GovCon Bid and Proposal Insights

Next Generation Trackless Targets (NGTT)

BidExecs

Use Left/Right to seek, Home/End to jump to start or end. Hold shift to jump forward or backward.

0:00 | 13:55

A quick dive into the U.S. Army’s Next Generation Trackless Targets (NGTT) opportunity focused on innovative, mobile live-fire targets that boost training realism without fixed infrastructure. We break down what the Army is really looking for and who should respond.

Tune in now and get your solution brief ready before Feb 12, 2026.

Contact ProposalHelper at sales@proposalhelper.com to find similar opportunities and help you build a realistic and winning pipeline.

From Carnival Ducks To Combat

SPEAKER_00

Okay, close your eyes for a second. I want you to picture a military shooting range. You've seen them in movies if you haven't been to one. You're standing in your lane looking down this uh perfectly manicured strip of dirt, and then pop a green plastic silhouette just flips up.

SPEAKER_01

The classic pop-up target. Yeah, a staple of military life.

SPEAKER_00

Exactly. You shoot it, it flips down.

SPEAKER_01

Yeah.

SPEAKER_00

Or, you know, maybe if the range is a little fancier, the target slides left to right on a rusty rail.

SPEAKER_01

Aaron Powell Kind of like a duck in a carnival game.

SPEAKER_00

It's totally like a carnival game. And it's fine for learning basics, sure. But it is so incredibly predictable. You know exactly where it's coming from.

SPEAKER_01

Aaron Powell And that predictability is precisely what the U.S. Army is trying to kill. Because in the real world, threats don't move on rails. They don't wait for you to be ready.

SPEAKER_00

Trevor Burrus And they definitely don't just sit there waiting to be shot.

SPEAKER_01

Not at all.

SPEAKER_00

Trevor Burrus And that's really the big shift we're digging into today. We're looking at a document that basically outlines the end of that whole carnival game era of training. The Army has issued a massive challenge to the tech world. They want robots.

SPEAKER_01

Specifically, next generation trackless targets.

SPEAKER_00

NGTT.

SPEAKER_01

Right. And just to be clear, we're not talking about like a remote-controlled car with a balloon tied to it. We are analyzing a call for solutions and this incredibly detailed performance specification document.

SPEAKER_00

And it comes from PEO S D O I.

SPEAKER_01

PEO SDI, the program executive office for simulation, training, and instrumentation. It's a mouthful.

SPEAKER_00

It is. But they're the people whose job it is to make training feel real. And this document isn't just a wish list, it has a deadline.

SPEAKER_01

A very, very tight one.

The Army’s Urgent Call For NGTT

SPEAKER_00

Yeah, we're recording this on January 30th, 2026. And the deadline for companies to get their ideas in is February 12th, 2026.

SPEAKER_01

That is less than two weeks. It's a sprint.

SPEAKER_00

So why so fast?

SPEAKER_01

It's a procurement method called a commercial solutions opening or CSO. We can get into the business side later, but the Army is basically saying we need this now, and we think someone in the commercial world might already have 90% of the answer.

SPEAKER_00

Someone building what, delivery bots or something?

SPEAKER_01

Exactly. Agricultural robots, delivery bots. They think the solution is already out there.

SPEAKER_00

The mission is stated very clearly. It's about increasing soldier lethality through training realism. But when I was reading the specs, the engineering challenges to get that realism, they seem immense.

SPEAKER_01

Well, they are because the core requirement is right there in the name trackless.

SPEAKER_00

Which sounds simple. Just, you know, get rid of the rails.

SPEAKER_01

Right. But if you don't have rails, where are these things driving?

SPEAKER_00

Anywhere.

SPEAKER_01

Anywhere. And that's the whole point. Legacy ranges are heavy on infrastructure. You need concrete pads, buried cables, all of it. The NGTT has to be deployable in, and this is their term, austere environments.

SPEAKER_00

Aaron Powell Austere is just military speak for the middle of nowhere. Trevor Burrus, Jr.

SPEAKER_01

Pretty much. No cell towers, no power grid, just a field. And the specs for terrain transibility, that's where it can drive, are just brutal.

SPEAKER_00

I was reading that. It's not just pavement. They list loose dirt, loose sand, mud up to two inches deep.

