What do we all think they're guilty?

Speaker 3: 16:43

Guilty, yeah, yeah, immediately.

Speaker 1: 16:46

Guilty? Yeah, so are they going to plead the fifth? Yes, you know, is it within their rights? Of course it is. So you know it's, and I think everybody on that list is going to likely testify and plead the fifth. I don't think you're going to get a single bit of information out of any one of those people. Um, as terrible as that is, but I think that is exactly what's going to happen. And, and you know, is this a wasted effort? Yeah, um, I, I think it is. Do I think that they are, you know, um, exercising their rights? They absolutely are, and I think we're going to get nowhere and nothing out of any of this. I think it's a waste of time.

Speaker 3: 17:28

Yeah, it feels like you know. It feels like a little bit of theater, to be honest, and I get it to an extent, like you know, going through the motions of accountability, which is, you know, of course, what we want, but we also know that reality of what they can do and what they are most likely to do. You know, the only thing that could shock anyone is if one of them said, yeah, you know what I'll talk, I'll tell you everything I got. They have nothing to gain from it, so there's no reason for them to. You know, I really know how much they have to lose. It's not a criminal that well, I don't know, is it? I mean, can charges come from that, in that, by their testimony?

Speaker 1: 18:06

I think that you know. So you've got like to me. I look at this and I say why are they bringing those people in specifically? So that tells you that the previous investigation, investigations plural right been incomplete, have been, you know, modified, something's been hidden, something's been left out, something's been avoided. And now you've got some direct questioning to fill in some of those gaps or to confirm or deny what's in some of these reports. You know you can get testimony, like, as an example, you know, president Clinton probably filled out a whole bunch of paperwork, affidavits and all kinds of other stuff.

Speaker 1: 18:45

Right Now they can sit him down, swear him in and even potentially put him on television and ask him very direct questions and force him to give the answer we know he's going to give, which is the Fifth Amendment, you know. Or they can say you stated previously X, y, z. Is that true or is that not true? Right, if he's already stated it and it's already in the investigations and he doesn't confirm that that's exactly what he wrote, now we have a problem. Right now there's a problem, yeah, yeah. And then I think that's where it leads to potential criminal activity, which is what you were asking about is are there charges potentially going to come out of this? Which is what you were asking about is are there charges potentially going to come out of this? And I think that's the only way that that happens is if somebody you know they pull out. You know, because this stuff went on five, six, seven, eight years ago. Yeah, but I think you're going to get a lot of Fifth Amendment and a lot of I do not recall.

Speaker 3: 19:40

It's so funny that you said that, because I was just going to say that like it's going to be a combination of those two. Right, like those too. Right, like I do not recall, yeah, and I always love and I I don't I mean this sarcastically I always love the way they do it. They sit back and they're like I do not recall, and then they sit back and, not to my recollection, yeah, very good, right, yeah, it's pretty good, um, so, yeah, so again, I, I guess this is a lot of theater. Do they have to stupid question? I guess maybe, but do they like, can they just say I plead the fifth on everything you're about to ask me, or do they literally have to go through the process of every question that's to be asked by whoever wants to ask questions and like we're going to hear that like 500 times?

Speaker 1: 20:15

Probably yeah, I think they would have to have to go through that whole thing no-transcript to be held at his residence.

Speaker 1: 20:55

So the vice president, the White House chief of staff, the attorney general, kash Patel, and the deputy attorney general so this is a strategy session amongst them, um, on, on these, all of these, um, you know, uh, on all of this testimony, so it's, it's going to be very interesting to see how the attorney general gets in the mix of this Cause this is the house oversight committee. This is not the department of justice, um, it's not coming from the white house, but but there is some sort of strategy session. It's not coming from the White House, but there is some sort of strategy session. So my guess is they're going to go through and feed a bunch of questions to the House committee, that's, you know, seeing this, overseeing this, and that's how that will roll. But, yeah, interesting crowd.

Speaker 3: 21:39

Very interesting crowd and you know, let's face it, we're all. I shouldn't say we're all. I know I'm going to tune in because even if they're going to be pleading the fifth, every two seconds, every question, I want to see this woman and this man look uncomfortable and squirm right and look furious because she is incapable of hiding her rage anymore. I don't think. I don't care how many meds they pump her with, I don't think she can hide it, Right? Wasn't that the whole thing?

Speaker 3: 22:09

Like they had heavily medicated because her, her crazy rage I mean, that's a word right there Rage. Now you know, I agree.

Speaker 1: 22:19

I am. You know me. There's only one conspiracy theory that I kind of follow along with, and that me there's only one conspiracy theory that I kind of follow along with and that's the whole President Kennedy thing. But I did see an interesting one the other day about Secretary Clinton and that all the way back to 2016, she had a health incident and the Secret Service like loaded her into suburban and they moved her out. I remember it well, and since then there are people that swear that she has been replaced.

