Heliox: Where Evidence Meets Empathy 🇨🇦
We make rigorous science accessible, accurate, and unforgettable.
Produced by Michelle Bruecker and Scott Bleackley, it features reviews of emerging research and ideas from leading thinkers, curated under our creative direction with AI assistance for voice, imagery, and composition. Systemic voices and illustrative images of people are representative tools, not depictions of specific individuals.
We dive deep into peer-reviewed research, pre-prints, and major scientific works—then bring them to life through the stories of the researchers themselves. Complex ideas become clear. Obscure discoveries become conversation starters. And you walk away understanding not just what scientists discovered, but why it matters and how they got there.
Independent, moderated, timely, deep, gentle, clinical, global, and community conversations about things that matter. Breathe Easy, we go deep and lightly surface the big ideas.
Heliox: Where Evidence Meets Empathy 🇨🇦
Their Heads Are Missing - What That Means for All of Us
Use Left/Right to seek, Home/End to jump to start or end. Hold shift to jump forward or backward.
📖 Read: https://helioxpodcast.substack.com
🎥 YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCd5BbCEeC3Z6dp-nNjWRbBw
🎙️Available for Broadcast: https://exchange.prx.org/group_accounts/253118-heliox_where_evidence_meets_empathy
In the summer of 2022, archaeologists excavating a prehistoric trench in southwestern Slovakia made one of the most haunting discoveries in European prehistory: 77 human skeletons, nearly all missing their heads, deposited in a massive enclosure ditch at a Neolithic settlement dating to 5300–4950 BCE.
In this episode of Heliox: Where Evidence Meets Empathy, we dive deep into the 2026 paper Neolithic Bodies in Vrabel, investigating the forensic evidence, the anthropological context, and the profound unanswered question at the heart of this discovery: where did the 77 skulls go?
We cover:
🏚️ The LBK (Linear Bandkeramik) culture — Europe's first farmers and their monumental longhouses
🗺️ Magnetometry mapping of 313 longhouse footprints at one of the largest Neolithic mega-sites ever found
🧱 The paranoia wall — a 1.3-km fortification whose gates faced the settlement's own neighbours
🦴 Taphonomy — the forensic science proving the bodies were placed fresh, the decapitations surgical
💀 Dividual personhood — why the head was the physical seat of the soul and the lineage
🌍 The late LBK crisis — and two other chilling sites: Aspern-Schletz and Herxheim
❓ The 200-year radiocarbon blind spot — why we still can't say if this took one afternoon or many years
And finally: a reflection on what this 7,000-year-old story tells us about modern identity, gated communities, and what communities reach for when their world begins to break.
This is Heliox: Where Evidence Meets Empathy
Independent, moderated, timely, deep, gentle, clinical, global, and community conversations about things that matter. Breathe Easy, we go deep and lightly surface the big ideas.
Disclosure: This podcast uses AI-generated synthetic voices for a material portion of the audio content, in line with Apple Podcasts guidelines.
We make rigorous science accessible, accurate, and unforgettable.
Produced by Michelle Bruecker and Scott Bleackley, it features reviews of emerging research and ideas from leading thinkers, curated under our creative direction with AI assistance for voice, imagery, and composition. Systemic voices and illustrative images of people are representative tools, not depictions of specific individuals.
We dive deep into peer-reviewed research, pre-prints, and major scientific works—then bring them to life through the stories of the researchers themselves. Complex ideas become clear. Obscure discoveries become conversation starters. And you walk away understanding not just what scientists discovered, but why it matters and how they got there.
Independent, moderated, timely, deep, gentle, clinical, global, and community conversations about things that matter. Breathe Easy, we go deep and lightly surface the big ideas.
Spoken word, short and sweet, with rhythm and a catchy beat.
http://tinyurl.com/stonefolksongs
This is Heliox, where evidence meets empathy. Independent, moderated, timely, deep, gentle, clinical, global, and community conversations about things that matter. Breathe easy. We go deep and lightly surface the big ideas. I want you to close your eyes for a second. Imagine you are standing in a wide, flat agricultural field in modern day Slovakia.
Speaker 2:And it's hot. The sun is just beating down on your neck.
Speaker 1:Exactly. It's the summer of 2022. You're part of an archaeological team and you're on your hands and knees in a trench. You're carefully brushing away this yellowish, incredibly fine dirt.
Speaker 2:Right. It's called lowest soil. It's essentially this glacial dust that blew across Europe thousands of years ago.
Speaker 1:Yeah.
Speaker 2:It is literally as fine as flour.
Speaker 1:Yeah, like flour. And you're excavating this massive ditch that has been filled in and hidden beneath the earth for, I mean, seven millennia.
Speaker 2:Which is the kind of meticulous, back-breaking work that archaeology usually demands, right? Like hours of scraping away millimeters of soil just to find a single shard of pottery or maybe a flint flake.
Speaker 1:But on this day, the brush hits something solid, bone. So you clear away the lois and you uncover a human skeleton. Right. Then you shift slightly, keep brushing, and right next to it, there's another, and then another. The dirt just keeps giving way to more bone.
Speaker 2:It's an excavator's worst nightmare and best dream at the same time.
Speaker 1:Seriously. Because soon, you are looking down at this tangled, chaotic mass of human bodies. At least 77 of them just piled on top of each other in the bottom of this prehistoric trench. Yeah. But as the sweat drips off your nose and you look closer at this massive tangle of remains, the sheer scale of the discovery is, well, it's eclipsed by a glaring, terrifying omission.
Speaker 2:The heads.
Speaker 1:Yes. Out of these 77 bodies, almost none of them have heads.
Speaker 2:That kind of discovery completely paralyzes the site. Because when we picture prehistoric burials, we have this, you know, this idealized image of someone carefully laid to rest.
Speaker 1:Right. Like a quiet grave.
Speaker 2:Exactly. Quad grave, maybe a ceramic pot placed near their hands, a polished stone axe by their side, a neat orderly farewell.
Speaker 1:Yeah.
Speaker 2:What you just described is a profound disruption. It's a rupture in literally everything we expect to see.
Speaker 1:It's a 7,000-year-old cold case. And today's deep dive is taking us straight into that trench in Slovakia. We are unpacking this massive, fascinating 2026 archaeological paper titled Neolithic Bodies in Vrabel.
Speaker 2:It's a great paper.
