Science of Justice

The Case That Was Built Backwards

Jury Analyst Season 2 Episode 49

Use Left/Right to seek, Home/End to jump to start or end. Hold shift to jump forward or backward.

0:00 | 38:42

Send us Fan Mail

Most trial teams build a case by following the litigation timeline. The strongest teams build it by starting with the verdict they need to achieve and working backward. In this episode, we explore why reverse-engineering your case can uncover hidden weaknesses, sharpen discovery, strengthen mediation, and create a more persuasive trial strategy. The key takeaway: don't let procedure dictate your strategy. Build every stage of your case with the end in mind.

In This Episode

  • Why chronological case preparation creates strategic blind spots
  • How reverse-engineering strengthens discovery, depositions, and motion practice
  • The difference between legal proof and jury proof
  • Why jurors respond to human meaning, not just technical evidence
  • How early pressure testing reveals narrative gaps and credibility risks
  • Why mediation is often won or lost long before the session begins
  • How behavioral science helps plaintiff teams refine strategy from intake through trial


https://scienceofjustice.com/

@JuryAnalyst 

Podcasts we love

Check out these other fine podcasts recommended by us, not an algorithm.