
Buying Florida
Didier Malagies is a leader in the Tampa Bay Mortgage industry, serving Pinellas, Pasco, Hillsborough counties, and beyond with his sights set on educating residential and commercial buyers regarding Florida purchases. With over 20 years of expertise, Didier has built relationships with realtors, bankers, and clients based on integrity and his drive to provide the best customer experience in the state by being there from beginning to end of every purchase.
Whether you're looking to move, invest, start a business or expand, Didier will share everything you need to know on his show every week.
Didier Malagies nmls#212566/DDA Mortgage nmls#324329
Buying Florida
AI underwriting compared to Human underwriting
Speed & Efficiency
AI Underwriting:
Processes applications in seconds to minutes.
1.Can instantly pull data from multiple sources (credit reports, bank statements, income verification, property valuations, etc.).
Ideal for high-volume, standardized cases.
Human Underwriter:
Takes hours to days, depending on complexity.
Manually reviews documents, contacts third parties, and applies professional judgment.
Slower, especially for complex or edge cases.
2. Data Handling
AI:
Uses algorithms and machine learning to analyze massive datasets.
Can detect patterns humans might miss (e.g., spending behavior, alternative data like utility payments, even digital footprints in some markets).
Human:
Relies on traditional documentation (pay stubs, tax returns, appraisals).
Limited by human bandwidth—can’t process as much raw data at once.
3. Consistency & Bias
AI:
Decisions are consistent with its rules and training data.
However, if the data it’s trained on is biased, the system can replicate or even amplify those biases.
Human:
Brings subjective judgment. Can weigh special circumstances that don’t fit a neat rule.
Risk of inconsistency—two underwriters might interpret the same file differently.
May have unconscious bias, but also flexibility to override rigid criteria.
4. Risk Assessment
AI:
Excels at quantifiable risks (credit scores, loan-to-value ratios, historical claim data).
Weak at unstructured or nuanced factors (e.g., a borrower with an unusual income stream, or a claim with unclear circumstances).
Human:
Strong at contextual judgment—understanding unique borrower situations, exceptions, or “gray areas.”
Can pick up on red flags that an algorithm might miss (e.g., forged documents, conflicting information).
5. Regulation & Accountability
AI:
Regulators are still catching up. Requires transparency in decision-making (explainable AI).
Hard to appeal an AI decision if it can’t explain its reasoning clearly.
Human:
Provides a clear chain of accountability—borrower can request explanations or escalate.
Easier for compliance teams to audit decision-making.
6. Cost & Scalability
AI:
Scales cheaply—one system can process thousands of applications simultaneously.
Lower ongoing labor costs once implemented.
Human:
Labor-intensive, costs grow with volume.
Better suited for complex, high-value, or unusual cases rather than mass processing.
✅ Bottom line:
AI underwriting is best for speed, scale, and straightforward cases.
Human underwriters are best for nuanced judgment, exceptions, and handling edge cases.
Most modern institutions use a hybrid model: AI handles the bulk of simple files, while humans step in for complex or flagged cases.
tune in and learn https://www.ddamortgage.com/blog
didier malagies nmls#212566
dda mortgage nmls#324329