Speaker 1: 22:46

I've heard that and I had never heard that theory before and I kind of dismissed it, except for one very small detail which I thought was brilliant, and that was she walked out of Chelsea's apartment building in New York City, out onto the street, with not a single secret service member detail member escorting her out of the building. Not one, nobody in front of her, nobody behind her. Now that doesn't mean there weren't guys on the street, but she literally walked out the door, nobody with her, nobody, um, and that I thought was a little bit odd. The rest of it like people are talking about her nose and her chin and some other things Okay, fine, was a little bit odd. The rest of it, like people are talking about her nose and her chin and some other things, and okay, fine, whatever. But that little piece, I know, kind of caught me by surprise, but that was.

Speaker 1: 23:28

I've never heard that theory before I kind of for the most part, but that that one scene with her I thought was very interesting.

Speaker 3: 23:35

Yeah, I, I've heard that one. Of course, I'm sure we've all heard about the the Biden clone, that he has many of them, that they say that you know they just trade out actors as they I don't even know, I mean as they pass away or as they simply need them. You know, and they do the same thing. They do the side by sides. It's always the earlobes. You're always talking about the earlobes.

Speaker 3: 23:54

You know, yeah, right, you know, listen, I am of the mindset that you cannot surprise me anymore. So if this were all true, wouldn't surprise me. If it wasn't true, wouldn't surprise me. You know, I don't know. I mean some interesting theories, let's put it that way for sure, and I wouldn't, I would never rule them out. You know, there's too much stuff going on underneath the surface of what we all see. So all of those things are not only possible, but potentially even very likely. So I don't know, I don't know. That is a story and a topic for another day, right? Not when we have this many Can't do it today.

Speaker 3: 24:33

Can't do it today, maybe one day, guys, you know what, guys, you know what you can do. Okay, this might be fun, clay, or it might be torture for us. Why don't you guys, in the comments, tell us all of the conspiracy theories you would like to talk about and we'll see which ones we can cover?

Speaker 1: 24:50

I think we did a holiday show, I think a couple of years ago, and we talked about like we asked questions of each other back and forth, and I think you hit me with the conspiracy theory thing, I think you're right, we've touched on it a couple of times, but that would be a fun show. We could even do that one. Folks, we haven't done a live one in a while. Maybe we should do a live show and just open it up for questions from the fans.

Speaker 3: 25:09

We could do one of those. I love that. I think that's a great idea. Yeah, we absolutely should.

Speaker 1: 25:12

We'll play one of those.

Speaker 3: 25:13

Yeah, definitely, my goodness. I'll definitely have to get my studying cap on and study up on my conspiracy theories. I think we're not even supposed to call it that anymore. Didn't we stop calling it because so many of them have been right that we call them just truths that haven't been discovered yet? All right, next one. Next one Nancy Mace I have feelings. Clay Tell me. Yeah, I just, I honestly, I genuinely, and I see all over the place my exact sentiment. However, I do not like saying things like this, but I'm going to say it anyway. I'm not a fan. I'm not a fan, okay.

Speaker 1: 25:51

I don't why.

Speaker 3: 25:54

She is so much, she's so much and I think that she comes across as at at times being a wee bit unhinged and I am not saying that she is unhinged. I certainly. I certainly have tremendous respect for her. She was the first female Citadel graduate and South Carolina congressman. You know a lot of respect for that. I think that's cool. I do think she is. It's a very dynamic, interesting person. She's positioning herself. What is she calling herself? Trump in heels? Is that it Trump in high heels? You know, I don't know. I mean, it's definitely very bold branding, for sure. I just don't know if her intensity translates well to the masses. What do you?

Speaker 3: 26:59

think. Do you have a higher opinion? I like her?

Speaker 1: 27:03

Yeah, I do. I admire her for the Citadel thing because she is the first graduate but, she's not the first to attend. Right there was a young lady I don't remember her name who you know went in there, you know kicked open the doors, lasted two weeks and quit.

Speaker 1: 27:18

But right behind her was and it's not just Nancy Mace there was a. There was a number of, a small number, a handful of women who graduated with her. She is in the first class that graduated women from the Citadel and I think that formed a lot of who she is as an adult. That experience those four years. You know she didn't take the commission as a, as a military officer, as as many do out of the Citadel, but I think that formed who she is as a person. Um, I like her because she does. You're right, she's an intense lady. Um, she doesn't take crap from anybody. Um, you know to the point where she even last year what was it? You know she she posted a naked silhouette of herself right In this whole. She's a big proponent of criminal charges for revenge porn, which she's been a victim of. She put a picture of herself, naked silhouette of herself, up in Congress right To make a point and I know that's a lot for some people, but I but I do like her and I but I think this cause.

Speaker 1: 28:16

We've also had Marsha Blackburn just today announced that she's running for governor of Tennessee. So we've got two GOP strong personality females leaving Congress to go, attempt to run their state and they do have to remove themselves from their congressional seats to do so. So you know, and neither one of them is a special election. So they're both coming out on a normal election cycle where replacements will be elected on a normal cycle, no special election required, and both of them are responding to term limit elections. So this isn't a I'm challenging the sitting governor. Both of them are in states where you've got a term limit governor and they've got to be replaced. So they're stepping out of Congress to do so and they're both doing it.