Speaker 1:It really is. It's an investigation into one of the most astonishing, chilling discoveries from the people who essentially invented the farming lifestyle in Central Europe, a group known as the Linear Bankeromic Culture.
Speaker 2:Yeah, or we usually just call them the LBK.
Speaker 1:The LBK. And our mission for this deep dive is to figure out what went so terribly wrong for them, because we aren't just here to gawk at a prehistoric crime scene, right?
Speaker 2:No, definitely not.
Speaker 1:We're going to decode the forensic clues left in that yellow dust to understand a massive content wide cultural crisis. We're going to figure out how these early humans viewed life, death and what it actually means to be a person.
Speaker 2:Because how a society treats its dead is basically a mirror. You know, it reflects their deepest anxieties, their view of the cosmos and well, what they valued above all else.
Speaker 1:Let's let's be honest. You all love a good 7000 year old mystery. Who doesn't? Right. OK, let's unpack this. Set the scene for us. Who are these people? Because when I hear 5500 BCE, I think of, I don't know, small struggling bands of people huddling around a fire.
Speaker 2:Barely surviving.
Speaker 1:Yeah, barely surviving. But that's not what was happening here.
Speaker 2:Far from it. I mean, the LBK culture represents an explosion of new technology and a totally new way of living. Before this, Europe was populated mostly by highly mobile hunter-gatherers. But the LBK folks brought something revolutionary out of the Carpathian Basin, a fully packaged agricultural lifestyle.
Speaker 1:Wow.
Speaker 2:Yeah, they had domestic crops like emmer and einkorn wheat. They brought domesticated cattle, sheep, pigs, and they brought this very distinct style of pottery.
Speaker 1:Right. The paper mentioned the pottery. It's decorated with these sweeping and sized linear bands.
Speaker 2:Exactly, which is literally where their German name, Linearband Ceramic, comes from.
Speaker 1:Linearband Ceramics makes sense. And they built these massive structures. That's the part that really surprised me in the research.
Speaker 2:A lot of were longhouses.
Speaker 1:Yes. We aren't talking about little temporary huts made of animal skins. We are talking about timber longhouses.
Speaker 2:It's monumental architecture for its time. A standard LBK longhouse could be anywhere from 15 to 40 meters long.
Speaker 1:That is huge.
Speaker 2:Yeah. They were constructed using massive old-growth oak trunks for the main support posts. And the walls were wattle and daub.
Speaker 1:Wait, what exactly is wattle and daub? I've heard the term, but...
Speaker 2:Oh, so it means they wove flexible branches like hazel or willow between smaller posts, kind of like a basket. And then they smeared the whole thing with a thick plaster of clay, mud, and straw to insulate it.
Speaker 1:Wow. It sounds incredibly permanent. Like, they were laying down roots in a way humanity just hadn't really done before in this region.
Speaker 2:It was a profound shift in the human psyche. I mean, they were no longer moving through the landscape. They were dominating it.
Speaker 1:They were clearing ancient forests, planting fields.
Speaker 2:Exactly. building structures designed to last generations. And at this specific site we are talking about today, Vrabel, located in southwest Slovakia, we are looking at one of the absolute largest LBK settlements ever discovered.
Speaker 1:The scale of Vrabel is staggering. The researchers used a technique called a geophysical survey to map the site before they even put a single shovel in the ground, right?
Speaker 2:Yeah, magnetometry.
Speaker 1:Right. And they found the outlines of at least 313 longhouses, Which, I was trying to figure out how they actually count houses that rotted away 7,000 years ago. Like, without digging up the whole valley.
Speaker 2:It's brilliant, actually. It comes down to understanding the construction process of those waddle and daub walls we just talked about. To get enough clay to plaster a 30-meter-long house, the builders didn't haul dirt from miles away. They just dug long, deep pits right next to the exterior walls of the house.
Speaker 1:Oh, that makes sense. Lazy, but efficient.
Speaker 2:Very efficient. And over the decades, those extraction pits slowly filled up with household refuse. Ash from the hearths, broken pottery, food waste, and eventually topsoil.
Speaker 1:So they essentially created parallel trash trenches right next to their houses.
Speaker 2:Exactly. And that refuse-filled dirt has a fundamentally different magnetic signature than the untouched natural subsoil surrounding it.
Speaker 1:Really?
Speaker 2:Well, the organic material and the ash are highly magnetic compared to the pure LSS. So when researchers ran magnetometers over this modern agricultural field, those parallel lateral pits showed up on the computer screen as bright anomalies.
Speaker 1:Oh, wow.
Speaker 2:It creates a perfect ghostly blueprint of the entire settlement. You can see the exact orientation and size of almost every house that ever stood there.
Speaker 1:It's like taking a prehistoric x-ray of the Earth.
Speaker 2:That's a great way to put it.
Speaker 1:And the x-ray showed that these 313 houses were clustered into three very distinct spatially separate neighborhoods. You have a northern neighborhood, a southeastern one, and a southwestern one. Each of these zones is about 15 hectares in size with a little creek running between them.
Speaker 2:We should point out not all 313 houses were standing at the exact same time.
Speaker 1:All right. The paper is careful to mention that. Why is that important?
Speaker 2:It's a crucial detail for understanding their society. The LBK operated on what archaeologists call the yard model or the farmstead model. Think of it like a multi-generational family plot. Even a well-built timber longhouse has a lifespan. After maybe 30 to 50 years, the wooden posts start to rot in the ground, the roof sags, and it becomes unsafe.
Speaker 1:So they don't pack up and move to a new valley.
Speaker 2:No, they just step out their front door and build a new house a few yards away.
Speaker 1:Oh, I see.
Speaker 2:The family lineage stays on the exact same plot of land for centuries. So when we see 313 house blueprints on the magnetic scan, we're actually looking at several generations of rebuilding.
Speaker 1:So a single continuous household might leave behind the footprints of five or six different long houses overlapping slightly in their designated yard.
Speaker 2:Precisely.
Speaker 1:But even when you do the math and divide the houses by the generations, Vrabel was still a massive, bustling metropolis by early Neolithic standards.
Speaker 2:Oh, absolutely. Hundreds of people living cheek by jowl, sharing resources, farming the same valley.
Speaker 1:Which brings us to the architectural anomaly that makes Vrabel so weird. And honestly, a little paranoid.
Speaker 2:The enclosure.
Speaker 1:Yeah, the enclosure. Because the southwestern neighborhood, just one of the three, is completely surrounded by a massive wall system.
