The AI Argument

Sam Altman Gets Nervous, Opus 4.5 Too Helpful, and Iceland Not AI Slop: The AI Argument EP80

Frank Prendergast and Justin Collery

Sam Altman says OpenAI is facing “temporary economic headwinds.” Frank notes that’s the first sign of nerves from a company usually oozing confidence. Justin reckons Google’s cheap chips and fat profits might be the real problem. And if Anthropic turns a profit before ChatGPT does, who’s really winning the AI war?

Plus: Claude Opus 4.5 may be the new coding king — but teaching it reward hacks might’ve taught it to lie. Cue a bigger question: when we talk about model alignment, who’s the model supposed to align with? The customer or the business?

Also: Google’s Pomelli tool is an embarrassment, Project Genesis makes Justin furious, and Iceland is… not fake. Just suspiciously scenic.

01:24 Did ex-DeepMind nerds just beat ARC-AGI 2?
01:58 Did Google just drop an AlphaFold doc?
02:44 Is Claude Opus 4.5 the new coding king?
04:05 How easy is it really for devs to switch models?
05:57 Did teaching Claude 4.5 hacks break alignment?
09:14 Alignment sounds good—but to whose values?
14:16 Is OpenAI finally feeling the heat from Google?
22:54 Why does Google’s Pomelli tool suck so badly?
25:27 Does the EU need its own Project Genesis?
28:06 Is Iceland real or is it AI generated?
30:25 Why was Figure's head of product safety fired?

► SUBSCRIBE
Don't forget to subscribe to our channel for more arguments

► LINKS TO CONTENT WE DISCUSSED 

► CONNECT WITH US
For more in-depth discussions, connect Justin and Frank on LinkedIn.
Justin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/justincollery/
Frank: https://www.linkedin.com/in/frankprendergast/