SPEAKER_01

Which is already tough for a small robot. Mud can be a real killer. But the one that I think keeps engineers up at night is the vegetation.

SPEAKER_00

The grass.

SPEAKER_01

The grass. The document says these robots have to move through grass up to two feet high.

SPEAKER_00

Two feet. I mean, for a person, that's up to your knee. For a small robot.

SPEAKER_01

It's a jungle. It's a complete visibility nightmare. If your robot uses LiDAR or cameras to navigate, two-foot grass is a wall. It tangles in your axles.

SPEAKER_00

But you have to have it.

SPEAKER_01

You have to, because that's where the enemy hides. If your target can only drive on a perfectly trimmed lawn, you're not training for combat. You're right back in the carnival.

Mobility In Mud, Sand, And Tall Grass

SPEAKER_00

So the robot's mobility has to match the soldier's mobility. If I can walk there, the target needs to go there too.

SPEAKER_01

Precisely.

SPEAKER_00

So let's meet these robots. The army wants two different kinds, right? An infantry one and a vehicle one.

SPEAKER_01

Yep. The TMTI for infantry and the TMTV for vehicle.

SPEAKER_00

Let's start with the infantry bot, the TMPI. What are we looking at?

SPEAKER_01

Okay, so physically, you're looking at a ruggedized robotic platform, maybe four feet by three feet low to the ground. And on top of that, you have a mannequin.

SPEAKER_00

But a really specific mannequin. The dock calls for a realistic 3D human head and torso. It even specifies the exact shade of green.

SPEAKER_01

Army standard green. But yeah, the look isn't the hard part. The durability is. This mannequin has to be a bullet sponge. The requirement is for it to survive 2,000 hits.

SPEAKER_00

2,000?

SPEAKER_01

2,000 hits from 7.62 millimeter rounds.

SPEAKER_00

That's a serious round. That's like an AK-47 or a machine gun.

SPEAKER_01

It's a lot of kinetic energy. And the robot base itself has to be armored. It needs to pick three hits in the exact same spot without penetration. You have to protect the brains, the motors. If a stray low shot kills the robot, the training stops.

SPEAKER_00

Okay, so it's tough. But how does it move? This is where it got really interesting for me. Top speed is 10 miles per hour.

SPEAKER_01

Which, you know, doesn't sound that fast.

SPEAKER_00

Right. I drive faster in a parking lot.

SPEAKER_01

But for a human target running across a muddy, uneven field, 10 miles per hour is a pretty good sprint.

SPEAKER_00

It's fast enough to be really hard to hit.

SPEAKER_01

Especially since it can turn on a dime, a turning radius of just 10 feet. It can zigzag, it can go through six inches of water, climb a 10% grade, but the movement is just the start. The real leap is the behavior.

SPEAKER_00

The smart reactions.

SPEAKER_01

Yes. This is where it stops being just a target and becomes a simulator. The document talks about reactive behaviors.

SPEAKER_00

I loved this section. The robot isn't passive. It has sensors that can tell when it's being shot at. And not just hits, it detects near misses.

SPEAKER_01

Which changes everything. In the old system, you miss, nothing happens, you just shoot again. Here, if your round subsonic or supersonic passes nearby, the robot knows.

SPEAKER_00

And it reacts.

SPEAKER_01

It can be programmed to do what a person might do. It might stop, it might run faster, it might even reverse direction and run for cover.

SPEAKER_00

It forces you to think tactically, not just aim.

SPEAKER_01

Exactly. Is it running away? Do I chase? Is it charging me?

SPEAKER_00

And there was that feature, the presentation device. I called it the bob.

SPEAKER_01

The bob.

SPEAKER_00

Yeah, the mannequin can lie flat to hide, right? And then pop up. But it can also do this thing where it bobs up and down when it's near mist.

The Infantry Bot: Tough And Reactive

SPEAKER_01

That's a classic infantry tactic. You pop up, shoot, get back down, move, and pop up somewhere else. This robot can simulate that. It's designed to break a shooter's focus.

SPEAKER_00

And just to make it even harder, these things have to work at night.

SPEAKER_01

Full spectrum operations. The spec calls for thermal enabled operations.