Speaker 2:It's intense. It's a 1.3 kilometer long double ditch. You have an outer trench that is up to 4 meters wide and 2 meters deep. Right next to it is a slightly smaller inner trench. And inside of that, there was a massive wooden palisade fence.
Speaker 1:Okay, try to conceptualize the sheer physical toll of creating that.
Speaker 2:Right, no steel excavator.
Speaker 1:Exactly. They didn't even have bronze shovels. The earth was moved using picks made from the antlers of red deer. and shovels fashioned from the shoulder blades of cattle.
Speaker 2:Digging a trench that is almost a mile long, a dozen feet across, and over six feet deep represents an astronomical expenditure of calories and human labor. But wait, hold on. This is the part that makes absolutely no sense to me.
Speaker 1:What's that?
Speaker 2:If I am expending that much back-breaking labor to build a fortress, I am going to put it around my entire town to protect my people. But they only walled off a third of the settlement.
Speaker 1:It is strange.
Speaker 2:If I live in the northern neighborhood, I'm looking across the creek at the guys in the southwestern neighborhood digging a moat around their houses, and I'm thinking, uh, guys, what do you know that we don't? Like, what are they hiding from?
Speaker 1:Were they trying to keep some foreign raiding party out, or were they trying to protect themselves from their own neighbors?
Speaker 2:Well, the archaeology provides a brilliantly subtle clue to answer that exact question. When the researchers mapped the ditch, they found at least six entrances.
Speaker 1:Places where the ditch was intentionally left undug.
Speaker 2:Exactly. To create a land bridge, allowing people to pass through the Palisade.
Speaker 1:So a gate, basically.
Speaker 2:Yes. But look at the orientation of those gates. They face outward, into the empty, broader landscape. They face away from the other two neighborhoods of Rabel.
Speaker 1:Oh, wow. I see where you're going with this.
Speaker 2:If the inhabitants of the southwestern neighborhood were terrified of an unknown foreign enemy coming from the distant hills, military logic dictates you want your gates facing your allies.
Speaker 1:Right. You want your entrances opening toward the other two neighborhoods so you can easily share resources or communicate or retreat.
Speaker 2:But instead, they turn their backs on the rest of the town. The solid, unbroken, most defensive sections of their massive wall face directly toward the other two neighborhoods.
Speaker 1:That is wild. It strongly implies that the people they feared, or at least the people they felt an urgent need to separate themselves from, were the people living just a stone's throw away.
Speaker 2:This wasn't necessarily a defense against an invading army. This screams of intra-community strife. We are looking at a society experiencing severe, paranoid internal friction.
Speaker 1:A prehistoric gated community born out of neighborhood tension. That is fascinating.
Speaker 2:It really is.
Speaker 1:And it turns out this massive 1.3 kilometer ditch wasn't just a physical barrier. As the archaeologists started actually digging into the dirt, filling the ditch, they realized it was a stage.
Speaker 2:A stage for some incredibly elaborate, bizarre rituals involving the dead.
Speaker 1:Yeah, the ditch served as a boundary, both physically and spiritually. And the way they interacted with that boundary changed depending on where you were standing.
Speaker 2:Let's trace the perimeter based on what they uncovered.
Speaker 1:Okay, let's start over at Entrance 1. It's the largest entrance on the southeast side of the enclosure.
Speaker 2:Now, if you just excavated this one spot, you might walk away thinking the LBK people were totally normal.
Speaker 1:Right, because the burials at Entrance 1 align with what we consider standard funerary practices. Individuals are placed in shallow pits. They are typically positioned on their side in a crouched fetal position.
Speaker 2:Almost as if they're sleeping.
Speaker 1:Yeah, there is one individual here who really stands out in the paper. An adult male buried squarely in the center of the entranceway.
Speaker 2:Oh, the VIP burial. The VIP.
Speaker 1:He was buried with six distinct ceramic containers. He had a long, beautifully crafted flint blade. He had a flat stone adze for woodworking. They even found the remains of half a sheep placed in the grave with him.
Speaker 2:That is a lot of wealth to bury in the ground. It demonstrates a significant investment of resources by the mourning community.
Speaker 1:And he isn't alone. Nearby, there is a pregnant woman carefully placed in that same sleeping posture. There is a child buried with a ceramic vessel and a perforated spondylus disc.
Speaker 2:The spondylus shell is an incredibly important detail.
Speaker 1:I actually looked that up because it sounded so out of place. That's a marine shell, right?
Speaker 2:Yes, it's a spiny oyster shell. And you do not find spondylus in the rivers of landlocked Slovakia.
Speaker 1:No kidding.
Speaker 2:Those shells were harvested in the Agen or the Mediterranean Sea and traded across thousands of miles of complex Neolithic exchange networks.
Speaker 1:Wow.
Speaker 2:Owning a spondylus ornament was a major status symbol. It carried immense prestige.
Speaker 1:So at entrance one, we see care, we see reverence. The community is taking the time to honor these specific individuals, equipping them with food, tools, and luxury goods for the afterlife.
Speaker 2:The paper even suggests some of these graves had wooden structures built over them that eventually collapsed. It's all very respectful.
Speaker 1:But then you start walking westward along the southern perimeter of the wall, and the vibe completely deteriorates. Yeah. The respectful sleeping burials vanish, and the headless skeletons begin.
Speaker 2:The researchers started finding these strange pairs of headless bodies scattered along the ditch. Let's look at entrance four, the western terminal. They dig down, and they find two headless skeletons.
Speaker 1:And oddly, they are accompanied by a third skeleton that does have its head, but someone took a massive 30-centimeter-long flat rock and laid it directly over the skull.
Speaker 2:It's a highly deliberate physical suppression of the head. Even when the skull is allowed to remain with the body, it is singled out for heavy, symbolic manipulation.
Speaker 1:Pinning it down.
Speaker 2:Exactly. The weight of that stone pinning the head down speaks to a very specific cosmological intent.
Speaker 1:Then you move to Entrance 3, another pair of headless skeletons dumped in the inner ditch. Move east to Entrance 2, another pair of headless bodies stretched out along the base of the trench.
Speaker 2:It's a repeating motif. Pairs of humans stripped of their heads, placed precisely at the boundaries and entrances of the settlement.
Speaker 1:And we should note the conditions here, Ray, because the preservation isn't perfect everywhere.
Speaker 2:Right. The inner ditch is generally shallower. And because it was likely dug earlier, the bone preservation there is quite poor.