Speaker 1: 29:03

Now here's the argument right, for the people who look at this and they say, well, we need them in Congress. Right, because that's the initial reaction, like we can't afford to lose a senator, we can't afford to lose a representative, but yet we you and I, both among the vast majority of America continue to say term limits in Congress. Yes, so this, if we get what we want, this is the future, right, right, we're going to turn over all of these Congressmen and women on a regular basis. So we have to get over that piece of it and we have to accept this as the future, if that's what we all want. So I like her. I like her in Congress. I think she's of value, she's not afraid. She was one of those you know. She kind of went after the whole transgender athletes, she's gone after the bathroom bills, she's gone after a lot of those very sensitive topics and she'll do the same thing for South Carolina. I just you know it's tough that we have to lose them, but I think it is also the right thing to do.

Speaker 3: 30:02

Yeah, yeah, I'm not, I'm certainly not against her becoming the governor there. I think I just simply would want for her to like, I guess my issue here kind of comes down to is this authentic or is this, you know, theater again? You know, is this just grand dramatics that you're doing all the time? You know I respect that. She is a an extremely vocal advocate for victims of sexual assault and abuse and all of those things, and she's, you know, extremely bold and open about her own traumatic experiences in life, about her own traumatic experiences in life.

Speaker 3: 30:41

I think where the line kind of comes in that if this is your platform, this is what you talk about all the time and you kind of use that as your battering ram on everyone who comes against you. You know, that's where I kind of get a little put off on her and you know, and I know other people do I actually was just, I was just perusing X before this to kind of get a vibe of what other people are thinking. You know more so to see, like, is this just me? Am I just, you know, am I just kind of being meh for no good reason? And you know, I see I see both sides of it and you know, I see, I see both sides of it.

Speaker 3: 31:29

But yes, I like the move towards the term limits that we've been talking about forever and would not be against her being governor. I just you know, it's just you know what. Sometimes people just rub you the wrong way. For me, that's that's the thing with her. Does not reflect, in my opinion, on whether I think she'll do a good job or not. Does not reflect, in my opinion, on whether I think she'll do a good job or not. I think she has the potential to do a great job and as long as her own things don't get in the way. You know a little less of a loose cannon vibe and more of that just fierce advocate for the things that she believes in.

Speaker 1: 31:56

That's where I'm at. I think one or both of them her and Marsh Blackburn are potentially setting themselves up for a VP or presidential run. As you know, the knock on a lot of Congress people who run who've never been a governor before Right If they come straight out of out of the Senate or straight out of the House and they run for president is, well, you've never been in charge of anything before Right.

Speaker 3: 32:20

So this could be positioning.

Speaker 1: 32:22

Right. So I think this is like check the resume, like I've run a budget for a state. I've run a state you know that has a house and a Senate. I've run, like you know, all of those things that we want our presidential candidates to be able to do and say that they've done right.

Speaker 1: 32:36

This is a little bit of block checking for either one or both of them. So I think in the you know, let's do a quick math right Maybe a 2036, you know presidential run for either one of them. I don't think either one of them would do a two year, hand the governor for two years and then bow out to either run for president or be on the ticket with JD Vance that's also possible or even be a cabinet member for Vance if he is elected as president in 2028. So I think there's some of this is I don't you know, you said theater, but I think it's maybe a little bit deeper than that but it is block checking, I think, for one or both of them to be a governor and make themselves more of a viable presidential candidate in the next eight to 12 years.

Speaker 3: 33:18

Yeah. Yeah, that makes perfect sense. Definitely, I'm looking to see. If I thought I had a question for you on this. Oh, I guess the question was about electability. Can she rally rural voters without alienating moderates?

Speaker 1: 33:30

Yeah, I think Marsha Blackburn is a done deal.

Speaker 1: 33:34

I think she's going to win. Tennessee hands down, no problem. I think you know what is it. There's four other candidates already in it in South Carolina that she's going to run against. I think she is the most well-known. I think she is probably the favorite walking in the door, so she can only go down from there, which there's nothing saying she won't. I mean, you said it. She is a little fiery, she is emotional and that may turn some people off if she runs for governor, but I think they're both the favorite walking in. I think Blackburn is a gimme. I think that's a three foot part, but I think you know Mace is. Mace is less certain because of her personality. So, yeah, yeah, definitely not a gimme.

Speaker 3: 34:14

Right, right, yeah, it's going to be interesting to watch. I definitely wish them both success because that's, you know, for the party and for the future, that's what we need. We need these people in each of these states. You know, simple as that, really, right, yep, who we got next. Speaking of states well, technically, cities. Speaking of where's my? Girl. Let me put my girl up there. There she is Megan busting on her for her makeup and hair and photo ops, but I don't care, I love her, so whatever.