SPEAKER_00

What does that mean exactly? Does it just have a light on it?

SPEAKER_01

It's way more advanced. Modern soldiers use thermal sights that see heat. A cold plastic mannequin is invisible. So these robots need to generate their own heat, a thermal signature, so they glow in a scope, just like a warm body.

SPEAKER_00

So you're in the dark, looking through your scope, you see this heat signature sprinting through the grass.

SPEAKER_01

It creates stress. And stress is how you learn.

SPEAKER_00

Okay, so that's the infantry robot, but there's also the vehicle robot, the TMTV, the big brother.

SPEAKER_01

That's right. The TMTV carries a 3D silhouette of a tactical truck, usually made of plywood or something similar. And because it's a truck, it has to move like one. Raster. Much faster. Top speed jumps to 20 miles per hour, and the acceleration is key zero to twenty in under a hundred meters.

SPEAKER_00

That requires some serious torque, especially on mud.

SPEAKER_01

It does. And it's not just a moving billboard, it has its own presentation devices to simulate a driver and even a passenger.

SPEAKER_00

So you can actually practice trying to hit the driver to stop the truck.

SPEAKER_01

Precisely. And the sensors have to be smart enough to tell the difference.

SPEAKER_00

It's not just hit or miss anymore.

SPEAKER_01

Right. The system logs what you hit, that you hit the engine, the door panel, the driver. Hitting the door won't stop the truck. Hitting the engine will. It teaches tactical anatomy.

SPEAKER_00

And to really crank up the pressure, the TMTV needs to have simulators for hostile fire.

SPEAKER_01

Meaning it shoots back. It simulates shooting back. Flashes, bangs, maybe lasers that trigger the soldier's training gear. So you have a truck doing 20 miles per hour across a field swerving and laying down suppression fire on you.

SPEAKER_00

That sounds absolutely chaotic. Which leads to my biggest question: you've got all these robots, infantry, and vehicle running around. How do they not crash into each other? Or worse, a soldier.

SPEAKER_01

That is the multimillion dollar question. It's all managed by what you could call the hive mind, a software system called Trachear2.

SPEAKER_00

Trachear. It's the conductor. Each robot is reporting its GPS position once a second, down to about two meters of accuracy. The control tower has a God's eye view.

SPEAKER_01

But GPS can drift. Correct. Which is why obstacle avoidance is a top priority. It's listed as an objective capability. The robots need their own onboard brains to see and avoid trees, big rocks, and most importantly, humans and other robots.

SPEAKER_00

Even if they're programmed to intersect.

SPEAKER_01

Even then, the safety logic has to override the command. It has to figure out how to avoid a collision, much like self-driving cars.

SPEAKER_00

Okay, but what if the software just freezes? What's a fail-safe?

Thermal Signatures And Night Stress

SPEAKER_01

The big red button. The specs demand a physical, remote emergency stop that's totally independent of the software. It's a hardware kill switch.

SPEAKER_00

That's reassuring. Now what about power? Are these things loud diesel engines? Nope.

SPEAKER_01

Fully electric. The battery has to last for three hours of constant movement or 72 hours just sitting on standby. That's a good long time.

SPEAKER_00

And charging.

SPEAKER_01

Very versatile. They have to be able to plug into a normal wall outlet, both US and European voltages.

SPEAKER_00

Which tells you they're planning on using these overseas.

SPEAKER_01

Right. Or they can plug into the Army's tactical generators out in the field. They live out there.

SPEAKER_00

But living out there means surviving the weather.

SPEAKER_01

Oh yeah. The environmental specs are basically a torture test. We're talking operating temps from minus 30 Celsius to 50 Celsius.

SPEAKER_00

That's minus 22 Fahrenheit to 122. From the Arctic to the desert.

SPEAKER_01

And storage down to minus 40? But that's the easy part. It's the rain, blowing sand, and the one they call salt fog.

SPEAKER_00

Salt fog? That sounds awful for electronics.

SPEAKER_01

It's a killer. It causes corrosion, shorts out circuit boards, they have to be sealed tight. And then there was the wind test. Trevor Burrus, Jr.

SPEAKER_00

The 35 mile per hour wind.