Speaker 1:But even with the degraded bones, preliminary in situ evaluations confirm the skulls are missing from those remains as well.
Speaker 2:Yes, it's the outer ditch. However, specifically, the later deeper construction phases where the preservation is phenomenal.
Speaker 1:And that phenomenal preservation is what allowed the team to blow this mystery wide open because those pairs of bodies were just the breadcrumbs. Oh, definitely. In 2022, the archaeologists opened up an area just east of Entrance 2. They called it Trench 23. This is the core of the mass deposition.
Speaker 2:When they first opened Trench 23, they documented about 37 skeletons. That alone would be a major career-defining find for an archaeologist.
Speaker 1:Right. But they kept expanding the trench over the next two years, in 2023 and 2024. And the bones just kept coming.
Speaker 2:It's astounding.
Speaker 1:At the time this paper was published, over a stretch of just 25 meters of the ditch, they had uncovered 77 headless human skeletons, plus exactly one complete skeleton.
Speaker 2:I really want you to try to visualize this scene, because this is not a neat row of Doug Graves.
Speaker 1:No, it's total chaos. The bodies are in utterly haphazard positions. Some are lying prone, face down in the dirt. Some are supine, staring up.
Speaker 2:Some bodies are twisted violently at the waist.
Speaker 1:Yeah, limbs are splayed out awkwardly or tucked tightly and unnaturally underneath their torsos. They are literally piled on top of each other.
Speaker 2:And surrounding these mostly intact bodies are hundreds of scattered random bones. Just loose arm bones, a stray rib, a thigh bone mixed in with the soil.
Speaker 1:The density of the remains is just difficult to comprehend. The paper maps it out beautifully.
Speaker 2:Yeah, 44 of those headless skeletons were packed into the first 9.5 meters of the ditch. Then there's a slight gap, then another tight cluster of eight bodies, then another cluster of 12.
Speaker 1:It creates a continuous undulating carpet of human remains paving the bottom of the trench.
Speaker 2:It really does.
Speaker 1:So when I first read about this chaotic pile of bodies, my immediate question was about the timeline.
Speaker 2:The timeline is everything here.
Speaker 1:Right. If you have 77 bodies tossed into a ditch, did these people die over the winter, rot in a field or temporary grave somewhere? And then months later, someone just gathered up the decomposing bodies with a rake and tossed them into the ditch to get rid of them.
Speaker 2:Or were they dumped in fresh right after they died?
Speaker 1:Exactly. How do you even prove that 7000 years later?
Speaker 2:This is where the true detective work begins, and it relies on a scientific discipline called taphonomy. Taphonomy. Yes. Taphonomy is the study of what happens to a biological organism after it dies. It covers how the soft tissue decays, how scavengers interact with it, how it gets buried, and how the bones move as the ligaments break down.
Speaker 1:It's the ultimate forensic tool for reading the past.
Speaker 2:It is. Okay, let's apply some taphonomy to Trench 23. The researchers noted that the cervical vertebrae, the bones of the neck on these headless bodies, were perfectly aligned in anatomical position.
Speaker 1:Okay, wait, what does that mean in practical terms?
Speaker 2:It tells us an immense amount about the decomposition process. In forensic anthropology, there is a very well-documented sequence to how human joints disarticulate.
Speaker 1:Like fall apart.
Speaker 2:Right. Connected tissues, muscles, and ligaments don't all rot at the same speed. The neck region, the cervical spine, is what we call a highly labile articulation.
Speaker 1:Labile meaning unstable.
Speaker 2:Exactly. Because it relies heavily on soft tissue for support rather than deep interlocking bone sockets, it is incredibly prone to falling apart very early in the decomposition timeline.
Speaker 1:So once the muscles and the ligaments of the neck rot away, there is nothing holding those little vertebrae together.
Speaker 2:Right. If you try to move a rotting body, the neck bones are just going to scatter everywhere.
Speaker 1:But they didn't.
Speaker 2:No. And the evidence doesn't stop at the neck. The researchers also examined the extremities. The human hand and the human foot are incredibly complex structures.
Speaker 1:Yeah, tons of little bones.
Speaker 2:Each hand is made up of 27 individual small bones. They are held together almost entirely by a web of ligaments. When a body is left exposed to the elements, or if it's dragged or moved after decomposition is set in, those tiny bones of the hands and feet are always the very first things to detach.
Speaker 1:They just fall off and get lost in the dirt.
Speaker 2:Precisely. But the paper states that in Trench 23, the hands and feet of these headless bodies were perfectly intact and articulated. Every little finger bone was exactly where it should be.
Speaker 1:Oh, wow. Which leads us to a definitive conclusion. Those bodies were relatively fresh when they were placed into that ditch.
Speaker 2:Yes. They had not been rotting in a field for weeks or months. the ligaments holding their spines, their hands, and their feet together were still strong, elastic, and entirely intact when they were thrown into the trench.
Speaker 1:That is a massive realization. They went into the earth fresh. And that realization leads to an even darker piece of evidence. The researchers found some of the bodies positioned in a very specific way against the wall of the ditch, right? Yes. Some of the bodies were found with their upper
Speaker 2:vertebrae, the severed topmost stump of their neck, pressed flush against the sloping dirt wall of
Speaker 1:the trench. And I mean, you cannot press a neck stump flush against a wall if there is a head in
Speaker 2:the way. It is a physical impossibility. This is the crucial piece of taphonomic evidence that proves the sequence of events. They went into the ditch already missing their heads. Wow. The skulls were not removed years later by grave robbers. They weren't carried off by wolves or scavengers. The people were decapitated, and then their fresh, headless bodies were deposited into the trench.
Speaker 1:And the decapitation itself, it wasn't some sloppy, frenzied hacking. The forensic clues on the neck bones tell a really specific story.
Speaker 2:They do. The researchers made preliminary microscopic observations of the cut marks on the cervical vertebrae.
Speaker 1:Because if this were a chaotic battlefield execution using blunt weapons, you would see crushing damage, right?
Speaker 2:Exactly. You would see splintered bone, massive fractures radiating through the vertebrae from the impact of a heavy stone club or a blunt axe.
Speaker 1:But they didn't find that.
Speaker 2:No, they found clean, narrow directional slicing marks. This indicates that someone used a sharp implement. In the Neolithic context, this would likely be a finely napped, razor sharp flint or obsidian blade.