Speaker 1: 34:44

yeah I'm a fan.

Speaker 3: 34:45

I like her um I.

Speaker 1: 34:47

Yeah, she's a, you know she. She is, you know, a midwest girl. She is a. He's on a farm, he's on a ranch, like she is she? Yeah, is she pretty? Yes, does she wear a lot of makeup? Yes, do we really care? No, like I, the photo ops. Maybe she probably missed the mark on a couple, but, you know, so is president Trump, so is everybody. Does Um, listen? You know my, you know me and Megan um go back, go back to some of her younger day photo shoots and tell me that she didn't miss the mark on a few things. So let's, uh, okay, let to topic at hand.

Speaker 3: 35:21

Yes, yes, all I'm going to say is listen, we all misstep, okay, it happens, it's a thing, uh, and we will all misstep more, so whatever, um, but you know, the important thing is that she's doing her job, she walks the walk. She doesn't just talk the talk, she walks the walk, she's the real deal. Um. So, fact summary here the doj released a list of 35 sanctuary jurisdictions states, cities, counties and vowed to litigate against laws obstructing federal immigration enforcement. Some lawsuits have already been filed, but courts have tossed cases in Chicago and elsewhere. Yeah, so I don't know what do you think, clay?

Speaker 1: 35:56

Yeah, so I went to the DOJ site to check this out and so it's a running list so they keep this updated. But the current, most recent, has, let's see, 12 cities, or 12 states plus DC. They list DC as DC and not as a city, right? So they listed it amongst the states of 12 states plus DC, 18 cities and four specific counties, one of those being Cook County, illinois, which is Chicago, two out of California, and then I don't remember the fourth one was that. But they update this and you're right. So there's been lawsuits filed, including against the city of New York. This is, you know, in violation of federal law. They're essentially impeding the enforcement of federal law and you know there is some effectiveness to this because we've already had I think it was Louisville, right, the mayor of Louisville came back and said I'm not playing the legal games and so pulled all sanctuary city status from the city of Louisville. So there's some of that. The list is not all inclusive, but it is constantly updated. So the 35 or so that are on there now I think you know you get updates as things like Louisville happens or, as you know, they add more to it.

Speaker 1: 37:08

But I guess the question is we talk about decentralized government, right? You and I, right, the GOP as a whole is against big gov, right? It's against federal control. It's more towards push to states rights. So in this case, where do you sit on that? Is this state's rights? Are they overstepping states rights? Like you know, there's again it's kind of like the term limits thing, like we need to be okay with some of this. You know, conceptually, maybe not this specific case, but you know, is it state's rights or are they overstepping what's going on?

Speaker 3: 37:51

Yeah, that's a good question. Yeah, I, I don't know. I don't have the answer to it. I'll tell you that much. I really don't, you know, and again, and I go back to like, sometimes a lot of this stuff just feels like theater because you know everybody is stepping on everybody else so nothing really actually happens. It's just a lot of you know tugging back and forth and then so what happens, you know? So I don't know. I mean, what do you think is what's?

Speaker 1: 38:18

You know, I think I, I personally believe that when you're endangering, when your policy endangers citizens, then there's a problem and I think that's the crux of it and and you know we're gonna get into this in one of our kind of closeout topics but like DC is a great example where you know DC policies. It doesn't belong to a state, right, but it is, you know, on par as the district itself. So what does the federal government do to make sure the citizens aren't, you know, at risk? And how far can the state, the federal government, step in? You know we've got Louisville reacted right to a lawsuit. They're like we're not playing this game, we can't afford it, we're not going to do it.

Speaker 1: 39:12

So what is what does the federal government do in a lawsuit against, like, say, this lawsuit against the city of New York and it wins, then what Does that take? All the power away from the mayor and therefore the people of New York that elected the mayor. I don't know, it's a very. This is definitely those lawsuits, if they progress, are going to the Supreme Court and it's going to be a very interesting outcome for all of those. You know, as they progress. I wish, I think we all wish that there would be some common sense solution to this, but I think you're going to get enough hard line in the blue states and cities, which is what all of these are.

Speaker 3: 39:52

Yeah they're going to they're.

Speaker 1: 39:54

they're not going to back down from it and I think it's going to get a little bit ugly.

Speaker 3: 40:00

Yeah, yeah, it definitely is. And I thought of our, you know, I've had this running thing week to week of something fatigue, something fatigue every week. This week for me I don't know about you this week for me is lawsuit fatigue. I have lawsuit fatigue because they're like, the court system is so saturated with these lawsuits that this will be going on for like 20 years before we see any kind of, you know, actual resolution. I mean, that's what it feels like. I don't know if that's the case. I know lots of them get tossed, you know, as they start to move along or get really looked at. But yeah, I don't know about y'all, but I definitely have lawsuit fatigue because that's the word you hear every two seconds. So and so is filing a lawsuit against this one, and you know, and that's kind of the last you hear of it for a little while so because it just sits in, you know, it sits in the system until it can be taken up.

