
Philippine Law Updates
Philippine Law Updates is a podcast about relevant Philippine laws and jurisprudence compiled by Amicus Juris Production, a group of volunteer lawyers and law students based in Iloilo City and the Ilonggo Volunteer Lawyers (IVL).
Episodes
28 episodes
PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, VS. LUCKY ENRIQUEZ Y CASIPI, ACCUSED-APPELLANT. [ G.R. No. 264473, August 07, 2024 ]
The police officers were obliged to give the appellant notice, show to her their authority, and demand that they be allowed entry. They may only break open any outer or inner door or window of a house to execute the search warrant if, after suc...
•
Season 1
•
Episode 27
•
9:59

ARNOLD D. NAVALES, REY C. CHAVEZ, ROSINDO J. ALMONTE, AND ALFONSO E. LAID, PETITIONERS, VS. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, RESPONDENT.[ G.R. No. 219598, August 07, 2024 ]
As to the third element of a violation of Section 3 (e) of RA 3019 or the Anti-Graft and Practices Act, the Court finds that the same is also absent. Case law identifies the two ways by which said section may be committed, namely: (a) cau...
•
Season 1
•
Episode 26
•
11:59

ARSENIO MANAGUELOD Y TANDAYU, PETITIONER, VS. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, RESPONDENT [ G.R. No. 261612, August 14, 2024 ]
In order to secure a conviction of an accused under Section 32 of Republic Act No. 7166, the prosecution must prove that: (a) the person is bearing, carrying, or transporting firearms or other deadly weapons; (b) such possession occurs during t...
•
Season 1
•
Episode 25
•
10:54

ROGELIO GARALDE MENDAROS, ROMEO DELA CRUZ, JR., JULIUS CAESAR GUTIERREZ, REY ABALOS, JEREMIAH MUGA, KING MICHAEL MUIT, AND JUNE SUAREZ, PETITIONERS, VS. LAZADA E-SERVICES PHIL., INC./ALLAN DAVID ANCHETA, RESPONDENTS. [ G.R. No. 257821, August 19, 2024 ]
In this 2024 decision, the Supreme Court recognized another classification of employment which is the fixed-term. A fixed-term employment is an arrangement wherein an employee is hired for projects with pre-determined completion or in a work wh...
•
Season 1
•
Episode 24
•
4:04

PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, VS. BENJAMIN OLIDAN Y ERLANDEZ, CRISPIN ARANETA Y PELAEZ, LYNFER BICODO Y BAYLON, ROGELIO CALORING,** ANNABELLE OLIDAN Y ARANETA, GODOFREDO NAVANES Y LORENZO,*** PO1 JOSE LONMAR ZAPATOS Y FIEL, AND PO1 ANTONI
It is necessary that a conspirator should have performed some overt act as a direct or indirect contribution to the execution of the crime committed. The overt act may consist of active participation in the actual commission of the...
•
Season 1
•
Episode 24
•
11:02

MARCELINO DELA CRUZ LINGGANAY, PETITIONER, VS. DEL MONTE LAND TRANSPORT BUS COMPANY, INC. AND NARCISO MORALES, RESPONDENTS. [ G.R. No. 254976, August 20, 2024 ]
An employer cannot legally be compelled to continue with the employment of a person admittedly guilty of gross negligence in the performance of his duties. This holds true specially if the employee's continued tenure is patently inimical to the...
•
Season 1
•
Episode 23
•
6:04

PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, VS. DIOSDADO REBUTON Y MELENDEZ A.K.A. "DADO" AND MARILOU REBUTAZO Y ENCABO A.K.A. "LOI," ACCUSED; MARILOU REBUTAZO Y ENCABO A.K.A. "LOI," ACCUSED-APPELLANT. [ G.R. No. 224581, October 09, 2024 ]
The absence of the insulating witnesses at the time of apprehension and for approximately 30 minutes thereafter constituted a significant gap in the chain of custody, which casts reasonable doubt as to the identity and integrity of the corp...
•
Season 1
•
Episode 22
•
4:40

IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT OF AMPARO IN FAVOR OF HENRY V. TAYO, JR., ALIAS "MAGELAN TAYO," HIEZEL V. TAYO, MERLINA V. TAYO, AND HENRY C. TAYO, SR., PETITIONERS, VS. PMAJ JOERY T. PUERTO, STATION COMMANDER OF BACOLOD CITY POLICE S
A disappearance has a doubly paralyzing impact: on the victim, who is removed from the protection of the law, frequently subjected to torture and in constant fear for their lives; and on their families, ignorant of the fate of their loved ones,...
•
Season 1
•
Episode 21
•
7:14

ROEL GEMENTIZA PADILLO, PETITIONER, VS. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, RESPONDENT. [ G.R. No. 271012, October 09, 2024 ]
For the valid issuance of a search warrant, specific requisites must be met to prevent abuse of power, viz.: (1) probable cause is present; (2) such probable cause must be determined personally by the judge; (3) the judge must examine, in writi...
•
Season 1
•
Episode 20
•
3:51

PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, VS. EDUARDO DELA CRUZ Y TOLENTINO, ACCUSED-APPELLANT., (G.R. No. 267163, October 29, 2024)
The mental disability of the victim was not disputed. However, the victim's level of disability has not been equated to a specific "mental age." Evidence must be adduced to aid the court in determining not only the existence of the illne...
•
Season 1
•
Episode 19
•
9:47

PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, VS. SIM O. MATA, JR., ACCUSED-APPELLANT. [ G.R. No. 255703, October 23, 2024 ]
It is true that under Section 481 of R.A. No. 7160, otherwise known as the "Local Government Code of 1991," a legal officer, such as Mata, is required to render his opinion on any question of law when requested to do so by his appointing author...
•
Season 1
•
Episode 18
•
6:11

PACIFIC OCEAN MANNING, INC. AND/OR V. SHIPS UK LTD./NORDIC AMERICAN TANKERS LIMITED, PETITIONERS, VS. NICOLAS F. BOBILES, RESPONDENT. [ G.R. No. 259982, October 28, 2024 ]
Areferral to a third doctor is mandatory when: (1) there is a valid and timely assessment by the company-designated physician, and (2) the seafarer-appointed doctor refuted such assessment. A seafarer's compliance with the POEA-SEC ...
•
Season 1
•
Episode 17
•
5:44

SONIA BALAGTAS, PETITIONER, VS. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, RESPONDENT. [ G.R. No. 257483, October 30, 2024 ]
In summary, given the prosecution's inability to prove that Balagtas enjoyed the higher degree of confidence of Visatech, her conviction for the crime of theft cannot be aggravated to qualified theft. The failure to establish this element rende...
•
Season 1
•
Episode 16
•
3:33

FLORSITA RODEO, MARCO RODEO, DEBORAH RODEO, ULDARICO RODEO, JR., AND MYRALYNN R. HULLESCA, PETITIONERS, VS. HEIRS OF BURGOS MALAYA, REPRESENTED BY CAESAR SAUL MALAYA, PURIFICACION MALAYA, GINA M. MERANO, CHEREMIE MERANO, AND REGIE MALAYA, RESPONDENTS. [ G
This 2024 decision of the Supreme Court ruled that cultivating the land of another does not automatically mean that an agricultural leasehold relation arises between the tiller and the landowner. The party claiming to be an agricultural lessee ...
•
Season 1
•
Episode 15
•
5:03

PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, VS. JOEMARIE UBANON Y MAN-AN ALIAS "JOMARE FRANCESCO" ALIAS "ALEX" [D-BJMP-V], ACCUSED-APPELLANT. (G.R. No. 270934, October 30, 2024)
It is common design which is the essence of conspiracy — conspirators may act separately or together, in different manners but always leading to the same unlawful result. The character and effect of conspiracy are not to be adjudged by dismembe...
•
Season 1
•
Episode 14
•
3:29

DAALCO DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, PETITIONER, VS. PALMAS DEL MAR HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION (PDM-HOA), REPRESENTED BY GIL FERNANDEZ, PRESIDENT, RESPONDENT.
A plain reading of the fourth portion or last paragraph of Section 31 conveys that the developer is required to donate the roads, alleys, sidewalks, and playgrounds to the local government unit. There is no mention of other open spaces, such as...
•
Season 1
•
Episode 13
•
4:17

