.png)
Looks Good on Paper
Looks Good on Paper flips hiring on its head. Hosted by Andrew Wood and Anita Chauhan, we dive into why CVs and "perfect fits" are overrated. Through fun, insightful conversations with industry experts, we explore how skills, potential, and real experience should be the focus of hiring... not what looks good on paper.
Quick, candid, and packed with actionable insights, we’re here to rewrite the rules of hiring, one episode at a time.
Looks Good on Paper
Challenging Hiring Norms: What Looks Good on Paper Gets Hiring Wrong
Use Left/Right to seek, Home/End to jump to start or end. Hold shift to jump forward or backward.
The rules of hiring were written for a different era, by people who needed to manage risk at scale, not find the best person for a specific job. Most of those rules are still in place — and most of them are quietly producing worse outcomes than the alternatives.
Degree requirements for roles that don't need degrees. Interview processes that test presentation rather than capability. Reference checks that produce no useful information. The standard hiring playbook is full of practices that persist because they're defensible, not because they work.
Martin Hauck is a fractional HR consultant and founder of People People Group, a community of over 5,000 HR, recruitment, and operations professionals. In this episode of Looks Good on Paper, he challenges the norms that still govern most hiring decisions, explains what he's seen actually work at the companies doing it differently, and makes the case for looking past what looks good on paper.
What you'll learn:
→ Which standard hiring practices persist despite producing poor outcomes
→ What the companies doing hiring differently actually do instead
→ How to challenge inherited hiring norms inside an organisation that resists change
GUEST
Martin Hauck — Fractional HR Consultant & Founder, People People Group
LinkedIn → https://www.linkedin.com/in/martinhauck/
YOUR HOSTS
Anita Chauhan — Fractional CMO, co-host
LinkedIn → https://www.linkedin.com/in/anitachauhan/
CHAPTER MARKERS:
00:00 Intro
00:35 Introduction
01:44 Biggest Hiring Mistake
05:37 Unknown Hidden Bias
10:48 Most Surprising Hire
15:01 Wildcard: How Can We Look At Candidates Differently?
18:30 Wrap Up
19:33 Outro
LISTEN & FOLLOW
Spotify → https://open.spotify.com/show/0dbfz6y0tMq3crViHQD66H
Apple Podcasts → https://podcasts.apple.com/podcast/id1625835562
All episodes → https://looksgoodonpaper.buzzsprout.com
WATCH ON YOUTUBE - https://youtu.be/D1y4yxhH34g
POWERED BY WILLO
Hire humans, not resumes → https://www.willo.video/looks-good-on-paper
CONNECT WITH US
LinkedIn → https://www.linkedin.com/company/10170893
If this episode changed how you think about hiring, share it with one person who needs to hear it. And subscribe — we're rewriting the rules of hiring, one episode at a time.
Most hiring norms persist not because they produce good outcomes but because they are defensible. Degree requirements, unstructured interviews, and pro forma reference checks are difficult to challenge internally because they look rigorous. The companies that hire best have replaced defensibility with validity — asking not 'is this practice standard?' but 'does this practice predict the performance we actually want?'
Show Resources
- Willo: willo.video - The most cost-effective way to screen candidates at scale. Interview candidates anywhere & at any time
- CV Free Toolkit: cvfree.me/join - Break up with the CV and get everything you need to modernize your hiring approach with skills-based assessments
- Anita Chauhan: linkedin.com/in/anitachauhan - Connect with the host