Speaker 1: 40:52

Yeah, yeah, we are certainly. We are certainly a very litigious society. We're at, you know, and it's, and it's gone everywhere from federal government, state government level, all the way down to individuals.

Speaker 3: 41:01

You know what I mean? Yeah, absolutely, we've talked about this.

Speaker 1: 41:05

Everybody's too happy. Sometimes you just wish two guys would go out in the street and beat the crap out of each other and then shake hands and be done with it. But we don't do that Good old days.

Speaker 3: 41:14

I miss the good old days where you could just go pop somebody right in the face. You know S know I posted a funny side note. I posted a meme. It's been circulating forever, or at least for a while, of Mike Tyson. Quote from Mike Tyson, my favorite. I love it so much. You know something to the effect of people on the Internet have gotten way too comfortable with saying things and you know, not getting punched in the mouth for it punched in the face for it.

Speaker 3: 41:38

You know I paraphrase, but that's pretty darn close to it. And I happen to do my quick, quick glance through the comments section. Most people are, you know, normal and either laugh or agree or, you know, leave it alone, you know. But there's always that like one or two that are like, oh, that's, that's terrible, that's not very Christian of you to want to punch somebody in the mouth, to which I say, yeah, like, oh, mouth. To that I say my favorite phrase, or one of them, which is cry more Like.

Speaker 1: 42:09

I stop, I don't care. Yeah, good old punter kisser, but with that right. So now we've got you know. Next topic we've got you know the Zohan.

Speaker 3: 42:16

The Zohan. Yes, Don't mess with the Zohan. Wait what that's not him, oh. I'm sorry. My bad, my bad. Oh, this was the one I, yeah. I mean. The question is how dangerous is this? Right? I mean his.

Speaker 1: 42:29

He is the blatant outspoken socialist you know it used to be bernie sanders and elizabeth warren and everybody kind of like. You know they were only two people and they were a little kooky and we all just kind of tolerated them and you know, whatever, um, and then you got AOC in the squad, right, you got a little bit more and so now you've got you know, mom Donnie, and you've got we talked about this a couple of weeks ago the mayoral candidate in Minneapolis, right.

Speaker 3: 43:12

Yes.

Speaker 1: 43:14

So we've got this rise in outward socialism in elected officials. And you know, I just posted something and I didn't even realize this. I posted it and then I got that message from somebody that said I was, I was quoting Stephen A Smith, which I don't do but I posted something on social media that said you know, the rise of socialism is either going to be the end of the Democratic Party or the end of America. Right, but wisely. And Stephen A Smith said exactly the same thing within the last few days and he was talking about this and he said that. He said you know, if you vote in socialism, right, then socialism will destroy America. Right, if the Democratic Party continues to vote in more and more socialists into the Democratic Party, it's going to destroy the Democratic Party because they're never going to win a federal level election of any kind ever and then the party is going to crumble. So you know, but I think he's. You know, the old adage goes you can vote, you can vote your way into socialism, but you're going to have to shoot your way out of it. Right, right, right.

Speaker 1: 44:22

But there's so many of the younger generation who are talking about wealth restrictions, wealth sharing, government control. We've talked about it before we talk about we would love for some of these uber wealthy to be more altruistic, more philanthropic. Right, the best one so far is Bezos's wife, who's essentially she sued the crap out of him in the divorce and has given away billions of dollars, right, right, but we can't mandate that Right, it's their money and we wouldn't want it. Right, they can be crappy human beings, it's their right. You know they. They've earned the money. It's their money to do what they want with. You know, whether you like Elon Musk or not, he can buy Twitter if he's got the money to do it, which he did. Right, that's the way America works.

Speaker 3: 45:12

Yeah, you can't be mad at the people who took advantage and had the knowledge of how to take advantage of the system that we all have the same opportunities to.

Speaker 1: 45:18

So just because they did it Worked hard enough to get the money.

Speaker 3: 45:23

Yeah, yeah, and it's crazy. And you touched on the, the youth, the young folks thinking this is all such a great idea because they have that, you know, rose colored glasses on that they have been trained and taught to have on. Because they have been taught what to think and not how to think and not to rationalize. And look at the other side of that and certainly not look at the countries. Look at every single place where it has failed. You know, and they buy into that, yeah, but the way we're going to do it is different. Like, yeah, no, that failed because they did it different. Like we've got the right way to do it. You know, you dummies, you dumb little dum-dums, oh, yes, and you know this is all part of that. You know, harped on this for many a year now that this is all part of the plan. The indoctrination from, you know, a very young age, the public school system, the colleges, all of those things they have been so trained and conditioned like good little seals to, you know, bark and clap and perform on command and not to ever actually think. And and this is where we're at and this is why we have going on what we have going on People like Mamdani, you know, winning New York City's Democratic mayoral primary.