Speaker 1:They used it to deliberately, almost surgically, sever the connective tissues and decapitate the individual.
Speaker 2:Oh, and they took the whole head.
Speaker 1:That detail really stuck with me. The archaeologists sifted through all that dirt, and they found almost no jawbones, no mannibals, and virtually no stray skull fragments mixed in with the bodies.
Speaker 2:Which is telling.
Speaker 1:Right. If you are just chopping someone's head off in the adrenaline rush of a battle, you might miss the joint. You might hack into the jawbone and leave it behind, or smash the skull in the process.
Speaker 2:But here, the heads were intentionally, cleanly taken away intact. Faces, lower jaws, everything.
Speaker 1:It points to a highly specific objective.
Speaker 2:Yes. The goal of the actors in this event wasn't simply to inflict death. The primary objective was the acquisition of the head as a complete, intact, physical unit.
Speaker 1:The fact that they removed them with such sharp tools, leaving the mandibles attached to the skulls, suggests a practiced, methodical approach.
Speaker 2:It wasn't uncontrolled rage. It was a calculated extraction.
Speaker 1:But amidst this calculated extraction of 77 adult heads, there is one glaring exception. mentioned it earlier. There is exactly one complete skeleton in the entire mass deposition of Trench 23.
Speaker 2:The child.
Speaker 1:Yes, and it belongs to a young child. Out of all these adults who are systematically decavitated, why in the world did they spare the child's head?
Speaker 2:It is arguably the most haunting anomaly in the entire excavation. We know it's a child based on preliminary osteological assessments.
Speaker 1:How do they know for sure?
Speaker 2:Osteologists look at things like epiphyseal closure. Essentially, as a human grows, the ends of our bones, the epiphyses, are separated from the main shaft by a layer of cartilage, the growth plate.
Speaker 1:Okay, sure.
Speaker 2:As we reach adulthood, that cartilage turns to bone, and the ends fuse seamlessly to the shaft. By looking at which bones have fused and which haven't, we can determine age at death with remarkable accuracy.
Speaker 1:And the bones of this individual were not fused?
Speaker 2:Correct. The data shows that sub-adult skeletons, children, and young teenagers are vastly underrepresented in this mass deposit compared to the normal demographic breakdown of an LBK community.
Speaker 1:And this one specific young child lying there in the ditch with its head completely intact alongside 77 headless adults breaks all the rules of whatever event occurred here.
Speaker 2:It makes your mind spin with the possibilities.
Speaker 1:This really does. Was a child's head just not considered cosmologically valuable in the same way an adult's was?
Speaker 2:Or did the people doing the decapitating look down at the kid and feel a sudden overpowering pang of taboo? Could they just not bring themselves to do it?
Speaker 1:Or, conversely, does the child's intact status serve a specific symbolic function that we simply lack the cultural context to understand?
Speaker 2:In archaeology, we have to be careful not to project our modern emotional responses onto past actors. But it undeniably highlights that real human beings were making complex, real-time decisions in that ditch 7,000 years ago.
Speaker 1:Okay, so we've established a physical reality of the scene. The bodies were dumped fresh, cleanly decapitated, and intentionally placed in the outer ditch. But the big question remains, why?
Speaker 2:That's the multi-million dollar question.
Speaker 1:Was this just a mass grave, a convenient, out-of-the-way place to hide the victims of a brutal massacre?
Speaker 2:The paper suggests we shouldn't jump to that conclusion, because there are these strange, seemingly ritual breadcrumbs scattered all throughout the trench.
Speaker 1:Right, the depositional practices. The way things were placed in the ditch reveals a high level of curation. It isn't just human bone and dirt.
Speaker 2:No, the excavators noticed a persistent, highly unusual presence of river pebbles mixed among the bones. These are smooth stones, roughly 8 to 10 centimeters in diameter.
Speaker 1:And we established earlier that Verbal is built on Lowe's. Fine windblown glacial dust. If you dig a hole in Lowe's, you don't hit rocks.
Speaker 2:Exactly. There are no natural stones of that size in the immediate soil profile. Every single one of those river pebbles had to be intentionally collected.
Speaker 1:Someone had to walk to the riverbed or dig deep into the older gravel deposits, physically gather these heavy stones, carry them back to the enclosure, and place them directly next to the headless skeletons.
Speaker 2:They even found an entire paved walkway made of these imported river pebbles at the bottom of the inner ditch near Entrance 5.
Speaker 1:Wow, you don't spend days or weeks hauling river stones to pave the bottom of a trench if it's just a garbage dump for bodies.
Speaker 2:Exactly. It shows this ditch was a constructed, highly curated, meaningful environment. And when we look at the artifacts found, or rather the artifacts not found with the bodies, the complexity deepens.
Speaker 1:Right. At entrance one, we saw the VIP burial with his six pristine ceramic pots and his half a sheep. But in Trench 23, with the 77 headless bodies, grave goods in the traditional sense are completely missing.
Speaker 2:Nobody gave him a pot of grain for the afterlife.
Speaker 1:But the archaeologists did find a few very strained items sprinkled in the dirt near the bodies. A single bone needle, some broken pieces of a spoon used for grinding grain, a polished stone axe head tucked underneath a femur bone.
Speaker 2:Now, a skeptic might argue that those items are accidental inclusions. When you dig a pit next to a settlement, sometimes household trash just falls in.
Speaker 1:But their proximity to the remains requires us to consider intentionality. However, the most startling, undeniably intentional artifacts found near the skeletons were five perforated teeth.
Speaker 2:This detail is wild.
Speaker 1:Four human teeth and one deer tooth. And someone had taken the immense time and effort, remember, without metal drills to bore a hole straight through the root of each tooth so they could be strung on a cord and worn as a necklace or a pendant.
Speaker 2:Finding perforated human teeth is an exceedingly rare phenomenon in the European Neolithic.
Speaker 1:Really? Where else have they found them?
Speaker 2:They are documented at a contemporaneous LBK site called Wernig-Soizelben in Germany. And if we look far to the southeast, we see them at the famous, much older site of Satteluk in modern Turkey. But they are not common.
Speaker 1:Wearing the physical body parts of other humans, especially teeth, which endure long after the flesh rots, is a highly charged symbolic act.
Speaker 2:It feels incredibly intimate. It ties deeply into concepts of lineage, memory, and perhaps harnessing the power or the essence of the deceased.