SPEAKER_01

Right. The robot has to keep that big mannequin or truck silhouette standing upright in a 35 mile per hour wind.

SPEAKER_00

Aaron Powell Think about that. That silhouette is basically a sail.

SPEAKER_01

It wants to tip over or fly away. The robot has to be constantly fighting that, which is a huge stability challenge.

SPEAKER_00

Aaron Powell It's like asking a waiter to carry a tray of drinks through a hurricane.

SPEAKER_01

Aaron Powell That's a great analogy. And it's why this isn't some hobby grade RC car project.

SPEAKER_00

Aaron Powell Which brings us back to the business side. You said they're using a CSO, this commercial solutions opening. Why do that instead of a traditional 10-year defense contract?

SPEAKER_01

Aaron Powell Because they don't have 10 years. And frankly, a lot of the real innovation in this space is happening in the commercial world right now.

SPEAKER_00

Aaron Powell In automated tractors and things like that.

The Vehicle Bot: Speed And Target Zones

SPEAKER_01

Exactly. The Army is basically saying you've already solved tough navigation, you've solved battery life. Can we just adapt your tech, paint it green, and put a mannequin on it?

SPEAKER_00

Aaron Powell So it's like Shark Tank for the Pentagon.

SPEAKER_01

It really is. The first step, phase zero, is just a white paper. 10 pages or 20 slides. That's it.

SPEAKER_00

A very low barrier to entry.

SPEAKER_01

Very. If they like your idea, you move on. And then you get to phase two, the pitch and demo.

SPEAKER_00

The fun part.

SPEAKER_01

You have to show up in person with your robot in a relevant environment, so a muddy field, and prove it can do what you say it can do. No tower point can save you if your bot gets stuck in the grass.

SPEAKER_00

And if you survive that, you get to negotiate a contract. It's so streamlined, it just shows how urgent this is for the army.

SPEAKER_01

They know there's a huge gap between the tech soldiers use in their daily lives and the tech they train on. That disconnect is a problem for readiness.

SPEAKER_00

So if we step back from all the specs, what's the big takeaway? Why does it matter if a target has a brain?

SPEAKER_01

It goes right back to that visualization we started with. If you train on predictable rails, you learn to game the system. You anticipate. But combat isn't a game.

SPEAKER_00

Complacency kills.

SPEAKER_01

Exactly. By making the targets unpredictable, reactive, and rugged, you force the soldier to actually think in real time. You force them through that whole decision-making cycle.

SPEAKER_00

The OD loop. Observe, orient, decide, act.

SPEAKER_01

Yes. If the target runs away, you have to decide now what to do. It changes training from simple shooting practice into a full-blown combat rehearsal.

SPEAKER_00

It creates a thinking soldier, not just a shooting one.

SPEAKER_01

And that is the definition of lethality thereafter.

SPEAKER_00

Before we wrap, one thought kept nagging me from the obstacle avoidance section. These robots have to autonomously avoid hitting human soldiers on the range.

SPEAKER_01

For safety, yeah, of course.

SPEAKER_00

Right. But think about the tech needed for that. The robot has to see a human form, track its movement, predict its path, and then maneuver relative to that human.

SPEAKER_01

I see where you're going with this.

SPEAKER_00

If you just flip a single line of code in that software, if you change the command from avoid to pursue, you don't have a training target anymore.

SPEAKER_01

You have a weapon.

SPEAKER_00

You have a robotic wingman or a hunter.

SPEAKER_01

The hardware is the same. The sensors, the motors, they're all identical. The only thing that separates a target running from you and a drone running at you is a parameter in the software.

SPEAKER_00

We think of killer robots as this far-off sci-fi idea. But looking at these specs, the army is essentially paying the commercial world to perfect the chassis and the brain for one right now.

Hive Mind Control And Safety

SPEAKER_01

It's a classic dual use technology. Every step they take to make training more realistic also makes autonomous combat systems more viable. That line is getting very, very thin.

SPEAKER_00

Something to think about the next time you see one of those little delivery bots rolling down the sidewalk.

SPEAKER_01

Indeed.

SPEAKER_00

That's it for this deep dive into the next generation trackless targets. Thanks for listening, and we'll catch you on the next one.