HILARIO COSME Y TERENAL, PETITIONER, VS. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, RESPONDENT. (G.R. No. 261113, November 04, 2024)
This begs the question as to whether it was Cosme's burden to prove the existence of a valid license in favor of his employer in addition to the DDO that it had issued to him. Phrased differently, may a PSP be held guilty of illegal possession ...
•
Season 1
•
Episode 12
•
6:21

MARIA LINA P. QUIRIT-FIGARIDO, PETITIONER, VS. EDWIN L. FIGARIDO, RESPONDENT (G.R. No. 259520, November 05, 2024)
It must be recapitulated that based on the rules and jurisprudence, the aggrieved or injured innocent spouse of either marriage has the sole right to file the petition for the declaration of nullity of the bigamous marriage. Proceeding therefro...
•
Season 1
•
Episode 11
•
4:55

PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, VS. MAGDALENA K. LUPOYON, CLARK CHATONGNA NGAYA, EDMUNDO CHALLIIS SIDCHAYAO, FERNANDO YACAM-MA CABLOG, ALBERT T. MARAFO, AND DANILO RABINA LUCAS, ACCUSED-APPELLANTS. (G.R. No. 259467, November 11, 2024)
Here, accused-appellant/s are charged with "caus[ing] undue injury to the Municipality of Barlig, Mountain Province by causing the" implementation of the Open Gym and Pathway projects.Clearly, accused-appellant...
•
7:24

PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, VS. LARISSA NADEL DOMINGUEZ, ACCUSED-APPELLANT. [ G.R. No. 267140, November 06, 2024 ]
As a general rule, a buy-bust operation, considered as a form of entrapment, is a valid means of arresting violators of Republic Act No. 9165. It is an effective way of apprehending law offenders in the act of committing a crime. In a buy-bust ...
•
Season 1
•
Episode 9
•
5:07

ERNESTO M. TELLEZ AND JOVINO M. TELLEZ, REPRESENTED BY MELANIA T. MAGPALE, PETITIONERS, VS. SPOUSES JOSE JOSON AND JOVITA JOSON, RESPONDENTS. (G.R. No. 233909, November 11, 2024)
In this 2024 Decision of the Supreme Court, it declared void the transfers of ownership, rights, or possession over lands acquired pursuant to Presidential Decree 27 (PD 27). It also emphasized that any waiver and transfer...
•
Season 1
•
Episode 8
•
4:59

NOE R. PAGARAO, JR. AND REBECCA CABALLA, PETITIONERS, VS. IMMACULADA T. TRINIDAD, RESPONDENT.[ G.R. No. 265223, November 13, 2024 ]
There have been many cases discussing the distinction between actions for unlawful detainer and those for forcible entry. However, the common thread has always been the Court's consistent adoption of the following precept—the border between for...
•
Season 1
•
Episode 7
•
6:02

GODOFREDO V. ARQUIZA, PETITIONER, VS. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, RESPONDENT. (G.R. No. 261627, November 13, 2024)
This is the 2024 Supreme Court decision laying down the four-fold test to determine whether to apply absolute privilege to statements made in the course of quasi-judicial proceedings, or in steps necessarily preliminary thereto.#qu...
•
Season 1
•
Episode 6
•
5:58

SPOUSES ORENCIO S. MANALESE AND ELOISA B. MANALESE, AND ARIES B. MANALESE, PETITIONERS, VS. THE ESTATE OF THE LATE SPOUSES NARCISO AND OFELIA FERRERAS, REPRESENTED BY ITS SPECIAL ADMINISTRATOR, DANILO S. FERRERAS, RESPONDENT.
Any public officer or employee who knowingly approves or assists in securing a decision allowing reconstitution in favor of any person not entitled thereto shall be subject to criminal prosecution and, upon conviction, shall be liable for impri...
•
Season 1
•
Episode 5
•
3:26

JOEL PANCHO BIGCAS, PETITIONER, VS. COURT OF APPEALS AND PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, RESPONDENTS. (G.R. No. 265579, November 26, 2024)
This is a 2024 decision by the Philippine Supreme Court acquitting Joel Pancho Bigcas of violation of Section 3(c) of Republic Act No. 3019. It ruled that it is clear that Bigcas did not act with dishonest or fraudulent purpos...
•
Season 1
•
Episode 4
•
6:55