Speaker 1:The presence of these teeth in the ditch alongside the headless bodies suggests we're dealing with a deeply complex cosmological event.
Speaker 2:So let's summarize the crime scene. We have 77 fresh bodies, cleanly, surgically decapitated, their heads carried off to parts unknown.
Speaker 1:The bodies are dumped in a massive perimeter ditch that was paved with imported river stones, sprinkled with drilled human teeth and a hidden stone axe.
Speaker 2:Was this a violent massacre, a bizarre funerary rite, or something else entirely?
Speaker 1:To even begin to answer that, we have to pull our lens back from the site of Verbal. We have to look at what was happening across the entire continent of Europe at this exact moment in time.
Speaker 2:Because Vrabel wasn't existing in a vacuum. Far from it.
Speaker 1:The mass deposition at Vrabel is carbon dated to somewhere between 5300 and 4950 BCE.
Speaker 2:This places the event squarely in a period that archaeologists refer to as the late LBK crisis. Around 5100 BCE, the entire LBK culture across Central Europe seems to hit a massive systemic breaking point.
Speaker 1:What causes a 7,000-year-old civilization to suddenly collapse?
Speaker 2:The exact triggers are heavily debated. It could have been rapid population growth exceeding the carrying capacity of the land.
Speaker 1:Because they were farming the same soils for generations, right?
Speaker 2:Exactly. Perhaps the crop yields plummeted due to soil depletion. There's also evidence of subtle climate shifts causing extended droughts.
Speaker 1:Whatever the skark, the result in the archaeological record is undeniable.
Speaker 2:The peaceful, expanding generations of the early LBK. The people who just quietly built longhouses and farmed seem to shatter. We see the sudden frantic construction of massive defensive enclosures everywhere, just like the one of Verabal.
Speaker 1:And we see a massive spike in extreme behavior. But the type of extreme behavior varies wildly from one valley to the next.
Speaker 2:This is where it gets really dark. Let's contrast Verabaloo with two other famous sites from this late LBK crisis to show just how unstable things have become.
Speaker 1:Okay, let's look at a site called Aspernschlitz in Lower Austria, which is geographically quite close to Vrabbley.
Speaker 2:If Vrabble's a mystery, Aspernschlitz is a nightmare. It is one of the most chilling sites in European prehistory.
Speaker 1:What happened there?
Speaker 2:There, at the very end of that settlement's existence, over 100 individuals were killed, and their bodies were left in the enclosure ditches. But unlike Vrabble, their bones show massive catastrophic blunt force trauma.
Speaker 1:Oh, wow.
Speaker 2:Skulls caved in with stone axes, forearms shattered from trying to block blows. It was a slaughter.
Speaker 1:But the most revealing data didn't come from the bones themselves. It came from their DNA, right? The ancient DNA study published by Jelliber and Reif in 2025.
Speaker 2:Yes. That study revealed something incredible. When they analyzed the genomes of the people killed in the ditch, they found that they did not have the biological relatedness you would expect from the long-term inhabitants of that settlement.
Speaker 1:They weren't the locals.
Speaker 2:Exactly. They were outsiders. These were people from other settlements who either marched on Aspernschlitz or were captured and brought there and were subsequently slaughtered.
Speaker 1:It represents straight up brutal mass intercommunity violence, a war or a massive deadly raid.
Speaker 2:So Aspernschlitz gives us a clear example of warfare and massacre during this crisis.
Speaker 1:But then we look at another set from the same period, Herxheim in Western Germany. And Herxheim makes everything else look tame.
Speaker 2:Herxheim is arguably the most debated controversial site in European archaeology. Just like Braille, it was a perfectly normal, functioning LBK farming settlement for over a century.
Speaker 1:Then what happened?
Speaker 2:Right in the 51st century BCE, the height of the crisis, they dug a massive double enclosure. And inside those ditches, archaeologists found the remains of hundreds of human beings.
Speaker 1:But they weren't just killed.
Speaker 2:No, the bodies were systematically meticulously chopped, crushed, and separated into tiny fragments. They found around 500 Stalkalat, which are the very top caps of the skull, intentionally cut away and deposited in tight clusters.
Speaker 1:They were dismantling human beings, and they didn't just smash the people, they smashed everything.
Speaker 2:They found intentionally destroyed, high-quality pottery, snapped flint blades, and broken polished stone tools mixed in with the bone fragments. It was an absolute frenzy of destruction.
Speaker 1:The interpretation of Herxheim is fiercely contested in the academic community, right?
Speaker 2:Very fiercely. Some researchers look at the cut marks in the fragmentation and argue that it is undeniable evidence of mass cannibalism.
Speaker 1:Cannibalism.
Speaker 2:They posit that people were being systematically butchered, the marrow extracted, and the meat consumed in some horrific crisis response.
Speaker 1:But that is not the only theory.
Speaker 2:No. Many researchers vehemently disagree with the cannibalism hypothesis. They argue that cannibalism completely misreads the cultural context. They interpret Herxheim as a massive regional center for incredibly complex secondary burial rites.
Speaker 1:Okay, explain secondary burial, because that sounds counterintuitive to us.
Speaker 2:In a secondary burial system, the initial death and decay of the body is just the first step. After the flesh rots away, the bones are dug up and manipulated.
Speaker 1:So what were they doing at Herxheim?
Speaker 2:The proponents of this theory argue that during the crisis, people from across the entire region brought the exhumed bones of their dead ancestors to Herxheim. The systematic chopping and fragmentation wasn't culinary. It was a deeply relational cosmology.
Speaker 1:By fragmenting the borns of their ancestors and physically mixing them with the bone fragments of other lineages in the ditch and destroying valuable objects alongside them, they were forging and cementing spiritual and social ties between different communities.
Speaker 2:They were trying to bind a fracturing society together through the shared substance of the dead.
Speaker 1:I look at Aspern Schlitz, which is clearly war, and I look at Herxheim. which might be this incredibly intricate magical ritual. And when I look back at rabble, my instinct is to demand a simple answer. Right. Was it a brutal, bloodthirsty massacre of the neighbors? Or was it a peaceful, highly symbolic funerary ritual? But what if our demand for a simple answer is the problem?
Speaker 2:That is exactly the trap that modern archaeology often falls into. And it is something the authors of the rabble paper explicitly warn against.
Speaker 1:We have inherited a very rigid Western binary. It must be either war or ritual. It must be profane violence or sacred veneration.