Speaker 3: 46:40

And this is a guy. He is such a cliche socialist. He comes from wealthy parents, he's got money, he's got all of the he had. You know, armed guards with you know like what air 15s or I don't know what they had they had. Like you know, right there, that should be chilling to people. And they don't even register. Like this guy is part of the wealth bracket that you're so against and he's your leader, like he's your beacon of hope. The stupidity to me is galling. It really is. And you know I try not to be mean, except for when this stuff aggravates me to the extent that it does. And then I just got to be. I got to be mean about it because I feel like it's the only way we can get this through their heads, or not?

Speaker 1: 47:36

I just I feel so. Take the socialism which he's he's admitted out loud, doesn't care, he's on a bash Right, he's a socialist. I think with him there's also a danger of um, you know islam and and you know sharia law and those kinds of things. I think that's a viable, viable danger with him. But I also think he is an absolute liar, like he is. He will lie and he will say anything and everything he has to to get elected.

Speaker 1: 48:06

Yeah, knowing 100 he's lying, doesn't care if he's lying, and he will say anything and everything he has to to get elected. Yeah, knowing 100% he's lying, doesn't care if he's lying. And then, once he gets into office, he's going to do what he wants to do, and I and it and it is so, so blatant to me, and he and he doesn't care, and he's and he knows it. And that's why I think he's most dangerous. He is going to do whatever it is that he wants to do, whatever he has to do, and he is the most dangerous in all of this. Bernie Sanders is a crazy old man. Elizabeth Warren is a liar and everybody knows it and they don't take her seriously. Aoc and the rest of the squad they're really really dumb as dirt. I actually think this guy is pretty smart, but I think he's a blatant, friggin liar and he will do anything and everything to get elected, and it's he is dangerous.

Speaker 3: 48:55

Yes, yeah, I agree, and I, and I hope, man, oh man, I hope they're taking that, that danger seriously. I think that they are. I think there are some some big New York business men putting up a nice, big, solid chunk of change to fight against him. Yeah, more people need to be, more people in that position should be doing that as well, taking this threat very seriously. Like you said, he is fully open about itish abolish the police, get rid of the police. Um, state government-run grocery stores, you know, I mean all the key, all of the key. Those are just two of them, those you know, but all of the key uh phrases and terms and and belief systems, um, he's just putting them right out there on a silver platter, neon lights on it. So, yeah, we have been forewarned, really by him himself.

Speaker 1: 49:51

Well, and then, moving on to our next topic, he gets backing and association from people that support this same sort of abomination. And I know this is going to get you worked up. I'm the talk person, then I'm going to let you fly off the handle. For those of you that haven't seen this, so there's a current production of Jesus Christ superstar, and if you're not familiar with it, it is. It is not well received in the Christian community. It never has been. It's the story of Christ told from Judas's perspective, right, and it is inflammatory and not very flavor favorable towards Jesus, as you know, the Savior himself, but also as a human being. So it's openly. In this current production you have Jesus being played by a gay black woman who is in the recent production of Wicked I believe that's the same woman, but the Wicked movie, I think that was out recently the same woman. So this is openly mocking Christianity. Openly, right. Not just the play itself, which always has been controversial, but her playing Christ is openly mocking Christianity. This never happens to another religion, right? Never.

Speaker 3: 50:59

They wouldn't dare.

Speaker 1: 51:01

Wouldn't dare, right, wouldn't dare go after Muhammad, wouldn't dare any of the other major religions. This is supported by Hollywood. The liberal left, all everybody in the entertainment industry is lauding how amazing this is. Um, you know you could. Is this freedom of speech? Sure? Maybe? Is it potentially a hate crime? It could be, um, but the. The one thing that I want to see, which you will never see, is I want to see Malcolm X played by an elderly Chinese woman with an amputated arm. Um, just to prove a point right, I love that.

Speaker 1: 51:33

Or she can't. You know, do the right, right she can't do that, right? Nope. But I want to see that, right, I want to see that. I want to see that kind of diversity, but you'll never see it. Okay. Only attacks on white Christians, specifically male, most of the time, you know, only those cases. Are these played by? You know, people who don't fit that bill, physically, physiologically, you know, et cetera, et cetera. Okay.

Speaker 3: 52:00

Yeah, so you know so, to state the the obvious and to echo, uh, what you said. You know this, this is obvious rage bait. It's, you know, more theater from the theater crowd, and the goal and intention is 100 percent to enrage and insult and inflame and to get people to pay attention to them. And you know, congratulations, they have succeeded in doing exactly that. Yes, absolutely.