Speaker 2:But that binary completely fails to capture the Neolithic mindset. To truly understand Zrabel or Horksheim, we have to fundamentally shift how we understand human identity. We have to talk about the concept of personhood.
Speaker 1:Okay, let's explore that. Because today, in the 21st century, I think of personhood as just me.
Speaker 2:Right, you're an individual.
Speaker 1:Exactly. My thoughts are contained entirely within my brain. My identity is tied to my specific physical body, my career, my social security number. I am cell-contained unit, and I end at my skin.
Speaker 2:That is the classic post-Enlightenment view of the bounded autonomous individual. But anthropologists who study traditional societies across the globe have documented a radically different way of existing in the world.
Speaker 1:And what is that?
Speaker 2:They argue that in many societies, and very likely during the Neolithic period, people operated on a concept of relational or individual personhood.
Speaker 1:Individual, as in the literal opposite of individual.
Speaker 2:Precisely. In a individual framework, you are not a single, isolated being. You are a composite.
Speaker 1:A composite of what?
Speaker 2:You are made up of your relationships. You are the physical manifestation of your ancestors, your lineage, your living community, and even your relationship with the natural world. The animals you herd, the crops you grow. Your personhood is distributed among the people and things you interact with.
Speaker 1:So under that worldview, my grandfather isn't just a memory in my head. A literal part of his essence resides within my physical body.
Speaker 2:Yes.
Speaker 1:And if I craft a beautiful flint blade and give it to you, a piece of my personhood is now physically attached to you.
Speaker 2:Yes. Ethnographers have seen this in action. For example, among certain Melanesian cultures, a person is viewed as a microcosm of all the people who have contributed to their existence through the sharing of food, blood, and labor.
Speaker 1:In some Amazonian tribes, identity is incredibly fluid and deeply tied to the physical substances shared within the community.
Speaker 2:In these worldviews, the physical body is saturated with lineage. And crucially, the most potent, concentrated symbol of that identity, that vitality, that personhood, is the human head.
Speaker 1:The head. This is where it all snaps into focus for Vrabel. Ethnographic accounts from all over the world suggest the head is frequently viewed as the physical seat of the soul, the life force, or the reproductive power of the lineage.
Speaker 2:So we have to look at the 77 decapitations at Vrabel through this lens of relational personhood.
Speaker 1:By removing the heads of those people, the actors were not just committing physical violence, they were performing an incredibly powerful, cosmologically charged act.
Speaker 2:Let's play out the two scenarios for Vrail using this individual mindset. Because either way, it is incredibly intense. Let's take scenario away. This was a violent raid.
Speaker 1:Okay, the paranoia and the intra-community tension finally boiled over. The gates of the southwestern neighborhood were breached, And one group slaughtered 77 people from the other group.
Speaker 2:If they are operating under relational personhood, taking the heads isn't just about collecting a grisly trophy to brag about around the campfire.
Speaker 1:Absolutely not. If this is an act of inner group violence, taking the head is an act of ultimate cosmic erasure.
Speaker 2:You aren't just killing the physical individual. You are actively capturing their lineage. You are stealing the reproductive power and the vital essence of their ancestors.
Speaker 1:You are subjugating their meta-persons and breaking their connection to the cosmos. You dump the discarded, powerless, headless bodies in the boundary ditch, and you take the heads of the concentrated power back to your own longhouses to absorb that vitality into your own community.
Speaker 2:Wow. You were literally sealing their soul and making it yours.
Speaker 1:But what about scenario B? What if this wasn't an attack? What if these 77 people died of a sudden, virulent disease or starved during a catastrophic crop failure, and their own families, the people who love them, are the ones decapitating them?
Speaker 2:If it is an act of veneration, a ritual honoring their own dead, taking the head is an act of profound preservation.
Speaker 1:Because if your personhood is distributed among your kin, taking the head is a way to keep the essence of the deceased alive and actively connected to the living community.
Speaker 2:You sever the head to liberate the lineage from the rotting, decaying flesh in the body. The body is left in the ditch, the physical boundary of the settlement, while the head is kept curated, perhaps plastered with clay to recreate the face, and consulted in the homes of the living.
Speaker 1:It sounds so gruesome to our modern sensibilities, but is it really that fundamentally different from how we process grief?
Speaker 2:That's a good point.
Speaker 1:Today, we cremate our loved ones and keep urns full of their ashes on our living room mantles. In the Victorian era, grieving mothers would cut locks of hair from their deceased children and weave them into intricate jewelry to wear around their necks.
Speaker 2:For the people of Rebel, facing the collapse of their world, keeping the complete head might have been the ultimate, most loving way to maintain a relationship with a dead relative.
Speaker 1:Exactly. Whether it was an act of extreme annihilating violence or an act of extreme desperate veneration, the removal of the head was the mechanism through which they navigated the cosmological crisis of death.
Speaker 2:And the fact that they did it so uniformly to 77 people in one specific spot tells us that the rules of their society were buckling under immense, unprecedented stress.
Speaker 1:You mentioned the dating earlier, placing this right in the late LBK crisis between 5300 and 4950 BCE. The paper notes that they ran carbon dating on rib samples from 12 of the headless skeletons to try and pinpoint exactly when this happened.
Speaker 2:But they hit a snag, something called a radiocarbon calibration curve plateau.
Speaker 1:The radiocarbon plateau. It is the absolute bane of a Neolithic archaeologist's existence. Absolutely. Because normally I think of carbon dating as this precise scientific clock. Carbon-14 decay is at a steady rate, so you just measure what's left in the bone and boom, you know the exact year they died. Why doesn't that work here?
Speaker 2:Because the amount of carbon-14 in the Earth's atmosphere hasn't been perfectly constant throughout time. Carbon-14 is created when solar radiation interacts with nitrogen in the upper atmosphere. Plants absorb it, humans eat the plants, and it gets locked into our bones.
Speaker 1:But solar activity fluctuates?
Speaker 2:Yes. Changes in the Earth's magnetic field alter how much radiation gets through. So there are certain periods in prehistory where the atmospheric carbon-14 levels fluctuated in such a way that it perfectly counteracted the radioactive decay.
Speaker 1:Meaning?
Speaker 2:Meaning that structurally, from an isotopic standpoint, a bone from a person who died in 5210 BCE looks absolutely identical to a bone from a person who died in 5000 BCE. The curve flattens out. It creates a 200-year blind spot right at the climax of the LBK crisis.
Speaker 1:So the science can't tell us exactly how fast the Vrabel Trench filled up. It leaves us with two drastically different pictures of life in this village.
Speaker 2:Yes, it does.
Speaker 1:On one hand, it could have been a slow, agonizing accumulation. Maybe one person died every few months over decades, and each time the community solemnly performed the decapitation ritual and placed the body in the ditch. It was just their new, bizarre normal.
Speaker 2:That is a possibility.
Speaker 1:Or it could have been a single horrific afternoon, a massive one-off event, 77 people dead in process before the sun went down.
Speaker 2:But the paper points out that the taphonomy gives us a pretty strong hint.
Speaker 1:Yes, the stratigraphy, the layering of the dirt and the bones doesn't lie.
Speaker 2:If these bodies were deposited years or decades apart, you would expect to see distinct layers of windblown lattice or silt separating the skeletons. But we don't see that.
Speaker 1:The bodies are piled directly on top of each other, intertwined with very little sedimentary settling between them.
Speaker 2:Furthermore, there are no signs that the ditch was repeatedly dug out and refilled to accommodate new bodies over time.
Speaker 1:Which pushes the authors toward the conclusion that this happened incredibly fast. Maybe over a few terrifying weeks, maybe in a single catastrophic day. The community of Rabel was dealing with a massive influx of bodies all at once.
Speaker 2:The logistics of processing 77 fresh bodies simultaneously, the labor of decapitation, the coordination of the deposition, the sheer emotional toll indicates an event of overwhelming magnitude.
Speaker 1:Which brings us back to the ultimate lingering mystery of Rabel. We have the 313 longhouses. We have the 1.3 kilometer paranoia ditch. We have the 77 bodies.
Speaker 2:We have the forensic proof of how they died, or at least how they were processed with flint blades while the ligaments were still fresh.
Speaker 1:We have the cultural context of a society in continent-wide crisis, clinging to or weaponizing the concept of the head to harness the power of their ancestors. But the most glaring question, the one that makes this specific site so haunting, remains totally unanswered.
Speaker 2:Where are the heads?
Speaker 1:Where are the heads? They are archaeologically invisible to us right now. They simply aren't in the ditch.
Speaker 2:The researchers speculate on several possibilities. They could be displayed or buried inside the unexcavated longhouses of Varabla. Remember, we know from the magnetic survey that there are over 300 houses, and archaeologists have only physically excavated a tiny fraction of them.
Speaker 1:The skulls of those 77 individuals could be sitting in the lateral pits of a longhouse right now, just inches beneath the modern plow zone, waiting to be found.
Speaker 2:Or if this was an act of violence, they could have been taken away completely. The raiding party could have carried the heads off to another settlement dozens of miles away as trophies of their cosmic victory.
Speaker 1:If it was a loving ritual, they might have been curated for years and then eventually destroyed, crushed into dust, or thrown into a fast-flowing river once the mourning period was officially over and the lineage was secure.
Speaker 2:In archaeology, what is missing is often just as informative as what is present.
Speaker 1:The deliberate removal and curation of 77 human heads required intent, it required complex logistics, and most importantly, it required a deep, shared cosmological belief system that made such an extreme, visceral act not just acceptable, but absolutely necessary for the survival of the community's worldview.
Speaker 2:The absence of the heads is the loudest piece of evidence we have.
Speaker 1:It's time to wrap this up. Rabel isn't just a mass grave. It is a window into a community standing right at the twilight of their civilization.
Speaker 2:They were the pioneers. They were the first farmers of Europe. They built a massive, thriving, multi-generational agglomeration of humanity.
Speaker 1:They conquered the forests and built monumental timber homes. And then something in their world broke.
Speaker 2:Whether they were tearing themselves apart in a paranoid frenzy, slaughtering the people across the creek and stealing their cosmic power, or whether they were desperately trying to hold their fracturing community together through an extreme loving ritual of preserving their ancestors. They left the final chapter of their story in that lowest ditch.
Speaker 1:They were facing an existential crisis, and they were trying to solve it using the only cosmological tools they had at their disposal. And for them, the most powerful tool in the universe was the human head. It really was. I want to leave you with a final thought to chew on today. In our modern world, we define ourselves by such abstract concepts. We define ourselves by our digital footprints, by our resumes, by our credit scores, by the internal monologue running through our brains.
Speaker 2:Very true.
Speaker 1:But 7,000 years ago, your identity, your very essence, your deep connection to the past and your hope for the future might have lived purely physically in the bone and flesh of your head. And if someone took it, who did you become?
Speaker 2:Did your soul cease to exist or did you become an unwilling part of them?
Speaker 1:The next time you walk past a modern gated community, look at the walls, look at the gates, and ask yourself, are those walls really meant to keep the scary world out, or are they hiding the anxieties of the people living inside?
Speaker 2:We build walls to feel safe. But often the most profound changes and the most terrifying threats come from within.
Speaker 1:Keep questioning the ground beneath your feet. There's always more to the story than what's on the surface.
Speaker 2:Heliox is produced by Michelle Bruecker and Scott Bleakley. It features reviews of emerging research and ideas from leading thinkers curated under their creative direction with AI assistance for voice, imagery and composition. Systemic voices and illustrative images of people are representative tools, not depictions of specific individuals. Thanks for listening today. Four recurring narratives underlie every episode. boundary dissolution, adaptive complexity, embodied knowledge, and quantum-like uncertainty. These aren't just philosophical musings, but frameworks for understanding our modern world. We hope you continue exploring our other episodes, responding to the content, and checking out our related articles at helioxpodcast.substack.com.
Podcasts we love
Check out these other fine podcasts recommended by us, not an algorithm.
Hidden Brain
Hidden Brain, Shankar VedantamAll In The Mind
ABC Australia
What Now? with Trevor Noah
Trevor Noah
No Stupid Questions
Freakonomics Radio + Stitcher
Entrepreneurial Thought Leaders (ETL)
Stanford eCorner
This Is That
CBCFuture Tense
ABC Australia
The Naked Scientists Podcast
The Naked Scientists
Naked Neuroscience, from the Naked Scientists
James Tytko
The TED AI Show
TED
Ologies with Alie Ward
Alie Ward
The Daily
The New York Times
Savage Lovecast
Dan Savage
Huberman Lab
Scicomm Media
Freakonomics Radio
Freakonomics Radio + Stitcher
Ideas
CBCLadies, We Need To Talk
ABC Australia