Speaker 3: 52:33

My first reaction is to become extremely unchristian and say some very, very unchristian things about this. And then I calmed down and I did pray on it. I did take that pause and say, lord, I actually need you to speak through me because you don't want me saying what I want to say. So I did take that pause and I did write, and I wrote a post and I made a video about it, which was really just echoing the same sentiment, just two different forms. And here's what I, here's what I came up with God Jesus does not need us to defend him. He's got this and I, I have come to a place where I feel very sad for them. You know, y'all can choose to believe whatever you want to believe, but I am speaking from my belief system and this is what I believe, and you are, of course, welcome to disagree with me. I believe that they will someday answer to the King of all Kings, and woe to them when that happens. And so I think it's my job as a Christian to pray for their souls and pray for their repentance. And do I think it'll happen? I mean not for me to say, because their conversations with God are their own. I think that we, as Christians, as followers of Christ if you don't want to call yourself a Christian, specifically because I know there's people that don't want to be called that, even though they're followers of Christ so, however you want to phrase it, just you know what. Let's not get angry about it, because that's what they want. That's what they want. Jesus is perfectly fine. He's got this 100% and more, so we will pray for them.

Speaker 3: 54:28

Yes, it absolutely is appalling, disgusting, disrespectful. The attack, like Clay said, the attack on white Christians is obscene, to say the least. And you know, at this point, gosh, we're so used to it, we're so used to it. It's like, really Like, can't you, literally cannot, hurt me with with this, this, this disgusting, deliberate? I'm adding it back to the screen here, this display of disrespect and mockery. This is not for me to handle. This is not for me to worry about. That will be for them to worry about. So do you see how I calmed myself down, clay? See, it wasn't me calming myself down, it was the good Lord calming me down and get me to act right. But I will tell you in all sincerity, the me in me wants to give a very, very different reaction, and that that is our, that is my Christianity at work, that is the Holy Spirit doing, doing its job inside of me, and I'm humbly grateful for that. Um, so, yeah, that's it. I'm off my soapbox. Uh, I, I hope I talked somebody else off of the.

Speaker 1: 55:40

The rage ledge there on you for for your calm and sincere response to that. I was expecting a little bit more animation, but good for you.

Speaker 3: 55:52

I was starting there. As soon as you started talking about it, clay, I could feel like you can't see because my hair is hiding it. But you know, I don't know about anybody else, but when I start getting angry or emotional or anything, my chest gets like fire engine red and it travels up to my face like I can't hide it and I was like calm it down, don't be you, don't be yourself here, be what you need to be. So, yes, yeah, we've got, we can do this, we've got two more to end our, our, our show tonight. These are, you know, again, including that one to a degree. I guess these are lighter topics, are more amusing, are you know not? End of the world, doom and gloom stuff. So here's one that I find you know entertaining. Bye, yeah, bye.

Speaker 1: 56:38

And this goes back to one of the things that we were talking about earlier, and this is capitalism at its finest. This is Colbert. Sirius Radio has canceled Howard Stern after however many years it's been.

Speaker 3: 56:51

Like 25 years, I think.

Speaker 1: 56:53

But you know, listen, Howard Stern years and years ago is the best thing on the radio, which is why not only did Sirius pick him up, they had him on two channels, right, and he had his own channels. So, but he didn't evolve with the times. Anybody who does anything in the exact same thing in entertainment for 20 years is bound to end, no matter who you are, even if you know and he tried to change with the times and failed, because he got to be very. You know he got to be an angry guy and he's yelling at people, and you know he's very anti-Trump, which you know the American public has shown time and time again. That is not the position to take and he's paying for it. So he has been canceled at the end of this contract. It will not be renewed and Howard Stern's show will go away forever.

Speaker 1: 57:37

And I for one who really never listened to Stern. It's not even that I am happy, it's that I really don't care. Yeah, but he got what he deserved. He got what he earned at the end of the day.

Speaker 3: 57:49

Listen. He asked for it. He came right out and said if you are a Trump supporter, don't watch my show, don't listen to my show. And it was like all right, I mean stop, you're hurting me, you know. I mean I'm good without your. You know, vulgar, mean-spirited, sexist, insulting, cranky old lady schtick. You know it's tired, it's old, we're sick of it. Nobody cares anymore.

Speaker 3: 58:15

And I don't know if I have the numbers on here, do I? I think his viewership went down. Yeah, so it went from like tens of millions to near extinction. But I had the exact number, darn it. I think it was something like from I don't know well millions to about 125,000 followers that he went down to Millions to thousands. That tells you everything you need to know, right there, I believe. Let's see, I'm looking for it here. It was a $500 million SiriusXM contract, so that's what he had. It was a $500 million Sirius XM contract, so that's what he had. It was a $500 million contract. And now it's winding down, it's done.

Speaker 3: 58:53

And it's because of all of that and he, like so many people of that mindset, that leftist mentality or liberal mentality during COVID I think I could be wrong. I think that is when he truly started to lose it. He became one of those terrified and I think he's always had open about like he's a really neurotic guy, like that is his thing, like he's super neurotic. I think he's like a germaphobe you know all that kind of stuff. He's got some stuff going on there mentally germaphobe, you know all that kind of stuff. He's got some stuff going on there mentally, and I think that that was like a final break for him.

Speaker 3: 59:31

It instilled a deep fear of the world and he's already. You know, these people are already in their isolation bubble. They're already so sheltered and in their echo chambers and you know everybody telling them how great they are and they're right about everything. And yes, sir, you know, you know you're the one. This is what happens. So goodbye and same Clay. I watched, I listened, watched, you know, decades ago and even then, only just to hear what the fuss was all about. You know, found him briefly amusing, but overall, you know, it's always been that mean-spirited thing. He's a bully.

Speaker 1: 1:00:05

He's a bully. He's a bully that hides behind a microphone. Yeah, you know, again in a different time in America would get popped in the mouth on a regular basis because he runs his mouth no-transcript. She, you know, she had drug and alcohol issues. She did some, you know, adult film stuff. She did some other things and he brought her onto a show and truthfully, my understanding was at the time she was kind of in a recovery mode, she had very little money to her name brought her on the show, ambushed her with some really, really horrible stuff, bullied the crap out of her and that night she killed herself. And it was a direct result of how he acted to her position. He put her in on the air in front of all of his listeners at the time and he's directly responsible and never held accountable for it.

Speaker 1: 1:00:57

So there's a lot of bringing that up and saying good, it's good to see things. You know you don't ever want to hear that that. But you know, right, justice is being served all these decades later. So but he is, he's a bullet being a bully behind a microphone. Um, yeah, and he's not at all what our man big balls is. I know that you wanted me to say that and not yes, I'm gonna say I can't, I started I can't do it.

Speaker 1: 1:01:21

Our guy listen, this is big balls. I'll say it again.

Speaker 1: 1:01:24

So it's one of the dogers, right? So he was one of these 19 year old programmers who everybody was so afraid of. So him and his significant other, a young lady, were in Washington DC. There was an attempted carjacking by anywhere from two to 12 people. Right, there's no two people have been arrested. So we know for sure. There's more than that. Him and his girlfriend were about to get in a car. There was an attempted carjacking. He shoved her into the car, he closed the door and then he turned and stood up to this crowd of people in Washington DC. We're going to carjack him. He took the beating to protect his girl, right? Yeah, you saw the picture.

Speaker 1: 1:02:01

He got he got sorry. Right, that's his own blood. He got beat up. There were, thankfully, police nearby that responded, reacted and they broke it up. They arrested two on the spot, a male and a female. A bunch of other kids took off, so anywhere from two to 12.

Speaker 1: 1:02:17

But old Big Ball stood up you know, and making that name proud, making it right protected his, his girl, and this is where the discussion of federal control over DC came from President Trump, as well as from Elon Musk. But but you know, that's it, folks. That's a man, right, 19 years old, he's a programmer, but he did the masculine thing, he stood up and he protected his woman and he took the beating, and sometimes that's what you have to do, right? Yeah, the beating Good on him.

Speaker 3: 1:02:45

Yeah, god bless him, and his non-toxic masculinity. That was a man, oh man, because you know, you know, we saw the picture he's. He's a. He's a lean kid, he's a young kid and, uh, he knew what he was, he knew what was going to happen to him, he knew, he knew he wasn't coming out of that clean and, uh, yeah, he's concussed and and, uh, you know, pretty, pretty banged and and bruised, but I bet he is feeling damn good about himself. Yes, good on him. That is a man right there. God bless him.

Speaker 3: 1:03:14

And that was our last topic man, oh man. Like Clay said at the top of the hour, here we have so many other things that we would have loved to talk about and so many things that are ongoing right now that we will be talking about in upcoming episodes as we get more concrete info, because, as you know, we do not like to join in in the presumptions and half-truths and all of that stuff. We want to give you the real information, you know, and that's what we'll do when we have it. So, thank you guys. So much, clay. Great job picking those topics, as always. Will you please close them out for the evening.

Speaker 1: 1:03:51

Yeah, folks. So Elsa and I are about to take our normal annual fall break. We're going to take the next two weeks off. We usually do this at the second half of August or part, you know, section of August, so that we can do a little bit of family time and enjoy our lives. So we're going to take a break for a couple of weeks. We will be back, um, you know, in three weeks. The next two weeks there will be no new shows, Although Elsa is constantly creating content, Um, so there's always stuff to look for from her. But for this show we will be back in a couple of weeks and, uh, we love y'all and maybe we'll put together something to do that live show. But pay attention, we're not going away. We will be back in a couple of weeks and until then, from me, keep moving, keep shooting.

Speaker 3: 1:04:30

We love you and we'll miss you, but we'll see you when we get back. Guys, Take care.

Speaker 2: 1:04:34

Prepare for the re-release of Clay's electrifying novel Keep Moving, keep Shooting. This is book one in his gripping Terry Davis series. Experience an edge-of-your-seat thriller that will leave you breathless. Get your copy of this highly anticipated re-release. It drops July 4th. Don't miss it. She's the voice behind the viral comedy, bold commentary and truth-packed interviews that cut through the chaos. Author, brand creator. Proud conservative Christian this is Elton Curt. No-transcript.